Q.67
Professional Ethics & BCI Rules Medium Case Study
Bare Act Advocates Act, 1961 · BCI Rules Part VI; Advocates Act S.35

Advocate Mr. X was representing a client, Mr. Y, in a property dispute case. During proceedings, Advocate X accepted a bribe from the opposing party to delay the case, causing harm to Mr. Y's interests. Mr. X also failed to inform his client about critical hearing dates. Select the correct option.

It is a violation of Rules made by the Bar Council of India for professional ethics Answer
B It is only an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2018
C It amounts to criminal conspiracy under the BNS, 2023
D It amounts to Contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

While the advocate's conduct could potentially attract criminal liability as well, the primary and most direct legal characterization is professional misconduct under BCI Rules. Accepting bribes from the opposing party, deliberately delaying a case, and failing to inform the client about hearing dates are all specific violations of the Standards of Professional Conduct prescribed under BCI Rules. Section 35 of the Advocates Act empowers the State Bar Council and BCI to take disciplinary action including suspension or removal from the roll of advocates.

At a Glance
Subject Professional Ethics & BCI Rules
Difficulty Medium
Act Advocates Act, 1961
Section BCI Rules Part VI; Advocates Act S.35
Answer (A) Case Study
Paper AIBE XIX — December 2024
Progress in Paper
Q.67 100 questions

67% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Advocates Act, 1961