Share Q.41:
Q.41
Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based
Bare Act Constitution of India · Case Law

In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has held that the investigating officer should be allowed to refer to the records of investigation

State of Karnataka v. Yarappa Reddi Answer
B Mohammed Khalid v. State of West Bengal
C Baburam v. State of U.P.
D State of Rajasthan v. Om prakash
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

This tests case law recall about a specific SC holding on legal principles. Identify the case from the options and match it to the described principle — whether it's about fundamental rights, procedural fairness, or statutory interpretation.

At a Glance
Subject Constitutional Law
Difficulty Medium
Act Constitution of India
Section Case Law
Answer (A) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XVI — October 2021
Progress in Paper
Q.41 100 questions

41% through paper

📖 Open Book — Reading Mode Constitution of India ↗ New Tab
📄

Mobile browsers only show page 1 of a PDF in-panel.
Open in a new tab to read all pages.

Open Constitution of India →
📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →