Share Q.34:
Q.34
Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Medium Knowledge-Based

Read the following statements and choose the correct option. Statement 1:Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, admissions are generally rele- vant and may be proved against the person making them, but cannot ordinarily be proved by or on behalf of that person. Statement 2:An admission can still be proved on behalf of the person making it if it relates to the existence of a state of mind or body, made at or about the time when such condition existed, and is supported by conduct showing its truthfulness. In the context of the above statements under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which one of the following is correct?

A Both Statements 1 and 2 are false
B Only Statement 1 is true
C Only Statement 2 is true
Both the Statements are true Answer
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Statement 1: Under BSA, statements made under special circumstances (like dying declarations) are relevant. Statement 2: BSA contains provisions corresponding to the Evidence Act's dying declaration and res gestae rules. Both statements are correct as the BSA carries forward these evidence principles with renumbered sections.

At a Glance
Subject Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
Difficulty Medium
Answer (D) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XX — November 2025
Progress in Paper
Q.34 100 questions

34% through paper

📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →