In the following question, a statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement:Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, when an offence is committed by a company, every person who was directly in charge of and responsible to the company at 26 the time of the offence, as well as the company itself, is deemed guilty. However, a person may escape liability if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised due diligence to prevent it.Conclusions:I. A company as well as its responsible officers may be held liable for environmental offences under the Act. II. An officer of a company can never escape liability once the company is found guilty of an offence.In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which one of the following is correct?
Explanation & Strategy
Click any section to expand · only one open at a time
Under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, the Central Government has broad powers to take measures for environmental protection. Conclusion I (about the government's power to protect environment) follows from the statement. Conclusion II (if about a specific limitation) does not follow. Only Conclusion I follows.