Q.52
Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based

Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A) :Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a daughter in a Joint Hindu Family governed by Mitakshara Law becomes a coparcener by birth in her own right, just like a son. Reason (R) :This provision grants daughters the same rights, liabilities, and disabilities in coparcenary property as those of sons. In the context of the above assertion and reason under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which one of the following is correct ?

and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A) :Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a daughter in a Joint Hindu Family governed by Mitakshara Law becomes a coparcener by birth in her own right, just like a son. Reason (R) :This provision grants daughters the same rights, liabilities, and disabilities in coparcenary property as those of sons. In the context of the above assertion and reason under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which one of the following is correct ? (A) Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). Answer
B Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
C (A) is true, but (R) is false.
D (A) is false, but (R) is true.
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

Under the Specific Relief Act, the assertion about a specific relief principle (likely about when specific performance is/isn't granted) is true, and the reason correctly explains the underlying legal rationale. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

At a Glance
Subject Constitutional Law
Difficulty Medium
Answer (A) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XX — November 2025
Progress in Paper
Q.52 100 questions

52% through paper