AIBE XX — November 2025 — Q.86 | AIBE Prep

Share Q.86:

Q.86

Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Medium Knowledge-Based

The Supreme Court of India in R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106 held an advocate guilty of misconduct for :

A threatening judges and use of abusive language during proceedings.

B filing false affidavits and making reckless allegations against judges.

✓ interfering in a criminal trial by attempting to influence a witness. Answer

D circulating scandalous pamphlets against a sitting Chief Justice.

📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

In R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009), the SC found an advocate guilty of professional misconduct for interfering in a criminal trial by attempting to influence and win over a prosecution witness. This was held to be a serious breach of professional ethics and contempt of court.

At a Glance

Subject Evidence Act & Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam

Difficulty Medium

Answer (C) Knowledge-Based

Paper AIBE XX — November 2025

Navigation

← Q.85 ☰ All Questions Q.87 →

🎯 Mock Test

Progress in Paper

Q.86 100 questions

86% through paper