Smt.A.Sobha Rani

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

Case No. :JCC/0100029/2017 C.W.O LAkkireddipalli P.S. Vs Vandadi Venkata Ramana @ Chinnodu and 4 others

Date  : 24-04-2018

Business: Juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5 called present. Final orders pronounced (vide separate) In the result, the juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 5 are found guilty for the offence punishable u/sec.379 IPC and accordingly they are convicted u/sec.255(2) Cr.P.C. When the juvenile in cofnlcit with law No.1 to 5 are questioned regarding the quantum of sentence, they submitted that juvenile in conflict with law No.1 having mother and father and pleaded mercy and also intended to continue his studies. Juvenile in conflict with law No.2 pleaded mercy and he intended to continue his studies. Juvenile in conflict with law No.3 having mother and she is a cancer patient and pleaded mercy. juvenile in conflict with law No.4 having mother and father and pleaded mercy and also he intended to continue his studies. The Additional District Probation Officer, Proddatur filed his report against juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5 in detail. As this Board found guilt on the part of the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5 it is also relevant to consider the report of the Probation Officer in imposing the sentence on the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5. Thus, considering misconduct of the juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 5 as per the report of the Probation officer this board is of the opinion that it is not required to release the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5.In view of seriousness of the offences we being the Board of the juvenile Justice feel the following sentence would meet the ends of justice. Hence the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5 are directed to take shelter at the Government Special Home for Boys, Mangalam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District for a period of one year in order to undergo institutional treatment and rehabitation u/sec.18(1)(g) of the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 5 from 19.1.2017 to 18.2.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 28.1.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 13.3.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 18.2.2017, 18.1.2017 to 24.1.2017 respectively shall be set off u/sec.428 Cr.P.C. from the sentence imposed to them. M.O.1 was already given to PW1 and shall made absolute after appeal time is over. The sentence passed in J.C.C.Nos.28/2017, 38/2017, 33/2017 shall run concurrently. The juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 5 are informed about their right to prefer appeal against the final order

before the Honourable District Court, Kadapa and to get free

legal aid from the Honourable D.L.S.A., Kadapap, if they have no means to engage counsel in preferring the appeal, if they intends to prefer appeal. Nature of Disposal: CONVICTED Disposal Date: 24-04-2018 I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

Case No. :JCC/0100028/2017 C.W.O. Lakkireddipalli P.S. Vs Vandadi Venkata Ramana @ Chinnodu and 3 others

Date  : 24-04-2018

Business: Juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 4 called present. Final orders pronounced (vide separate) In the result, the juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 4 are found guilty for the offence punishable u/sec.411 IPC and accordinglythey are convicted u/sec.255(2) Cr.P.C. When the juvenile in cofnlcit with law No.1 to 4 are questioned regarding the quantum of sentence, they submitted that juvenile in conflict with law No.1 having mother and father and pleaded mercy and also intended to continue his studies. Junvenile in conflict with law No.2 pleaded mercy and he intended to cintinue his studies. Junveile in conrflict with law No.3 having mother and she is a cancer patinet and pleaded mercy. juvenile in conflict with law No.4 having mother and father and pleaded mercyand also he intended to continue his studies. The Additonal District Provbation Officer, Proddatur filed his report against juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 4 in detail. As this Board found guilt on the part of the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 4 it is also relevant to consider the report of the Probation Officer inimposign the sentence on the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 4. Thus, condisering misconduct of the juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 4 as per the report of the Probation officer this board is of the opinion that it is not required to relase the juvenile in conflict withlaw No.1 to 4.In view of seriousness of the offences we being the Board of the juvenile Justice feel the following sentence would meet the ends of justice. Hence the juvenile in conflict with law No.1 to 4 are directed to take shelter at the Government Special Home for Boys, Mangalam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District for a period of one year in order to undergo institutional treatment and rehabitation u/sec.18(1)(g) of thejuvenile in cofnlict with law No.1 to 4 from 19.1.2017 to 18.2.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 28.1.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 13.3.2017, from 19.1.2017 to 18.2.2017 respectively shall be set off u/sec.428 Cr.P.C. from the sentence imposed to them. M.O.1 was already given to PW1 and shall made absolute after appeal time is over. The sentence passed in J.C.C.Nos.29/2017, 38/2017, 33/2017 shall run concurrently. The juveniles in conflict with law No.1 to 4 are informed about their right to prefer appeal against the final order before the

Honourable District Court, Kadapa and to get free legal aid from

the Honourable D.L.S.A., Kadapap, if they have no means to engage counsel in preferring the appeal, if they intends to prefer appeal. Nature of Disposal: CONVICTED Disposal Date: 24-04-2018 I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

Case No. :PRC/0100002/2017 Boreddy Siva shankar Vs Boreddy Mallikarjuna and 2 others

Date  : 26-04-2018

Presence: Boreddy Mallikarjuna and 2 others Boreddy Reddaiah Srikarapu Prasanth Business: Accused No.1,2 and 4 called present. Orders pronounced (vide separate) the offence alleged against the accused No.1,2 and 4 are punishable U/sec. 324,307 r/w 34 of IPC which is exclusively triable by the court of sessions, Kadapa Division. Hence the case is committed to the court of sessions Judge, Kadapa U/sec. 209 (a) Cr.P.C. Accused No.1,2 and 4 are on bail and they are continue on bail until the conclusion of the trial before the court of sessions

Judge, Kadapa U/sec. 209 (b) Cr.P.C. Submit the case

records and property if any to the court of sessions Judge, Kadapa U/sec.209 (c) Cr.P.C. Notify the Asst. Public prosecutor under U/sec. 209 (d) Cr.P.C. On enquiry the accused No.1,2 and 4 submitted that they have means to engage an advocate during the course of trial before the court of sessions, Kadapa the accused No.,2 and 4 are directed to appear before the court of sessions, Kadapa after receipt of summons from the court of sessions Kadapa. Nature of Disposal: COMMITTED TO SESSIONS Disposal Date: 26-04-2018 I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

Case No. :CC/0100639/2017 S.H.O KAdapa Traffic U/G P.S. Vs Mogilicheruvu Sudhakar

Date  : 27-04-2018

Presence: S.H.O KAdapa Traffic U/G P.S. Mogilicheruvu Sudhakar Business: Accused called present Judgment pronounced (vide separate Judgment) In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/sec. 337,304(A) of IPC and sec. 134(a)(b) r/w 187 of M.V Act and accordingly, he is acquitted U/sec. 255(1) of Cr.P.C the bail bonds of the accused shall be in force for a period of six months as per sec. 437-A of Cr.P.C. Nature of Disposal: ACQUITTAL Disposal Date: 27-04-2018 I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa

Case No. :CC/0100435/2017 M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Com.Ltd., P. Sadaq Ali Khan Vs Gollaiahhari Lakshumma

Date  : 25-04-2018

Presence: M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Com.Ltd. P. Sadaq Ali Khan Business: Complainant called present. accused absent. He counsel for complainant filed petition U/sec. 257 Cr.P.C and the same is allowed. Therefore the complainant is permitted to withdraw the case against the accused U/sec. 257 Cr.P.C hence accused is acquitted for the offence U/sec. 138 r/w 142 of NIACT. Nature of Disposal: WITHDRAWN Disposal Date: 25-04-2018 I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa