add

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 26 th day of November, 2013

Calendar Case No.636/2010

Between : Darivemula Lakshmi Kumari … Complainant

And

Kurapati Ramamohana Rao … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Complainant in-person and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

Complainant is called absent, no rep. on behalf of thecomplainant, accused is called absent, the counsel for the accused is present and represented that the accused was died long back and filed memo to that effect,

A perusal of the case docket, it reveals that neither the complainant nor counsel for the complainant is not attending the court for quite long time inspite of notice served on the counsel for the complainant, in these circumstances there is no other alternative left to the court except to believe the representation of counsel for the accused, hence the case against the accused is abated

Pronounced by me in the open Court this the 26th day of November, 2013.

For/-M.S.Karimulla

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

For/M.S.K

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 26 th day of November, 2013

Calendar Case No.636/2010

Between : Darivemula Lakshmi Kumari … Complainant

And

Kurapati Ramamohana Rao … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Complainant in-person and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

Complainant is called absent, no rep. on behalf of thecomplainant, accused is called absent, the counsel for the accused is present and represented that the accused was died long back and filed memo to that effect,

A perusal of the case docket, it reveals that neither the complainant nor counsel for the complainant is not attending the court for quite long time inspite of notice served on the counsel for the complainant, in these circumstances there is no other alternative left to the court except to believe the representation of counsel for the accused, hence the case against the accused is abated

Pronounced by me in the open Court this the 26th day of November, 2013.

For/-M.S.Karimulla

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

For/M.S.K

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 28 th day of June, 2013

Calendar Case No.126/2008

Between :

State : The Sub-Inspector of Police. … Complainant

And

Pothireddy Rangareddy … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

Accused is called absent, Judgment pronounced. Vide separate one. In the result, the accused is fond not guilty for the offence punishable under section 380 or 411 of IPC and he is acquitted under section 248 clause 1 crpc for the said offence, the bail bonds of the accused , if any shall stand cancelled. The case property 3 stolen Nokia cell phones Mo1 and 2 and another which were given to pW1 and 2 and Uppalapati lakshmi Narasimha Raju (L.W.5) for their interim custody shall be retained by them in their regular custody after expiry of appeal time.

Sd/-xxxxxxxxxxx

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxxxx

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 23 rd day of November, 2013

Calendar Case No.134/2012

Between : State; SI of Police, Machavaram PS … Complainant

And

Thota Sai Kishore … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

Order.

Both parties are present, I have gone through the pleadings and record placed before me, it appears to me that there are bright chances of settlement of the matter by the Lok Adalat, accordingly exercising my power under section 19 and 20 of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, I refer the matter to Lok Adalat and the matter may be placed before the Mandal Legal services committee for settlement, award is passed accordingly, hence accused is acquitted under section 320 clause 8 crpc for the offence under section 341,323,506 of IPC.

Sd/-M.S.Karimulla

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/M.S.K

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 13 th day of May, 2013

Calendar Case No.62/2013

Between : State: Represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada City. … Complainant

And

Koppisetty Durga Rao … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

Accused No.1 and 2 and defacto complaiant are present,heard and perused the joint memo filed by both parties to refer the matter to lok adalat, the same is allowed, hence matter is referred to lok adalat. Accused is acquitted under section 320 clause 8 crpc for the offence under section 447,323, 509 read with 34 IPC

Sd/-xxxxxxxxxx

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxxxx

I AJCM,VJA.