Currently Serving

Ms. B.Anusha

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class ,Hanumakonda

Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex · Hanumakonda · Telangana

Ms. B.Anusha, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class ,Hanumakonda, is posted at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex, Hanumakonda, Telangana, India. 57 court orders on record since 2025. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, CC cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/2350/2022

Ponugoti Sathish Kumar vs Guddeti Suresh

05 May 2026

1 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL

JUDGE, HANUMAKONDA.

Tuesday, the 5th day of May, 2026.

Present: Smt. B.Anusha, Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.2350 OF 2022

(Old O.S.No.1137 of 2021) Between:-

1. Ponugoti Sathish Kumar, S/o. Late Srinivasa Rao, Age. 65 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 1-8-726/8, Brindavan Colony, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

2. Bommak Ramesh, S/o. Poshaiah, Age 52 years, Occ: Business and Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1-4, Boduppal, Near Ambedkar Statue, Ghatkeshar, Medchal, Malkajgiri District.

...Plaintiffs

And

1. Guddeti Suresh, S/o. Alia, Age.27 years, Occ: Agriculture, H.No. 2-13, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District

2. Madasi Raju @ Saleem, S/o. Bikshapathi, Age.26 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 2-71, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District

3. Guddeti Alia, S/o. Venkataiah, Age. 46 years, Occ: Agriculture, H.No. 2-75, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District.

4. Madasi Srujana, W/o. Cheralu, Age.50 years, Occ: Agriculture, H.No. 2-46, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District.

5. Macha Bujjamma, W/o. Veeraswamy, Age.45 years, Occ: Agriculture, H.No. 2-54, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

2 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

6. Madasi Padma, W/o. Yellaiah, Age.38 years, Occ. Agriculture, H.No. 2-16, Venkatapur village, Inavole Mandal, Warangal District.

... Defendants.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing on 08.04.2026 in the presence of Sri. K.Narsimha Rao and Smt. K.Indira N.Rao, Advocate for plaintiffs and of Sri K.Ramesh, Advocate for defendants No.1 to 6; and the matter having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:-

-:: J U D G E M E N T ::-

1.This suit is filed under Section 26 r/w Order IV, VII Rule 1 of Civil

Procedure Code, seeking for grant of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff No.1 restraining the defendants, their successors in interest agents, assignees, workmen or any other persons acting on their behalf from interfering or in any way invading with the exclusive peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff No.1 over the suit schedule property; and to award costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

i) It is submitted that the plaintiff No.1 is the absolute owner, possessor and enjoyment of the agricultural dry land admeasuring to an extent of

Ac.13-07 guntas comprised in Sy.Nos.324/D/1/3/5, 324/D/1/3/6, and 324/D/1/3/7 situated at Venkatapur village, Inavolu Mandal, Warangal Urban district, which is the suit schedule property.

ii) The plaintiff further submitted that, the plaintiff No.1 had purchased the agricultural dry land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.4-20 guntas comprised in Sy.No. 324/D/1/3/5 for a valid sale consideration through a

II AJCJ, Hnk.

3 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

Registered Sale deed vide Document bearing No. 3582 of 2020 dated 20.05.2020 from his Vendors Sri Arrabelli Rajender Rao and

Sri Pindi Mahender duly represented by their registered power of attorney holder E. Niranjan Rao and on the date of purchase the plaintiff No.1 had inducted into possession and enjoying the same. In turn said A. Rajender

Rao had purchased the above said property from the defendant No.1 and he got mutated his name vide proceedings No. B/225/2018 and obtained pattedar passbook bearing No. T-21060091065 under Khata No. 60005.

Subsequently A. Rajender Rao along with defendant No.1 being the vendor of said A. Rajender Rao both in turn had jointly sold the above land for valid sale consideration and accordingly they executed registered Agreement of

Sale-cum-GPA in favour of E. Niranjan Rao on 05.12.2018 registered as document No. 7560 of 2018.

iii) It is further submitted that, the plaintiff No.1 had purchased the agricultural dry land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.4-03 guntas comprised in Sy.No. 324/D/1/3/6 for a valid sale consideration through a registered Sale deed vide document bearing No.3583 of 2020 dt. 20.05.2020 from his

Vendors Sri Perala Muralidhar Rao and Sri Pindi Mahender duly represented by their registered power of attorney holder E. Niranjan Rao and on the date of purchase the plaintiff No.1 had inducted into possession and enjoying the same. In turn said P. Muralidhar Rao had purchased the above said property from the defendant No.1 and he got mutated his name vide proceedings No.

B/230/2018 and obtained pattedar passbook bearing No. T-21060091066 under Khata No.60006. Subsequently P. Muralidhar Rao along with defendant

II AJCJ, Hnk.

4 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

No.1 being the vendor of said P. Muralidhar had jointly executed registered

Agreement of Sale-cum-GPA in favour of E. Niranjan Rao on 05.12.2018 registered as document No. 7562 of 2018.

iv) It is further submitted that, the plaintiff No.1 had purchased the agricultural dry land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.4-24 guntas comprised in Sy.No.324/D/1/3/7 for a valid sale consideration through a registered sale deed vide document bearing No.3584 of 2020 dated 20.05.2020 from his

Vendors Sri P. Narsi Reddy and Sri Pindi Mahender duly represented by their registered power of attorney holder E. Niranjan Rao and on the date of purchase the plaintiff No.1 had inducted into possession and enjoying the same. In turn said P. Narsi Reddy had purchased the above said property from the defendant No.1 and he got mutated his name vide proceedings No.

B/228/2018 and obtained pattedar passbook bearing No. T-21060091067 under Khata No. 60007. Subsequently P. Narsi reddy along with defendant

No.1 being the vendor of said P. Narsireddy had jointly executed registered

Agreement of Sale-cum-GPA in favour of E. Niranjan Rao on 05.12.2018 registered as document No. 7561 of 2018.

(iv) It is further submitted that, the Plaintiff No.1 purchased the aforesaid three registered sale deeds, he became the absolute owner and possessor of Ac. 13-07 gts., of land through three separate sale deeds i.e., doc.Nos. 3582 of 2020, 3583 of 2020 and 3584 of 2020 dated 20.05.2020, all the land being the compact block which is suit schedule property. The plaintiff No.2 has taken lease of suit schedule property from Plaintiff No.1 for cultivating the suit schedule property.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

5 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

(v) It is further submitted that, on 12-07-2020 Pindi Mahender one of the vendor of plaintiff No.1 along with three others tried to interfere with the suit schedule property, as such the plaintiff No. 1 filed suit OS.No. 725 of 2020 on the file of II Addl. Junior Civil Judge's Court, Warangal and obtained ad-interim injunction in I.A.No. 230/2020.

(vi)It is further submitted that, the defendants are strangers and have no right over the suit schedule property, on 06.08.2021 the defendants with the assistance of some antisocial elements came to suit schedule property and obstructed the cultivation work of plaintiff No.2 and threatened him to dispossess from suit land and asserted that they shall not allow the plaintiffs to enjoy the suit schedule property. On 07.08.2021 the plaintiff

No.2 filed complaint before PS Wardhannapet, but the police have not responded. However on 09.08.2021 and 11.08.2021 the defendants made attempts to dispossess the plaintiffs, but the plaintiffs unable to resist the onslaughts of defendants. Hence the suit.

3.The defendants No. 1 to 6 filed Vakalathnama, but failed to file written statements within statutory period, hence the right to file written statement was forfeited.

4.To prove the case, the plaintiff No.1 himself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6.

5.Hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

6 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

6.Now the point for consideration is:-

Whether the plaintiff No. 1 is entitled for the relief of Permanent Injunction as prayed for ?

7. POINT:-

In order to prove their case, the plaintiff No.1 himself examined as

PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. Ex.A1 is the certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3582/2020, dated 20.05.2020, Ex.A2 is the certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3583/2020, dated 20.05.2020

Ex.A3 is the certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3584/2020,

dated 20.05.2020, Ex.A4 is the certified copy of registered agreement of

sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No. 7560/2018, dated 15.12.2018, Ex.A5 is the certified copy of registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No.7562/ 2018, dated 15.12.2018 and Ex.A6 is the certified copy of registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No.7561/2018, dated 15.12.2018.

Ex.A1 to A3 are the certified copy of registered sale deeds, which reflects that the plaintiff No.1 purchased the suit schedule property from his vendors

Arrebelli Rajender and Pindi Mahender duly represented by their registered power of attorney holder E. Niranjan Rao. Exs.A4 to Ex.A6 are registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA, which shows that the vendors of plaintiff No.1 executed agreement of sale-cum-GPA in favour of Errabelli Niranjan Rao.

Thus it is clear from the evidence of PW.1 that plaintiff No.1 purchased the suit schedule property from his vendors.

8. As per Ex.A1 to Ex.A3, it shows that the plaintiff No.1 is the owner of suit schedule properties. Further, plaintiff No.1 also filed Ex.A4 to Ex.A6

II AJCJ, Hnk.

7 O.S.No.2350 of 2022 which are agreement of sale-cum-GPA documents executed in favour of GPA holder. Thus from the evidence of PW.1 and the documentary evidence under Ex.A1 to Ex.A6, clearly establishes the possession of plaintiff No.1 over the suit schedule properties as on date of filing of the suit. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 coupled with Exs.A1 to

A6 remained unchalleged and unrebutted.

9. In the circumstances, this court is of the opinion that the plaintiff No.1 could prove his possession over the suit schedule property and he is entitled for the relief of permanent injunction as prayed for. Accordingly, the Point

No.1 is answered.

POINT No.2:

10. In the result, the suit is decreed without costs, granting permanent injunction in favour of the Plaintiff No.1, restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff No.1 over the suit schedule property.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 5th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiff:- For Defendant:-

PW.1 : P.Sathish Kumar - None -

II AJCJ, Hnk.

8 O.S.No.2350 of 2022

-:: EXHIBITS MARKED ::-

For Plaintiff:-

Ex.A1 : Certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3582/2020, dated 20.05.2020 Ex.A2 : Certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3583/2020, dated 20.05.2020 Ex.A3 : Certified copy of registered sale deed vide doc.No.3584/2020, dated 20.05.2020, Ex.A4 : Certified copy of registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No. 7560/2018, dated 15.12.2018 Ex.A5 : Certified copy of registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No.7562/2018, dated 15.12.2018 Ex.A6 : Certified copy of registered agreement of sale-cum-GPA vide doc.No. 7561/2018, dated 15.12.2018.

For Defendants:- - NIL -

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

OS/4508/2022

Canara Bank vs Santhoshimatha Mahila Podupu Sangham

06 May 2026

1 O.S.No.994 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL

JUDGE, HANUMAKONDA.

Wednesday, the 6th day of May, 2026.

Present: Smt. B.Anusha, Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.994 OF 2024

Between:- Pendli Raghunatha Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, Age.47 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H.No.2-54, Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Plaintiff

And

1. Rollakanti Ravikumar, S/o.Late Yakaiah, Age.48 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, R/o. Kapulakanaparthy Village, Sangem Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

2. Rollakanti Kumar, S/o. Yellaiah, Age.30 years, Occ.Auto driver,

3. Rollakanti Yellaiah, S/o.Late Muthaiah, Age.60 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, Both are R/o. Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Defendants

This suit is coming before me on this day for final hearing on 17.04.2026 in the presence of Sri. Ch.Swamynathan, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri L.Jalander Reddy, Advocate for defendants, and the matter having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:-

-:: J U D G E M E N T ::-

1.This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 r/w Section 26 of Civil

Procedure Code, seeking for grant of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, restraining them, their men, servants, yes-men etc., or any other person claiming through them from interfering

II AJCJ, Hnk.

2 O.S.No.994 of 2024 with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property in any manner; and to award costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

a) The plaintiff submits that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the RCC house and GI sheet shed along with open place bearing G.P.H.No.

2-54(New) and 2-56/2(Old)in Sy.No.392 to an extent of 786.Sq.yards or 657.17 Sq.mts situated at Perumandalgudem Village, Inavolu Mandal,

Hanumakonda District, which is the suit schedule property.

b) It is further submitted that the plaintiff got the suit schedule property from his wife through Regd. Gift Settlement deed vide doc.No.1480/2013, dated 10.05.2013. Further the donor of plaintiff has got the property through the proceeding of Housing Finance AP Housing

Corporation, Warangal vide proceeding No.E1/685/IHP (Indiramma Housing

Plan) 2007-2008/2007, dated 22-09-2007 and Serial No.48 and Patta

No.21120754, dated 24.09.2007 and the donor of plaintiff has constructed the house under Indiramma Housing Scheme in the year 2007 and also constructed four rooms in the said property and the remaining land is kept open. The name of donor of plaintiff is also mutated in the Grampanchayath

Record and she has been paying the taxes and enjoying the property as absolute owner and possessor without anybody's interference. After Gift settlement deed, the name of plaintiff is mutated in the Grampanchayath record and he has been paying the taxes regularly.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

3 O.S.No.994 of 2024

c) It is further submitted that the defendants who are strangers, imposters to the suit schedule property, and are no way concern with the suit schedule property on 10.11.2024 the defendants high handedly trespassed int the suit schedule property of plaintiff with a dishonest intention tried to damage the compound wall in order to squeeze amounts from the plaintiff. In the said circumstances, plaintiff is unable to protect the suit property from the defendant. Hence the suit.

3.The learned counsel for the defendant filed Vakalathnama, but failed to file written statement, hence defendants were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. To substantiate the claim of plaintiff, he also got examined one Kalpagiri Srinivas as PW.2.

5.Hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

6. Now the point for consideration is:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

2. If so, to what relief?

7. POINT No.1:

In order to prove the case, the plaintiff examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. Ex.A1 is the certified copy of Gift settlement deed vide document No.1480/2013, dated 10.05.2013,Ex.A2 is the Original

II AJCJ, Hnk.

4 O.S.No.994 of 2024 proceedings copy issued by AP Housing Corporation vide proceedings

No.E1/685/IHP 2007-2008, dated 24.09.2007, Ex.A3 is the Original house ownership certificate issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District, dated 05.10.2015, Ex.A4 is

Original Encumbrance Certificate, dated 13.11.2024, Ex.A5 is Original house tax receipts (10) issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannpet Mandal, Warangal District, Ex.A6 is Photographs(04) along with CD.

8. On perusal of Ex.A1 to Ex.A3, shows that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule property. As per Ex.A4 to Ex.A6, establish that the plaintiff is in possession over the suit schedule property as on date of filing of the suit. To support their claim, the plaintiff also got examined one Kalpagiri

Srinivas as PW.2 who corroborated the case of plaintiff. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 and PW.2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A6 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

9. In the circumstances, this court is of the opinion that the plaintiff could prove his possession over the suit schedule property and the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of permanent injunction as prayed for. Accordingly, the

Point No.1 is answered.

POINT No.2:

10. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, granting permanent

II AJCJ, Hnk.

5 O.S.No.994 of 2024 injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiff:- For Defendant:-

PW.1 : Pendli Raghunatha Reddy - NIL - PW.2 : Kalpagiri Srinivas

-:: EXHIBITS MARKED ::-

For Plaintiff:-

Ex.A1 : Certified copy of Gift settlement deed vide document No.1480/2013,

dated 10.05.2013.

Ex.A2 : Original proceedings copy issued by AP Housing Corporation vide proceedings No.E1/685/IHP 2007-2008/2007, dated 22.09.2007. Ex.A3 : Original house ownership certificate issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem, Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District,

dated 05.10.2015.

Ex.A4 : Original Encumbrance Certificate, dated 13.11.2024 Ex.A5 : Original house tax receipts (10) issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem, Wardhannpet Mandal, Warangal District. Ex.A6 : Photographs(04) along with CD.

For Defendants:- - NIL -

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

OS/4508/2022

Canara Bank vs Santhoshimatha Mahila Podupu Sangham

06 May 2026

1 O.S.No.994 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL

JUDGE, HANUMAKONDA.

Wednesday, the 6th day of May, 2026.

Present: Smt. B.Anusha, Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.994 OF 2024

Between:- Pendli Raghunatha Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, Age.47 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H.No.2-54, Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Plaintiff

And

1. Rollakanti Ravikumar, S/o.Late Yakaiah, Age.48 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, R/o. Kapulakanaparthy Village, Sangem Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

2. Rollakanti Kumar, S/o. Yellaiah, Age.30 years, Occ.Auto driver,

3. Rollakanti Yellaiah, S/o.Late Muthaiah, Age.60 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, Both are R/o. Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Defendants

-:: J U D G E M E N T ::-

1.This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 r/w Section 26 of Civil

II AJCJ, Hnk.

2 O.S.No.994 of 2024 with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property in any manner; and to award costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

a) The plaintiff submits that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the RCC house and GI sheet shed along with open place bearing G.P.H.No.

2-54(New) and 2-56/2(Old)in Sy.No.392 to an extent of 786.Sq.yards or 657.17 Sq.mts situated at Perumandalgudem Village, Inavolu Mandal,

Hanumakonda District, which is the suit schedule property.

Corporation, Warangal vide proceeding No.E1/685/IHP (Indiramma Housing

Plan) 2007-2008/2007, dated 22-09-2007 and Serial No.48 and Patta

II AJCJ, Hnk.

3 O.S.No.994 of 2024

3.The learned counsel for the defendant filed Vakalathnama, but failed to file written statement, hence defendants were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. To substantiate the claim of plaintiff, he also got examined one Kalpagiri Srinivas as PW.2.

5.Hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

6. Now the point for consideration is:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

2. If so, to what relief?

7. POINT No.1:

II AJCJ, Hnk.

4 O.S.No.994 of 2024 proceedings copy issued by AP Housing Corporation vide proceedings

No.E1/685/IHP 2007-2008, dated 24.09.2007, Ex.A3 is the Original house ownership certificate issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District, dated 05.10.2015, Ex.A4 is

Original Encumbrance Certificate, dated 13.11.2024, Ex.A5 is Original house tax receipts (10) issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannpet Mandal, Warangal District, Ex.A6 is Photographs(04) along with CD.

Srinivas as PW.2 who corroborated the case of plaintiff. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 and PW.2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A6 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

Point No.1 is answered.

POINT No.2:

10. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, granting permanent

II AJCJ, Hnk.

5 O.S.No.994 of 2024 injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiff:- For Defendant:-

PW.1 : Pendli Raghunatha Reddy - NIL - PW.2 : Kalpagiri Srinivas

-:: EXHIBITS MARKED ::-

For Plaintiff:-

Ex.A1 : Certified copy of Gift settlement deed vide document No.1480/2013,

dated 10.05.2013.

dated 05.10.2015.

For Defendants:- - NIL -

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

OS/4508/2022

Canara Bank vs Santhoshimatha Mahila Podupu Sangham

06 May 2026

1 O.S.No.994 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL

JUDGE, HANUMAKONDA.

Wednesday, the 6th day of May, 2026.

Present: Smt. B.Anusha, Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.994 OF 2024

Between:- Pendli Raghunatha Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, Age.47 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H.No.2-54, Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Plaintiff

And

1. Rollakanti Ravikumar, S/o.Late Yakaiah, Age.48 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, R/o. Kapulakanaparthy Village, Sangem Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

2. Rollakanti Kumar, S/o. Yellaiah, Age.30 years, Occ.Auto driver,

3. Rollakanti Yellaiah, S/o.Late Muthaiah, Age.60 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, Both are R/o. Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Defendants

-:: J U D G E M E N T ::-

1.This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 r/w Section 26 of Civil

II AJCJ, Hnk.

2 O.S.No.994 of 2024 with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property in any manner; and to award costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

a) The plaintiff submits that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the RCC house and GI sheet shed along with open place bearing G.P.H.No.

2-54(New) and 2-56/2(Old)in Sy.No.392 to an extent of 786.Sq.yards or 657.17 Sq.mts situated at Perumandalgudem Village, Inavolu Mandal,

Hanumakonda District, which is the suit schedule property.

Corporation, Warangal vide proceeding No.E1/685/IHP (Indiramma Housing

Plan) 2007-2008/2007, dated 22-09-2007 and Serial No.48 and Patta

II AJCJ, Hnk.

3 O.S.No.994 of 2024

3.The learned counsel for the defendant filed Vakalathnama, but failed to file written statement, hence defendants were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. To substantiate the claim of plaintiff, he also got examined one Kalpagiri Srinivas as PW.2.

5.Hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

6. Now the point for consideration is:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

2. If so, to what relief?

7. POINT No.1:

II AJCJ, Hnk.

4 O.S.No.994 of 2024 proceedings copy issued by AP Housing Corporation vide proceedings

No.E1/685/IHP 2007-2008, dated 24.09.2007, Ex.A3 is the Original house ownership certificate issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District, dated 05.10.2015, Ex.A4 is

Original Encumbrance Certificate, dated 13.11.2024, Ex.A5 is Original house tax receipts (10) issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannpet Mandal, Warangal District, Ex.A6 is Photographs(04) along with CD.

Srinivas as PW.2 who corroborated the case of plaintiff. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 and PW.2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A6 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

Point No.1 is answered.

POINT No.2:

10. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, granting permanent

II AJCJ, Hnk.

5 O.S.No.994 of 2024 injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiff:- For Defendant:-

PW.1 : Pendli Raghunatha Reddy - NIL - PW.2 : Kalpagiri Srinivas

-:: EXHIBITS MARKED ::-

For Plaintiff:-

Ex.A1 : Certified copy of Gift settlement deed vide document No.1480/2013,

dated 10.05.2013.

dated 05.10.2015.

For Defendants:- - NIL -

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

OS/4508/2022

Canara Bank vs Santhoshimatha Mahila Podupu Sangham

06 May 2026

1 O.S.No.994 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL

JUDGE, HANUMAKONDA.

Wednesday, the 6th day of May, 2026.

Present: Smt. B.Anusha, Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.994 OF 2024

Between:- Pendli Raghunatha Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy, Age.47 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o. H.No.2-54, Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Plaintiff

And

1. Rollakanti Ravikumar, S/o.Late Yakaiah, Age.48 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, R/o. Kapulakanaparthy Village, Sangem Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

2. Rollakanti Kumar, S/o. Yellaiah, Age.30 years, Occ.Auto driver,

3. Rollakanti Yellaiah, S/o.Late Muthaiah, Age.60 years, Occ.Agriculture coolie, Both are R/o. Perumandla Gudem Village, Inavolu Mandal, Hanumakonda District.

...Defendants

-:: J U D G E M E N T ::-

1.This suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 r/w Section 26 of Civil

II AJCJ, Hnk.

2 O.S.No.994 of 2024 with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property in any manner; and to award costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

a) The plaintiff submits that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the RCC house and GI sheet shed along with open place bearing G.P.H.No.

2-54(New) and 2-56/2(Old)in Sy.No.392 to an extent of 786.Sq.yards or 657.17 Sq.mts situated at Perumandalgudem Village, Inavolu Mandal,

Hanumakonda District, which is the suit schedule property.

Corporation, Warangal vide proceeding No.E1/685/IHP (Indiramma Housing

Plan) 2007-2008/2007, dated 22-09-2007 and Serial No.48 and Patta

II AJCJ, Hnk.

3 O.S.No.994 of 2024

3.The learned counsel for the defendant filed Vakalathnama, but failed to file written statement, hence defendants were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A6. To substantiate the claim of plaintiff, he also got examined one Kalpagiri Srinivas as PW.2.

5.Hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

6. Now the point for consideration is:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief as prayed for?

2. If so, to what relief?

7. POINT No.1:

II AJCJ, Hnk.

4 O.S.No.994 of 2024 proceedings copy issued by AP Housing Corporation vide proceedings

No.E1/685/IHP 2007-2008, dated 24.09.2007, Ex.A3 is the Original house ownership certificate issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District, dated 05.10.2015, Ex.A4 is

Original Encumbrance Certificate, dated 13.11.2024, Ex.A5 is Original house tax receipts (10) issued by Grampanchayath, Perumandlagudem,

Wardhannpet Mandal, Warangal District, Ex.A6 is Photographs(04) along with CD.

Srinivas as PW.2 who corroborated the case of plaintiff. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 and PW.2 coupled with Exs.A1 to A6 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

Point No.1 is answered.

POINT No.2:

10. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs, granting permanent

II AJCJ, Hnk.

5 O.S.No.994 of 2024 injunction in favour of the Plaintiff, restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 6th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiff:- For Defendant:-

PW.1 : Pendli Raghunatha Reddy - NIL - PW.2 : Kalpagiri Srinivas

-:: EXHIBITS MARKED ::-

For Plaintiff:-

Ex.A1 : Certified copy of Gift settlement deed vide document No.1480/2013,

dated 10.05.2013.

dated 05.10.2015.

For Defendants:- - NIL -

Sd/-

Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) under PCR Act- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hanumakonda.

II AJCJ, Hnk.

Order Record 52 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/4508/2022	Canara Bank vs Santhoshimatha Mahila Podupu Sangham	06 May 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2350/2022	Ponugoti Sathish Kumar vs Guddeti Suresh	05 May 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2469/2022	Kandukuri Devadas vs Akkala Sampath	24 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/34/2024	Vankudoth Sai vs Nunsavath Ravi	23 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/927/2023	Manda Upender vs Bheemavadam Hari	22 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5002/2022	Akula Nagaraju vs Thirunahari Murali	22 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/169/2023	S Srinivas Reddy vs Mohammad Raziyddin	20 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1011/2024	Ellaboina Ravi vs Kothi Bikshapathi	20 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2564/2022	Katta Indrasena Reddy vs Shazia Nikhat	20 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3276/2022	Canara Bank Kazipet Branch vs Bomma Naveen Kumar	17 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3252/2022	Siddaboina Laxman Rao vs Kanagala Veera Venkata Laxmi	16 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
PRC/122/2025	SHO PS, HANAMKONDA vs Sunitha Bhukya	15 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/4712/2022	CANARA BANK KAZIPET BRANCH REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER vs Anjaneya Mahila Podupu Sangem Rep by its president Jampala Madhari	13 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
PRC/45/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA, PS HANAMKONDA vs Dr. Sai Sarath Dasari	13 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/2486/2022	Canara Bank Hanamkonda Branch-ll vs Jonnalagadda Kalyani	08 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3231/2022	Nalla Mahender Reddy vs Kandi Jithender Reddy	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3275/2022	Danduguduma Ramu vs Mekala Sanjeev	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/77/2025	Shyamala Mrudula vs The District Collector	06 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1083/2023	Guluru Padma vs Bandi Thirupathi	06 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/4741/2022	Canara Bank Kakatiya Colony Branch Hanamkonda vs Mukunda Mahila Padupu Sangham Rep by its president Thatipelli Uma	02 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/95/2024	Dumpala Ramesh vs Surabhi Rama Rao alias Kiran	31 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/598/2024	Yanamala Rama Devi vs Pallepu Edukondalu	31 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
EP/329/2024	Duvva Venkateshwarlu vs Naini Sammaiah	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/4735/2022	CANARA BANK KAKATIYA COLONY BRANCH HANAMKONDA Rep by its GPA Holder vs Jai Vaishanavi Mahila Podupu Sangham rep by its president Dumpala Urmila	30 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3038/2022	Canara Bank Hanamkonda Branch-ll vs Abbaraboina Srilatha	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/654/2025	BURRA THIRUPATHI vs CHIRAGONI SAROJANA	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/877/2025	Thalla Bhagyalaxmi vs Thalla Srinivas	23 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/795/2025	Challa Rajitha vs Sompelli Prakash	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1141/2025	Sadineni Chandra Shekar vs Madishetti Narsing	11 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/13/2023	Vooribindu Mahesh Kumar vs Vuribindi Raghu	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/141/2024	Gangadhari Rajamouli vs Sandela Pedda Komramma	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2253/2022	MD.Akheel pasha vs K.yadagiri	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2314/2022	ANKESARAPU KOMALA vs THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS GOVT OF TELANGANA HYDERABAD	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/116/2026	SHO PS, HNK vs Veeru Mudu	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/659/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA vs Pavan Routh	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/2529/2025	SHO PS, HANAMKONDA vs Veeru Mudu	10 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
EP/146/2023	KAPIL CHITS KAKATIYA PVT LTD vs B SHANKAR	09 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/763/2024	Kuntamalla Nagaraju vs Ganapaka Bhadraiah	09 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/856/2024	Union Bank of India its Suresh Babu vs M/s Anajana Earth Movers its Madhavi	09 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1809/2022	VELPUGONDA RAGHAVENDRA BEING MINOR vs VELPUGONDA KUMARASWAMY	09 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/573/2025	Shaik Najma vs Md Farjana	06 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/249/2024	Shriram Finance Limited P. Raju vs Vikrama Rao Celam	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/625/2025	Shriram Finance Limited, rep by its SPA holder and Authorized Signatory P Raju vs ANIL KUMAR BATTINI	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/698/2025	Juwadi Vijaya Lakshmi Rep by her SPA Holder Punnamaneni Narotham Rao vs To whomsoever concerned	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/4435/2022	Canara bank vs Laxmi Ganapathi Mahila Podupu Sangham	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/4784/2022	Damera Rajender vs SK Saleemuddin	24 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/194/2024	Pingili Narender Reddy vs Purelli Srinivas	23 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2259/2022	Madishetti Vijaya vs Madhamshetty Haribabu	19 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/139/2024	Nampally Sarojana vs Jalikapu Rajeshwari	16 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/617/2024	Pamu Ramesh vs Bojja Sridher	16 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/697/2025	Telangana Grameena Bank Mucherla Branch Rep by its Branch Manager Ch Nagasreevalli vs Perugu Bikshapathi	16 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
EP/278/2024	Pulluri Savithri vs Pulluri Thirupathi Rao	02 Feb 2026	Order	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		5
Apr 2026		20
Mar 2026		25
Feb 2026		7

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms. B.Anusha handled?

Ms. B.Anusha has handled 57 court orders since 2025 at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 10 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms. B.Anusha hear?

Based on available records, Ms. B.Anusha primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms. B.Anusha currently posted?

Ms. B.Anusha is posted as I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class ,Hanumakonda at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex, Hanumakonda, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms. B.Anusha available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms. B.Anusha are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms. B.Anusha dispose cases?

Ms. B.Anusha disposes approximately 10 cases per month, based on 57 orders handled over their tenure at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms. B.Anusha serving?

Ms. B.Anusha has been serving at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

OS 86%

EP 5%

CC 5%

PRC 4%

Posting History

May 2026 — Present

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class ,Hanumakonda
May 2026 — Present

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class ,Hanumakonda
Apr 2026 — Present

IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-IV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Juvenile Court) ,Hanumakonda
Dec 2025 — Present

Spl Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge ,Hanumakonda · 57 orders

Other Judges at this Court

M.R.Sunitha

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda

5 orders

Dr T Srinivas Rao

LRAT-cum- I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Han...

4 orders

Smt. G.L. Sridevi

II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda

1 orders

Gandu Rama Lingam

Pricipal Senior Civil Judge-cum- Assistant Session...

247 orders

Smt. V.Usha Kranthi

I Addl. Senior Civil Judge cum I Addl Assistant Se...

35 orders

Smt Sampathi Rao Chandana

II Addl. Senior Civil Judge cum II Addl Assistant...

519 orders

Mr. Prateek Sihag

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum- Judicial Magistr...

2 orders

← View all judges at Hanumakonda, PDJ Court Complex