Sri.Ch.Madhava Rao,B.Sc.,B.L.,

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 8 th day of March, 2013

Calendar Case No.135/2002

Between : AP Drugs Inspector. … Complainant

And

Sri Vanama Rajamannar … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

A2 present and filed a petition under section 70 clause 2 crpc for recall the nbw pending against him and the same is allowed , the accused also filed memo stating that he is suffering with spinal problem, having and depending upon him, he is working as clerk in medical shop and entire family is depending upon him and prayed to take a lenient view by considering his health and family conditions, by taking into consideration of the above facts, the accused is convicted under section 241 crpc, the accused is found guilty and convicted to under go si till raising of the court and also a fine of Rs.2500 for the offence punishable under section 27 clause b of drugs and cosmetics act, failing to pay the fine amount he shall undergo additional si for a period of one month. \ The accused is found guilty and convicted to under go si till raising of the court and also a fine of Rs.2500 for the offence punishable under section 27 clause b of drugs and cosmetics act, failing to pay the fine amount he shall undergo

additional si for a period of one month.\ The accused is found guilty and

sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000 for the offense punishable under section 28 of drugs and cosmetics act, failing to pay the fine amount he shall undergo

additional si for a period of 15 days. \ the accused is found guilty and sentenced

to pay a fine of Rs.1000 for the offense punishable under section 22 clause 3 of drugs and cosmetics act, failing to pay the fine amount he shall undergo

additional si for a period of 15 days

Sd/-XXXXXX

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxx

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 24 th day of January, 2013

Calendar Case No.5/2013

Between : Inspector of Police, SN Puram PS.

Vs.

… Complainant Sanaka Visweswara Rao. … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

A1 to A3 are present. copies of documents furnished to the accused, accused are examined under section 251 crpc, they pleaded guilty. charge under section 9 clause A clause 1 and 2 of A.P.Cinema Regulation act is framed and read over to them, they pleaded guilty voluntarily, their plea is accepted as voluntary. \ Accordingly A.1 to A.3 are found guilty and convicted under section 241 crpc for the offense punishable under section 9 clause A clause 1 and 2 of

A.P.Cinema Regulation act and they are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000 to each accused and failing to pay of fine amount, they shall undergo si for one month, seized cash of Rs.8,900// from A1 and cash of rs.26000 from A2 shall confiscated to state and destroy the remaining property tickets after completion of appeal time, the return of reliance cell phone of a1 and samsung cell phone to A2 after completion of appeal time.

Sd/-M.S.Karimulla

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/M.S.K

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 20 th day of March, 2013

Calendar Case No.387/2005

Between : The SHO, Machavaram PS. … Complainant

And

Gotti Rambabu @ Sai Rambabu @ Ramu … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

Since NBW pending against the accused on 14.8.2007, some of the witnesses were examined under section 299 crpc, In this case summons were issued 24 adjourments to lw7,9 and 10 but the prosecution did not evince interest to produce the witnesses. The matter is old one on the file of this court, hence the further proceedings of this case is closed. so the accused is discharged under section 239 crpc, for the offense under section 420 IPC, the police is directed to return the NBW.

Sd/-XXXXXX

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxx

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 30 th day of March, 2013

Calendar Case No.102/2005

Between :

SHO, Machavaram PS. … Complainant

And

N.Aruna Kumari … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

NBWs pending against accused on 9/2/2007. section 82 and83 crpc proceedings issued on 6.7.2009. In this case also 14 adjournments were given to execute the above said proceedings. In this case, surety bonds were also forfeited on 28.11.2009. But the prosecution did not evince interest to serve the summons to the witnesses. Since the matter is old one. Hence, the further proceedings of this case is closed. So, the case against accused is discharged under section 239 crpc for the offense under section 420,468,471 IPC

Sd/-xxxxxxxxx

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxxxx

I AJCM,VJA.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT

VIJAYAWADA

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

This the 30 th day of March, 2013

Calendar Case No.299/2002

Between :

State: Station House Officer, Machavaram PS … Complainant

And

Katragadda Subrahmanyam … Accused * * *

This case is coming for hearing before me on this day for final hearing

before me in the presence of Learned APP for State and the accused in person

and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

NBWs pending against accused on 27.12.2004. In this casesummons were issued to the witnesses on 31.3.2009, under section 299 crpc, even 27 adjourments were given to serve the summons against the witnesses. But the prosecution did not evince interest to serve the summons to the witnesses. Since the matter is old one. Hence, the further proce4edings of this case is closed. So, the case against accused is discharged under section 239 crpc for the offense under section 420 IPC.

Sd/-xxxxxxxxxxx

I ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/xxxxx

I AJCM,VJA.