Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L.,

II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada · Krishna · Andhra Pradesh

Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L.,, II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada, is posted at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,861 court orders on record since 2014. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, JCC, PRC cases.

1,861

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

CC/301903/2013 Acquitted

SHO MAHILA P.S vs MULAGADA SUDHEER KUMAR@SUDHEER

02 May 2017

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

–CUM–MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

PRESENT: Ms.D.Lakshmi,

II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-

Cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada.

Tuesday, this the 2nd day of May, 2017.

C.C.No.1903/2013

Between: The State: Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila P.S., Vijayawada City.

...Complainant .

And

1) Mulagada Sudheer Kumar @ Sudheer, S/o.Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, 30 Years, Viswabrahmin, B-8 Aairport Quarters, New Karasa Vishakpatnam.

2) Mulagada Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, S/o.Veera Brahmam, 65 Years, Viswabrahmin, D.No.23-5-27/A, Chintala Thopu, Chirala Prakasam District. (Abated).

3) Mulagada Punyavathi, W/o.Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, 54 Years, Viswabrahmin, D.No.23-5-27/A, Chintala Thopu, Chirala Prakasam District.

4) Thanne Chandra Sekhar, S/o.Hanumatha Rao, 42 Years, Viswabrahmin, D.No.24-4-11 (3) Ganjipalem Chirala Prakasam District.

... Accused Nos.1 to 4.

This case is coming on for final hearing before me for consideration today after hearing both sides on 02-05-2017 in the presence of Sri M.A.Hameed, Incharge Asst. Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri K.Jayaram, Advocate for accused and this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada city, has filed the charge sheet against the accused in Crime No.111/2013 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.

2)The brief facts of the prosecution case as stated below:

The marriage of L.W.1-Mulagada Uma Katyayini was celebrated with A-1 on 18.06.11 in the presence of elders and at the time of parents of

L.W.1 she gave Rs.5 lakhs cash as dowry and besides Rs.50,000/- to sister-in- law and 10 sovereigns of gold and silver and A-1 is working in Airport, 2

Vishakapatnam and after marriage L.W.1 went to marital life and resided at

Cheerala for one month and after she went to Vishakapatnam. It is further alleged that later A-1 was not residing with her as A-1 addicted to vices and that A-2 and A-3 being the in-law harassed her to bring more dowry and threatened her and abused her with the instigation of A-2 and A-3, A-1 daily used to abused her and beat her and that A-1 to A-3 even also not gave any food and harassed her and that the parents of L.W.1 came and questioned the acts of Accused at that time the accused demanded more dowry and the parents of L.W.1 bring to Vijayawada and A-1 to A-4 came to the house with the elders and promised to look after her and taken her to Cheerla. It is further alleged that later A-1 daily beat L.W.1 and demanded more dowry from her parents with the instigation of A-2 to A-4 and harassed her physically and mentally.

On the strength of the report of L.W.1, L.W.10-K.Jagan Mohan Rao,

A.S.I of Mahila P.S., registered the same as FIR and took up investigation.

During the course of investigation, he examined and recorded the statements of witnesses and arrested A-1 on 21.10.13 and sent him for remand and that

A-2 to A-4 got released as per the orders passed by Hon'ble Mahila Sessions

Judge, Vijayawada vide Crl.MP.No.1908/13, dt.27.11.13 and sent them for

remand and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet.

3.This case was taken on file against A-1 to A-4 for the offence under section 498-A IPC.

4. On appearance of the accused Nos.1 to 4 before this Court, copies of all documents have been furnished to them as contemplated under Section 207 Cr.P.C.

5.A-1 to A-4 were examined u/s 239 of Cr.P.C stating the accusation for the offence under Section 498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to them in Telugu, for which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6.During the pendency of trial, the police filed death certificate of A- 2 through the learned Incharge Assistant public Prosecutor for the state and hence the case against A-2 was abated.

7.During the course of trial, the prosecution in all examined P.Ws.1 and 2 only and got marked Exs.P-1 to P-4.

8. After closure of prosecution side evidence, as there is no incriminating material in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, Section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with.

8.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

9.Now the point of determination is that:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

Accused Nso.1 to 4 for the offence punishable under

section 498-A IPC beyond all reasonable doubt or not?

10.POINT:P.W.1-M.Uma Kasthyani, has deposed that she is resident of Vijayawada. A-1 is her husband, A-2 is her father-in-law, A-3 is her mother-in-law and A-4 is her maternal uncle of A-1. Her marriage was performed with A-1 on 18-6-11 at Vijayawada as per rites and customs of

Hindus and out of wedlock they did not blessed with children. She further deposed that in the year 2013 due to some disputes arose between them, she went to police station to complain the same and by that time Police obtained her signature in Ex.P-1 on a blank paper, but she does not know what police have scribed on the blank paper. She clearly deposed that recently the matter was settled outside the Court and that herself and A-1 obtained divorce on the file of Hon'ble Family Court, Vijayawada on mutual consent and she has no objection to acquit the case against Accused Nos.1, 3 and 4. P.W.2 father of

P.W.1 has deposed on the same lines as deposed by P.W.1. So, in view of the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State has given up the evidence of other material witnesses available on record.

11.On perusal of evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, they did not depose anything against A-1, A-3 and A-4 with regard to alleged harassment meted out by the accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 towards P.W.1. Since, P.Ws.1 and 2 turned hostile and go bye their case, it seems to be absolutely no positive evidence revealed to base conviction against the accused. Hence, in view of the above discussion, I hold that prosecution utterly failed to prove the case against the

Accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

12.IN THE RESULT, A-1, A-3 and A-4 are found not guilty and they are acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C for the charge u/section 498-A IPC. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal. The case against

A-2 is abated.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court dated this the 2nd day of May, 2017.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BE HALF OF

PROSECUTION: ACCUSED: P.W.1 : M.Uma Kasthyani. -NONE- P.W.2 : A.Veeresalingam.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Signature in Report. Ex.P2 : Contents in report. Ex.P3 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.1 Ex.P4 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.2.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

-NIL-

MATERIAL OBJECTS

-NIL-

II ACMM,

VJA.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

-CUM-MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA

Calendar Case No : 1903/2013

DATES OF :

01. Offence (prior to): 21-10-2013.

02. Complaint: 21-10-2013.

03. Apprehension of Accused : 21-10-2013 (A1) : 01-12-2013 (A2 to A4)

04. Commencement of Trial: 02-05-2017.

05. Close of Trial: 02-05-2017.

06. Judgment: 02-05-2017.

07. Complainant :The Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila P.s., Vijayawada City.

08. Name of the Accused:1) Mulagada Sudheer Kumar @ Sudheer, S/o.Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, 30 Years, Viswabrahmin, B-8 Aairport Quarters, New Karasa Vishakpatnam.

2) Mulagada Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, S/o.VeeraBrahmam,65Years, Viswabrahmin, D.No.23-5-27/A, Chintala Thopu, Chirala Prakasam District.

(Abated).

3) Mulagada Punyavathi, W/o.Siva Satyanarayana Prasad, 54 Years, Viswabrahmin, D.No.23-5-27/A, Chintala Thopu, Chirala Prakasam District.

4)ThanneChandraSekhar, S/o.HanumathaRao,42Years, Viswabrahmin,D.No.24-4-11(3) Ganjipalem Chirala Prakasam District.

09. Offence: Under Section 498-A IPC.

10. Plea of Accused.: NOT GUILTY.

11. Finding: FOUND NOT GUILTY.

12. Result : A-1, A-3 and A-4 are found not guilty for the charge u/section 498-A of IPC and they are acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

13. Explanation for delay : This case is taken on file on 19-12-2013 and posted to 03-03-2014. On 11-08-2015 A-1, A-3 and A-4 are present. Copies of case documents were supplied to them as contemplated u/sec.207 Cr.P.C. On 07-12-2015 Accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 are examined under section 239 Cr.P.C a charge u/sec.498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to them, in Telugu language, for which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution side evidence is commenced from 02-05-2017 and closed on the same day; as there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with. Heard both sides. On 02-05-2017 Judgment pronounced. Hence, the delay.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

Copy Submitted to: The Hon’ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Dis.No. dated:

CC/301285/2012 Acquitted

SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs CHEGONDI VENKATASWARARAo

03 May 2017

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

–CUM–MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

PRESENT: Ms.D.Lakshmi,

II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-

Cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada.

Wednesday, this the 3rd day of May, 2017.

C.C.No.1285/2012

Between:

The State: Sub Inspector of Police, Penamaluru P.S., Vijayawada City.

...Complainant .

And

1. Chegondi Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana, 30 Years.

2. Chegondi Satyavathi, S/o.Ram Murthy.

3. Chegondi Satyanarayana, S/o.Rama Murthy.

4. Chegondi Ramakrishna, s/o.Satyanarayana.

5. Chegondi Varaprasad, S/o.Satyanarayana.

(A1 to A4 are residents of Near Elementary School, Kirlapudi, Palkol, W.G.

District.)

... Accused Nos.1 to 4.

This case is coming on for final hearing before me for consideration today after hearing both sides on 02-05-2017 in the presence of

Sri M.A.Hameed, Incharge Asst. Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of

Sri G.Pothu Raju, Advocate for accused Nos.1 to 5 and this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Penamaluru Police Station,

Vijayawada city, has filed the charge sheet against A-1 to A-5 in Crime

No.133/2012 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.

2)The brief facts of the prosecution case as stated below:

The marriage of L.W.1-Chegondi Madhavi, was solemnized with the accused about 6 years back in the presence of elders and since from the inception of marriage the accused harassed her by demanding that the dowry amount is given by her parents is less dowry and demanded her to bring 2

additional dowry. It is further alleged that A-2 to A-5 are also harassed her

physically and mentally and instigated A-1 and finally necked her out with a demand to bring additional dowry from her parents house.

On the strength of the report of L.W.1, L.W.6-Krishore Babu, Sub Inspector of

Penamaluru Police station, Vijayawada City, registered the same as a F.I.R in Crime No.133/12 u/section 498-A IPC and took up investigation. During the course of investigation, he examined the witnesses and recorded their statements and later he arrested the accused No.1 on 6.3.12 and sent him for remand and that A-2 to A-5 are absconding at the time filing of charge sheet and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet.

3.This case was taken on file against A-1 only for the offence under section 498-A IPC and issued N.B.W against A-2 to A-5.

4.On appearance of accused No.1 before this Court, copies of all documents have been furnished to them as contemplated under Section 207

Cr.P.C.

5.A-2 to A-5 approached the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh,

Hyderabad for granting stay against them vide Crl.P.No.8470 of 2013 on 18-08-2013 and the same is allowed and later on 27-02-2017 stay is vacated.

6.A-1 to A-5 were examined u/s 239 of Cr.P.C stating the accusation for the offence under Section 498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to them in Telugu, for which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

7.During the course of trial, the prosecution in all examined P.Ws.1 and 2 only and got marked Exs.P-1 to P-4.

8.After closure of prosecution side evidence, as there is no 3 incriminating material in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, Section 313

(b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with.

9.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

10.Now the point of determination is that:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

Accused Nso.1 to 5 for the offence punishable under

section 498-A IPC beyond all reasonable doubt or not?

11.POINT:P.W.1-Ch.Madhavi, has deposed that she is resident of

Vijayawada. A-1 is her husband, A-2 and A-3 are her in-laws, A-4 is brother of

A-1, A-5 is brother-in-law of P.W.1. Her marriage was performed with A-1 in the year 2005 at Dwaraka Tirumala Eluru as per rites and customs of the Hindus and out of wedlock they did not blessed with children. She further deposed that in the year 2012 due to some disputes arose between them, she went to police station to complain the same and by that time Police obtained her signature in Ex.P-1 on a blank paper, but she does not know what police have scribed on the blank paper. She clearly deposed that recently the matter was settled outside the Court and that herself and A-1 filed divorce O.P before the

Hon'ble Family Court of Vijayawada and the same is pending and now they are

agreed to reside separately and she has no objection to acquit the case against the accused. P.W.2 mother of P.W.1 has deposed on the same lines as deposed by P.W.1. So, in view of the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, the learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor for State has given up the evidence of other material witnesses available on record.

12.On perusal of evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, they did not depose anything against A-1 to A-5 with regard to alleged harassment meted out by

A-1 to A-5 towards P.W.1. Since, P.Ws.1 and 2 turned hostile and go bye their case, it seems to be absolutely no positive evidence revealed to base 4 conviction against the accused. Hence, in view of the above discussion, I hold that prosecution utterly failed to prove the case against the Accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

13.IN THE RESULT, A-1 to A-5 found not guilty and they are acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C for the charge u/section 498-A IPC. The bail bonds of

Accused Nos.1 to 5 shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court dated this the 3rd day of May, 2017.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BE HALF OF

PROSECUTION: ACCUSED: P.W.1 : Ch.Madhavi. -NONE- P.W.2 : M.Kumari.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Signature in Report. Ex.P2 : Contents in report. Ex.P3 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.1 Ex.P4 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.2.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

-NIL-

MATERIAL OBJECTS

-NIL-

II ACMM,

VJA.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

-CUM-MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA

Calendar Case No : 1285/2012

DATES OF :

01. Offence (prior to): 03-03-2012.

02. Complaint: 03-03-2012.

03. Apprehension of Accused : 06-03-2012.

04. Commencement of Trial: 03-05-2017.

05. Close of Trial: 03-05-2017.

06. Judgment: 03-05-2017.

07. Complainant :The Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila P.s., Vijayawada City.

08. Name of the Accused:1.ChegondiVenkateswaraRao, S/o.Satyanarayana, 30 Years.

2.Chegondi Satyavathi, S/o.Ram Murthy. 3.C.Satyanarayana, S/o.Rama Murthy.

4.Chegondi Ramakrishna, S/o.Satya- narayana. 5.ChegondiVaranasi,S/o.Satya- narayana. (A1 to A5 are residents of Near Elementary School, Kirlapudi, Palkol, W.G. District.)

09. Offence : Under Section 498-A IPC.

10. Plea of Accused. : NOT GUILTY.

11. Finding : FOUND NOT GUILTY.

12. Result : A1 to A5 are found not guilty for the charge u/section 498-A of IPC and they are acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

13. Explanation for delay : This case is taken on file on 20-10-2012 and posted to 30-01-2013. On 14-03-2017 A-1 to A-5 are present. Copies of case documents were supplied to them as contemplated u/sec.207 Cr.P.C. On 02-05-2017 Accused Nos.1 to 5 are examined under section 239 Cr.P.C a charge u/sec.498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to them, in Telugu language, for which, they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution side evidence is commenced from 03-05-2017 and closed on the same day; as there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with. Heard both sides, judgment was pronounced on the same day. Hence, the delay.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

Copy Submitted to: The Hon’ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Dis.No. dated:

CC/300403/2013 Acquitted

SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs BARRI BALAIAH

01 May 2017

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE– CUM – MAHILA

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

PRESENT: Ms.D.Lakshmi,

II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-

Cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada.

Monday, this the 1st day of May, 2017.

C.C.No.403 of 2013

Between: The State: Sub Inspector of Police, Penamaluru P.S., Vijayawada City.

...Complainant .

And

Md.Salem, S/o.Farooq, 30 Years, Muslim, Near Ambedkar Satatue, Gangutur Village, Penamaluru Mandal.

... Accused.

This case is coming on for final hearing before me for consideration today after hearing both sides on 01-05-2017 in the presence of Sri M.A.Hameed, Incharge Asst. Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri U.V.Subrahmanyam, Advocate for accused and this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Penamaluru Police Station,

Vijayawada city, has filed the charge sheet against the accused in Crime

No.148/2013 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.

2)The brief facts of the prosecution case as stated below:

The marriage of L.W.1-Barri Jhansi Lakshmi, was celebrated with the accused on 22.2.03 in the presence of relatives and both side elders at

Ramalayam Temple, Patamata as per Hindu customs and at the time of marriage her parents gave cash of Rs.2,00,000/-, gold 3 sovereigns of

Nonthradu; 2 sovereigns of Bangles and ear studs and 2 sovereigns of Matties as per Pasupu Kumkuma and attended all formalities. Subsequently, the accused habituated to bad vices i.e, consuming alcohol and made illegal contacts with another lady and abused and beat her and demanded to bring more dowry from her parents house and L.W.1 brought Rs.50,000/- and that again the accused demanded to bring Rs.2 lakhs from her parents house. It is further alleged that L.W.1 selected as lady conductor in 2008 and since then the accused harassed her physically and mentally by visiting her working 2 place and abused her beat her and harassed her physically and mentally and caused mental agony.

On the strength of the report of L.W.1, L.W.6-K.Dharmendra, registered a case in Cr.No.148/13 u/section 498-A IPC and took up investigation. During the course of investigation, he visited the scene of offence, examined the witnesses and recorded their statements and arrested the accused on 15.3.13 and sent him for remand and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet. Hence, the charge.

3.One of my predecessors in the office took the case on file against the accused for the offence u/section 498-A IPC.

4. On appearance of the accused before this Court, copies of all documents has been furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207

Cr.P.C.

5.The Accused was examined u/s 239 of Cr.P.C stating the accusation for the offence under Section 498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which, the accused is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6.During the course of trial, the prosecution in all examined P.W.1 only and got marked Exs.P-1 to P-3.

7.After closure of prosecution side evidence, as there is no incriminating material in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, Section 313

(b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with.

8.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

9.Now the point of determination is that:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

Accused for the offence punishable under section 498-A

IPC beyond all reasonable doubt or not?

10.POINT:P.W.1-B.Jhansi Lakshmi, has deposed she is resident of

Vijayawada. The Accused is her husband and her marriage was performed with the accused about 17 years ago at her in-laws house as per the rites and customs of Hindus and out of wedlock they blessed with two children. She further deposed that in the year 2013, due to some disputes with her husband she went to Police station to make report and by that time the Police obtained her signature under Ex.P-1 on a blank paper, but she does not know what police have scribed on a blank paper. She further clearly deposed that recently the matter was settled outside the Court and now they are agreed to reside separately and she has no objection to acquit the case against the accused. So, in view of the evidence of P.W.1, the learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor for State has given up the evidence of other material witnesses available on record.

11.On perusal of evidence of P.W.1, she did not depose anything against the accused with regard to alleged harassment meted out in the hands of the accused. Since, P.W.1 turned hostile and go bye her case, it seems to be absolutely no positive evidence revealed to base conviction against the accused. Hence, in view of the above discussion, I hold that prosecution utterly failed to prove the case against the Accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

12.IN THE RESULT, the accused is found not guilty and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C for the charge u/section 498-A IPC. The bail bonds of the

Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court dated this the 1st day of May, 2017.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BE HALF OF

PROSECUTION: ACCUSED: P.W.1 : B.Jhansi Lakshmi. -NONE-

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Signature of P.W.1 in her report. Ex.P2 : Contents in Report. Ex.P3 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.1.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

-NIL-

MATERIAL OBJECTS

-NIL-

II ACMM,

VJA.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

-CUM-MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA

Calendar Case No : 403/2013

DATES OF :

01. Offence (prior to): 14-03-2013.

02. Complaint: 14-03-2013.

03. Apprehension of Accused : 15-03-2013.

04. Commencement of Trial: 01-05-2017.

05. Close of Trial: 01-05-2017.

06. Judgment: 01-05-2017.

07. Complainant :The Sub Inspector of Police, Penamaluru P.s., Vijayawada City.

08. Name of the Accused:Md.Salem, S/o.Farooq, 30 Years, Muslim, Near Ambedkar Satatue, Gangutur Village, Penamaluru Mandal.

09. Offence: Under Section 498-A IPC.

10. Plea of Accused.: NOT GUILTY.

11. Finding: FOUND NOT GUILTY.

12. Result : The Accused is found not guilty for the charge u/section 498-A of IPC and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

13. Explanation for delay : This case is taken on file on 03-04-2013 and posted to 15-04-2013. On 22-07-13 The Accused is present. Copies of case documents were supplied to him as contemplated u/sec.207 Cr.P.C. On 16-08-2016 The Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C a charge u/sec.498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to him, in Telugu language, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution side evidence is commenced from 01-05-2017 and closed on the same day; as there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with. Heard both sides. On 01-05-2017 Judgment pronounced. Hence, the delay.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

Copy Submitted to: The Hon’ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Dis.No. dated:

CC/301163/2014 Acquitted

SHO MAHILA P.S vs VELESILA RAJESH

01 May 2017

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE– CUM – MAHILA

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

PRESENT: Ms.D.Lakshmi,

II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-

Cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada.

Saturday, this the 1st day of May, 2017.

C.C.No.1163 of 2014

Between: The State: Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila P.S., Vijayawada City.

...Complainant .

And

Velesila Rajesh, S/o.Rayappa, 37 Years, Caste by Mala, Ayyappanagar, F601, Hanumanpeta, Subrahmainam street, Autonagar, Patamata, Vijayawada.

... Accused.

This case is coming on for final hearing before me for consideration today after hearing both sides on 01-05-2017 in the presence of Sri M.A.Hameed, Incharge Asst. Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri K.Rama Krishna, Advocate for accused and this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada city, has filed the charge sheet against the accused in Crime No.662/2012 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.

2)The brief facts of the prosecution case as stated below:

The marriage of the defacto-complainant/L.W.1-P.Durga Bhavani, was performed with the accused on 19.11.03 before the elders and they blessed with two daughters and later the accused used to harass her physically and mentally by suspecting her fidelity and also demanded her to bring money from her mother. It is further alleged that the accused sold away her gold jewels and later she purchased the gold with her own money and he demanding her to sold away the gold and behaved like a sadist and she placed the matter before elders and at once Police conducted couselling to the accused but he did not change his attitude.

On the strength of the report of L.W.1, L.W.7M.Vijaya Kumari, Sub

Inspector of Mahila Police station, Vijayawada City registered the same as a

FIR in Crime No.105/14 u/section 498-A IPC and took up investigation. During the course of investigation, he examined the witnesses and recorded their statements and later he arrested the accused on 15.8.14 and sent him for remand and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet. Hence, the charge.

3.This case was taken on file against the Accused for the offence punishable u/section 498-A IPC.

4. On appearance of the accused before this Court, copies of all documents has been furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207

Cr.P.C.

6.During the course of trial, the prosecution in all examined P.W.1 only and got marked Exs.P-1 to P-3.

7.After closure of prosecution side evidence, as there is no incriminating material in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, Section 313

(b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with.

8.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

9.Now the point of determination is that:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

Accused for the offence punishable under section 498-A

IPC beyond all reasonable doubt or not?

10.POINT:P.W.1-P.Durga Bhavani, has deposed she is resident of

Vijayawada. The Accused is her husband and her marriage was performed with the accused about 13 years ago at Vijayawada as per the rites and customs of Hindus and out of wedlock they blessed with two children. She further deposed that in the year 2014, due to some disputes with her husband she went to Police station to make report and by that time the Police obtained her signature under Ex.P-1 on a blank paper, but she does not know what police have scribed on a blank paper. She further clearly deposed that recently the matter was settled outside the Court and now they are residing together under roof. So, in view of the evidence of P.W.1, the learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor for State has given up the evidence of other material witnesses available on record.

12.IN THE RESULT, the accused is found not guilty and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C for the charge u/section 498-A IPC. The bail bonds of the

Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court dated this the 1st day of May, 2017.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BE HALF OF

PROSECUTION: ACCUSED: P.W.1 : P.Durga Bhavani. -NONE-

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Signature of P.W.1 in her report. Ex.P2 : Contents in Report. Ex.P3 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.1.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

-NIL-

MATERIAL OBJECTS

-NIL-

II ACMM,

VJA.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

-CUM-MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA

Calendar Case No : 1163/2014

DATES OF :

01. Offence (prior to): 13-08-2014.

02. Complaint: 15-08-2014.

03. Apprehension of Accused : 15-08-2014.

04. Commencement of Trial: 01-05-2017.

05. Close of Trial: 01-05-2017.

06. Judgment: 01-05-2017.

07. Complainant :The Sub Inspector of Police, Mahila P.s., Vijayawada City.

08. Name of the Accused:Velesila Rajesh, S/o.Rayappa, 37 Years, Caste by Mala, Ayyappanagar, F601, Hanumanpeta, Subrahmainam street, Autonagar, Patamata, Vijayawada.

09. Offence: Under Section 498-A IPC.

10. Plea of Accused.: NOT GUILTY.

11. Finding: FOUND NOT GUILTY.

12. Result : The Accused is found not guilty for the charge u/section 498-A of IPC and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

13. Explanation for delay : This case is taken on file on 26-12-2014 and posted to 24-03-2015. On 22-07-2015 The Accused is present. Copies of case documents were supplied to him as contemplated u/sec.207 Cr.P.C. On 29-04-2017 The Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C a charge u/sec.498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to him, in Telugu language, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution side evidence is commenced from 01-05-2017 and closed on the same day; as there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with. Heard both sides. On 01-05-2017 Judgment pronounced. Hence, the delay.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

Copy Submitted to: The Hon’ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Dis.No. dated:

CC/300184/2014 Acquitted

SHO S.R.PET P.S vs YAMALA SURYANARAYANA

01 May 2017

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE– CUM – MAHILA

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

PRESENT: Ms.D.Lakshmi,

II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-

Cum-Mahila Magistrate, Vijayawada.

Monday, this the 1st day of May, 2017.

C.C.No.184/2014

Between: The State: Sub Inspector of Police, Suryaraopet P.S., Vijayawada City.

...Complainant .

And

Yamala Suryanarayana, S/o.Satyam, Seetharampuram, Vijayawada.

... Accused.

This case is coming on for final hearing before me for consideration today after hearing both sides on 01-05-2017 in the presence of Sri M.A.Hameed, Incharge Asst. Public Prosecutor for the complainant and of Sri G.P.Raju, Advocate for accused and this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Suryaraopet Police Station,

Vijayawada city, has filed the charge sheet against the accused in Crime

No.148/2013 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC.

2)The brief facts of the prosecution case as stated below:

The marriage of L.W.1-Yamala Narasimham, was performed with the accused about 16 Years back and since her marriage the accused used to come to house in drunken state, abuse in filthy language and beat her indiscriminately without giving money for the family maintenance and there by tortured her both physically and mentally. On 14.1.14 at about 17.00 hrs., the accused came to house in drunken state, scuffled with L.W.1, abused and beat her indiscriminately.

On the strength of the report of L.W.1, L.W.5-M.Sambasia Rao, Sub

Inspector of Police, Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada registered a case in 2

Cr.No.17/14 u/sec.498-A IPC and took up investigation. During the course of investigation, he examined the witnesses and recorded their statements and arrested the accused on 16.01.14 and sent him for remand and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet. Hence, the charge.

3.This case was taken on file against the Accused for the offence under section 498-A IPC.

4. On appearance of the accused before this Court, copies of all documents has been furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207

Cr.P.C.

6.During the course of trial, the prosecution in all examined P.W.1 only and got marked Exs.P-1 to P-3.

7.After closure of prosecution side evidence, as there is no incriminating material in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, Section 313

(b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with.

8.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

9.Now the point of determination is that:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

Accused for the offence punishable under section 498-A

IPC beyond all reasonable doubt or not?

10.POINT:P.W.1-Y.Suresh, has deposed he is resident of

Vijayawada. The deceased/L.W.1-Y.Narasamma, is her mother and the

Accused is his father. He further deposed that he does not know the marital disputes between his deceased mother and his father. So, in view of the evidence of P.W.1, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State has given 3 up the evidence of other material witnesses available on record.

11.On perusal of evidence of P.W.1, he did not depose anything against the accused with regard to alleged harassment meted out by the accused towards his mother. Since, P.W.1 turned hostile and go bye his case, it seems to be absolutely no positive evidence revealed to base conviction against the accused. Hence, in view of the above discussion, I hold that prosecution utterly failed to prove the case against the Accused beyond all reasonable doubt.

12.IN THE RESULT, the accused is found not guilty and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C for the charge u/section 498-A IPC. The bail bonds of the

Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-III, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court dated this the 1st day of May, 2017.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BE HALF OF

PROSECUTION: ACCUSED: P.W.1 : Y.Suresh. -NONE-

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of P.W.1.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

-NIL-

MATERIAL OBJECTS

-NIL-

II ACMM,

VJA.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

-CUM-MAHILA MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA

Calendar Case No : 184/2014

DATES OF :

01. Offence (prior to): 14-01-2014.

02. Complaint: 14-01-2014.

03. Apprehension of Accused : 16-01-2014.

04. Commencement of Trial: 01-05-2017.

05. Close of Trial: 01-05-2017.

06. Judgment: 01-05-2017.

07. Complainant :The Sub Inspector of Police, Suryaraopet P.s., Vijayawada City.

08. Name of the Accused:Yamala Suryanarayana, S/o.Satyam, 34 Years, d.No.33-13-8, Kadiyalavari Street, Seetharampuram, Vijayawada.

09. Offence: Under Section 498-A IPC.

10. Plea of Accused.: NOT GUILTY.

11. Finding: FOUND NOT GUILTY.

12. Result : The Accused is found not guilty for the charge u/section 498-A of IPC and he is acquitted u/s 248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of Accused shall continue till disposal of the appeal.

13. Explanation for delay : This case is taken on file on 31-01-2014 and posted to 13-02-2014. On 19-01-016 The Accused is present. Copies of case documents were supplied to him as contemplated u/sec.207 Cr.P.C. On 28-11-2016 The Accused is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C a charge u/sec.498-A IPC is framed, read over and explained to him, in Telugu language, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution side evidence is commenced from 01-05-2017 and closed on the same day; as there is no incriminating material available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses section 313 (b) of Cr.P.C examination is dispensed with. Heard both sides. On 01-05-2017 Judgment pronounced. Hence, the delay.

II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN,

MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.

Copy Submitted to: The Hon’ble Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Dis.No. dated:

Order Record 1,832 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/301285/2012	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs CHEGONDI VENKATASWARARAo	03 May 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/301903/2013	SHO MAHILA P.S vs MULAGADA SUDHEER KUMAR@SUDHEER	02 May 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/300184/2014	SHO S.R.PET P.S vs YAMALA SURYANARAYANA	01 May 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/300403/2013	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs BARRI BALAIAH	01 May 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
CC/301163/2014	SHO MAHILA P.S vs VELESILA RAJESH	01 May 2017	Judgment	Acquitted
JCC/300078/2012	SHO Machavaram P.S vs Kopila Sudarshan	28 Apr 2017	Order	—
CC/300055/2017	The Station House Officer, Krishnalanka, Police Station vs MIITTINA KRISHNA	25 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/300216/2012	Station House Officer. vs Golla Satyanarayana	24 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/300697/2008	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs LANKAPALLI MURALI MOHAN	24 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/301092/2011	SHO vs MD SHABBEER	24 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
JCC/300004/2014	SHO S.N.PURAM P.S vs YADAVALLI RAJESH	17 Mar 2017	Order	—
JCC/300110/2015	SHO BANTUMILLI PS vs GUDAVALLI CHAKRADHARA RAO@CHAKRI	17 Mar 2017	Order	—
JCC/300148/2016	SHO VEERULAPADU PS vs JAKKI VENKATESH	17 Mar 2017	Order	—
JCC/300119/2009	S H O NUNNA RURAL PS vs Kopella Sudarsan @ bachi	15 Mar 2017	Order	—
CC/300470/2012	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs MOGADATI BABU	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/300615/2012	SHO Krishna Lanka P.S vs Kallam Ramreddy	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/300861/2010	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs Vsmalapati lakshmi reddy	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/300946/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs KONDADASU NAGA GOVARDHAN KUMAR	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
JCC/300103/2016	SHO NUZVID TOWN PS vs CHITTALURU MANIKANTA	10 Mar 2017	Order	—
JCC/300111/2016	SHO A.KONDURU PS vs GANJI GOPAYYA	08 Mar 2017	Order	—
CC/300590/2010	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs KILARAPU RAMA RAO	07 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/301246/2012	II TOWN P.S vs CHINTALAPUDI VIJAY KUMAR	07 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/301496/2012	SHO KRIHNALANKA P.S vs SHAIK SHAN MAS	07 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/301273/2011	STATION HOUSE OFICER vs Indupalli Munna	06 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
PRC/300015/2016	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs KOSURI SRIDEVI	06 Mar 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300141/2016	SHO MYLAVARAM PS vs MALLADI RAVINDRA BABU	03 Mar 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300124/2016	SHO JAGGAIAHPET PS vs MONDITOKA CHINNA SYDULU	02 Mar 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300133/2016	SHO S.R.PET PS vs PUKARAM @PRAKASH	02 Mar 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300160/2016	SHO A.S.NAGAR PS vs SAANI CHANDU	02 Mar 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301308/2012	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs DULLA JASHUVA	28 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301606/2012	SHO II TOWN P.S vs PAGOLU SATYA SAI SRIDHAR	28 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/300013/2015	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs MADALA VENKATA RAO	28 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/300014/2016	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs REBBA RAJESH	28 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300143/2012	Station House Officer. vs Ponnganti Pushpa Sri Haridhar@ Hari.	27 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301157/2011	SHO vs JUJJAVARAPU SURESH	27 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301203/2011	SHO vs Nimmakuri Subramaneyeswara Rao	27 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300631/2012	SHO MAHILA P.S vs Petha Pothu Raju	25 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301040/2013	SHO I TOWN P.S vs BOYI DURGA PRASAD	25 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301192/2011	SHO vs Pedikiti Koteswara Rao	25 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300059/2016	SHO GUDIVADA I TOWN PS vs KAILA RAKESH	23 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300110/2016	SHO I TOWN PS vs J1-GOLI VENKATA LAXMIKANTH	23 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300142/2016	SHO GAMPALAGUDEM PS vs KALYANAM VAMSI	22 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/300001/2014	SHO KRISHNALANKA P.S vs SHAIK MOHAMMAD ALI @ALI	21 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300006/2015	SHO AJITHSINGH NAGAR P.S vs KORAGANTI MISHAC	17 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300018/2015	SHO MACHILIPATNAM PS vs BEZAWADA SAIBABU@SAI	15 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300037/2015	SHO MACHAVARAM PS vs THAMMISETTY HEMANTH KUMAR	15 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300139/2016	SHO PAMIDIMUKKALA PS vs CHUDURU UMA POLESWARARAO	15 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300144/2016	SHO MACHILIPATNAM PS vs PAMARTHI SIVADURGA GANESH @GANESH	15 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300042/2012	Station House Officer vs Pasi Venkata Durgarao.	14 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300736/2014	SHO UNGUTURU P.S vs PATHAN PEDDA ALI KHAN	14 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301173/2013	SHO Penamaluru P.S vs ANGALURI VENKATA NAGA VYKUNTESWARA RAO	14 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301315/2012	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs ABDUL KHAIDER	14 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300647/2012	SHO II TOWN P.S vs Ranimekala Krishna	13 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300705/2013	SHO II TOWN P.S vs SHAIK BAJI SYDA	13 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300766/2012	SHO Penamaluru P.S vs Majji saleem	13 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300807/2013	SHO II TOWN P.S vs SHAIK BAAJI	13 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/300016/2016	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs THIRUMALASETTI SAMPATH	13 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300359/2012	SHO vs Velivela Naveen Chowdary	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300507/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs BANDI ESWARA RAO	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300685/2010	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs CHILLIMUNTHA RADHA KRISHNA	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300784/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs MAREDDY PRASAD	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300979/2011	STATION HOUSE OFF ICER vs BUDDALA THIMOTHI	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301242/2011	SHO vs Cheedarla Babu Rao	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301605/2012	SHO II TOWN P.S vs SYANANETI KRISHNA MOHAN	07 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300198/2016	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs PENDEM VIJAYA KUMAR	04 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300944/2012	SHO I TOWN P.S vs THAMMISETTY PRABHUDASU	04 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301222/2011	SHO vs Syed Basha	04 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301660/2012	SHO KRISHNA LANKA P.S vs SHAIK CHAN BASHA	04 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300039/2016	SHO HANUMAN JUNCTION PS vs NIMMAKURI SRINIVAS @SRINIVAS RAO	02 Feb 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300005/2012	Station House Officer vs Nendra rajesh.	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300055/2013	SHO KRIHNALANKA P.S vs KUTHADI NANCHARAIAH@VIKAS	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300272/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs Vspedagopuram chinna	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300638/2012	SHO SURYARAOPET P.S vs Pagolu Anil Prashanth Babu	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300827/2012	SHO II TOWN P.S vs GEDELA SURYANARAYANA	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301030/2011	SHO vs GUMMADI NAGARAJU	31 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301014/2011	SHO vs SUNKARA VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO	30 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301077/2011	SHO vs BAVIREDDY VINAY	30 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300041/2013	SHO KRIHNALANKA P.S vs DUVVRI GOPALA KRISHNA	24 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300055/2015	SHO MAHILA P.S vs MUPPIRISETTI SRINIVASA RAO	24 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300293/2013	SHO II Town P.S vs TEEGALA UPENDRA	24 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300524/2014	SHO II TOWN P.S vs SHAIK JILANI	24 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301090/2011	SHO vs KONAGAMALA VENKATA PADMANABHA RAO	24 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300322/2012	SHO vs Shaik Alli Saheb	21 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300045/2014	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs NALLAVARAPU MOUNIKA	21 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300049/2010	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs Magam Srinivas @ Srinu	21 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
JCC/300095/2016	SHO AVANIGADDA PS vs KOKKILAGADDA SRI VENKATA NARASIMHA SWAMI	21 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300086/2012	Gannavaram PS vs Desavath. Harichandra Naik	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300450/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER vs PATHAN NAZEER KHAN	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300682/2013	SHO PENAMALURU P.S vs KANCHARLA SRINIVAS	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300888/2011	SK.FHATIMA vs SK. RAFI	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301667/2012	SHO S.R.PET P.S vs PULLAREDDY THIRUPATHI RAO	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/300022/2016	SHO KRISHNALANKA PS vs GUJJULA CHENNA REDDY	17 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300108/2012	Station House Officer. vs Sk. Mujeer	16 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300138/2014	SHO MAHILA P.S vs PUNDROTHU RAMA KRISHNA	16 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300227/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICE vs Vsaddanki murali @murali manohar	16 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300969/2013	SHO Gannavaram P.S vs Vemu Naga Raju	16 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301326/2011	STATION HOUSE OFFICER. vs EEDA NARESH.	16 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/300845/2014	SHO KRISHNALANKA P.S vs VELLANKI VENKATA KRISHNA RAO	10 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301420/2013	SHO MAHILA P.S vs MOHAMMAD GOUSE	10 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/301529/2012	SHO I TOWN P.S vs MUNISWAMY PANDU RANGADU@PANDU	10 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—

Showing 100 of 1,832 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2017		5
Apr 2017		5
Mar 2017		19
Feb 2017		40
Jan 2017		44
Dec 2016		42
Nov 2016		15
Oct 2016		36
Sep 2016		53
Aug 2016		29
Jul 2016		43
Jun 2016		42

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., handled?

Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., has handled 1861 court orders since 2014 at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada. The average disposal rate is 50 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., hear?

Based on available records, Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada.

Where is Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., currently posted?

Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., is posted as II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., dispose cases?

Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., disposes approximately 50 cases per month, based on 1861 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada.

Since when is Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., serving?

Ms.D.Lakshmi B.Sc., M.L., has been serving at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada since 2014.

Case Types

CC 79%

JCC 18%

PRC 3%

Posting History

Mar 2014 — May 2017

II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada · 1,861 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 5

Other Judges at this Court

M.Suneel Kumar

II Addl. District Judge-cum- Metropolitan Sessions...

15 orders

Smt. L. Thejovathi

III Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

0 orders

K.neelima

IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

0 orders

G.Rajeswari

V Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

686 orders

Bandela Abraham

VII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) V...

620 orders

N.padmavathi

VIII Additional District and Session Judge (FTC)...

3 orders

Sri G.Subrahmanyam

XII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC)...

3 orders

Smt M.Sudha

XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC)...

7 orders

Smt K. Madhavi Devi

Principal Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

218 orders

Smt.K.Vani

I Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri S.Venkateswara Reddy

II Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

458 orders

Smt.k.aruna

III Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

0 orders

Smt.M.Satya Kumari

IV Addl Senior Civil Judge cum V ACMM Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri K.P. Sai Ram

VI Addl Senior Civil Judge Vajayawada

408 orders

Sri.Ch.L.Srinivasa Rao

VII Addl Senior Civil Judge Vajayawada

377 orders

Sri Chapala Srinivasa Babu

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Metropolitan Magis...

1,336 orders

Ms. G.devika

I Addl Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Additional Metr...

301 orders

Sri S.Srikanth

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum- II Additional Met...

0 orders

Shaik Rehana

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- III Additional...

969 orders

T.anjani S.s.rama Aditya Rishik

IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- IV Additional M...

600 orders

Smt P Santhi

V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Addition...

0 orders

B Radha Rani

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,518 orders

M.S.Karimulla

I Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,985 orders

Smt.Nettem Radhika

II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

319 orders

Sri.P.Tirumala Rao

III Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,555 orders

Sri U.Ram Mohan

IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

15 orders

Sri.Marapu Sridhar

VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawad...

0 orders

Sri P.Ramana Reddy

IX Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada

0 orders

KP Sai Ram

XI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri Kandepu Seeta Rama Krishna Rao

Special Judge for CBI Cases, Vijayawada

125 orders

A.anitha

Spl. Judge for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to...

18 orders

N Radhika

Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board Vijaya...

70 orders

Kampa Jayalakshmi

Special Judge for POCSO Act Vijayawada.

0 orders

Sri G.Bhupal Reddy

Special Judge for Commercial Disputes Vijayawada

28 orders

← View all judges at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada