Smt. Deepa Kasaragadda

1

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KHAMMAM

This the 26th day of August, 2025

Present: K. Deepa, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. FAC: I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

O.S No. 317 of 2025

Between:-

1. Dugyala Veera Swamy, S/o. Venkaiah, Age: 54 years, Occ: Fisherman

2. Dugyala Harish, S/o. Veera Swamy Age: 28 years, Occ: Student

3. Dugyala Vasu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Age 26 years, Occ: Private employee All are resident of H.No.2-40, Ramalayam Veedi, Konijerla village and Mandal, Khammam District.

...Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Konijerla

2. To whomsoever it may concern.

...Defendants

This suit came before me for final hearing on 20.08.2025 in the presence of Sri K. Kishore Ambethkar, learned counsel for the plaintiffs; Defendants No.1 and 2 set exparte; upon perusing the material papers available on record, upon hearing and having stood over for consideration, till this day; this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed under Order VII, Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 26 of

CPC for the relief of declaration with a prayer to declare the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of one Dugyala Mangamma and to grant any other relief or reliefs.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are that:

The plaintiff No.1 is the husband of Late Dugyala Mangamma and the plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are the sons of Late Dugyala Mangamma and 2

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma, who died on 19.01.2025 in an accident by leaving behind the plaintiffs as her legal heirs, except the plaintiff, there are no other legal heirs to the deceased Dugyala

Mangamma. On 04.02.2025 the plaintiffs approached the Tahsildar, Konijerla i.e. defendant No.1 in order to obtain the legal heir certificate of one

Dugyala Mangamma, but the defendant No.1 refused to give the said certificate stating that it will be given only to the government employees, but not to private persons, since the deceased was not government employee and she was an agricultural coolie, the legal heir certificate was not issued to the plaintiff, but the office of defendant No.1 advised the plaintiff to approach the competent court for remedy, as such the the plaintiffs are constrained to file the present suit.

3.After registering the suit, the summons of defendant No.2 was issued by way of substitute service in paper publication, but no one come forward with any objection and the suit summons were issued to defendant

No.1 and the same was served on him and was held sufficient service and inspite of receiving the same, they did not appear before this Court and hence the defendants No.1 and 2 were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff No.1 got examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A5 in support of his claim.

5.Heard the arguments.

6.Now, the point for consideration is:

3

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief as prayed for?

POINT:

7.The plaintiff No.1 examined himself as PW1 and reiterated the contents of the plaint in his chief examination affidavit and got marked

Ex.A1 to A5 on his behalf i.e., Ex.A1 is the original death certificate of

Dugyala Mangamma, dt.08.02.2025, Ex.A2 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of deceased person (compared with original), Ex.A3 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.1 (compared with original), Ex.A4 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.2 (compared with original) and

Ex.A5 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.3 (compared with original). On perusal of Ex.A1 the death of Dugyala Mangamma was established. On perusal of Ex.A2 to Ex.A5 it reveals that PW1, plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are husband and sons of deceased Dugyala Mangamma and the evidence of PW1 was remained unchallenged and unrebutted. The unchallenged testimony of the PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to A5 are consistent, cogent and trustworthy and further it establishes that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma and thus the evidence of PW1 coupled with the documentary evidence proves that the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief prayed for.

8.In the result, the suit of the plaintiffs are decreed, by declaring the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma.

However it is made clear that as per the Sec.35 of Specific Relief Act, the judgment is binding only on the parties to the suit, but not on the third 4

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

parties. There shall be no order as to costs.

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 26th day of August, 2025.

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For Plaintiffs: For Defendants:

P.W.1: Dugyala Harish -Exparte-

Documents marked

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A1: is the original death certificate of Dugyala Mangamma, dt.08.02.2025

Ex.A2: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of deceased person (compared with original)

Ex.A3: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.1 (compared with original)

Ex.A4: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.2 (compared with original)

Ex.A5: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.3 (compared with original)

For Defendants:

-NIL-

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

5

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KHAMMAM

This the 26th day of August, 2025

Present: K. Deepa, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. FAC: I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

O.S No. 317 of 2025

Presented on:25.04.2025 Filed on:25.04.2025

Between:-

1. Dugyala Veera Swamy, S/o. Venkaiah, Age: 54 years, Occ: Fisherman

2. Dugyala Harish, S/o. Veera Swamy Age: 28 years, Occ: Student

3. Dugyala Vasu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Age 26 years, Occ: Private employee All are resident of H.No.2-40, Ramalayam Veedi, Konijerla village and Mandal, Khammam District.

...Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Konijerla

2. To whomsoever it may concern.

...Defendants

CLAIM FOR: This suit is filed for declaration to declare the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 as legal heirs of Dugyala Mangamma, who died on 19.01.2025.

CAUSE OF ACTION AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION:

The cause of action arose on 19.01.2025 when Dugyala Mangamma was died and on 04.02.2025 when the plaintiffs approached the office of Tahsildar, Konijerla and authorities refused to issue legal heir certificate and the cause of action is continuing one.

VALUATION OF THE SUIT AND COURT FEE: The relief of declaration is notionally valued at Rs.10,000/- upon which a court fee of Rs.786/- is paid under Section 24 (d) of T.S.C.F. and S.V.Act.

DECREE: This suit came before me for final hearing on 20.08.2025 in the presence of Sri K. Kishore Ambethkar, learned counsel for the plaintiffs; Defendants No.1 and 2 set exparte; upon perusing the material papers available on record, stood over for consideration; this court doth order and 6

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

decree:

1.That the suit be and is hereby decreed without costs, by declaring the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala

Mangamma. However it is made clear that as per the Sec.35 of Specific

Relief Act, the judgment is binding only on the parties to the suit, but not on the third parties. There shall be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court, on this the 26th day of August, 2025.

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

PARTICULARS OF COSTS

Sl.FOR PLAINTIFFS FOR DEFENDANTS No.No.1 to 3 No.1 and 2 1Stamps on plaintE 2Stamps on power X 3stamps on processP 4Stamps on petitionsA 5Publication chargesR 6Stamps on documentsT 7Advocate feeE 8Misc. & type charges -

Total-

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

1

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KHAMMAM

This the 26th day of August, 2025

Present: K. Deepa, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. FAC: I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

O.S No. 317 of 2025

Between:-

1. Dugyala Veera Swamy, S/o. Venkaiah, Age: 54 years, Occ: Fisherman

2. Dugyala Harish, S/o. Veera Swamy Age: 28 years, Occ: Student

3. Dugyala Vasu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Age 26 years, Occ: Private employee All are resident of H.No.2-40, Ramalayam Veedi, Konijerla village and Mandal, Khammam District.

...Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Konijerla

2. To whomsoever it may concern.

...Defendants

This suit came before me for final hearing on 20.08.2025 in the presence of Sri K. Kishore Ambethkar, learned counsel for the plaintiffs; Defendants No.1 and 2 set exparte; upon perusing the material papers available on record, upon hearing and having stood over for consideration, till this day; this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed under Order VII, Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 26 of

CPC for the relief of declaration with a prayer to declare the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of one Dugyala Mangamma and to grant any other relief or reliefs.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are that:

The plaintiff No.1 is the husband of Late Dugyala Mangamma and the plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are the sons of Late Dugyala Mangamma and 2

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma, who died on 19.01.2025 in an accident by leaving behind the plaintiffs as her legal heirs, except the plaintiff, there are no other legal heirs to the deceased Dugyala

Mangamma. On 04.02.2025 the plaintiffs approached the Tahsildar, Konijerla i.e. defendant No.1 in order to obtain the legal heir certificate of one

Dugyala Mangamma, but the defendant No.1 refused to give the said certificate stating that it will be given only to the government employees, but not to private persons, since the deceased was not government employee and she was an agricultural coolie, the legal heir certificate was not issued to the plaintiff, but the office of defendant No.1 advised the plaintiff to approach the competent court for remedy, as such the the plaintiffs are constrained to file the present suit.

3.After registering the suit, the summons of defendant No.2 was issued by way of substitute service in paper publication, but no one come forward with any objection and the suit summons were issued to defendant

No.1 and the same was served on him and was held sufficient service and inspite of receiving the same, they did not appear before this Court and hence the defendants No.1 and 2 were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff No.1 got examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A5 in support of his claim.

5.Heard the arguments.

6.Now, the point for consideration is:

3

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief as prayed for?

POINT:

7.The plaintiff No.1 examined himself as PW1 and reiterated the contents of the plaint in his chief examination affidavit and got marked

Ex.A1 to A5 on his behalf i.e., Ex.A1 is the original death certificate of

Dugyala Mangamma, dt.08.02.2025, Ex.A2 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of deceased person (compared with original), Ex.A3 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.1 (compared with original), Ex.A4 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.2 (compared with original) and

Ex.A5 is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.3 (compared with original). On perusal of Ex.A1 the death of Dugyala Mangamma was established. On perusal of Ex.A2 to Ex.A5 it reveals that PW1, plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are husband and sons of deceased Dugyala Mangamma and the evidence of PW1 was remained unchallenged and unrebutted. The unchallenged testimony of the PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to A5 are consistent, cogent and trustworthy and further it establishes that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma and thus the evidence of PW1 coupled with the documentary evidence proves that the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief prayed for.

8.In the result, the suit of the plaintiffs are decreed, by declaring the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala Mangamma.

However it is made clear that as per the Sec.35 of Specific Relief Act, the judgment is binding only on the parties to the suit, but not on the third 4

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

parties. There shall be no order as to costs.

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 26th day of August, 2025.

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For Plaintiffs: For Defendants:

P.W.1: Dugyala Harish -Exparte-

Documents marked

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A1: is the original death certificate of Dugyala Mangamma, dt.08.02.2025

Ex.A2: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of deceased person (compared with original)

Ex.A3: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.1 (compared with original)

Ex.A4: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.2 (compared with original)

Ex.A5: is the photostat copy of aadhar card of plaintiff No.3 (compared with original)

For Defendants:

-NIL-

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

5

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KHAMMAM

This the 26th day of August, 2025

Present: K. Deepa, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. FAC: I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

O.S No. 317 of 2025

Presented on:25.04.2025 Filed on:25.04.2025

Between:-

1. Dugyala Veera Swamy, S/o. Venkaiah, Age: 54 years, Occ: Fisherman

2. Dugyala Harish, S/o. Veera Swamy Age: 28 years, Occ: Student

3. Dugyala Vasu, S/o. Veera Swamy, Age 26 years, Occ: Private employee All are resident of H.No.2-40, Ramalayam Veedi, Konijerla village and Mandal, Khammam District.

...Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Konijerla

2. To whomsoever it may concern.

...Defendants

CLAIM FOR: This suit is filed for declaration to declare the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 as legal heirs of Dugyala Mangamma, who died on 19.01.2025.

CAUSE OF ACTION AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION:

The cause of action arose on 19.01.2025 when Dugyala Mangamma was died and on 04.02.2025 when the plaintiffs approached the office of Tahsildar, Konijerla and authorities refused to issue legal heir certificate and the cause of action is continuing one.

VALUATION OF THE SUIT AND COURT FEE: The relief of declaration is notionally valued at Rs.10,000/- upon which a court fee of Rs.786/- is paid under Section 24 (d) of T.S.C.F. and S.V.Act.

DECREE: This suit came before me for final hearing on 20.08.2025 in the presence of Sri K. Kishore Ambethkar, learned counsel for the plaintiffs; Defendants No.1 and 2 set exparte; upon perusing the material papers available on record, stood over for consideration; this court doth order and 6

O.S No.317 of 2025, dated 26.08.2025

decree:

1.That the suit be and is hereby decreed without costs, by declaring the plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of Late Dugyala

Mangamma. However it is made clear that as per the Sec.35 of Specific

Relief Act, the judgment is binding only on the parties to the suit, but not on the third parties. There shall be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court, on this the 26th day of August, 2025.

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

PARTICULARS OF COSTS

Sl.FOR PLAINTIFFS FOR DEFENDANTS No.No.1 to 3 No.1 and 2 1Stamps on plaintE 2Stamps on power X 3stamps on processP 4Stamps on petitionsA 5Publication chargesR 6Stamps on documentsT 7Advocate feeE 8Misc. & type charges -

Total-

FAC: I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

TSKH030020622026

Presented on : 28-03-2026 Registered on : 28-03-2026 Decided on : 28-03-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khammam

AT KHAMMAM URBAN ,KHAMMAM

(Presided Over by JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

STC/440/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): PS Thirumalayapalem Through Police Station Officer , Thirumalayapalem

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

PS Thirumalayapalem VERSUS : SK. Mahabub Pasha Age: 0 Occupation : Thirumalayapalem ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: , Advocate for appearing for SK. Mahabub Pasha Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 285 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

ORDER

Taken on file for the offence punishable u/sec. 285 BNS against the accused. Issue special summons to the accused U/Sec.229 BNSS, 2023, directing to appear before this court on 28.03.2026 either in person or by his pleader or if he desires to plead guilty to the charge without appearing before this court he may transmit by post or by message the said plea in writing and the fine of Rs.50/- to this court. Summons served. Report filed accused pleaded guilty. Guilt plea appears to be voluntary and the accused is convicted u/Sec. 275 BNSS., for offence u/Sec.285 BNS and the office is directed to collect the fine which is transmitted by accused along with lead of guilty and remit it to Government and issue fine receipt to that effect.

Date : 28-03-2026 (JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH030020662026

Presented on : 28-03-2026 Registered on : 28-03-2026 Decided on : 28-03-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khammam

AT KHAMMAM URBAN ,KHAMMAM

(Presided Over by JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

STC/444/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): PS Thirumalayapalem Through Police Station Officer , Thirumalayapalem

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

PS Thirumalayapalem VERSUS : P. Shankar Lal Age: 0 Occupation : Thirumalayapalem ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: , Advocate for appearing for P. Shankar Lal Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 285 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

ORDER

Taken on file for the offence punishable u/sec. 285 BNS against the accused. Issue special summons to the accused U/Sec.229 BNSS, 2023, directing to appear before this court on 28.03.2026 either in person or by his pleader or if he desires to plead guilty to the charge without appearing before this court he may transmit by post or by message the said plea in writing and the fine of Rs.50/- to this court. Summons served. Report filed accused pleaded guilty. Guilt plea appears to be voluntary and the accused is convicted u/Sec. 275 BNSS., for offence u/Sec.285 BNS and the office is directed to collect the fine which is transmitted by accused along with lead of guilty and remit it to Government and issue fine receipt to that effect.

Date : 28-03-2026 (JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH030020632026

Presented on : 28-03-2026 Registered on : 28-03-2026 Decided on : 28-03-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khammam

AT KHAMMAM URBAN ,KHAMMAM

(Presided Over by JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

STC/441/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): Ps Thirumalayapalem Through Police Station Officer , Thirumalayapalem

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Ps Thirumalayapalem VERSUS : Somanath Babu Age: 0 Occupation : Thirumalayapalem ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: , Advocate for appearing for Somanath Babu Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 285 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

ORDER

Taken on file for the offence punishable u/sec. 285 BNS against the accused. Issue special summons to the accused U/Sec.229 BNSS, 2023, directing to appear before this court on 28.03.2026 either in person or by his pleader or if he desires to plead guilty to the charge without appearing before this court he may transmit by post or by message the said plea in writing and the fine of Rs.50/- to this court. Summons served. Report filed accused pleaded guilty. Guilt plea appears to be voluntary and the accused is convicted u/Sec. 275 BNSS., for offence u/Sec.285 BNS and the office is directed to collect the fine which is transmitted by accused along with lead of guilty and remit it to Government and issue fine receipt to that effect.

Date : 26-03-2026 (JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(JYOTHIRMAI KAKUMANI)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS