Sri. K. Jamaleswara Rao

1

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT

KHAMMAM.

Friday, the 28th day of February, 2020.

Present:- Sri K. JAMALESWARA RAO,

Judge, Family Court,

Khammam.

F.C.O.P No. 265 of 2019

Between:

1.Palapati @ Kesetti Neeraja W/o Palapati Kranthi Kumar, D/o Kesetti Venkateswarlu, Age: 35 years, Occ: Household, R/o H.No.7-3-330, near Amba Bhavani Temple, Ricob Bazar, Khammam City and District.

And

2.Palapati Kranthi Kumar S/o Appala Swamy, Age: 38 years, Occ: Lab Technician, R/o Manuguru Town, Bhadradri Kotha- -gudem District.

...Petitioners

*** This petition came before me for hearing on this day in the presence of Sri Ravula Venkat, Advocate for the petitioners; upon perusing the material papers on record; having heard the Counsel for the petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This petition is fled under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners praying to dissolve their marriage dated 11.05.2003 by granting decree of divorce on mutual consent.

2.The averments of the petition, in brief, are that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of petitioner No.2 herein and their marriage was performed on 11.05.2003 at Yellandu, Khammam District, as per the rites and customs prevailing in Hindu Community. Immediately after the marriage, petitioner No.1 joined the company of petitioner No.2 and that their marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock they have blessed with a female child. It is averred that thereafter some disputes and differences were arose in between them and they are not living happily and 2 due to disputes they are not leading marital life for the last four years. That inspite of elders mediation, the disputes could not be resolved. That the petitioners are residing separately from January, 2017. All the efforts made by the parents of petitioners to settle the disputes amicably, were went in vain. Thereafter, the elders advised the petitioners to take divorce legally. It is further averred that, as per the advise of elders, the petitioners with consent of their respective parents have agreed to take divorce on some terms and conditions in between them. Hence, the petition.

3.On behalf of the petitioners, the 1st petitioner examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.P.1 & P.2 and 2nd petitioner examined as PW.2 and got marked Ex.P.3 documents.

4.Heard the counsel for petitioners. Perused the record.

5.POINT:-Whether the petitioners are entitled for decree of divorce on mutual consent as prayed ?

The petition was registered on 21.12.2019. That the parties sought for waiver of the statutory period of Six months, that an endeavor is made

before the mediator to unite the parties, that the parties struck to their

opinion to live separately, that to keep pending the proceedings would further aggravate the agony of the parties, the Six months period is waived.

Both the petitioners appeared before this court and they fled their respective chief afdavits as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Exs.P.1 to P.3.

Both parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent. In these circumstances, as the marriage in between the petitioners is not bearing fruits/working out, it is a ft case to dissolve the marriage in between the petitioners by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent. By virtue of 3 evidence of PWs.1 and 2, it is proved that they have been living separately from January, 2017. It has also been proved that they have not been able to live together. It could also be discerned from the chief examination afdavits of PWs.1 and 2 that in the above circumstances they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

6.In the result, the petition is allowed. Decree of divorce by mutual consent is granted and the marriage in between the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2, dated 11.05.2003 is hereby dissolved.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this, the 28th day of February, 2020.

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner No.1:For Petitioner No.2:

PW-1: Palapati @ Kesetti Neeraja PW-2: Palapati Kranthi Kumar

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PETITIONERS

For Petitioner No.1:

Ex.P-1:- Copy of Marriage Certifcate Ex.P-2:- Copy of Adhar Card of 1st petitioner (Verifed with Original)

For Petitioner No.2:

Ex.P-3:- Copy of Adhar Card of 2nd petitioner (Verifed with Original)

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

Read by:

Compared by:

1

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT

KHAMMAM.

Friday, the 28th day of February, 2020.

Present:- Sri K. JAMALESWARA RAO,

Judge, Family Court,

Khammam.

F.C.O.P No. 253 of 2019

Between:

1.Aakina Swathi W/o Naveenkumar, Aged 30 years, Occ: Household, R/o H.No. 304, Surya Towers, Rotary Nagar, Khammam Town and District.

And

2.Aakina Naveenkumar S/o Vasanthkumar @ Srinivasa Rao, Aged 32 years, Occ: Surveyor, R/o H.No.21-114, Siddhardha BC Colony, Chinnagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

*** This petition came before me for hearing on this day in the presence of Sri Vallala Srinivas and S. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners; upon perusing the material papers on record; having heard the Counsel for the petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This petition is fled under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners praying to dissolve their marriage dated 14.02.2013 by granting decree of divorce on mutual consent.

2.The averments of the petition, in brief, are that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of petitioner No.2 herein and their marriage was performed on 14.02.2013 Lakshmichandra Gardens, Khammam, as per the rites and customs prevailing in Hindu Community. Immediately after the marriage, petitioner No.1 joined the company of petitioner No.2 and that their marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock they have no issues.

It is averred that thereafter some disputes and diferences were arose in 2 between them and they are not living happily and due to disputes they are not leading marital life. That inspite of elders mediation, the disputes could not be resolved. That the petitioners are residing separately. All the eforts made by the parents of petitioners to settle the disputes amicably, were went in vain. Thereafter, the elders advised the petitioners to take divorce legally. It is further averred that, as per the advise of elders, the petitioners with consent of their respective parents have agreed to take divorce on some terms and conditions in between them. Hence, the petition.

3.On behalf of the petitioners, the 1st petitioner examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.P.1 to P.3 and 2nd petitioner examined as PW.2 and got marked Ex.P.4 documents.

4.Heard the counsel for petitioners. Perused the record.

5.POINT:-Whether the petitioners are entitled for decree of divorce on mutual consent as prayed ?

The petition was registered on 12.12.2019. That the parties sought for waiver of the statutory period of Six months, that an endeavor is made

before the mediator to unite the parties, that the parties struck to their

opinion to live separately, that to keep pending the proceedings would further aggravate the agony of the parties, the Six months period is waived.

Both the petitioners appeared before this court and they fled their respective chief afdavits as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Exs. P.1 to P.4.

Both parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent. In these circumstances, as the marriage in between the petitioners is not bearing fruits/working out, it is a ft case to dissolve the marriage in between the petitioners by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent. By virtue of 3 evidence of PWs.1 and 2, it is proved that they have been living separately.

It has also been proved that they have not been able to live together. It could also be discerned from the chief examination afdavits of PWs.1 and 2 that in the above circumstances they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

6.In the result, the petition is allowed. Decree of divorce by mutual consent is granted and the marriage in between the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2, dated 14.02.2013 is hereby dissolved.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this, the 28th day of February, 2020.

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner No.1:For Petitioner No.2:

PW-1: Aakina SwathiPW-2: Aakina Naveenkumar

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PETITIONERS

For Petitioner No.1:

Ex.P-1:- Wedding Card Ex.P.2:- Marriage Photos Ex.P-3:- Copy of Adhar Card of 1st petitioner (Verifed with Original)

For Petitioner No.2:

Ex.P-4:- Copy of Adhar Card of 2nd petitioner (Verifed with Original)

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

Read by:

Compared by:

1

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT

KHAMMAM.

Friday, the 28th day of February, 2020.

Present:- Sri K. JAMALESWARA RAO,

Judge, Family Court,

Khammam.

F.C.O.P No. 253 of 2019

Between:

1.Aakina Swathi W/o Naveenkumar, Aged 30 years, Occ: Household, R/o H.No. 304, Surya Towers, Rotary Nagar, Khammam Town and District.

And

2.Aakina Naveenkumar S/o Vasanthkumar @ Srinivasa Rao, Aged 32 years, Occ: Surveyor, R/o H.No.21-114, Siddhardha BC Colony, Chinnagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioners

*** This petition came before me for hearing on this day in the presence of Sri Vallala Srinivas and S. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners; upon perusing the material papers on record; having heard the Counsel for the petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This petition is fled under Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners praying to dissolve their marriage dated 14.02.2013 by granting decree of divorce on mutual consent.

2.The averments of the petition, in brief, are that the petitioner No.1 is the legally wedded wife of petitioner No.2 herein and their marriage was performed on 14.02.2013 Lakshmichandra Gardens, Khammam, as per the rites and customs prevailing in Hindu Community. Immediately after the marriage, petitioner No.1 joined the company of petitioner No.2 and that their marriage was consummated. Out of their wedlock they have no issues.

It is averred that thereafter some disputes and diferences were arose in 2 between them and they are not living happily and due to disputes they are not leading marital life. That inspite of elders mediation, the disputes could not be resolved. That the petitioners are residing separately. All the eforts made by the parents of petitioners to settle the disputes amicably, were went in vain. Thereafter, the elders advised the petitioners to take divorce legally. It is further averred that, as per the advise of elders, the petitioners with consent of their respective parents have agreed to take divorce on some terms and conditions in between them. Hence, the petition.

3.On behalf of the petitioners, the 1st petitioner examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs.P.1 to P.3 and 2nd petitioner examined as PW.2 and got marked Ex.P.4 documents.

4.Heard the counsel for petitioners. Perused the record.

5.POINT:-Whether the petitioners are entitled for decree of divorce on mutual consent as prayed ?

The petition was registered on 12.12.2019. That the parties sought for waiver of the statutory period of Six months, that an endeavor is made

before the mediator to unite the parties, that the parties struck to their

opinion to live separately, that to keep pending the proceedings would further aggravate the agony of the parties, the Six months period is waived.

Both the petitioners appeared before this court and they fled their respective chief afdavits as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Exs. P.1 to P.4.

Both parties agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent. In these circumstances, as the marriage in between the petitioners is not bearing fruits/working out, it is a ft case to dissolve the marriage in between the petitioners by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent. By virtue of 3 evidence of PWs.1 and 2, it is proved that they have been living separately.

It has also been proved that they have not been able to live together. It could also be discerned from the chief examination afdavits of PWs.1 and 2 that in the above circumstances they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

6.In the result, the petition is allowed. Decree of divorce by mutual consent is granted and the marriage in between the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2, dated 14.02.2013 is hereby dissolved.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this, the 28th day of February, 2020.

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner No.1:For Petitioner No.2:

PW-1: Aakina SwathiPW-2: Aakina Naveenkumar

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PETITIONERS

For Petitioner No.1:

Ex.P-1:- Wedding Card Ex.P.2:- Marriage Photos Ex.P-3:- Copy of Adhar Card of 1st petitioner (Verifed with Original)

For Petitioner No.2:

Ex.P-4:- Copy of Adhar Card of 2nd petitioner (Verifed with Original)

JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,

KHAMMAM.

Read by:

Compared by:

TSKH000028782017

Presented on : 13-03-2017 Registered on : 14-03-2018 Decided on : 27-02-2020 Duration : 2 years, 11 months, 14 days

IN THE COURT OF

Judge, Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Khammam AT ,KHAMMAM

EP/100088/2018

Sriram city union fin.ltd. by its Holder, K.SRinivasulu Age: 37 Address: R/o.Khammam. VERSUS Gugulothu Balaji and 2 other Age: 32 Address: R/o.H.No.7-2-3, Mekala thanda, Karepally mandal. 2:Nunavath Ravi R/o.H.No.8-79 Gangaram thanda gate karepally Singareni Mandal 3:Somandula Ramavath R/o.2-79 Bharath nagar Karepally ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : P.Karunakar Rao Advocate for : appearing for Gugulothu Balaji and 2 other: Advocate , appearing for 2,3 respectively

ORDER

(Delivered on 27-02-2020 )

F.S memo filed and recorded. E.P terminated.

Judge, Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Khammam

TSKH000026182018

Presented on : 26-11-2018 Registered on : 04-12-2018 Decided on : 27-02-2020 Duration : 1 years, 3 months, 1 days

IN THE COURT OF

Judge, Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Khammam AT ,KHAMMAM

EP/100519/2018

M/S Sriram City Union Finance Ltd,Madhra Branch. Age: 34 Address: M/S Sriram City Union Finance Ltd,Madhra Branch

VERSUS

Pavan Kuamr Kambampati Address: H no 2-22,Atukuru,Khammam dist.

2:Shaik Ameer Pasha H No 3-15 Khajipura Atukuru Khammam dist ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : GADE HARENDER REDDY Advocate for : appearing for Pavan Kuamr Kambampati: Advocate appearing for 2 respectively.

ORDER

(Delivered on 27-02-2020 ) amounts are being received reportedly E.P closed.

Judge, Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Court,

Khammam