Smt. K. Maruthi Devi

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SATHUPALLY 

Dated this the 15th day of April, 2019

Present :­ Smt. K.Maruthi Devi,

Senior Civil Judge,

Sathupally

I.P.No.07 of 2017

Between:­ Vemireddy Laxmi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Age: 33 yrs, Occ: Nil, R/o. Narayanapuram village of Thallada mandal, Khammam district. …..…Insolvency Petitioner 

And

1Potetti Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Chinna Reaghava Reddy, Adult, R/o. Narayanapuram village of Thallada mandal, Khammam District.

2. Lade Ramesh, S/o. Rajaiah, adult, R/o. H.No.3­62, Gudapalli village, Kompalli panchayath, Bhupalapalli mandal, Jayashankar district.

3Growmeries Organics, #1­1­385/19, G­2, Flat BN Arcade, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad 500 080, Its proprietor K. Rama Krishna 4Challa Mahender Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o. Mylaram village, Sayampet mandal, Warangal Rural District.

5Sontireddy Janardhan Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o. Mylaram village, Sayampet mandal, Warangal District.

6Venkateswara Fertilizers & Pesticides, its proprietors Sri Gone Veeraswami, S/o. Rajaiah, R/o. Kondapalli village, Nallabelli mandal, Warangal Rural district. 

7.Ransak Orga, Thorur Road, Hayath Nagar mandal.

8Chienna Swami, S/o. Bhadraiah, R/o. Pathipaka village, Shayampet mandal, Warangal Rural district.

9Yaramala Atchireddy, S/o. Subbi Reddy, Age: 45 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Narayanapuram village, Thallada mandal, Khammam District.

10Seelam Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Seshireddy, Age: 40 yrs, Agriculture, R/o. Narapanenipalli village, Wyra mandal, Khammam District.

11Desuri Rajaiah, S/o. Sayanna @ Sailu, Age:60 yrs, R/o. Thirumalagiri village, Regonda mandal, Jayashanker District.

……… Respondents. 

This suit is coming up before me for final hearing on 12­04­2019 in the presence of Sri K.Ramesh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the respondents remained exparte, upon perusing the material on record and after hearing the arguments, this Court made the following:­

JUDGMENT 

1.This is a suit filed to declare the petitioner as insolvent and to discharge the petitioner from debts, due to the respondents. 

2. The averments made in the plaint in brief are that, Insolvency petitioner done business supplying pesticides as a dealer for SS Plant

Organics Company, for the districts Khammam and Warangal from 2012 to 2017 and he also Fertilizers business at Parakala of Warangal district. In the year 2016 due to losses occurred in the said business and for promotion of the business, the petitioner took amounts from the respondents with huge rate of interest @ Rs.5/­ to Rs.10/­ per Rs.100/­ per month and at the instance of the respondents, the insolvent petitioner signed on blank promissory notes and also took pesticides on credit basis from Respondents

No.3, 6 & 7with a fond hope to run business profitfully. But due to fate of petitioner, he sustained huge losses and unable to pay the amounts borrowed from respondents. The respondents are insisting the petitioner for payment of debts with interest and threatening him with dire consequences and forcibly taken all the valuable properties from his house and made an effort of men handling on the petitioner. As he is not able to pay the debts, he is compelled to file this petition to declare him as insolvent.

3.The respondents remained exparte.

4.Now, the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief as prayed for ?

5. Point:­

The petitioner in order to establish the petition claim, himself examined as PW.1, who reiterated the plaint averments. The A­schedule shown in the petition disclosing the petitioner borrowed loan amount from the respondents. The respondents did not choose to filed their counter. The respondents even did not choose to contest the matter. The evidence of

PW.1 coupled with schedule ‘A & B’ properties clinchingly goes to show that the petitioner has availed loan amounts and failed to repay the same and thus, the petitioner is entitled to declare as insolvent as prayed for. Point is answered accordingly.

6.In the result, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is declared as insolvent from discharging the debts due to the respondents. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Grade­II Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of April, 2018.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI. 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For PetitionerFor Respondents/Creditors

PW.1: V. Lakshmi Reddy ­None­

EXHIBITS MARKED

­­NIL­­

 SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI. 

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SATHUPALLY 

Dated this the 15th day of April, 2019

Present :­ Smt. K.Maruthi Devi,

Senior Civil Judge,

Sathupally

I.P.No.07 of 2017

Presented on: 04­12­2017/ 06­12­2017 Filed on: 07­12­2017 Between:­ Vemireddy Laxmi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Age: 33 yrs, Occ: Nil, R/o. Narayanapuram village of Thallada mandal, Khammam district. …..…Insolvency Petitioner 

And

1Potetti Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Chinna Reaghava Reddy, Adult, R/o. Narayanapuram village of Thallada mandal, Khammam District.

2. Lade Ramesh, S/o. Rajaiah, adult, R/o. H.No.3­62, Gudapalli village, Kompalli panchayath, Bhupalapalli mandal, Jayashankar district.

3Growmeries Organics, #1­1­385/19, G­2, Flat BN Arcade, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad 500 080, Its proprietor K. Rama Krishna 4Challa Mahender Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o. Mylaram village, Sayampet mandal, Warangal Rural District.

5Sontireddy Janardhan Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o. Mylaram village, Sayampet mandal, Warangal District.

6Venkateswara Fertilizers & Pesticides, its proprietors Sri Gone Veeraswami, S/o. Rajaiah, R/o. Kondapalli village, Nallabelli mandal, Warangal Rural district. 

7.Ransak Orga, Thorur Road, Hayath Nagar mandal.

8Chienna Swami, S/o. Bhadraiah, R/o. Pathipaka village, Shayampet mandal, Warangal Rural district.

9Yaramala Atchireddy, S/o. Subbi Reddy, Age: 45 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Narayanapuram village, Thallada mandal, Khammam District.

10Seelam Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Seshireddy, Age: 40 yrs, Agriculture, R/o. Narapanenipalli village, Wyra mandal, Khammam District.

11Desuri Rajaiah, S/o. Sayanna @ Sailu, Age:60 yrs, R/o. Thirumalagiri village, Regonda mandal, Jayashanker District.

……… Respondents. 

­2­ CLAIM FOR:

This is a suit filed to declare the petitioner as insolvent and to discharge the petitioner from debts, due to the respondents.

CAUSE OF ACTION AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION: Cause of action arose about 5 years back at Narayanapuram village and in the year 2016 at Parakala village and on 18­11­2017 and the cause of action is continuing one. 

VALUATION OF THE SUIT AND COURT FEE: A fixed Court Fee of Rs.10/­ is paid as per Schedule 1, Article 2 of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act. 

DECREE:

This suit is coming up before me for final hearing on 12­04­2019 in the presence of Sri K.Ramesh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the respondents remained exparte, upon perusing the material on record and after hearing the arguments, this court doth order and decree:

1.That the suit be and is hereby allowed. No costs.

2.That the petitioner is declared as insolvent from discharging the debts due to the respondents.

 Given under my hand and the seal of the court, on this the 15th day of April, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI.

PARTICULARS OF COSTS

FOR PETITIONER FOR RESPONDENTS

1. Stamps on plaint

2. Stamps on power

3. Stamps on process

4. Stamps on petitions

5. Publication charges

6. Stamps on documents

7. Advocate fee

8. Misc. & type charges ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Total Rs. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI.

­3­

PETITION ‘A’ SCHEDULE (DUES TO THE CREDITORS)

Sl.No.Name of the creditorAmount due Rs.

1Potetti Narasimha Reddy2,00,000/­

2. Lade Ramesh5,00,000/­ 3Growmeries Organics12,00,000/­ 4Challa Mahender Reddy1,20,000/­ 5Sontireddy Janardhan Reddy30,000/­ 6Venkateswara Fertilizers, Kondapally 1,50,000/­

7.Ransak Orga, Hiyatnagar1,50,000/­ 8Chienna Swami1,50,000/­ 9Yaramala Atchireddy1,50,000/­ 10Seelam Srinivasa Reddy2,50,000/­ 11Desuri Rajaiah1,00,000/­

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI.

TSKH020005162018

Presented on : 28-08-2018 Registered on : 28-08-2018 Decided on : 13-03-2019 Duration : 0 years, 6 months, 16 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by SMT. K. MARUTHI DEVI

OS/100342/2018

Exhibit No.:

:

DANDA JYOTHI REDDY

Age: 47 Occupation : Address: OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.15-19-124/1, DHANALAKSHMI TOWERS, FLAT NO.402, OPP N.S.P GUEST HOUSE, YELLANDU

ROAD, KHAMMAM

VERSUS :

JONNA NAGESWARA RAO

Age: 52 Occupation : Address: OCC BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.10-6-40/4/E, BURHANPURAM,

KHAMMAM

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : B. HANUMAT KISHORE KUMAR Advocate for : appearing for JONNA NAGESWARA RAO: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-03-2019 )

ORDER

In the result, suit is decreed without costs in favour of plaintiff against the defendant for Rs.9,06,400/- along with future further simple interest at 6 percentage p.a from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization on Rs.4,53,200/- only

Date : 13-03-2019 (SMT. K. MARUTHI DEVI)

Senior Civil Judge

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT SATHUPALLY ,KHAMMAM

CMA/100005/2014

Exhibit No.:

:

CHINTHAPATLA GOPAIAH

Age: 0 Occupation : Address: AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, RO WYRA

VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT.

VERSUS :

CHAVA VENKATESWARLU

Age: 0 Occupation : Address: AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, RO RAPALLY

VILLAGE, BONAKAL MANDAL, KHAMMAM DISTRICT.

2:CHAVA SUDARSANAM Age: 0 Occupation :

3:YENUGU VENKATA NARASAIAH @ RITHY Age: 0 Occupation :

4:PENIGONDA ANJANEYULU Age: 0 Occupation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : M. AJAY KUMAR AND V. VENKATESWARA RAO Advocate for : appearing for CHAVA VENKATESWARLU: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, 4 respectively.

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 10-04-2019 )

Judgment pronounced in the open court (VSO) in the

result, CMA is dismissed. The lower court is hereby directed to

dispose the matter expeditiously within two months from the date

of the order. No costs.

{JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAME}

SATHUPALLY ,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH020004942015

Presented on : 03-12-2015 Registered on : 03-12-2015 Decided on : 13-03-2019 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 10 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. C.VIKRAM

OS/100466/2015

Exhibit No.:

:

NUNNA. RAMANA

Age: 0 Occupation : Address: OCC. BUSINESS H.NO 6-3-3021 CHOWDARY STREET

BANK COLONY KHAMMAM

VERSUS :

PANDILLAPALLI. PRAMEELA

Age: 0 Occupation : Address: OCC. BUSINESS H.NO 5-181 RAMNAGAR BONAKAL

KHAMMAM

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : R. SIVA RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY Advocate for : appearing for PANDILLAPALLI. PRAMEELA: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-03-2019 )

ORDER

The counsel for plaintiff filed. FS memo at 5.15 pm stating that the matter settled out of court. Hence the suit is dismissed against defendant.

Date : 13-03-2019 (Sri. C.VIKRAM)

Senior Civil Judge

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH020001732019

Presented on : 25-02-2019 Registered on : 28-02-2019 Decided on : 13-03-2019 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 16 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. C.VIKRAM

OS/88/2019

Exhibit No.:

:

BOMMISETTY LAXMINARSAIAH

Age: 49 Occupation : Address: OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.1-119, KOTHAGUDEM, DIVISION NO.7, KHAMMAM

VERSUS :

CHOUDAM SATYANARAYANA

Age: 55 Occupation : Address: OCC BUSINESS, RAMA KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE,

CHINTHAKANI MANDAL, KHAMMAM

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : SIVA RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY RANGU Advocate for : appearing for CHOUDAM SATYANARAYANA: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 13-03-2019 )

ORDER

As per order passed in IA. /19 the suit date advanced to today. Plaintif present. FS memo filed. hence the suit is closed.

Date : 13-03-2019 (Sri. C.VIKRAM)

Senior Civil Judge

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS