Currently Serving

Ms. M.Aparna

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally

Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex · Medchal Malkajgiri · Telangana

Based on 4 recent orders

Ms. M.Aparna, III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally, is posted at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex, Medchal Malkajgiri, Telangana, India. 4 court orders on record since 2025. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/644/2024

Shaik Gousiya and others vs All concerned and Tahasildar

09 Jan 2026

Page 1 Dated 09.01.2026

IN THE COURT OF III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE - CUM - XIV ADDL.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL - MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY.

PRESENT: Ms. M. Aparna, III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - Cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Friday, this the 09th day of January, 2026

O.S. No. 644 Of 2024

BETWEEN:-

1. Shalk Gousiya, W/o. Late Shaik Masthan, Aged about: 59 years, Occ: Housewife,

2. Pathan Parveen, D/o. Late Shaik Masthan, W/o. Khadar Basha, Aged about: 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H. No. 3- 104, B.C. Colony, Gudluru, Prakasam, AP 523281.

3. Shaik Ramtujani, S/o. Late Shaik Masthan, Aged about: 40 years, Occ: Business,

4. Shaik Khaja Moinuddin, S/o. Late Shaik Masthan, Aged about: 39 years, Occ: Business

5. Shaik Jeelani, S/o. Late Shaik Masthan, Aged about: 37 years, Occ: Business,

Plaintiff No. 1 and 3 to 5 are R/o. H. No. 7-8-123, Goutham Nagar, Feroz Guda, Balanagar Mandal, Hyderabad District, TS - 500011.

……... Petitioner / Plaintiffs no. 1 to 5

AND

OS.No. 644 of 2024 III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum -

XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 2 Dated 09.01.2026

1.All Concerned

2. The Tahsildar Balanagar, Balanagar, X Roads, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana State - 500037. …Respondents / Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the present of Sri K. Venkataiah, Learned Counsels for the plaintiffs / petitioners and the defendants remained ex-parte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit for declaration to declare that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 3 are the absolute owners and possessors of the suit schedule property being the legal heirs of Late Shaik Masthan, who died on 01.11.2012.

2.The brief facts of plaintiffs as mentioned in the plaint is that plaintiffs No.1 is the wife and plaintiff nos. 2 and 3 are the children of Late Shaik Masthan. He died on 01/11/2012, leaving the plaintiffs as his legal heirs and successors and except the plaintiffs, there are no other legal heirs. It is further submitted that, the plaintiffs approached the defendant No.2 on dt. 02-05-2013 and again on 14- 02-2014 and again on 17-03-2017 and again on 25-06-2019 and again on 24-08- 2022 and again on 04-06-2023 and again on 05-01-2024 for issuance of Legal

Heir certificate in favour of Plaintiffs, for which Defendant No.2 advised the plaintiffs to approach the competent authority for issuance of Legal Heir

OS.No. 644 of 2024 III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum -

XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 3 Dated 09.01.2026 certificate. Having no other option, the plaintiffs filed present suit and to declare the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of deceased / Late Shaik Masthan, who died on 01.11.2012.

3.Issued paper publication for defendant No. 1 and Notice served to defendant No. 2 and the defendants called absent and no representation, as such they were set ex-parte.

4.The point for consideration:

“Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of Late Shaik Masthan, who died on 01-11-2012 or not ?

5.To substantiate the claim of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff examined herself as

PW1 in lieu of his chief examination and Ex.A1 to Ex.A13 were marked. This court perused Ex. A1 to Ex. A13 they are as follows : -

Ex. A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Shaik Masthan , Ex. A2

is the Original Aadhar Card of Deceased, Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar

Card of Plaintiff No. 1, Ex. A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 2.,

Ex. A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 3, Ex. A6 is the Original

Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 4, Ex. A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff

No. 5, Ex. A8 is the SSC certificate of P2. Ex. A9 is the Original Voter ID

Cards of the plaintiff no. 1, Ex. A10 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the

plaintiff no. 2. Ex. A11 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 3,

OS.No. 644 of 2024 III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum -

XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 4 Dated 09.01.2026

Ex. A12 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 4, Ex. A13 is the

Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 5.

6. On careful Perusal of documents filed by the plaintiffs and the documents marked, establishes that plaintiff No. 1 to 5 are the legal heirs of deceased.

As the defendants remained ex-parte, the entire oral as well as documentary evidence lead by the plaintiffs remained unrebutted and unchallenged. In the light of the fact that the defendants has opted not to contest the claim of the plaintiffs, meaning thereby that they have indirectly admitted the claim of the plaintiffs. Moreover, there is no reason to discard the entire oral as well as documentary evidence on the record. Hence, in the light of aforesaid unrebutted and unchallenged oral as well as documentary evidence on the record, the plaintiffs are entitled to declare them as legal heirs of Late Shaik

Masthan, who died on 01.11.2012. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of plaintiffs as against the defendants.

7.In the result, suit is decreed in favour of plaintiffs and hereby declaring that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 5 are the legal heirs of Late Shaik Masthan, who died on 01.11.2012.

Typed to my dictation, Corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 09th day of January, 2026.

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

OS.No. 644 of 2024 III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum -

XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 5 Dated 09.01.2026

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

PW1: Smt. Shalk Gousiya

FOR DEFENDANTS:- Nil -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Ex. A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Shaik Masthan,

Ex. A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Deceased,

Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 1,

Ex. A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 2.,

Ex. A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 3,

Ex. A6 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 4,

Ex. A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 5,

Ex. A8 is the SSC certificate of P2.

Ex. A9 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 1,

Ex. A10 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 2.

Ex. A11 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 3,

Ex. A12 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 4,

Ex. A13 is the Original Voter ID Cards of the plaintiff no. 5.

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

OS.No. 644 of 2024 III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum -

XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

OS/443/2025

Jadala Prakash Goud vs Mandal Revenue Officer

09 Jan 2026

Page 1 OS. No. 443 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE - CUM - XIV ADDL.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL - MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY.

PRESENT: Ms. M. Aparna, III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - Cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Friday, this the 09th day of January, 2026

O.S.No. 443 OF 2025

BETWEEN:-

1. Jadala Prakash Goud, S/O Late J. Shankar Goud, Aged: 70 years, Occ: Business

2. Jadala Shobha, W/O Late Jadala Narender Goud, Aged: 56 years Occ: House Wife

3. Jadala Vinay Goud, S/O Late Jadala Narender Goud, Aged 37 year Occ: Business

4. Panjala Priyanka, W/O P.Raghavender, D/O Late Jadala Narender Goud, Aged: 38 years occ: House Wife R/O H.No. 4-100 Kundanpally R.R. District, 501301

5. Jadala Ramesh Goud, S/O Late J. Shankar Goud. Aged: 62 years, Occ: Business

All Plaintiff No. 1 to 3 and 5 are R/O H.No 10-3-113 Opposite Pochamma Temple Road Fathenagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad

………... Plaintiffs no. 1 to 5

AND

Page 2 OS. No. 443 of 2025

1. Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar Mandal, Hyderabad

2. All concern. …….… Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the present of M/s. A.

Manik Prabhu Goud, N. Rani Anantha Laxmi, M. Surya Vamshi Goud and A.

Ranadheeshwar Goud, Learned Counsels for the plaintiffs / petitioner and the defendantsremained ex-parte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit for declaration to declare that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 5 are the legal heirs of Late Sri Jadala Rukkamma, who died on 17.07.2024.

2. The brief facts of plaintiffs are mentioned in the plaint is the Plaintiffs are the Legal Heirs of the deceased Late Jadala Rukkamma, W/o. Late Sri Jadala

Shankar Goud, who passed away on 17-07-2024 by leaving behind the plaintiff’s as their legal heirs and successors. The deceased Late Jadala Rukkamma, got three sons namely Jadala Prakash Goud who is plaintiff no. 1 hearin, Jadala

Ramesh Goud who is plaintiff no. 5 herein and late Jadala Narendar Goud who died on 25-09-2023 by leaving his wife namely Smt. Jadala Shoba Plaintiff no. 2 herein, his son namely Jadala Vinay Goud Plaintiff no. 3 herein and his daughter namely Panjala Priyanka Plaintiff no. 4 herein as his legal heirs.

3.It is further submitted that, the plaintiffs approached the defendant No.1 for issuance of Legal Heir certificate for which Defendant No.1 advised the plaintiffs to approach the competent authority for issuance of Legal Heir certificate as the deceased is not a government employee. Having no other option, the plaintiffs

Page 3 OS. No. 443 of 2025 filed present suit and to declare the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of deceased /

Late Smt. Jadala Rukkamma who died on 17.07.2024.

4.Notice served to defendant No.1 and issued paper publication for defendant No.2 and the defendants called absent and no representation, as such they were set ex-parte.

5.The point for consideration:

“Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs

of Late Smt. Jadala Rukkamma, who died on 17.07.2024 or not ?

6.To substantiate the claim of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff no. 1 examined himself as PW1 in lieu of his chief examination and Ex.A1 to Ex.A7 were marked. The Plaintiff no. 2 is Examined as PW2 and no documents were marked. This court perused Ex.A1 to Ex.A7 are as follows : -

Ex. A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Jadala Rukkamma, dt.

17-07-2024, Ex. A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 1, dt. 19-09-

2013, Ex. A3 is the Original Death Certificate of deceased Jadala Narender

Goud, dt. 22-09-2023, Ex. A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 2,

dt. 16-10-2011, Ex. A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 3, dt. 04-

09-2017, Ex. A6 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 4, dt. 10-07-2013,

Ex. A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 5.

Page 4 OS. No. 443 of 2025

7. on careful perusal of the documents filed by the plaintiffs which are marked as Ex. A1 to A7 establishes that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of the deceased.

Jadala Rukkamma, who died on dt. 17-07-2024. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of plaintiffs as against the defendants.

8.In the result, suit is decreed in favour of plaintiffs and hereby declaring that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 5 are the legal heirs of Late Smt Jadala Rukkamma, who died on 17.07.2024.

Typed to my dictation, Corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 09th day of January, 2026.

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 5 OS. No. 443 of 2025

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

PW1: Smt. Saroja Koppala

FOR DEFENDANTS:- Nil -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Ex. A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Jadala Rukkamma, dt. 17-07- 2024,

Ex. A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 1, dt. 19-09-2013,

Ex. A3 is the Original Death Certificate of deceased Jadala Narender

Goud, dt. 22-09-2023,

Ex. A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 2, dt. 16-10-2011,

Ex. A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 3, dt. 04-09-2017,

Ex. A6 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 4, dt. 10-07-2013,

Ex. A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No. 5.

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

OS/494/2024

Saroja Koppala and others vs Tahsildar, MRO

09 Jan 2026

Page 1 O.S. No. 494 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE - CUM - XIV ADDL.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL - MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY.

PRESENT: Ms. M. Aparna, III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - Cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Friday, this the 09th day of January, 2026

O.S.No. 494 OF 2024

BETWEEN:-

1.Smt.SarojaKoppala,W/o.LateKoppala Balasubramanyam, Aged about 65 years, Occ: House Wife,

2) Sabitha Koppala, D/o. Late Koppala Balasubramanyam. Aged about 41 years, Occ: House Wife,

3) Samrat Koppala, S/o. Late Koppala Balasubramanyam, Aged about 39 years, Occ: Private Employee,

4) Koppala Navatha, S/o. Late Koppala Balasubramanyam, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Un married,

All are R/o. Flat No. 102B, 1st Floor, Essel Classics, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

………... Plaintiffs no. 1 to 4

AND

1. The Thasildar/MRO, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

2. All Concerned … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the present of M/s. K.L.B.Kumar, G.J. Balaji and Sri P. Srimannarayana, Learned Counsels for the plaintiffs and the defendantsremained ex-parte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

Page 2 O.S. No. 494 of 2024

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit for declaration to declare that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 4 are the absolute owners and possessors of the suit schedule property being the legal heirs of Late Koppala Balasubramanyam, who died on 23.10.2023.

2.The brief facts of plaintiffs as mentioned in the plaint is that plaintiffs No.1 is the wife and plaintiff nos. 2 to 4 are the children of Late Sri Koppala

Balasubramanyam. He died on 23/10/2023, leaving the plaintiffs as his legal heirs and successors and except the plaintiffs, there are no other legal heirs. It is further submitted that, the plaintiffs approached the defendant No.1 for issuance of Legal Heirs certificate for which Defendant No.1 advised the plaintiffs to approach the competent authority for issuance of Legal Heir certificate. Having no other option, the plaintiffs filed present suit and to declare the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of deceased / Late Sri Koppala

Balasubramanyam, who died on 23.10.2023.

3.Notice served to defendant No.1 and issued paper publication for defendant No.2 and the defendants called absent and no representation, as such they were set ex-parte.

4.The point for consideration: “Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to

be declared as legal heirs of Late Sri Koppala Balasubramanyam, who

died on 23.10.2023 or not ?

5.To substantiate the claim of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff no. 3 examined himself as PW1 in lieu of his chief examination and Exhibit no’s. A1 to A11 were marked. This court perused Exhibit no’s. A1 to A11 they are as follows : -

Page 3 O.S. No. 494 of 2024

Ex. A1 is the C.C. of Death Certificate, dated 23-10-2023 of Late

Sri Koppala Balasubramanyam, Ex. A2 is the Original of Aadhar Cards

of Plaintiff No. 1, Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No.

2, Ex. A4 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 3, Ex. A5 is the

Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 4, Ex. A6 is the original

Aadhar Card of Deceased Late Sri Koppala Balasubramanyam, Ex. A7 is

the Copy of Representation, dated. 12-07-2024 with Postal Receipt,

Ex. A8 is the Online Postal Tracking Report, dated. 15-07-2024, Ex. A9

is the Study Certificate of Plaintiff No. 2, Ex. A10 is the Study

Certificate of Plaintiff No. 3, Ex. A11 is the Study Certificate of Plaintiff

No. 4.

6. on careful perusal of the documents filed by the plaintiffs which are marked as Exhibit No’s. A1 to A11 establishes that Plaintiff no. 1 to 4 are the

Legal heirs of the deceased person / Late Sri Koppala Balasubramanyam.

Sri Koppala Balasubramanyam, who died on 23.10.2023. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of plaintiffs as against the defendants.

Page 4 O.S. No. 494 of 2024

7.In the result, suit is decreed in favour of plaintiffs and hereby declaring that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 4 are the legal heirs of Late Sri Koppala

Balasubramanyam, who died on 23.10.2023.

Typed to my dictation and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 09th day of January, 2026.

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Page 5 O.S. No. 494 of 2024

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

PW1: Smt. Saroja Koppala

FOR DEFENDANTS:- Nil -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Ex. A1 is the C.C. of Death Certificate, dated 23-10-2023 of Late Sri Koppala

Balasubramanyam,

Ex. A2 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 1,

Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 2,

Ex. A4 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 3,

Ex. A5 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 4,

Ex. A6 is the original Aadhar Card of Deceased Late Sri Koppala

Balasubramanyam,

Ex. A7 is the Copy of Representation, dated. 12-07-2024 with Postal Receipt,

Ex. A8 is the Online Postal Tracking Report, dated. 15-07-2024,

Ex. A9 is the Study Certificate of Plaintiff No. 2,

Ex. A10 is the Study Certificate of Plaintiff No. 3,

Ex. A11 is the Study Certificate of Plaintiff No. 4.

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

OS/383/2024

Kuturu Vijaya Lakshmi and others vs The Tahsildar

09 Jan 2026

Page 1 O.S. No. 383 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE - CUM - XIV ADDL.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL - MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY.

PRESENT: Ms. M. Aparna, III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - Cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Friday, this the 09th day of January, 2026

O.S. No. 383 Of 2024

BETWEEN:-

1. Kuturu Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o. Late Kuturu Narsing Rao, aged 34 years, Occ: Household

2) Kuturu Tanush, S/o. Late Kuturu Narsing Rao, aged 10 years, Occ: Student

3) Kuturu Kundanika, D/o. Late Kuturu Narsing Rao, aged 7 years, Occ: Student (P2, P3 Rep. by their Mother P1)

All are residents of H.No. 12-16-72 Janathanagar, Moosapet Kukatpally Mandal Medchal-Malkajiri District

………... Plaintiffs no. 1 to 3

AND

1. The Thasildar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

2. All Concerned … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the present of M/s. CMR Velu Vinay Kumar J, Learned Counsels for the plaintiffs and the defendants remained ex-parte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

Page 2 O.S. No. 383 of 2024

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit for declaration to declare that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 3 are the absolute owners and possessors of the suit schedule property being the legal heirs of Late Kuturu Narsing Rao, who died on 14.01.2024.

2.The brief facts of plaintiffs as mentioned in the plaint is that plaintiffs No.1 is the wife and plaintiff nos. 2 and 3 are the children of Late Kuturu Narsing Rao.

He died on 14/01/2024, leaving the plaintiffs as his legal heirs and successors and except the plaintiffs, there are no other legal heirs. It is further submitted that, the plaintiffs approached the defendant No.1 for issuance of Legal Heir certificate for which Defendant No.1 advised the plaintiffs to approach the competent authority for issuance of Legal Heir certificate as the deceased is not a government employee. Having no other option, the plaintiffs filed present suit and to declare the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of deceased / Late Kuturu

Narsing Rao, who died on 14.01.2024.

3.Notice served to defendant No.1 and issued paper publication for defendant No.2 and the defendants called absent and no representation, as such they were set ex-parte.

4.The point for consideration:

“Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs

of Late Kuturu Narsing Rao, who died on 14-01-2024 or not ?

Page 3 O.S. No. 383 of 2024

5.To substantiate the claim of the plaintiffs, the plaintiff examined himself as

PW1 in lieu of his chief examination and Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 were marked. This court perused Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 they are as follows : -

Ex. A1 is the Death Certificate of Late Sri Kuturu Narsing Rao

(Original), dt. 02-02-2024. , Ex. A2 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff

No. 1, Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 2, Ex. A4 is the

Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 3.

6. on careful perusal of the documents filed by the plaintiffs establishes that which is marked as Exhibit No’s. A1 to A4 and further the tax receipts and other documents establishes that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of the deceased.

Kuturu Narsing Rao, who died on 14.01.2024. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of plaintiffs as against the defendants.

Page 4 O.S. No. 383 of 2024

7.In the result, suit is decreed in favour of plaintiffs and hereby declaring that the plaintiff nos. 1 to 3 are the legal heirs of Late Sri Kuturu Narsing Rao, who died on 14.01.2024.

Typed to my dictation, Corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 09th day of January, 2026.

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

PW1: Smt. Kuturu Vijaya Lakshmi

FOR DEFENDANTS:- Nil -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Ex. A1 is the Death Certificate of Late Kuturu Narsing Rao (Original), dt. 02-02- 2024.

Ex. A2 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 1,

Ex. A3 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 2,

Ex. A4 is the Original of Aadhar Cards of Plaintiff No. 3,

SD/-

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge - cum - XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

Order Record 4 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/383/2024	Kuturu Vijaya Lakshmi and others vs The Tahsildar	09 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/443/2025	Jadala Prakash Goud vs Mandal Revenue Officer	09 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/494/2024	Saroja Koppala and others vs Tahsildar, MRO	09 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/644/2024	Shaik Gousiya and others vs All concerned and Tahasildar	09 Jan 2026	Judgement	—

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms. M.Aparna handled?

Ms. M.Aparna has handled 4 court orders since 2025 at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 1 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms. M.Aparna hear?

Based on available records, Ms. M.Aparna primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits) at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms. M.Aparna currently posted?

Ms. M.Aparna is posted as III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex, Medchal Malkajgiri, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms. M.Aparna available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by Ms. M.Aparna are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms. M.Aparna dispose cases?

Ms. M.Aparna disposes approximately 1 cases per month, based on 4 orders handled over their tenure at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms. M.Aparna serving?

Ms. M.Aparna has been serving at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

OS 100%

Posting History

Dec 2025 — Present

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally · 4 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Ms. G.S.L.Priyanka

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-XI Addl.Judicial...

0 orders

Mr. Devarapalli Devendra Babu

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Addl. Judicial...

5 orders

Smt. T.swapna

IV Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-XV Addl. Judicial M...

0 orders

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl Judicial...

43 orders

Sri. M.venkateswara Rao

III Addl District and Sessions Judge-cum-Principal...

370 orders

Sri. C. Vikram

Additional Family Court, Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist....

0 orders

Smt. M. Sandya Rani

Senior Civil Judge-cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate...

288 orders

← View all judges at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex