Currently Serving

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally

Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex · Medchal Malkajgiri · Telangana

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally, is posted at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex, Medchal Malkajgiri, Telangana, India. 43 court orders on record since 2025. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/565/2024

Naram Sateesh and others vs The Tahsildar and all concerned

27 Apr 2026

1 of 8OS.No.565/2024

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

Present : Ms. Sankepalli Jahnavi, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum-XIII Addl. Judl.

Magistrate of First Class, M.M. District at

Kukatpally

Monday, on this the 27 th day of April, 2026

O.S. No.565 of 2024

Between:-

1. Naram Sateesh, S/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Suyra Rao, Aged about 64 Years, Occ: Retired Employee, R/o. H.No.2-31/1, Plot No.9, Nizampet Road, Near Hanuman Temple, Hyder Nagar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, T.S-500 085.

2. Naram Venkata Kantha Rao, S/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 68 Years, Occ: Retired Employee, R/o. Flat No.218, B-Block, Meghadri Heights, JJ Nagar, Near Hanuman Temple, Yapral, Jawaharnagar, K.V. Rangareddy District, T.S-500 087.

3. Kommuru Sobharani, W/o. Kommuru Apparao, D/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 66 Years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Dera Street (Main Road) Guntur, N.A.C. Gunupur, Rayagada, Odisha-765 022.

4. Naram Gopala Krishna, S/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 61 Years, Occ: Retired Employee, R/o. B-4, F-1, Out House, Vijayanagar Colony, Near St. Anns High School, P.S. Nagar, Asifnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 028.

2 of 8OS.No.565/2024

5. Kuchu Rama Devi, W/o. Kuchu Raj Kumar, D/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 59 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. 10-3-871, 24 MIGH, Humayun Nagar, Vijaya Nagar Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 057.

6. Macherla Aruna, W/o. Macherla Venkat Apparao, D/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 55 Years, Occ: House Wife, Plot No.3-6-11, Flat No.303, Classic Mansion, Classic Enclave Road No.1, Near Sai Baba Temple, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad, Talangana-500 094.

7. Alahari Anuradha, W/o. Alahari Bala Gopal, D/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 54 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. Plot No.78, 2nd Floor, 6th Cross Road, Sai Puri Colony, Sainikpuri Post, Sainikpuri Mandal, Tikrumalagiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 094.

8. Keshwa Roja Ramani, W/o. K. Anand, D/o. Late Naram Rama Ratnam and Late Naram Surya Rao, Aged about 50 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. 2-3-528/C/15/B/1, Bapu Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 013.

.....Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Kukatpally.

2. All Concerned

…..Defendants

The suit coming before me for final hearing and for disposal in the presence of Sri Ch. Thandava Krishna, Counsel for the

Plaintiffs and the defendants remained set exparte and the matter 3 of 8OS.No.565/2024 having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 of Civil

Procedure Code by the Plaintiffs for the relief of declaration to declare the Plaintiffs No. 1 to 8 as the legal heirs of deceased late Smt. Naram Rama Ratnam.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows: The Plaintiffs submit that Plaintiff No. 1/Naram Sateesh, Plaintiff No.2/Naram

Venkata Kantha Rao, Plaintiff No.4/Naram Gopala Krishna are the sons, plaintiff No.3/Kommuru Sobharani, Plaintiff

No.5/Kuchu Rama Devi, Plaintiff No.6/Macherla Aruna, Plaintiff

No.7/Alahari Anuradha and Plaintiff No.8/Keshwa Roja Ramani, are the daughters of Late Smt. Naram Rama Ratnam who died intestate on 22.04.2024 leaving behind the plaintiffs 1 to 8 as the only legal heirs and successors of late Smt. Naram Rama

Ratnam.

3. The Plaintiffs further submit that on 28.06.2024, they approached the Defendant No. 1 / Tahasildar, Kukatpally

Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District for issuance of legal heir 4 of 8OS.No.565/2024 certificate. However, Defendant No. 1 refused to issue the legal heir certificate on the ground that they are not competent authority to issue the same. Thus the Plaintiffs have no other efficacious alternative remedy except to approach this Hon’ble Court with the present suit for declaration.

4. Summons served on Defendant No. 1 on receiving Summons remained exparte. On the application of the Plaintiffs this court ordered, to issue a paper publication for defendant No.2. In spite of paper publication none appeared before this court and no objections were received from any person. Hence the defendants No. 2 was set exparte.

5. During the course of Plaintiffs evidence, Plaintiff No. 1 was examined as PW.1 and Exs.A1 to A18 got marked through

PW.1.

6. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs.

7. Now the points for consideration are;

1. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of declaration as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

5 of 8OS.No.565/2024

POINT NO.1:

8. In order to substantiate their case, Plaintiff No. 1 filed his chief examination affidavit in lieu of his examination-in-chief. The contents of his chief examination are nothing but reiteration of the Plaint averments and Plaintiff No. 1 is examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs. A1 to A18. According to the chief examination affidavit, the Plaintiff No. 1 to 8 are the sons and daughters respectively of deceased Smt. Naram Rama Ratnam who died on 22.04.2024 living behind the Plaintiffs as her legal heirs. Exh. A.1 is the original death certificate dated:

22.04.2024, Ex.A2 is the Aadhar Card of the deceased Smt.

Naram Rama Ratnam, Ex.A3 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff

No.1, Ex.A4 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2, Ex.A5 is the

Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3, Ex.A6 is the Aadhar Card of

Plaintiff No.4, Ex.A7 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.5, Ex.A8 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.6, Ex.A9 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.7, Ex.A10 is the Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.8,

Ex.A11 is the Household card of plaintiff No.4, dt. 15.04.2006.

Ex.A12 is the PAN card of Plaintiff No.3, Ex.A13 is the PAN card of Plaintiff No.5, Ex.A14 is the PAN card of Plaintiff No.6, ExA15 is the PAN card of Plaintiff No.7, Ex.A16 is the PAN card of

Plaintiff No.8, Ex.A17 is the PAN card of Plaintiff No.1, Ex.A18 is 6 of 8OS.No.565/2024 the PAN card of Plaintiff No.2. All of which shows that the

Plaintiff Nos. 1 to 8 are sons and daughters of deceased Smt.

Naram Rama Ratnam and only the legal heirs of the deceased.

As the defendants No. 1 & 2 remained exparte, the evidence of

PW.1 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

9. As per Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 “ any person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit against any person denying, or interested to deny his title to such character or right, and the court may in its discretion make therein a declaration that he is so entitled, and the Plaintiff need not in such suit ask for any further relief.

Provided that no court shall make any such declaration whether Plaintiff, being able to seek further relief then a mere declaration of title, omits to do so”.

10.A plain reading of the Section 34 of the Specific Relief

Act, 1963 makes it expressly clear that when the legal character of any person is denied or disputed by other person, he may institute a suit seeking for the relief of declaration as to his / her legal character.

7 of 8OS.No.565/2024

11. In the case on hand, as the Plaintiffs for seeking legal heir certificate by declaring them as legal heirs of deceased Late

Smt. Naram Rama Ratnam, the Plaintiffs intending to obtain legal heir certificate to avoid future legal complications, necessity arose for them to file the present suit. Therefore on careful perusal of the material available on record, there being no objection from any as to the legal character of Plaintiff Nos.

1 to 8 are sons and daughters of late Naram Rama Ratnam.

This court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of

Late Naram Rama Ratnam. Accordingly the point is answered in favour of the Plaintiffs.

POINT NO.2:

IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed without cost declaring that the Plaintiffs Nos. 1 to 8 as the legal heirs of Late Naram

Rama Ratnam for the purpose of legal status only.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of April, 2026.

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

8 of 8OS.No.565/2024

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

PW1: Naram Gopala Krishna

FOR DEFENDANTS: -NIL-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

1.Ex.A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Naram Rama Ratnam issued by GHMC, Dt:22.04.2024.

2.Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of deceased Naram Rama Ratnam

3.Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1

4.Ex.A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2

5.Ex.A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3

6.Ex.A6 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.4

7.Ex.A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.5

8.Ex.A8 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.6

9.Ex.A9 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.7

10.Ex.A10 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.8

11.Ex.A11 is the Original Household card of Plaintiff No.4, dt. 15.04.2006.

12.Ex.A12 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.3

13.Ex.A13 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.5

14.Ex.A14 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.6

15.Ex.A15 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.7

16.Ex.A16 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.8

17.Ex.A17 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.1

18.Ex.A18 is the Original PAN Card of Plaintiff No.2

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

OS/590/2025

Yasa Sunitha Reddy and others vs The Mandal Revenue Officer (Tahasildar)

05 May 2026

1 of 6OS.No.590/2025

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

Present : Ms. Sankepalli Jahnavi, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum-XIII Addl. Judl.

Magistrate of First Class, M.M. District at

Kukatpally

Tuesday, on this the 5th day of May, 2026

O.S. No.590 of 2025

Between:-

1. Yasa Sunitha Reddy, W/o. Late Yasa Krishna Reddy, Aged about 59 Years, Occ: House Wife,

2. Yasa Srikanth Reddy, S/o. Late Yasa Krishna Reddy, Aged about 41 Years, Occ: Business,

3. Yasa Swathi Reddy, D/o. Late Yasa Krishna Reddy, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: House Wife.

(All are R/o.H.No.12-5-24, Maruthi Nagar, Moosapet (V), Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 018)

.....Plaintiffs

And

1. The Mandal Revenue Officer (Tahsildar), Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad.

2. All Concerned

…..Defendants

The suit coming before me for final hearing and for disposal in the presence of M/s. Shaik Zakeer Hussain, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants remained set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 & 2 of Civil

Procedure Code by the Plaintiffs for the relief of declaration to 2 of 6OS.No.590/2025 declare the Plaintiffs No. 1 , 2 and 3 as the legal heirs of deceased late Yasa Krishna Reddy

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows: The Plaintiffs submit that Plaintiff No. 1/ Yasa Sunitha Reddy is the wife , plaintiff no 2/

Yasa Srikanth Reddy is the son and plaintiff no 3/ Yasa Swathi Reddy is the daughter of Yasa Krishna Reddy who died intestate on 31.05.2025 leaving behind the plaintiffs 1 to 3 as the only legal heirs and successors of late Yasa Krishna Reddy

3. The Plaintiffs further submit that ,they approached the Defendant

No. 1 / Tahasildar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District for issuance of legal heir certificate. However, Defendant No. 1 refused to issue the legal heir certificate on the ground that they are not competent authority to issue the same. Thus the Plaintiffs have no other efficacious alternative remedy except to approach this Hon’ble

Court with the present suit for declaration.

3 of 6OS.No.590/2025

5. During the course of Plaintiffs evidence, Plaintiff No. 1 was examined as PW.1 and Exs.A1 to A9 got marked through PW.1.

6. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs.

7. Now the points for consideration are;

Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of declaration as prayed for?

To what relief?

8. POINT NO.1:

In order to substantiate their case, Plaintiff No. 1 filed his chief examination affidavit in lieu of his examination-in-chief. The contents of his chief examination are nothing but reiteration of the

Plaint averments and Plaintiff No. 1 is examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs. A1 to A9. According to the chief examination affidavit, the Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and the Plaintiff No. 2 and 3 are the son and daughters respectively , of deceased Yasa Krishna Reddy who died on 31.05.2025 living behind the Plaintiffs as her legal heirs.

Exh. A.1 is the original death certificate dated: 31.05.2025 of Late

Yasa Krishna Reddy. Ex. A2 is the original Adhar Card of the plaintiff no.1. Exh. A3 is the original Adhar Card of Plaintiff No. 2. Ex. A4 is the original Adhar card of the plaintiff no 3. Ex.A5 is the original SSC

Marks Memo of plaintiff no.2 , Ex.A6 is the original SSC Marks Memo of plaintiff No ,Ex.A7 is the original Bank Passbook of plaintiff

No.1 ,Ex.A8 is the letter to Tahasildar /MRO Kukatpally Mandal, 4 of 6OS.No.590/2025

Medchal Malkajgiri district and Ex.A9 is the regd.post Receipt.All of which shows that the Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and the Plaintiff No. 2 is the son and plaintiff no 3 is the daughter and only the legal heirs of the deceased. As the defendants No. 1 & 2 remained exparte, the evidence of PW.1 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

10. Provided that no court shall make any such declaration whether

Plaintiff, being able to seek further relief then a mere declaration of title, omits to do so”.

11. A plain reading of the Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 makes it expressly clear that when the legal character of any person is denied or disputed by other person, he may institute a suit seeking for the relief of declaration as to his / her legal character.

12. In the case on hand, as the Plaintiffs for seeking legal heir certificate by declaring them as legal heirs of deceased Yasa

Krishna Reddy, the Plaintiffs intending to obtain legal heir certificate to avoid future legal complications, necessity arose for them to file 5 of 6OS.No.590/2025 the present suit. Therefore on careful perusal of the material available on record, there being no objection from any as to the legal character of Plaintiff No. 1 as wife , Plaintiff No. 2 as the son and Plaintiff No. 3 is the daughter of late Yasa Krishna Reddy. This court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Yasa

Krishna Reddy. Accordingly the point is answered in favour of the

Plaintiffs.

POINT NO.2:

IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed without cost declaring that the Plaintiffs No. 1, 2 and 3 are the legal heirs of Late Yasa Krishna

Reddy for the purpose of legal status only.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 5th day of May, 2026.

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

PW1: Yasa Sunitha Reddy

FOR DEFENDANTS: -NIL- 6 of 6OS.No.590/2025

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

1.Ex.A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Yasa Krishna Reddy, dt.31.05.2025.

2.Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1

3.Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2

4.Ex.A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3

5.Ex.A5 is the Original SSC Marks Memo of Plaintiff No.2

6.Ex.A6 is the Original SSC Marks Memo of Plaintiff No.3

7.Ex.A7 is the Original Bank Passbook of Plaintiff No.1

8.Ex.A8 is the Letter to Tahasildar/MRO, Serilingampally Mandal

9.Ex.A9 is the Registered Post Receipt

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

OS/599/2025

Gangisetty Madhura vani vs The Tahsildar

21 Apr 2026

1 of 5OS.No.599/2025

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

Present : Ms. Sankepalli Jahnavi, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum-XIII Addl. Judl.

Magistrate of First Class, M.M. District at

Kukatpally

Dated this the 21st day of April, 2026

O.S. No.599 of 2025

Between:-

1. Gangisetty Madhura Vani, W/o. Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu, Aged about 50 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. H.No.16-31-396/4, RRC Residency, 6 Phase, Opp GHMC Park, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

2. Gangisetty Vamshi Manoj, S/o. Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu, Aged about 30 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.16-31-396/4, RRC Residency, 6 Phase, Opp GHMC Park, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

3. Gangisetty Amulyasree, D/o. Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.No.16-31-396/4, RRC Residency, 6 Phase, Opp GHMC Park, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

.....Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Kukatpally.

2. All Concerned

…..Defendants

The suit coming before me for final hearing and for disposal in the presence of M/s. V. Siddharth, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defentants remained set 2 of 5OS.No.599/2025 exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 & 2 of Civil Procedure

Code by the Plaintiffs for the relief of declaration to declare the Plaintiffs

No. 1 , 2 and 3 as the legal heirs of deceased late Seetaramanjaneyulu.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows: The Plaintiffs submit that

Plaintiff No. 1/Gangisetty Madhura vani is the wife , plaintiff no 2/

Gangisetty Vamshi Manoj is the son and plaintiff no 3/ Gangisetty

Amulyasree is the daughter of Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu who died intestate on 01.08.2025 leaving behind the plaintiffs 1 to 3 as the only legal heirs and successors of late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu.

3. The Plaintiffs further submit that on 11.09.2025 ,they approached the

Defendant No. 1 / Tahasildar, Kukatpally Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District for issuance of legal heir certificate. However, Defendant No. 1 refused to issue the legal heir certificate on the ground that they are not competent authority to issue the same. Thus the Plaintiffs have no other efficacious alternative remedy except to approach this Hon’ble Court with the present suit for declaration.

3 of 5OS.No.599/2025

5. During the course of Plaintiffs evidence, Plaintiff No. 1 was examined as

PW.1 and Exs.A1 to A4 got marked through PW.1.

6. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs.

7. Now the points for consideration are;

1. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of declaration as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

POINT NO.1:

Plaintiff No. 1 is examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs. A1 to A4. According to the chief examination affidavit, the Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and the

Plaintiff No. 2 and 3 are the son and daughters respectively , of deceased

Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu who died on 01.08.2025 living behind the

Plaintiffs as her legal heirs. Exh. A.1 is the original death certificate dated:

13.08.2025 of Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu. Ex. A2 is the original

Adhar Card of the plaintiff no.1. Exh. A3 is the original Adhar Card of

Plaintiff No. 2. Ex. A4 is the original Adhar card of the plaintiff no 3.All of which shows that the Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and the Plaintiff No. 2 is the son and plaintiff no 3 is the daughter and only the legal heirs of the deceased. As the defendants No. 1 & 2 remained exparte, the evidence of

PW.1 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

4 of 5OS.No.599/2025

Provided that no court shall make any such declaration whether Plaintiff, being able to seek further relief then a mere declaration of title, omits to do so”.

10. A plain reading of the Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 makes it expressly clear that when the legal character of any person is denied or disputed by other person, he may institute a suit seeking for the relief of declaration as to his / her legal character.

11. In the case on hand, as the Plaintiffs for seeking legal heir certificate by declaring them as legal heirs of deceased Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu, the Plaintiffs intending to obtain legal heir certificate to avoid future legal complications, necessity arose for them to file the present suit. Therefore on careful perusal of the material available on record, there being no objection from any as to the legal character of Plaintiff No. 1 as wife ,

Plaintiff No. 2 as the son and Plaintiff no 3 is the daughter of late Gangisetty

Seetaramanjaneyulu. This court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu. Accordingly the point is answered in favour of the Plaintiffs.

5 of 5OS.No.599/2025

POINT NO.2:

IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed without cost declaring that the

Plaintiffs No. 1, 2 and 3 are the legal heirs of Late Gangisetty

Seetaramanjaneyulu for the purpose of legal status only.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 21st day of April, 2026.

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

PW1: G. Vamshi Manoj

FOR DEFENDANTS: -NIL-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

1.Ex.A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Gangisetty Sita Ramanjaneyulu issued by GHMC, Moosapet, dt. 13.08.2025.

2.Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1

3.Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2

4.Ex.A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

OS/599/2025

Gangisetty Madhura vani vs The Tahsildar

21 Apr 2026

1 of 5OS.No.599/2025

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

Present : Ms. Sankepalli Jahnavi, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum-XIII Addl. Judl.

Magistrate of First Class, M.M. District at

Kukatpally

Dated this the 21st day of April, 2026

O.S. No.599 of 2025

Between:-

.....Plaintiffs

And

1. The Tahsildar, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Kukatpally.

2. All Concerned

…..Defendants

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed under Section 26, Order VII, Rule 1 & 2 of Civil Procedure

Code by the Plaintiffs for the relief of declaration to declare the Plaintiffs

No. 1 , 2 and 3 as the legal heirs of deceased late Seetaramanjaneyulu.

2. The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows: The Plaintiffs submit that

Plaintiff No. 1/Gangisetty Madhura vani is the wife , plaintiff no 2/

Gangisetty Vamshi Manoj is the son and plaintiff no 3/ Gangisetty

3. The Plaintiffs further submit that on 11.09.2025 ,they approached the

3 of 5OS.No.599/2025

5. During the course of Plaintiffs evidence, Plaintiff No. 1 was examined as

PW.1 and Exs.A1 to A4 got marked through PW.1.

6. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs.

7. Now the points for consideration are;

1. Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of declaration as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

POINT NO.1:

Plaintiff No. 1 is examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs. A1 to A4. According to the chief examination affidavit, the Plaintiff No. 1 is the wife and the

Plaintiff No. 2 and 3 are the son and daughters respectively , of deceased

Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu who died on 01.08.2025 living behind the

Plaintiffs as her legal heirs. Exh. A.1 is the original death certificate dated:

13.08.2025 of Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu. Ex. A2 is the original

Adhar Card of the plaintiff no.1. Exh. A3 is the original Adhar Card of

PW.1 remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

4 of 5OS.No.599/2025

Provided that no court shall make any such declaration whether Plaintiff, being able to seek further relief then a mere declaration of title, omits to do so”.

Plaintiff No. 2 as the son and Plaintiff no 3 is the daughter of late Gangisetty

Seetaramanjaneyulu. This court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Gangisetty Seetaramanjaneyulu. Accordingly the point is answered in favour of the Plaintiffs.

5 of 5OS.No.599/2025

POINT NO.2:

IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed without cost declaring that the

Plaintiffs No. 1, 2 and 3 are the legal heirs of Late Gangisetty

Seetaramanjaneyulu for the purpose of legal status only.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 21st day of April, 2026.

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

PW1: G. Vamshi Manoj

FOR DEFENDANTS: -NIL-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

1.Ex.A1 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Gangisetty Sita Ramanjaneyulu issued by GHMC, Moosapet, dt. 13.08.2025.

2.Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1

3.Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2

4.Ex.A4 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

OS/10/2026

Yaddala Ramana Reddy vs M/s. Lucent Drugs Private Limited and others.

07 May 2026

Order Record 42 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/10/2026	Yaddala Ramana Reddy vs M/s. Lucent Drugs Private Limited and others.	07 May 2026	Other	—
OS/590/2025	Yasa Sunitha Reddy and others vs The Mandal Revenue Officer (Tahasildar)	05 May 2026	Judgement	—
OS/565/2024	Naram Sateesh and others vs The Tahsildar and all concerned	27 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
OS/599/2025	Gangisetty Madhura vani vs The Tahsildar	21 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
EP/75/2025	G. Messiah Kumari vs Poojari Ravi Kumar	20 Apr 2026	Other	—
EP/34/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. G. Anjaneyulu and others	01 Apr 2026	Other	—
EP/88/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs Mrs. Deepthi Chilukuri and others	26 Mar 2026	Other	—
EP/24/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. V. Sambya Naik	25 Mar 2026	Other	—
EP/33/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. P. Narsimha Srinivas and others	25 Mar 2026	Other	—
OS/1988/2022	State Bank of India vs Thati Srikanth	25 Mar 2026	Other	—
EP/388/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. Abdul Ghani and others	18 Mar 2026	Other	—
EP/300/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyderabad Pvt Ltd vs Mr. Rama Krishna Nalluri and others	11 Mar 2026	Other	—
OS/1805/2022	M/s.Seventy Seven Express and Topline Technologies vs Ujwal Karre	09 Mar 2026	Other	—
OS/637/2024	Kadrekar Ashok vs Gayam Ravi	27 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/118/2023	State Bank of India vs G.Mallikharjuna	23 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1999/2022	State Bank of India vs Jakkidi Rakesh Reddy	20 Feb 2026	Other	—
OS/459/2025	Darga Prasad vs Darga Jeethamma	18 Feb 2026	Other	—
EP/517/2022	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs Mrs. Shilpa Gillella	12 Feb 2026	Other	—
OS/342/2025	Dandamudi venkata Samrajyam and others vs The Thashildhar	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
EP/390/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. T. Sagar and Others	03 Feb 2026	Other	—
EP/12/2024	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. Ravi Kumar Sankuru and others	02 Feb 2026	Other	—
OS/205/2025	Kondoju Sarojini vs The Tahsildar and all concerned	29 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
EP/124/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyderabad Pvt Ltd vs Rajesh Mohan and others	21 Jan 2026	Other	—
OS/417/2024	M/s. Vikranthi and co. vs Saparam Reddanna	19 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/545/2025	Durgaram Prajapathi vs The Tahsildar	19 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1602/2022	M/s. Siddirameswara and Company vs Shaik Pasha	09 Jan 2026	Other	—
OS/1457/2022	Union Bank of India vs Mr.M.Raja	07 Jan 2026	Other	—
OS/202/2023	Kandula Brahmananda Reddy vs Smt. Chigurla Akka Mahadevi	05 Jan 2026	Other	—
OS/1791/2022	Smt.Dadi Gunasree vs Smt.G.Sunila Rani	30 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/212/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyderabad Pvt Ltd vs P. Venu Gopal and others	24 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/297/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyderabad Pvt Ltd vs Mr. A. Harikanth Reddy and others	24 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/93/2022	Kapil Chits Pvt Ltd Rep By Ch. Ramesh vs Raghu Rama Raju Dandu	23 Dec 2025	Other	—
OS/755/2024	Bachala Jyothi vs Life Insurance Corporation of India	23 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1446/2022	Smt.Gaddam Aruna vs Gaddam Amrutha	23 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/217/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyderabad Pvt Ltd vs Chennaiah Panuganti and others	18 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/206/2023	M/s. ICICI Bank Limited vs D. Ravindra Reddy	12 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/393/2022	Kapil chits Hyderabad Pvt. Ltd. vs Tharakarama Chary and others	12 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/512/2022	B.Venkata Lakshmi vs Laxminaryana	12 Dec 2025	Other	—
OS/1477/2022	K.Prabhakar Mudiraj vs Mengani narsing Rao	11 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/4/2024	M/s. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. vs Mr. S. Swarupa and Others	10 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/91/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt Ltd vs D. Madhu Kumar and others	08 Dec 2025	Other	—
EP/389/2023	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd vs Mr. Haseebur Rahman and others	05 Dec 2025	Other	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		2
Apr 2026		5
Mar 2026		7
Feb 2026		8
Jan 2026		7
Dec 2025		14

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi handled?

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi has handled 43 court orders since 2025 at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 7 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi hear?

Based on available records, Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi currently posted?

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi is posted as II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex, Medchal Malkajgiri, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi dispose cases?

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi disposes approximately 7 cases per month, based on 43 orders handled over their tenure at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi serving?

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi has been serving at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

OS 51%

EP 49%

Posting History

Dec 2025 — Present

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist. at Kukatpally · 43 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Ms. G.S.L.Priyanka

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-XI Addl.Judicial...

0 orders

Mr. Devarapalli Devendra Babu

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Addl. Judicial...

5 orders

Ms. M.Aparna

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIV Addl. Judicia...

4 orders

Smt. T.swapna

IV Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-XV Addl. Judicial M...

0 orders

Sri. M.venkateswara Rao

III Addl District and Sessions Judge-cum-Principal...

370 orders

Sri. C. Vikram

Additional Family Court, Medchal-Malkajgiri Dist....

0 orders

Smt. M. Sandya Rani

Senior Civil Judge-cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate...

288 orders

← View all judges at Kukatpally, ADJ Court Complex

Ms.Sankepalli Jahnavi

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

Monday, on this the 27 th day of April, 2026

J U D G M E N T

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

J U D G M E N T

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

J U D G M E N T

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

IN COURT OF THE II ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI

DISTRICT AT KUKATPALLY

J U D G M E N T

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFFS

FOR DEFENDANTS -NIL-

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XIII ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT AT

KUKATPALLY

THE II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM- XIII ADDL. JUDICIAL

KUKATPALLY

.NO. OS 10 /202 6