Sri M. Sreedhar

IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: VIJAYAWADA

Present: Smt. K.Krishna Satya Latha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

Monday, this the 28th day of June, 2021

CC.No. 767/2021

Between: The State: Rep. By the Sub-Inspector of Police, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada City. … Complainant

And:

1. Gorrela Tata Rao, S/o.Ramu, 35 years, Plot No.125, SF-3, Vambay Colony, Vifjayawada. Vehicle bearing No.AP 16 DR 3251.

2. Annabathula Siva Subrahmanyam, S/o.Siva Sankar, 26 years, Rajaka , Dr.No.3-6, Mylavaram, Krishna District. Vehicle bearing No.AP 39 AW 5094.

3. Medepalli Sai Mohan, S/o.Rajeswara Rao, 21 years, Patnaik, Block No.140, TF-6, Rama Nagar Colony, Vijayawada. Vehicle bearing No.AP 16 AK 6610.

.... Accused

This case came up on this day for appearance of the accused before me as the accused Nos.1 and 3 filed memo admitting their guilt for the offences in respect of which cognizance is taken, after hearing the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state and the accused Nos.1 and 3 in person with regard to the quantum of sentence and having stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

(1)The Sub Inspector of Police, Ajith Singh Nagar Police Station laid charge sheet against the accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.246/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 188 and 269 of Indian Penal Code and Sec.130, 179(1) R/w.177 of M.V.Act.

2.The essence of the charge sheet is that:

On 19.05.2021 at about 13.30 PM while the defacto complainant/L.W.4/Sri

K.Ramesh.,/S.I of Police, A.S.Nagar police station was conducting vehicle checking at Daba Kotla Centre, Ajit Singh Nagar, Vijayawada along with his staff in order to implement the orders issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh for containment, control and prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Carona virus disease), they noticed the accused Nos.1 to 3 who were going on the vehicles bearing Nos.AP 16 DR 3251, AP 39 AQ 5094 and AP 16 AK 6610, by violating the curfew orders, social distance rule and acted negligently, even after wide publicity regarding the disease. As such, he drafted an occurrence report.

Based on the same, he registered the above case and investigated into. After completion of the investigation L.W.4/Sri K.Ramesh /Sub Inspector of police laid charge sheet against the accused. Hence, this case.

3.Cognizance is taken under Section 190 (1) (b) of Code of Criminal

Procedure Code for the offences punishable under Sections 3 of Epidemic Act r/w. 188 of Indian Penal Code and Sec. 269 of Indian Penal Code, Sec 130 r/w.177 of Motor Vehicles Act, 179 of Motor Vehicles Act.

4.On appearance of the accused, copies of documents were furnished to them as contemplated under section 207 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

5. The Accused Nos.1 and 3 filed memo by admitting their guilt for the offences in respect of which cognizance is taken. This court is satisfied that the admission of the guilt of the Accused Nos.1 and 3 are voluntary and not due to undue influence or coercion by anyone. Hence the admission of guilt of the

Accused for the offences punishable under Sections 3 of Epidemic Act r/w. 188 of Indian Penal Code and Sec. 269 of Indian Penal Code, Sec 130 r/w.177 of

Motor Vehicles Act, 179 of Motor Vehicles Act is accepted and the Accused

Nos.1 and 3 are found guilty for the said offences and convicted Under Section 252 of code of Criminal Procedure for the said offences.

6.The Accused Nos.1 and 3 stated that they are getting meager income towards their salary and they are the only earning members of their respective families. Hence, sought to take lenient approach.

7.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, dependency of the accused I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to impose fine instead of sentencing them to imprisonment.

8.In the result, the Accused Nos.1 and 3 are sentenced to pay fine of Rs.

200/- (Rupees two hundred only) each for the offence punishable under Sec. 3 of Epidemic Act r/w. 188 of Indian Penal Code in default of payment of fine, the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- (Rupees three hundred only) each for the offence punishable under Sec. 269 of Indian Penal Code in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week, they are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- (Rupees Three Hundred only) each for the offence punishable under Sec.179 of M.V.Act in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and they are also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.100/- (Rupees One Hundred only) each for the offence punishable Under Sec.130 R/w.177 of Motor Vehicles Act in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

The Accused Nos.1 and 3 are appraised of their right to prefer an appeal against the legality of the sentence. On enquiry they stated that they have got means to engage an Advocate. They executed a bond for Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) eahc in order to ensure their presence before the appellate court if any appeal is preferred against them in compliance with section 437(A) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.III directly and pronounced by me through the Whats App Video conference on this the day of 28th day of June, 2021.

Sd/-K.Krishna Satya Latha

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

A ppendix Of Evidence Witnesses Examined/Documents Marked/ Material Objects

For Prosecution: For Defence

Nil

Sd/-K.Krishna Satya Latha

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: VIJAYAWADA

Present: Sri Marpu Sreedhar., Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

Thursday, this the 9th day of September, 2021

Calendar Case No.767 of 2021

Between: The State: Rep. By the Sub-Inspector of Police, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada City. … Complainant

And:

1. Gorrela Tata Rao, S/o.Ramu, 35 years, Plot No.125, SF-3, Vambay Colony, Vifjayawada. Vehicle bearing No.AP 16 DR 3251.

2. Annabathula Siva Subrahmanyam, S/o.Siva Sankar, 26 years, Rajaka , Dr.No.3-6, Mylavaram, Krishna District. Vehicle bearing No.AP 39 AW 5094.

3. Medepalli Sai Mohan, S/o.Rajeswara Rao, 21 years, Patnaik, Block No.140, TF-6, Rama Nagar Colony, Vijayawada. Vehicle bearing No.AP 16 AK 6610.

.... Accused

This case came up on this day for appearance of the accused before me as the accused No2. filed memo admitting his guilt for the offences in respect of which cognizance is taken, after hearing the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state and the accused No.2 in person with regard to the quantum of sentence and having stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

(1)The Sub Inspector of Police, Ajith Singh Nagar Police Station laid charge sheet against the accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.246/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 188 and 269 of Indian Penal Code and

Sec.130, 179(1) R/w.177 of M.V.Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in nut shell is as follows:-

On 19.05.2021 at about 13.30 PM while the defacto complainant/L.W.4/Sri

K.Ramesh.,/S.I of Police, A.S.Nagar police station was conducting vehicle checking at Daba Kotla Centre, Ajit Singh Nagar, Vijayawada along with his staff in order to implement the orders issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh for containment, control and prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Carona virus disease), they noticed the accused Nos.1 to 3 who were going on the vehicles bearing Nos.AP 16 DR 3251, AP 39 AQ 5094 and AP 16 AK 6610, by violating the curfew orders, social distance rule and acted negligently, even after wide publicity regarding the disease. As such, he drafted an occurrence report.

Based on the same, he registered the above case and investigated into. After completion of the investigation L.W.4/Sri K.Ramesh /Sub Inspector of police laid charge sheet against the accused. Hence, this case.

3.Cognizance is taken under Section 190 (1) (b) of Code of Criminal

Procedure Code for the offences punishable under 188 and Sec.3 of Epedemic

Act, 269 of Indian Penal Code and Sec 130 r/w.177, 179 of Motor Vehicles Act.

4.On appearance of the accused, copies of documents were furnished to

Accused No.2 as contemplated under section 207 of Code of Criminal

Procedure. Accused Nos.1 and 3 already admitted the offence but my Learned

Predecessor continued the same C.C against the Accused No.2 also. Hence this court has to continue the the same Calendar Case.

5.A2 is called present. Copies of documents furnished to accused. He was examined U/sec.251 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable U/sec. 188, 269 IPC and

Sec.179(1), 130 R/w.177 of M.V.Act and he admitted the guilt of the offence.

6. This court is satisfied that the admission of the guilt of the Accused No.2 is voluntary and not due to undue influence or coercion by anyone. Hence the admission of guilt of the Accused for the offences punishable under Section 188

IPC and Sec.3 of Epedimic Disease Act and 269 IPC and Sec. 179(1), 130,

R/w.177 of M.V.Act is accepted and the Accused No.2 is found guilty for the said offences and convicted Under Section 252 of code of Criminal Procedure for the said offences.

7.Accused No.2 requested the court to take lenient view and they stated that he was the earning members of his family.

8.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, dependency of the accused I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to impose fine instead of sentencing them to imprisonment.

9.In the result, the Accused No.2 is sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 200/- (Rupees two hundred only) for the offence punishable under Sec.188 IPC Sec.3 of Epedemic Disease Act and in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- (Rupees Two Hundred and Fifty Only) for the offence punishable under Sec. 269 of Indian Penal Code in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week, he was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) for the offence punishable under Sec.179 of M.V.Act in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and he also sentenced to pay fine of

Rs.100/- (Rupees One Hundred only) for the offence punishable Under Sec.130

R/w.177 of Motor Vehicles Act in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

10. The Accused No.2 is appraised of their right to prefer an appeal against the legality of the sentence. On enquiry he stated that he has got means to engage an Advocate. He executed a bond for Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) in order to ensure his presence before the appellate court if any appeal is preferred against him in compliance with section 437(A) of Code of

Criminal Procedure.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.III directly and pronounced by me through the Whats App Video conference on this the day of 9th day of September, 2021.

Sd/-M.Sreedhar

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

A ppendix Of Evidence Witnesses Examined/Documents Marked/ Material Objects

For Prosecution: For Defence

Nil

Sd/-M.Sreedhar

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: VIJAYAWADA

Present: Sri Marpu Sreedhar., Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

Thursday, this the 9th day of September, 2021

Calendar Case No.337 of 2021

Between: The State: Rep. By the Sub-Inspector of Police, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada City. … Complainant

And:

1. Polimetla Nagaiahm, S/o.isreal, 26 years, Ravindra Theater back Side, Payakapuram, Vijayawada. Motor cycle bearing No.AP 16 YKTR 2983.

2. Nandi Nagireddy, S/o.Venkaeswarlu, 27 years, Mahalakshmamma Temple, Old RR Peta, Vijayawada. Motor Cycle bearing No.AP 16 EF 7258.

3. Sanigalla Gopikrishna, S/o.Veera Govinda Rao, 27 Years, Dr.No.43-2-62D, Dabakotlu Centre, Vijayawada. Motor cycle No.AP 39BB 3536.

4. Cheveti Viswa Ratnam, S/o.Vijay kumar, 32 Years, Dr.No.35-6-55, Dondapati Yellaiah Veedi, Labbipet, Vijayawada. Bearing No.AP 16 BB 9456.

5. Peddi Govind (Died)

6. Manthri Mahesh, S/o.Appalanaidu, 24 years, Dr.No.77-91-7, Radha Nagar, Payakapuram, Vijayawada. Motor cycle No.AP 16 EG 9540.

7. Ravada Chandra Mouli, S/o.Venkata Rao, Age 24 years, Dr.No,.43-132-5/2, Krishna Hotel Centre, Singh Nagar, Vijayawada. Motor Cycle No.AP 39 AM 0420. ….Accused On 31.08.2021 Prosecution filed Death Certificate of A5. Hence Case against Accused No.5 is abated.

This case came up on this day for appearance of the accused before me that Accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 filed memo admitting their guilt for the offences in respect of which cognizance is taken, after hearing the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state and the accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 in persons with regard to the quantum of sentence and having stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

(1)The Sub Inspector of Police, Ajith Singh Nagar Police Station laid charge sheet against the accused Nos.1 to 7 in Crime No.194/2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 188 and 269 of Indian Penal Code and Sec.130, 179(1) R/w.177 of M.V.Act.

2.The case of the prosecution in nut shell is as follows:-

ON 20.05.2020 at about 17.00 hours at Krishna Hotel Centre, A.S.Nagar

LW.4 Smt G.Sowjanvya., SI of Police, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada due to transmission of Covid Virus and to prevent transmission State and Central

Governments imposed lock down orders to prevent transmissionof Corona Virus not to come on to the roads with out without vehicles to maintain physical distance not to move on the viehciles, while S.I of Police conduting vehcile checking on 02.05.2020 at 17.00 hrs at Krishna Hotel Centre, A.S.Nagar found

A1 to A7 of you along with your bikes bearing Nos. AP 16YKTR 2983, AJP 16 EF 7258, AP39BB3536, AP BB 9456, AP BW 3175, AP EG9540 and AP 39 AM 0420 by violating the prohibitory orders passed by the Government and failed to show the record of vehicle and to stop the vehicle. Then He sized the vehicles and prepared occurrence report, basing on the same he registered it as F.I.R in

Cr.No.194/2020 U/secs.188, 269 IPC and Sec.179 (1),130 R/w.177 of M.V.Act.

After completion of the investigation L.W.4/Smt G.Sowjanvya, Sub Inspector of police laid charge sheet against the accused. Hence, this case.

3.Cognizance is taken under Section 190 (1) (b) of Code of Criminal

Procedure Code for the offences punishable under 188 and Sec.3 of Epedemic

Act, 269 of Indian Penal Code and Sec 130, 179 r/w.177 of Motor Vehicles Act.

4.On 31.08.2021 prosecution filed Death Certificate of Accused No.5. Hence case against A5 is abated. On appearance of the accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 copies of documents were furnished to Accused as contemplated under section 207 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

5.Accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 are called present. Copies of documents furnished to accused. They were examined U/sec.251 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable U/sec. 188 and Sec.3 of Epedemic Disease Act, 269 IPC and

Sec.179(1), 130 R/w.177 of M.V.Act and they admitted the guilt of the offence.

6. This court is satisfied that the admission of the guilt of the Accused Nos.1 to 4, A6 and A7 are voluntary and not due to undue influence or coercion by anyone. Hence the admission of guilt of the Accused for the offences punishable under Section 188 and Sec.3 of Epedemic Disease Act. 269 IPC and

Sec. 179(1), 130, R/w.177 of M.V.Act is accepted and the Accused Nos.1 to 4,

A6 and A7 are found guilty for the said offences and convicted Under Section 252 of code of Criminal Procedure for the said offences..

7.A1 to A4, A6 and A7 requested the court to take lenient view and they stated that they are the earning members of their family.

8.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, dependency of the accused I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to impose fine instead of sentencing them to imprisonment.

9.In the result, the Accused Nos.1 to 4, A6 and A7 are sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 200/- (Rupees two hundred only) each for the offence punishable under

Sec.188 IPC and Sec.3 of Epedemic Disease Act and in default of payment of fine, the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 250/- (Rupees Two Hundred and Fifty

Only) each for the offence punishable under Sec. 269 of Indian Penal Code in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week, they are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five

Hundred only) each for the offence punishable under Sec.179 of M.V.Act in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and they are also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.100/- (Rupees

One Hundred only) each for the offence punishable Under Sec.130 R/w.177 of

Motor Vehicles Act in default of payment of fine the defaulter shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

The Accused Nos.1 to 4, A6 and A7 are appraised of their right to prefer an appeal against the legality of the sentence. On enquiry they stated that they have got means to engage an Advocate. They executed a bond for Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) in order to ensure their presence before the appellate court if any appeal is preferred against them in compliance with section 437(A) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.III directly and pronounced by me through the Whats App Video conference on this the day of 9th day of September, 2021.

Sd/-M.Sreedhar

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

A ppendix Of Evidence Witnesses Examined/Documents Marked/ Material Objects

For Prosecution: For Defence

Nil

Sd/-M.Sreedhar

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE: VIJAYAWADA

Present: Sri Marpu Sreedhar., Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

Friday, this the 17th day of September, 2021

Calendar Case No.882 of 2019

Between:-

The State: Rep. By the Sub-Inspector of Police, A.S.Nagar Police Station, Vijayawada City. … Complainant

And:

Gudipati Rama Rao, S/o.Guravaiah, 66 Years, Vysya, Dr.No.42-54-7, Luna

Centr, Singhnagar, Vijayawada. .... Accused

This case came up on this day for appearance of the accused before me as the accused filed memo admitting his guilt for the offences in respect of which cognizance is taken, after hearing the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state and the accused in person with regard to the quantum of sentence and having stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

The Sub Inspector of Police, Ajith Singh Nagar Police Station laid charge sheet against the accused in Crime No.343/2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 270, 273 IPC and Sec.20 (ii) of COTPA Act, 2003.

2.The case of the prosecution in nut shell is as follows:- 18.10.2019 at about 5.00 PM, Lw.5, K.Prasada Rao., S.I of Polie, Ajit

Singh Nagar Police station, he received reliable information that accused was having in possession of Gutkas, Khainees and Cigarettes for sale which is injurious and dangerous to human helath and Prohibitted its sale by the

Government of Andhra Pradesh. He rushed to Dr.No.42-54-7, Luna Centre,

Singhanagar, Vijayawada, on seeing them accused tried to escape from the shop, he caught hold the accused and questioned about identity particulars, accused confessed the identity particualars,then S.I of Police verfied the shop and found Raja Khaini 1360 packets, Bajaj Jarda 60 sachets, Mezban Khaini 30 sachets, Miraz Khaini 2580 Sachets, Raja Khaini 900 small packets, Paris cigarettes 60 Boxes they are valid Rs.2,57,320/- and he seized the Gutkhas,

Khainees and Cigarettes from the possession of accused in the presence of mediators Lw.3 P.Ganesh and Lw.4 B.Josheph Karmila under cover of mediators report. Basing on the same he registered it as case in Cr.No.270, 273

IPC and Sec.20 (ii) of COTPA Act, 2003. Hence, this case.

3.Cognizance is taken under Section 190 (1) (b) of Code of Criminal

Procedure Code for the offences punishable under Secs. 270, 273 and Sec.20

(ii) of COTPA Act.

4.On appearance of the accused, copies of documents were furnished to

Accused as contemplated under section 207 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

5.Accused is called present. Copies of documents furnished to accused. He was examined U/sec.251 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable U/secs.270, 273 and

Sec.20 (ii) of COTPA Act and he admitted the guilt of the offence.

6.This court is satisfied that the admission of the guilt of the Accused is voluntary and not due to undue influence or coercion by anyone. Hence the admission of guilt of the Accused for the offences punishable under Sections 270, 273 IPC and Sec.20(ii) of COTPA Act is accepted and the Accused is found guilty for the said offences and convicted Under Section 252 of code of Criminal

Procedure for the said offences.

7.Accused requested the court to take lenient view and he was the earning members of his family.

8.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, dependency of the accused I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to impose fine instead of sentencing him to imprisonment.

9.In the result, the Accused is sentenced to pay fine of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees

Four Thousand only) for the offence punishable under Sec.270 IPC and in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One

Thousand Only) for the offence punishable under Sec. 273 of Indian Penal Code in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week, he is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One

Thousand Only) for the offence punishable under Sec.20 (ii) of COTPA Act in default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one week.

10. The Accused is appraised of his right to prefer an appeal against the legality of the sentence. On enquiry he stated that he has got means to engage an Advocate. He executed a bond for Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) in order to ensure his presence before the appellate court if any appeal is preferred against him in compliance with section 437(A) of Code of Criminal

Procedure.

The un marked property ie., Raja Khaini 1360 packets, Bajaj Jarda 60 sachets, Mezban Khaini 30 sachets, Miraz Khaini 2580 Sachets, Raja Khaini 900 small packets, Paris cigarettes 60 Boxes (As per Form 60) shall be destroyed forthwith. The accused reported no objection for destruction of the property. The Station House Officer, A.S.Nagar Police Station is directed to destroy the same in the presence of two mediators, prepare panchanama report with regard to the destruction and file the same before this court immediately after the destruction.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.III directly and pronounced by me through the Whats App Video conference on this the day of 17th day of September, 2021.

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

A ppendix Of Evidence Witnesses Examined/Documents Marked/ Material Objects

For Prosecution: For Defence

Nil

Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: VIJAYAWADA:

Present: Sri Marpu Sreedhar., Prl Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada Thursday, this the 23rd day of September, 2021

ORIGINAL SUIT No.915 of 2019

Between:

Nanduri Krishna Mohan S/o.Rambabu, Hindu, aged about 35 Years,

Dr.No.78­3­14, K.V.Kandrika, Patapadu Post, Vijayawada.... Plaintiff

And: 

Shaik Dilshad Begum, W/o.Sk.Nagoor Basha, Muslim, Aged about 32 years, Dt.No.26­4­50, 3rd Floor, Vyuru Zamindar Street, Gandhinagar,

Vijayawada.... Defendant

This suit came up before me on this day in the presence of Sri K.V.Raghava Rao.,Learned Advocate for the plaintiff andSri D.V.Subrahmanyam., Learned Advocate for the Defendant, upon hearing of both counsels through Blue Jeans APP and upon perusal of the material on record, having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is the suit instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant seeking relief of recovery of amount of Rs.7,57,800/­ with subsequent interest @ 24%

P.A. from the date of suit till the date of relaisation on the principle amount and for costs of the suit.

The suit is filed for recovery of amounts of Rs.7,57,800/­ along with interest of 24% P.a and for costs of the suit. Now the matter is at the stage of trail. At this stage the plaintiff filed a petition to permit him to withdraw the suit as the amounts were received by him. Since no objection raised by the defendant the said petition I.A.1551 of 2021 is allowed by permitting the plaintiff to withdraw the suit. Accordingly the suit is dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Typed to my dictation directly by the stenographer, prints are taken by him, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court through the Bluejeans App Video Meeting, this the 23rd day of September, 2021. Sd/­M.Sreedhar Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE 

­­NIL­­

Sd/M.Sreedhar Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada 2

IN THE COURT OF

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada AT

,KRISHNA

EP/116/2020

Ch.N.Satyanarayana Age: 43 Address: R/o.D.no.6-15-03,Kummari street, Taylorpet, Vijayawada.

VERSUS: Sk.Nazeerun@Nazeemun Age: 50 Address: D.no.20-8-15/38,FF2 Surya Bala Apartments, 1st Floor,New Ayodya Nagar,Vijayawada. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : P.SESHU MOHAN Advocate for : appearing for Sk.Nazeerun@Nazeemun: Advocate appearing for respectively

ORDER

Heard the petitioner he represented no objection to close the EP has the property was delivered and also said delivered the other EA which are pending not with regard to claimant of the delivery property. Hence the EP is closed.

Date : 24-09-2021 Sd/- XXX XXX XXX

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

,KRISHNA