Sri M V S Prabhakar Rao

1

IN THE COURT OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

TIRUPATI.

PRESENT: Sri M.V.S. PRABHAKRA,

V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati. FAC/IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati.

Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of October, Two thousand and Nineteen.

CC.No. 698 of 2012

Between: The State, represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police,

Central Crime Station, Tirupati. (Cr.No. 90 of 2017). ..Complainant.

And:

1.R.Hari Krishna, age 39 years, S/o. R. Rajagopal Naidu, D.No.18-5/367, Sapthagiri Nagar, Tirupati, CPM District Secretary Member and CITU District General secretary.

...Accused.

2.G Markondaiah, age 28 years, S/o. G. Doraswamy, D.No.11-132B, Arunodaya Nagar, Jeevakona, KVPS District Secretary.

3.P. Gangappa ChettyMurali, age 31 years, S/o. P. Kannaiah, D.No.9-15, Gandamaneni Sivaiah Bhavan, Bairagipatteda, Tirupati, AITUC Town Secretary (CPI).

4.K. Venkata Ratnam, age 26 years, S/o. K. Venkatasami, D.No.9-7, Lingeswar Nagar, Bairagipatteda, Tirupati, AIYF District secretary (CPI).

5.R. Gopi, age 26 years, S/o. R. Venkata Ramana, D.No.6- 206, Sri Venkateswara Colony, Mangalam, Tirupati, TDP Member.

6.D. Madhava, age 30 years, S/o. D. Ankaiah, D.No.17-47, B.T.R Colony, Tirupati.

7.S. Basha, age 45 years, S/o. Babu Saheb, D.No.9-67, BTR Colony, Tirupati, License Porters General Secretary, TTD.

8.P.Nageswar Rao, age 48 years, S/o. P. Nagaiah, D.No.531 A, Parvathi Nagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

9.B. Venkatadri, age 39 years, S/o. B. Ramesh babu, D.No.2- 27B, BTR Colony, Tirupati, KVPS District Assistant Secretary.

10. E.Mastan, age 22 years, S/o. E. Nagur Nadipi Mastan, D.No.20-3-60/31 A, Yerramitta, Akkarampalli Road, Tirupati.

11. P. Nabi Rasul, age 20 years, S/o. P. Hussain Peran, Yerramitta, Akkarampalli road, Tirupati.

12. P. Ameer Basha, age 20 years, s/o. Mastan, D.No.20-3- 2 60/31 A, Yerramitta, Akkarampalli Road, Tiruapti.

13. K. Siva, age 23 years, s/o. Brahmaiah Achari, D.No.8-80, Venkateswara Colony, mangalam.

14. D.Nagaraju, age 23 years, s/o. D.Krishnaiah, D.No.8-23, BTR Colony, Tirupati, Dy. FI – CPM.

15. C. Subramanyam, age 38 years, S/o. C.Venkata Sami, D.No.7-83, Annapurna Colony, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

16. B. Sreeramulu Naick, age 45 years, S/o. B. Ramachandra Naick, Arunodaya Nagar, Jeva Kona.

17. S. Murali, age 19 years, S/o. Nagaraja, D.No.8-77, Jeevakona, S.N.Puram, Tirupati.

18. V. Lakshmaiah, age 35 years, s/o. V. Krishnaiah, D.No.9- 901, BTR Colony, Tirupati, MPTC – CPM.

19. M. Kumar, age 20 years, S/o. Rajendra, D.No.12-503, Saptagiri Nagar, Tirupati.

20. K. Kesavaiah, age 22 years, S/o. Venkaiah, D.No.8-7/13 BTR Colony, Tirupati.

21. V. Arjun, age 20 years, S/o. Venkaiah, D.No.11-213, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

22. P. Bhaskar, age 22 years, S/o. P. Chinnaiah, D.No.12-12A, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

23. G. Gopi, age 23 years, s/o. Subramanyam, D.No.16-7 BTR Colony, Tirupati.

24. T .Muneendra Chetty, age 29 years, S/o. Govinda Chetty, D.No.8-4/42, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

25. K. Chalapthi, age 23 years, S/o. K. Prasad, D.No.10-118, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

26. M. Siva, age 23 years, S/o. S/o. M. Mohan, D.No.12-463, Saptagiri Nagar, Mangalam, Tirupati.

27. N. Sreenu, age 23 years, S/o. N. Ramulu, D.No.8-16/31, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

28. M. Viswanath, age 26 years, S/o. Ramachandraiah, D.No.8-3/28, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

29. G. Subramanyam, age 30 years, S/o. G. Raja, D.No.8- 11/20, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

30. Mallela nagaraja, age 30 years, S/o. Subbaramaiah, D.No.6-289, S.V Colony, Mangalam, Tirupati.

31. A. Jayachandra Reddy, age 29 years, S/o. Chenga Reddy, D.No.1-28, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

32. T. Padmanabham, age 44 years, S/o. T. Subbaiah, D.No.7- 80, Mangalam Quarters, Tirupati.

3

33. A. Govinda Reddy, age 32 years, S/o. A. Arjun Reddy, D.no.11-591, Parvathi Nagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

34. R. Sreenivasulu, age 30 years, s/o. R. Raju, Parvathi Nagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

35. Y. Kesavamurthy, age 37 years, S/o. Ramasami, D.No.10- 585, Kranthi Nagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

36. T. Sudakar @ Sudha, age 28 years, S/o. Nagaiah, D.No.10-131, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

37. P. Chinna, age 36 years, s/o. Narasaiah, D.No.6-1-246/50, Yasoda Nagar, Tirupati.

38. P. Narasimhulu, age 28 years, s/o. Penchalaiah, D.No.4-20, Govinda Nagar, Tirupati.

39. M. Kannaiah, Naidu, age 39 years, S/o. BN. Ramanaidu, D.No.10-30, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

40. K. Dilip, age 20 years, S/o. Gurusami, D.No.8-59, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

41. M. Damu, age 22 years, s/o. M.S.Natarajan, D.No.12-316, B.T.R Colony, Mangalam.

42. G.Malyadri, age 30 years, s/o. Malakondaiah, D.No.6-160, Dhanalakshmi Nagar, Avilala, Tirupati Rural Mandal.

43. S. Venkatesu, age 32 years, S/o. Chinna Kondaiah, D.No.4- 4, Govinda Nagar, Tirupati.

44. V. Hari, age 35 years, S/o. Chenga Reddy, D.No.18-1-77, Railway Colony, Tirupati.

45. M. Chakravarthi, age 28 years, S/o. Venkatramaiah, D.No.20-3-226, S.J.Nagar, Tirupati and some others.

46. G. Krishnaiah, age 36 years, S/o. G. Pandurangaiah, D.No.18-1-88/D2, Yasoda Nagar, Tirupati.

This case is coming before me on 25.10.2019 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for complainant and of Sri

M.Vinod, Counsel for A.17 and upon hearing arguments of both sides, and upon perusing the material on record and this matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Alipiri Police Station, Tirupati filed charge sheet against A1 to A.46 in Cr.No.90 of 2007 for the offences 4 punishable under sections 147, 148, 447, 188, 506 r/w 149 of IPC and section 7(1) of Criminal Law Amendment Act 1932.

2. The brief averments of the charge sheet are that: A1 to A.46 are residents of in and around Tirupati Town and belong to C.P.I (M) and C.P.I party and all are interested on each other. As the CPI(M) and CPI party given “Bhuakramana” call from 06.05.2007 to occupy the valuable Government lands forcibly in and around Mangalam village and other villages of Tirupati

Urban Mandal by raising huts and party flags illegally, in order to protect the valuable Government lands and to maintain peace and public tranquility, the

Tahsildar cum executive magistrate, Tirupati Urban, issued orders under section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code, promulgated on 06.05.2007 vide proceedings M.C.No.85/2007 dated 05.05.2007 prohibiting unlawful assembly of five or more persons and carrying sticks, kerosene, fire-arms, bricks, chains and other deadly weapons and persons moving with a view to crate violence upto 15.05.2007. Though the orders under section 144 of Criminal Procedure

Code are in force, on 11.05.2007 at about 6.00 A.M A.1 to A.47 noted above and some others formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapons like crow bars, spades, sticks etc, criminally trespassed into the Government land in S.No.119, knowing fully well that orders are in force and tried to occupy the land by erecting huts and their party flags. When the police and revenue officials intervened to prevent them, the accused pelted stones on police and revenue officials who were discharging their legitimate duties as public servants, resulting which, P.V.Sathyanarayana, STF P.C 1664 of A.R, Chittoor and I.Gurappa, PC 3207 of Traffic Police station, Tirupati sustained injuries on their persons. The accused also created public nuisance in the locality of behaving highhandedly. In this connection on the report of

Tahsildar, Tirupati Urban, a case in Cr.No.90 of 2017 under sections 147, 148, 447, 188, 332, 506 r/w 149 of IPC on 11.05.2017 was registered and investigated into. During the course of investigation, A.1 to A.29 were arrested on 11/12.05.2007 at 1.00 a.m at the scene of offence at S.No.119,

Chenganagunta Tank, Mangalam, Tirupati, A.30 to A.45 were arrested on 11.05.2007 at 10.30 p.m and sent them to court for judicial custody on 27.06.2007 at 12.45 p.m A.46 was surrendered in Alipiri police stated and was 5 arrested and sent to court for judicial custody. In this case the Tahsildar,

Tirupati urban also lodged complaint in Cr.No.89 of 2007 under sections 147, 148, 332, 427, 353 r/w 149 of IPC and sections 3, 4 and 5 of Prevention of

Damage to Public Property Act 1984 of Alipiri Police Station, Tirupati, as the section 332 of IPC is attracts only to A.30 to A.46, who are concerned in

Cr.No. 89 of 2007 marked as A.1 to A.17. Therefore, the section of Law 332 of

IPC was deleted from this case and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against A.1 to A.46 for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 188, 506 r/w 149 of IPC and section 7(1) of Criminal Law

Amendment Act, 1932.

3. This court has taken cognizances of offences under sections 147, 148, 188, 506 r/w 149 of IPC and section 7(1) of Criminal Law Amendment

Act, 1932 taken against all the accused.

4. On production of A17 copies of documents, on which, the prosecution intends to rely upon, were furnished to the accused as contemplated Under Section 207 of Cr.P.C.

5. On further production of A17 he was examined under Sec: 239

Cr.P.C. He denied the accusation. Charges under sections147, 148, 447, 188, 506 r/w 149 IPC and 7(1) of Criminal Amendment Act are framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6.To prove its case, the prosecution has examined P.Ws.1 to 7 and got marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.4 On behalf of defence, no oral or documentary evidence was adduced.

7. After completion of prosecution side evidence, A17 was examined under section 313 of Cr.P.C by explaining in Telugu, the incriminating evidence deposed against him by the prosecution witnesses, for which, he denied the same and reported no defence evidence on his behalf.

8. Now the point for determination is: Whether the prosecution is

able to prove the guilt of A.17 for the offences under sections 147, 148,

6

447, 188, 506 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code and 7(1) of Criminal

Amendment Act beyond reasonable doubt?

9.Originally this case was filed against A1 to A.46 vide CCNo. 569 of 2007 on the file of III Addl. Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Tirupati and as per proceedings of the Principal District Judge, Chittoor in Dis.No.17 of 2009

dated 02.01.2009 this case was withdrawn and transferred to IV Additional

Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Tirupati, and numbered as CCNo. 141 of 2009. As

NBWs are pending, case against A.12, A.17 and A.45 was split up from main

C.C.No.141 of 2009 and numbered as present C.C.No. 698 of 2012. While so,

A.17 i.e present accused became under trial prisoner and NBWs against A12 and A45 could not be apprehended since long time case against A.12 and

A.45 was split up from C.C.No. 698 of 2012 and numbered as C.C.No. 10 of 2019. Case against A.1 to A.11, A.13 to A.16, A.18 to A.44 and A.46 was disposed of on 30.04.2013. Case against A.7 was abated on 01.10.2009 as he died during pendency of trial. Therefore the present case is only against A17.

10. POINT: In this case, the prosecution has cited as many as 10 witnesses but examined only P.Ws.1 to 7 since the other witnesses were given up by learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

11. When the evidence of P.W.1, who earlier worked as Surveyor,

Tirupati Urban is perused, he testified that on 11.05.2007, he went to field work near S.No.119, Mangalampalle and observed 60 persons as mob, trying to erect houses. As the land is kaluva poramboke, he intimated the same to the

Tahsildar and at that time section 144 Cr.P.C proceedings are in force. Then, himself, his Tahsildar and other officials went to the scene at 5.00 p.m and the mob made an attempt to scatter them from the scene as they are making efforts to remove the huts in the said place. In the scuffle the Sub-Inspector of

Police sustained blood injury and he was shifted to Sri Venkateswara

Ramanarayana Ruia Government General Hospital, Tirupati. Though P.W.1 stated that there was mob at the scene, he has not specifically stated that A.17 was present there in the mob or not. Hence, the evidence of PW1 has got no direct bearing against A17.

7

12. The next evidence let in by the prosecution is that of P.W.2, who earlier worked as police constable in Traffic Police Station, Tirupati. He testified that on 11.50.2017 he along with other police officials went to

Gangachennaiahkunta, Settipalle Panchayat, for the purpose of bundo-busth , since the CPI and CPM party people are illegally occupying the Government land. At that time, section 144 Cr.P.C proceedings are in force. The mob tried to attack them with stones and crowbars when they tried to dispossess them.

P.W.2 further deposed that one M.Nagaraja beat him with a stick on his head and Chinna Damu beat Sathyanarayana, who is STF Constable with a stick and he gave report to police. Admittedly, those two persons i.e Nagaraja and

Sathyanarayana are not the present accused. In the cross examination, P.W.2 has categorically admitted that he cannot identify whether A.17 was present in that mob or not. Therefore, the evidence of P.W.2 also will not render much help to prove the complicity of A17.

13. The next evidence let in by prosecution is that of P.W.3 who is working as Thalari, Mangalam village, since 1996. He testified that on 11.05.2007 CPI and CPM party people erected houses in Government Land at

Chennaiahgunta, Tirupati. He along with Village Revenue Officer went to the scene and made a call to the Thasildar who also came to the scene. At that time they removed the houses on the instructions of Tahsildar and CPI workers 50 in number tried to obstruct them. P.W.3 also categorically admitted in the cross examination that he cannot say whether A.17 in this case was present in the mob at the scene on the date of offence or not. Therefore, much credence need not be attached to the evidence of this witness also.

14. When the evidence of P.W.4 who earlier worked as police constable, armed Reserve, Chittoor from August 1990 to August 2007 is perused, he testified that on 11.05.2007 he along with his staff went to

Settipalli Cheruvu for bandobust duty and at that time mob consisting 200 people who belong to CPI and CPM party tried to erect houses in the

Government land and at that time section 144 Cr.P.C proceedings are in force.

P.W.4 further deposed that they pelted stones on them and in the incident 8

P.W.2 sustained injuries and he sustained injury on his right hand. This witness has also categorically stated in the cross examination that he cannot say whether A.17 in this case was present in the mob at the scene on the date of offence or not. Hence, much credence need not be attached to the testimony of this witness also.

15. In as much as the evidence of P.W.5 who earlier worked as

Tahsildar, Tirupati Urban is perused, he testified that on 11.05.2007 CPI and

CPM party workers made an attempt to occupy Government Lands under the name and style as Bhoo Akramana at Mangalam, Tirupati Urban and at that time section 144 Cr.P.C proceedings are pending. He further deposed that on 11.05.2007 at 7.00 a.m he received phone call that the mob consisting of 500 people tried to enter the land in Sy.No.119 in an extent of Ac:46.04 cents of

Mangalam village and then he along with his Revenue Inspector –

V.Viswanathan and Assistant Revenue Inspector Hemanth Reddy and P.Ws.1 and 3 along with police personnel proceeded to the scene and announced to public to leave the place. Despite it, some of the leaders in the mob provoked others to raise huts in the said land and some persons in the mob pelted stones on them and in the scuffle two constables sustained injuries. Ex.P.1 is orders under section 144 Cr.P.C dated 05.05.2007 issued by him. Ex.P.2 is his complaint given to Station House Officer of Alipiri Police Station, dated 11.05.2007. Of-course, P.W.5 has categorically identified A.17 particularly as the person in the mob. In the cross examination, this witness has stated that he cannot identify all the 500 members in the mob. He further admitted that he has not mentioned the physical features of A.17 in Ex.P.2. In such case, as to how P.W.5 has specifically identified A.17 in the Court at the time he gave evidence in the Court, is a million dollar question, since the incident was happened about 12 years back. P.W.5 has not stated specifically that he has got close acquaintance with A.17 for one reason or the other. Therefore, the identity of P.W.5 in respect of A.17 before the Court more particularly, after lapse of 12 yeas of time is rather a myth and far fetching from truth and as an official of Revenue, he has deposed against A.17. Had it been a fact that he had acquaintance with A.17, he would have mentioned the physical features of

A.17 in the report or he would have stated his other close acquaintance with 9

A17. Therefore, the argument of learned counsel that PW5 purposefully deposed against A17 more particularly with regard to the identity in the mob on the date of incident is an acceptable version. Hence, the sole evidence of

P.W.5 is not trustworthy so as to base conviction against A.17.

16. The next evidence let in by prosecution is that of P.W.6 who earlier worked as Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Alipiri Police Station from 2005 to 2007. He deposed that on 11.05.2007 at 9.00 p.m on the report of P.W.5 he registered a case in Cr.No. 90 of 2007. Ex.P.3 is original FIR in Cr.No. 90 of 2007. He further deposed that he went to the scene of offence and recorded the statements of P.Ws.1 to 3 and prepared Ex.P.4, rough sketch. At the scene he arrested A1 to A.27 and sent them to court for judicial custody. This witness has also not specifically stated that A.17 is one among the persons in the mob, except stating that he arrested A.17 also. Even otherwise, P.W.6 is not an eyewitness and P.W.6 has categorically admitted in the cross examination that along with complaint, P.W.5 has not submitted any document to him and he has not stated about the physical features of A.17. Therefore, much credence need not be attached to the testimony of P.W.6 also, since he stated about the arrest of accused and registration of crime.

17. The last evidence let in by prosecution is that of P.W.7 who earlier worked as Sub-Inspector of Police, Alipiri Police Station, from 06.09.2006 to 06.06.2010. He further deposed that on 09.06.2007 he arrested A.30 to A.45 at Chennaiagunta fields under police proceedings and sent them to Court for judicial custody. The evidence of P.W.7 is also not much helpful to prove the complicity of A.17, since, he deposed that he arrested A.30 to A.45.

18. To sum up as the evidence on record is not sufficient and there was no specific identity spoken out by any of the witnesses and the evidence of

P.W.5 did not stand to legal scrutiny, A.17 is entitled for acquittal for all the offences with which he is charged.

19. In the result, I found A17 not guilty for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 447, 188, 506 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 7(1) of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 and he is acquitted under 10 section 248(1) of Cr.P.C. A17 shall be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other case. Case against A.12 and A.45 was split up from

C.C.No. 698 of 2012 and numbered as C.C.10 of 2019.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open court this the 30 th day of October 2019.

V Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati. FAC IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined For prosecution:For defence: P.W.1V. Ravisekhar.

P.W.2I. Gurrappa.None.

P.W.3M. Subramanyam.

P.W.4P.V.Satyanarayana.

P.W.5V.K.Narasa Reddy.

P.W.6P. Chinnaswamy.

P.W.7C.Krishnaiah. Exhibits marked For prosecution: Ex.P.1Section 144 Cr.P.C proceedings, issued by the Tahsildar, Tirupati Urban dated 05.05.2007.

Ex.P.2Complaint given by P.W.5 to the SHO, Alipiri Police Station.

Ex.P.3Original FIR in Cr.No. 90 of 2007, Alipiri P.S, Tirupati.

Ex.P.4Rough sketch of scene of offence.

For defence: Nil. Material objects marked : Nil.

V Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati. FAC IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati.

11

Calender and judgment

IN THE COURT OF IV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS;

TIRUPATI.

CC.No. 234 of 2018

(Cr.No. 60 of 2007 of Alipiri Police Station, Tirupati).

Date of offence:11.05.2007

Date of complaint:11.05.2007

Date of taken on file:23.10.2007

Date of apprehension of A.17:11/12.05.2007 at 1.00 a.m. (present accused) 7.8.2019

Date when released on bail:A.17 on 15.05.2007

Date of commencement of trial:19.09.2019

Date of close of trial:25.10.2019

Date of sentence or order:30.10.2019

Complainant:The State, represented by the Sub- Inspector, Alipiri Police station.

Name of theFather’s/AgeReligionVillageMandal/Occupation AccusedHusband’s nameDistrict A1/R.Hari KrishnaR. Rajagopal39HinduD.No.18-5/367,CPM District NaiduyearsSapthagiri Nagar,Secretary Member Tirupati, and CITU District General secretary

A2/G.MarkondaiahG. Doraswamy28HinduD.No.11-132B,KVPS District yearsArunodaya Nagar,Secretary Jeevakona

A3/P. Gangappa P. Kannaiah31HinduD.No.9-15, GandamaneniAITUC Town Chetty MuraliyearsSivaiah Bhavan,Secretary (CPI). Bairagipatteda, Tirupati

A4/K. VenkataK. Venkatasami26HinduD.No.9-7, LingeswarAIYF District RatnamyearsNagar, Bairagipatteda,secretary (CPI) Tirupati

A5/R. GopiR. Venkata26HinduD.No.6-206, SriTDP Member. RamanayearsVenkateswara Colony, Mangalam, Tirupati 12

A6/D. MadhavaD. Ankaiah30HinduD.No.17-47, B.T.R-- yearsColony, Tirupati.

A7/S. BashaBabu Saheb45MuslimD.No.9-67, BTR Colony,License Porters yearsTirupati,General Secretary, TTD

A8/P.Nageswar RaoP. Nagaiah48Hindu D.No.531 A, Parvathi-- yearsNagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

A9/B. VenkatadriB. Ramesh Babu39HinduD.No.2-27B, BTR Colony,KVPS District yearsTirupati,Assistant Secretary.

A.10/ E.MastanE. Nagur Nadipi22MuslimD.No.20-3-60/31 A,-- MastanyearsYerramitta, Akkarampalli Road, Tirupati.

A.11/ P. Nabi Rasul P. Hussain Peran20MuslimYerramitta, Akkarampalli-- yearsroad, Tirupati.

A.12/P. AmeerMastan20MuslimD.No.20-3-60/31 A,-- BashayearsYerramitta, Akkarampalli Road, Tirupati.

A.13/K. SivaBrahmaiah Achari23HinduD.No.8-80, Venkateswara-- yearsColony, Mangalam.

A.14/D.NagarajuD.Krishnaiah23HinduD.No.8-23, BTR Colony,Dy. FI – CPM. yearsTirupati

A.15/C.C.Venkata Sami38HinduD.No.7-83, Annapurna-- SubramanyamyearsColony, BTR Colony, Tirupati.

A.16/B. SreeramuluB.Ramachandra45HinduArunodaya Nagar, Jeva-- NaickNaickyearsKona.

A.17/S. Murali Nagaraja 19 Hindu D.No.8-77, Jeevakona, -- years S.N.Puram, Tirupati.

A.18/ V.V. Krishnaiah35HinduD.No.9-901, BTR Colony,MPTC – CPM LakshmaiahyearsTirupati

A.19/M. KumarRajendra20HinduSaptagiri Nagar, Tirupati.-- years

A.20/K. KesavaiahVenkaiah22HinduD.No.8-7/13 BTR Colony,-- yearsTirupati.

A.21/V. ArjunVenkaiah20HinduD.No.11-213, BTR-- yearsColony, Tirupati.

A.22/P. BhaskarP. Chinnaiah22HinduD.No.12-12A, BTR-- yearsColony, Tirupati

A.23/G. GopiSubramanyam23HinduD.No.16-7 BTR Colony,-- yearsTirupati.

A.24/T .MuneendraGovinda Chetty29HinduD.No.8-4/42, BTR-- ChettyyearsColony, Tirupati.

13

A.25/K. ChalapthiK. Prasad23HinduD.No.10-118, BTR-- yearsColony, Tirupati.

A.26/M. SivaM. Mohan23HinduD.No.12-463, Saptagiri-- yearsNagar, Mangalam, Tirupati.

A.27/N. SreenuN. Ramulu23HinduD.No.8-16/31, BTR– yearsColony, Tirupati

A.28/M. ViswanathRamachandraiah26HinduD.No.8-3/28, BTR-- yearsColony, Tirupati.

A.29/G.G. Raja30HinduD.No.8-11/20, BTR-- SubramanyamyearsColony, Tirupati.

A.30/MallelaSubbaramaiah30HinduD.No.6-289, S.V Colony,-- NagarajayearsMangalam, Tirupati.

A.31/A.Chenga Reddy29HinduD.No.1-28, BTR Colony,-- Jayachandra ReddyyearsTirupati.

A.32/T.T. Subbaiah44HinduD.No.7-80, Mangalam-- PadmanabhamyearsQuarters, Tirupati.

A.33/A. GovindaA. Arjun Reddy32HinduD.No.11-591, Parvathi-- ReddyyearsNagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

A.34/R.R. Raju30HinduParvathi Nagar,-- SreenivasuluyearsJeevakona, Tirupati.

A.35/Y.Ramasami37HinduD.No.10-585, Kranthi-- KesavamurthyyearsNagar, Jeevakona, Tirupati.

A.36/T. Sudakar @Nagaiah28Hindu.No.10-131, BTR Colony,-- SudhayearsTirupati.

A.37/P. ChinnaNarasaiah36HinduD.No.6-1-246/50, Yasoda-- yearsNagar, Tirupati

A.38/P.Penchalaiah28HinduD.No.4-20, Govinda-- NarasimhuluyearsNagar, Tirupati.

A.39/M. Kannaiah,BN.Ramanaidu39Hindu D.No.10-30, BTR-- NaiduyearsColony, Tirupati.

A.40/K. DilipGurusami20HinduD.No.8-59, BTR Colony,-- yearsTirupati.

A.41/M. DamuM.S.Natarajan22HinduD.No.12-316, B.T.R-- yearsColony, Mangalam.

A.42/G.MalyadriMalakondaiah30HinduD.No.6-160,-- yearsDhanalakshmi Nagar, Avilala, Tirupati Rural Mandal.

A.43/S. VenkatesuChinna Kondaiah32HinduD.No.4-4, Govinda-- yearsNagar, Tirupati.

14

A.44/V. HariChenga Reddy35HinduD.No.18-1-77, Railway-- yearsColony, Tirupati.

A.45/M.Venkatramaiah28HinduD.No.20-3-226,– ChakravarthiyearsS.J.Nagar, Tirupati

A.46/G. Krishnaiah G. Pandurangaiah36HinduD.No.18-1-88/D2,-- yearsYasoda Nagar, Tirupati.

Nature of offence:Rioting; Rioting armed with deadly weapon; Criminal trespass; Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant; Criminal intimidation; with intent to cause any person to abstain from doing or to do any act which such person has a right to do or to abstain fro doing, obstructs or uses violence to or intimates such person or any member of his family or person in his employ, or loiters at or near a place where such person or member or employed person resides or works or carries on business or happens to be, or persistently follows him from place to place, or interferes with any property owned or used by him or deprives him of or hinders him in the use thereof.

Section of Law:Under sections 147, 148, 447, 188, 506 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 7(1) of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932

Plea of the accused:Not guilty.

Finding of the Court:Not guilty. Sentence or order : In the result, I found A17 not guilty for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 447, 188, 506 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 7(1) of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 and he is acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C. A17 shall be set at liberty forthwith, if he is not required in any other case. Case against A.12 and A.45 was split up from C.C.No. 698 of 2012 and numbered as C.C.10 of 2019.

V Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati. FAC IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class Tirupati. Copy to

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chittoor.

15

1

 IN THE COURT OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: TIRUPATI

Present:­ Sri.M.V.S. PRABHAKAR

V Additional Junior Civil Judge,Tirupati. FAC / IV Additional Junior Civil Judge,Tirupati.

Friday, the First Day of November, Two Thousand and Nineteenth.

P.R.C. No. 20 of 2019

(Cr.No. 349 of 2018 of Chandragiri Police Station)

Between: The state, represented by Inspector of Police,

Chandragiri Police Station....Complainant.

And: Bodala Giri, aged 38 years, S/o. Munaswamy, Mallaiahpalli village, Dornakambala Panchayath, Chandragiri Mandal, Caste: Yadav,

occupation: Cultivation....Accused.

 This case is coming on this day before me for final hearing in the presence of

Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri C.Sankar Reddy and

K.Reddappa, Advocates for the accused, upon hearing and perusing the material on record, the court delivered the following:

­:: O R D E R ::­

The Inspector of Police, Chandragiri Police Station, filed charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No. 349 of 2018 for the offences under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that:  The accused is resident of

Mallaiahpalli village. The scene of offence is located at canal of Mallaiahpalli village. The deceased is P.Giraja.

On 24.11.2018 at 8.00 p.m P.Chenchu Munaiah being the husband of

P.Girija, gave a complaint that his wife P.Girija left the house on 13.11.2018 between 2.30 p.m and 6.00 p.m without informing anybody, they searched for her, but could not trace her whereabouts. He suspected B.Giri of the same village, who used to entice her with his fallacious words, is responsible for missing of his wife.

2

Basing on his complaint, initially, a case in Cr.No.349 of 2018 under head Woman

Missing was registered on 24.11.2018 and investigated into.

During the course of investigation P.Chenchu Munaiah and Galam Guravaiah were examined and recorded their statements, made hectic efforts to trace the missing woman (deceased) besides keeping surveillance on the movements of the suspect B.Giri. On 25.11.2018 at about 9.00 a.m Mekala Munaswamy, Village

Revenue officer, Chandragiri III Cluster, came to Chandragiri police station along with accused B.Giri and gave a written complaint to the Inspector of Police to the effect that on 25.11.2018 at about 7.00 a.m while he was present at the premises of

Revenue Office, Chandragiri Mandal, accused B.Giri appeared before him and voluntarily made extra judicial confession that he got illegal intimacy with the deceased P.Girija, wife of Chenchu Muni of the same village since 5 years and both of them met in the fields situated in the outskirts of the village and also in her house at some times for cohabitation and he used to give money to her and also provided cell phone to talk secretly with her. For the last few months, he got suspicion that the deceased P.Girija is having illegal intimacy with some others also.

Further, she demanded him to arrange Rs.5,00,000/­ for renovation of her house, for which, he promised her that he will arrange the same. On that, his suspicion reached at peak level and decided to do away with her life as she demanded money and also having illegal intimacy with some others and hence, as part of execution of his intention to get rid of the deceases, on 13.11.2018 afternoon at about 2.30 p.m the deceased Girija contacted him over cell phone and instructed him to meet him nearby the canal (vanka) situated to the east of their village, as she wanted to meet him to talk with each other. At about 3.00 p.m P.Girija left her house without informing anybody, reached the dry canal, on the way to Quarry situated to the east of their village and met the accused B.Giri, who picked up quarrel with her on the pretext that she is having more illegal affairs with others, so he leveled allegations 3 against her, got enraged and picked up a stick beat firmly on her head and caused bleeding injury, as a result of which, the deceased died on the spot with severe head injury. Immediately, the accused B.Giri with an intention to conceal the evidence of murder, went to his house, brought a gunny bag and gagged the dead body of

P.Girija in the gunny bag and carried the dead body to a dried irrigation well belonging to Balachandra Naidu and threw the dead body into the well and went away. Later, he came to know that the husband of deceased gave a complaint in

Chandragiri police station about missing of deceased, suspecting that he is responsible for her missing, police searching for him. Hence, he approached and sought his help and hence, he produced the accused before the police for taking necessary action against him.

On receipt of complaint from Mekala Munaswamy, the Inspector of Police altered section of Law from Woman Missing into section 302 and 201 of IPC, submitted copies of FIR to all concerned officers and investigated into. During investigation, Inspector of Police secured mediators, along with Mekala

Munaswamy, reached scene of offence situated in Dodlavanka (canal), North way to Suresh Reddy Quarry, near Mallaihpalle village, Chandragiri Mandal on 25.11.2018 at 10.00 a.m, seized the stick used in the commission of offence by the accused, under a cover of scene observation mahazar, got photographed with the camera. Later, accused B.Giri took the police party along with mediators to the unused dried well belongs to Balachandra Naidu and showed a gunny bag bundle stating that the dead body of P.Girija was gagged into gunny bag by him on the date of occurrence. Then, Inspector of Police secured P.Chenchu Munaiah, Galam

Guravaiah, Mekala Munaswamy, Galam Gurrappa, Galam Chinnamma, Bunga

Vasaiah, K.Murali Reddy and Kamasani Sidda Reddy, removed the dead body out of the well and held inquest over the dead body of P.Girija, forwarded the same to S.V

Medical College, Tirupati, for autopsy to know the real cause of death. Later 4 interrogated thea ccused B.Giri in the presence of mediators, recordedhis confessional statement under a cover of mahazar, arrested the accused and sent him to the court for judicial remand. On 25.11.2018 examined P.Chengaiah,

M.Vinodh, M.Bharath Kumar and recorded their statements. On 26.11.2018 seized red colour nighty, green coloured petty coat ,yellow thread containing three red beads, two black beads, four round gold designed small balls, one round shaped

Thalibottu, an iron key, after conducting Postmortem examination, under a cover of police proceedings. After receiving postmortem examination report opining that the “death due to consequence of physical assaulted could not be denied” and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against accused for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

3. This case is taken on file for the offence under sections 302 and 201 of IPC against accused.

4. On appearance of the accused he was furnished with copies of documents as required U/s. 207 Cr.P.C.

5. Heard both sides.

 6. The point for determination is, whether the offence punishable

under sections 3302 and 201 of IPC is exclusively triable by the court of

sessions or not?

7. POINT: On perusal of the material records and close scrutiny of the entire material placed on record, a prima­face case is found against acused for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of IPC, which are exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, Chittoor Division U/Sec.209 Cr.P.C, hence, the case is committed to the Court of Sessions.

5

8.The office is directed to submit the entire case records to the Hon’ble

Court of Sessions, Chittoor with material objects if any duly indexed.

9.The Public Prosecutor, Chittoor is notified about the commitment of the case to the Court of Sessions, Chittoor Division U/Sec.209(A) Cr.P.C.

10. Accused was released on bail on 26.02.2019 as per orders in Crl.M.P.No.

387 of 2019 dated 25.02.2019 of Hon’ble X Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Tirupati.

11. The accused in informed about his right to free legal aid to defend his case in the Court of Sessions, Chittoor Division.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 01 st day of November, 2019.

// True copy \\(Sd/- M.V.S.Prabhakar) (Sd/- M.V.S.Prabhakar)V Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, V Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class,FAC / IV Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, FAC / IV Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class,Tirupati. Tirupati.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUPATI.

PRESENT: Sri M.V.S. PRABHAKAR

V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati. FAC / IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati.

Friday, the 25th day of October, Two thousand and Nineteen.

CC.No. 336 of 2017

Between: P. Sujatha, W/o. P.Srikanth, Hindu, aged about 30 years, residing at Door No.20­1­164/A, Maruthi Nagar, Korlagunta, Opp. Sai Baba Temple, Tirupati, Chittoor

 ..Complainant.

District.

And: J. Kesava Murthy, S/o. J.Chandramouli, Hindu, aged about 40 years, Business, residing at C.Mallavaram village, Perumallapalli Post, Tirupati Rural Mandal,

Chittoor District....Accused.

This complaint was filed by the complainant against the accused praying this court to punish the accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of N.I Act.

This case is coming before me this day in the presence of Sri

N.Yoganand, Advocate for the complainant, Sri S.Ramachandra Rao,

Advocate for Accused, Complainant filed a petition U/sec.257 Cr.P.C and the same was allowed, this court delivered the following.

O R D E R

Both parties present. Crl.M.P.No. 2130 of 2019 filed under section257

Cr.P.C to withdraw the complaint was allowed. Accused, Consequently, the accused is acquitted for the offence under section 138 of N.I Act.

Pronounced by me in open court this the 25 th day of October, 2019.

(Sd/­ M.V.S.Prabhakar) V Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, FAC/IV Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tirupati.

2

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For Complainant:For Accused:

P.W.1P. Sujatha.None. P.W.2G. Manjula.

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Complainant:For Accused:

Ex.P.1Original cheque bearing No.034844 dated NIL. 24.08.2016 issued by accused in favour of P.W.1. Ex.P.2Return memo dated 31.10.2016. Ex.P.3Office copy of legal notice dated 15.11.2016. Ex.P.4Served acknowledgement dated 17.11.2016.

(Insld/- MVSP) IV Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, FAC/IV Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tirupati.

In the court of IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Tirupati.

Dated this the 18th day of October, 2019

CCNo 306 of 2018

Petitioner and Advocate

1) SI of police, Chandragiri PS Address - Chandragiri PS. Advocate- APP

Respondent and Advocate

1) Y.Anil Kumar Address - Nuthiguntapalli village, Boppatajupalli post, Ramachandrapuram mandal, Chittoor Dist

Acts

Under Act(s) Under Section(s)

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860S338,279IPC MV ACTS134-a-b-,r/w187MVACT

Docket order dated 14.09.2019:

Both parties present. Settled before Lok Adalath.

PO, LA.