Sri. O.venkata Nageswara Rao

ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE

III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka) · Chittoor · Andhra Pradesh

Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO, ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE, is posted at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 700 court orders on record since 2010. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, SC cases.

700

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

SC/70/2015 Acquitted

Inspector of police vs V. Sowmya

13 May 2015

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS::: CHITTOOR DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF ADDITINAL ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE:: TIRUPATI

Present:Sri O.Venkata Nageswara Rao,

Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Tirupati

Wednesday, the 13th of May, 2015

S.C. No.70 of 2015

ComplainantThe State represented by Inspector of Police, Renigunta P.S.

Accused1. V.Sowmya, 27 years D/o V.Ramaiah, Setti Balija by caste, D.No.374106,Kurrakaluva, Papanaidupeta Post, Yerepedu Mandal,.

2. S.Silpa, 20 years, D/o Chinnappa, Dalithbycaste,Door No.37.4.106,Kurrakaluva, Papanaidupeta Post, Yerpedu Mandal.

3. Sireesha, 20 years, D/o Lakshmainarayana, Gajula Balija by caste, Karnataka, presently residing a near Govt.High School, B.T.R.Colony, Daminedu Post, Tirupati Rural Mandal.

P.R.C.P.R.C.No 3/2015 on the file of the V Addl.Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tirupati.

Prosecution conducted bySri G.Sudhakar Babu,

Additional Public Prosecutor.

Accused defended byKum.K.A.Kumari, Advocate for accused 1 to 3

ChargePunishment for robbery under Section 392 of IPC. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery under section 394 of IPC.

Plea of the accusedPleaded not guilty

Finding of the CourtAccused are found not guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 392 and 394 of IPC.

Sentence or OrderThe accused are acquitted under section 235(1) Cr.P.C for the offence punishable under Section 392 and 394 of IPC.

:: J U D G M E N T::

1. The Inspector of Police, Renigunta Police Station has filed charge sheet under Sections 392 and 394 of IPC in Cr.Nos 176/2011 and 25/2012 against the accused before the III Addl.Judl. Magistrate of I Class Court, Tirupati.

2. The brief facts of the charge sheet are as follows:

The The defactocomplainants M.Rajagopal and R.Mohan Kumar while they were answering calls of nature at Renigunta check post, Renigunta and

Ramana Vilas Circle, Renigunta on 4122011 at 230 P.M and 1722012 at about 930

A.M respectively,the accused went there and caused cut injury on the throat of

M.Rajagopal and taken away cash of Rs.4,500/ and cellphone and a sum of Rs.5,000/ from the possession of defactocomplainant Mohan Kumar in Cr.No.25/2012. The

Inspector of Police having recorded the statement of one of the defactocomplainant

M.Rajagopal at hospital and after receiving of written report from another defacto complainant M.Mohan Kumar and registered the same as a case in Cr.NO.176/2011 under section 394 of IPC and Cr.No.25/2012 under section 392 of IPC and issued FIRs in both the crimes. He examined the defactocomplainants in both the crimes and also visited scene of offence and drawn rough sketches and examined the witnesses.

On 1822012 at about 530 P.M, on receiving credible information about the accused, he secured the mediators, staff and went to Gajulamandyam four road junction on Puthalapattu Naidupeta 150 feet bypass road and arrested A1 to A3 under the cover of mahazar in the presence of mediators and seized cash of Rs.1,500/ and also recorded confession of the accused under the said mahazar. Later the accused are produced before the III Addl.Judl.Magistrate of I Class, Tirupati for remand. The Inspector of Police got conducted test identification parade through the 3

II Addl.Judl.Magistrate of I Class, Kadapa. The Medical Officer who examined the injured M.Rajagopal gave wound certificate and opined that the injury is simple in nature. After completion of investigation, the Inspector of Police filed charge sheet under section 392 and 394 of IPC.

3. The learned III Addl.Judl.Magistrate of I Class, Tirupati had taken cognizance of the offence under Section 392 and 394 of IPC against the accused 1 to 3.

4. On appearance of the accused 1 to 3, the copies of documents were furnished to the accused as contemplated U/sec. 207 Cr.P.C. The case was committed to the Court of Session, Chittoor Division, Chittoor as contemplated U/sec. 209 of

Cr.P.C.

5. The Hon'ble Sessions Judge, Chittoor Division was pleased to made over the case to this Court for conducting trial and to proceed according to law.

6. On appearance of the accused and on hearing of the learned Additional

Public Prosecutor, the defence counsel and on perusal of the record, prima facie case is made out to frame charge against the accused. Charge under sections 392 and 394 of

IPC framed against the accused 1 to 3. The accused were examined U/sec. 228 of

Cr.P.C. The accused denied the charges and claimed to be tried the case.

7. At the time of trial, the prosecution has examined PWs.1 to 5 and marked Exs.P.1 to P.15 and M.O.1.

8. The learned Addl.Public Prosecutor given up the evidence of witnesses i.e., P.Subramanyam, D.Ramachandra, M.Venkataiah, Brahmanapattu Gopi,

Ramasathy MohanKumar, Shaik Shareef, Deggulu Srinivasulu, Putta Krishnaurthy,

K.Ramaiah and M.Bujjappa.

9. After closure of the evidence of prosecution, the accused were examined U/sec. 313 1(b) of Cr.P.C. by putting the incriminating material available against them in the evidence of witnesses. The accused denied the same. The accused did not choose to examine any witnesses and marked any documents in his defence.

10. The points that arises for determination in this case are as follows:

1. Whether the prosecution able to prove that the accused robbed cash of Rs.4,500/ and Cellphone from the possession of P.W.1 by causing injury to his throat on 4122011at about 230 P.M

near Old Koduru check post at Renigunta?

2. Whether the prosecution able to prove the accused robbed Rs.5,000/ from R.Mohan Kumar at Ramana Vilas Circle, Renigunta while he was answering calls of nature on 1722012 at 1030 P.M?

3. Whether the prosecution able to prove the charges levelled against the accused 1 to 3 beyond reasonable doubt?

11. Points No. 1 to 3 (taken up jointly):

The prosecution has examined Five witnesses in order to prove the charges levelled against the accused. P.W.1 is the defactocomplainant and injured,

P.Ws 2 and 3 are examined as independent eye witnesses to the occurrence but they have stated that they doesn’t' know anything about this case and they turned hostile to the case of the prosecution. P.W.4 is the mediator for the arrest of the accused and seizure of property. P.W.5 is the Investigation Officer.

12. P.W.1 has stated that about 2 ½ years ago on one day he boarded

Kadapa – Arakonam Passenger at Pullampeta to go to Renigunta. He alighted train at about 630 P.M and started to go to Venkatagiri by bus and reached old Koduru check post at about 700 P.M. While he was answering calls of nature by the side of bushes, three persons came and pushed him down and taken away cash of Rs.4,900/ from his pocket forcibly and also Cellphone. As there was darkness, he has not seen the said persons. While taking cash and cell phone, they caused cut injury on his throat with a knife by one of the said persons. He went to road and called the police and that police took him to SVRRRG Hospital, Tirupati for treatment. Later police came and obtained his signature in a report. P.W.1 further stated that he does not know the contents of the said report. P.W.1 has not identified the culprits who snatched away cash and cellphone by causing injury. P.W.1 has stated that he does not know the contents of 5 the report basing on which the criminal law set into motion. P.W.1 being the defacto complainant and injured has not stated anything against the accused. Even in the report Ex.P7 there is no mention about the particulars of culprits. Though the evidence of P.W.1 is sufficient to say that three persons robbed the cash and cell phone by causing injury to his throat but there is no evidence put forth by the prosecution to prove the nexus between the accused and the offence.

13. P.W.4 is examined by the prosecution as one of the mediators for arrest of the accused and seizure of cash of Rs.1,500/ under the cover of mahazar

Ex.P13. But P.W.4 has stated that police called him to the police station and obtained his signature. Further P.W.4 has stated that he has not seen the accused in police station and that police were not arrested the accused in his presence. P.W.4 without stating anything about the apprehension of accused and seizure of property he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.

14. P.W.5 being the Inspector of Police, stated that he registered FIR in

Cr.No.176/2011 under section 394 of IPC and FIR in Cr.No.25/2012 under Section 392 of IPC on 4122011 and 1722012 basing on Exs.P7 and P10 respectively and took up investigation. P.W.5 further stated that on receiving credible information on 1822012 he secured the mediator P.W.4 and staff, arrested the accused 1 to 3 at

Gajulamandyam four roads junction at Renigunta – Puthalapattu main road and seized

M.O.1 cash under the cover of mahazar Ex.P13. As discussed above, the independent mahazardar P.W.4 turned hostile to the case of the prosecution. Though P.W.5 stated that he identified the accused with the assistance of defactocomplainant P.W.1 but

P.W.1 signature finds no place in Ex.P13. Though P.W.5 got conducted test identification parade of the accused through the learned II Addl.Judl.Magistrate of I

Class, Kadapa, but as seen from the proceedings of test identification parade of the accused, the defactocomplainant P.W.1 has not identified the culprits. However, the material witnesses turned hostile to the case of the prosecution and there is no 6 evidence to prove the nexus between the accused and the offence in both the crimes i.e., Cr.No.176/2011 and Cr.No.25/2012. Therefore, it can be said that the prosecution miserably failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused and that the accused are entitled to benefit of doubt.

15. In the result, the prosecution has failed to prove the charges under

Section 392 and 394 of IPC and that the accused are found not guilty of the said offences and they are acquitted U/sec. 235(1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall stands cancelled after expiry Six months as contemplated under Section 437(A) Cr.P.C. M.O.1 cash of Rs.1,500/ shall be confiscated to the state after expiry of appeal time as nobody claimed the same.

Dictated to the personal Assistant, transcribed by him, corrected by me and

pronounced in the open court on this the 13th day of May, 2015.

Additional Assistant Sessions Judge,

Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined on behalf of

Prosecution Defence PW1: M.Rajagopal. None P.W.2: C.Prasad, P.W.3: Dhananjaya, P.W.4: T.Rami Reddy, P.W.5: V.Ramana Kumar, C.I of Police.

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF

Prosecution: Ex.P1/ : Signature of P.W.1 in the complaint. Ex.P2/ : Portion in 161 (3) Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1. Ex.P3/ : Portion in 161 (3) Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2. Ex.P4/ : Portion in 161(3) Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.3. Ex.P5/ : Signature of P.W.4 in mahazar report. Ex.P6/3122011: Hospital intimation. Ex.P7/ : Statement of P.W.1 in Cr.No.176/2011. Ex.P8/ : Original FIR. Ex.P9/ : Rough sketch in Cr.No.176/2011. Ex.P10/ : Statement of L.W.7 Mohan Kumar. Ex.P11/ : Original FIR in Cr.No.25/2012. Ex.P12/ : Rough sketch in Cr.No.25/2012. Ex.P13/18212: Mahazar report. Ex.P14/ : Wound certificate. Ex.P15/ : Test identification proceedings.

For Defence: Nil. M.Os Marked

M.O.1: Cash of Rs.1,500/.

Addl. Asst. S.J TPT.

8 //fair judgment//

OS/234/2014

Union Bank of India vs Sri. C. Padmakar Reddy

01 May 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE : : TIRUPATI

Present: Sri O.Venkata Nageswara Rao,,

Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.

FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MAY, 2015

O.S.No.234 OF 2014

Between:- M/s Union Bank of Inida, having its Main Branch At 8-50/1B, Annamaiah Circle, AIR Bye pass road, Opp. R.D.O., Office, Tirupati rep by its Branch Manager.

.. Plaintiff

And:

1. C.Padmakar Reddy

2. G. Muraharintha Reddy ...Defendants

This suit is coming on 01-05-2015 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri N.Ananda Kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendants remained exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :-

J U D G M E N T

This is suit filed by the plaintiff bank for recovery of Rs.6,84,412/- from the defendants 1 and 2 jointly and severally at 24% pa., and for costs.

Chief affidavit of Pw.1 filed Ex.A-1 to A-12 marked. Heard. Perused the record. The plaintiff bank filed the suit for recovery of amount basing on the registered sale deed, mortgage deed, term loan agreement, deed of guarantee and original promissory note. The 1st respondent availed the house loan from the plaintiff’s bank by creating registered equitable mortgage by depositing the title deeds by execution of term loan and that plaintiff bank sanctioned Rs.3,50,000/- to the 1st defendant on 31-5-20107. The said amount has to be repaid with interest. The second defendant is guarantor and executed deed of guarantee besides promissory note. Subsequently the defendants 1 and 2 failed to pay installments and committed default. The account is treated as non performing asset (NFA) as per the norms and guidelines given by R.B.I. When the plaintiff book initiate action under SARFAESI Act and made requisition to locate the property but it was not found in the name of the 1st defendant. To that effect, Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal, gave report 25-11-2013, the defendants 1 and 2 colluded and fabricated forged document and taken loan. Since the defendants failed to pay the amount, the plaintiff bank is entitled to recovery the same. The defendants have not contested the matter for the reasons best known to them. Therefore, the suit has to be decreed.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for the suit amount of Rs.6,84,412/- with subsequent interest at 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit ie., 24-01-2014 till realization on principal amount of Rs.3,50,00/-.

Pronounced by me in the open court this the 1st day of May, 2015.

Additional Senior Civil Judge,

Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Plaintiff :- Defendant :- Pw-1 A. Prasanth NIL

EXBIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF :-

Ex.A-1: Dt.27-9-1976 Certified copy of Sale deed executed by one potteli Ramachandraiah in favour of N.Damodharm. Ex.A-2: Dt. 22-05-2007 Original Regd.Sale deed executed by N.Damodharam in favour of D-1 and 2. Ex.A-3: Dt.30-05-2007 Original Regd.Memorandum of deposit of title deeds executed by the D-1 in favour of plaintiff bank. Ex.A-4: Dt.31-05-2007 Original General Term loan agreement dt. 31-05-2007 executed by defendant No.1. Ex.A-5: Dt. 31-05-2007 Original letter of Guarantee executed by defendant No.2. Ex.A-6: Dt. 31-5-2007 Original promissory note executed by defendant No.1. Ex.A-7:O/c of enforcement notices under the provisions of SARFAESI Act dt.12-11-2011 and Take possession of assets notice dt. 30-05-2012. Ex.A-8: Dt. 8-2-12 Composite Debt Balance confirmation acknowledgement of loan executed by D-1. Ex.A-9 Original Adangal dt.6-7-2013 issued by Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural Mandal. Ex.A-10 Dt. 16-7-2013 Office copy of legal notice with postal receipts. Ex.A-11Dt. 25-11-2013 Original Mandal Survey report with F.M.B. Ex.A-12 Original Bank account statement of defendant No.1 till 17-1-2014. DEFENDANT :- NIL

ASCJ, Tirupati

Draft / Fair Judgment in

O.S.No. 662/12

Dt. 01-05-2015

OS/662/2012

T.subramanyam nadiu vs B.gowri sankar

01 May 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE : : TIRUPATI

Present: Sri O.Venkata Nageswara Rao,,

Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati.

FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MAY, 2015

O.S.No.662 OF 2012

Between:-

T. Subramanyam Naidu .. Plaintiff

And:

1. B.Gowri Sankar

2. A. Rajya Lakshmi ...Defendants

This suit is coming on 01-05-2015 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Nagaraju, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendants remained exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :-

J U D G M E N T

This is suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.1,33,333/- being the principal and interest due under the suit pronote dated 13-07-2011 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs.

Chief affidavit of Pw.1 filed Ex.A-1 to A-3 marked. Heard. Perused the record, the suit is filed basing on Ex.A-1. Prior to filing of the suit, the plaintiff repeated demands the defendants not complied with the same. The defendants are remained exparte without contesting the suit for the reason best known to them. The claim of the plaintiff proved. Therefore the suit has to be decreed.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for the suit amount of Rs.1,33,333/- with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of suit ie., 04-12-2012 till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a., on the principal amount Rs.1,00,000/-.

Pronounced by me in the open court this the 1st day of May, 2015.

Additional Senior Civil Judge,

Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Plaintiff :- Defendant :- Pw-1 T. Subramanyam Naidu NIL

EXBIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF :-

Ex.A-1 : Dt.13-07-2011 Suit promissory note executed by the defendants. Ex.A-2: Dt. 12-09-2011 Office copy of legal notice along with postal receipts. Ex.A-3: Returned covers (2 nos) DEFENDANT :- NIL ASCJ, Tirupati

Draft / Fair Judgment in

O.S.No. 662/12

Dt. 01-05-2015

OS/110/2015

J. Ramesh Babu vs S. Mohini Bai

30 Apr 2015

OS/110/2015

J. Ramesh Babu vs S. Mohini Bai

30 Apr 2015

Order Record 611 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
SC/70/2015	Inspector of police vs V. Sowmya	13 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
OS/234/2014	Union Bank of India vs Sri. C. Padmakar Reddy	01 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/662/2012	T.subramanyam nadiu vs B.gowri sankar	01 May 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/110/2015	J. Ramesh Babu vs S. Mohini Bai	30 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/360/2012	B.Subhakanthamma vs K.Varalakshmi	30 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/66/2013	Sriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs K.Hariprakash Reddy	28 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/170/2014	Gundluru Munaswamy Reddy vs Koyambathuru Bathi Reddy	28 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/9/2012	Kuppa Ramamurthy vs Pellakur Venkatrao	27 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/28/2013	Ramachandra Naidu 55yrs vs G.Muneendra Babu and 18others 32yrs	27 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/110/2014	I.C.I.C.I Bank Limited vs Mitta Balaji Guptha	24 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/452/2008	Koniki Chengamma vs Badi Gangaiah	24 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/496/2014	State Bank of India vs Chilla Srinivasulu	24 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/866/2014	S. Shafi vs K. Ramakrishnaiah	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/46/2015	M. Subramanyam vs Chitipi Kamakshaiah	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/24/2015	Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company LTD vs B. Lakshmi Pathi	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/132/2013	s.madar shaw vs Vssk.shameena	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/172/2013	Kapil Chil Fund Pvt. Ltd. vs K.rajesh	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/428/2013	M.Swarna Kumari vs N.Prabhakar Reddy	16 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/272/2013	K.Chennamma 53 yrs vs A.Munirathnam 48yrs	13 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/692/2014	R. Thyagaraju vs P. Subramanyam	13 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/446/2014	Sri. C. Nagaraju vs A. Adikesavulu	10 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/532/2011	Ms Srivari Industries vs Ms Lakshmi Gold Khazana	10 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/270/2014	I.C.I.C.I Bank Limited vs Krishnapuram Neelavathamma	09 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/125/2014	R. Madhusudhan vs D. Navamohan Reddy	08 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/194/2013	Kapil Chil Fund Pvt. Ltd. vs Lavanya	08 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/694/2010	Smt L.Usha vs Banala Nagabhushanam	08 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/11/2015	Sub Inspector of Police vs Nagisetty Bhaskar	08 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/394/2013	L.K.padma 36yrs vs B.prameela 34yrs	06 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/412/2014	V. Hemapathi vs P. Krishnamurthy	06 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/482/2014	K. Subramanyam vs G. Ravi Sekhar	06 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/676/2014	D.Anuradha vs Agri Gold Project Limited	06 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/136/2011	S.Hemamalini vs Charishma Housing Pvt. Ltd.,	02 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/514/2014	M. Rama Narayana Reddy vs M. Vijaya	02 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/668/2014	R. Baskar Naidu vs E. Ankam Naidu	31 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/886/2014	Jogi Yugandhar vs Jogi Munikrishnaiah	31 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/316/2014	The Inspector of Police vs P. Marudhu	31 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/50/2015	R. Nadhamuni vs P. Muniraja Reddy	30 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/162/2014	K. Lakshmana Reddy vs L. Dharanipathi	30 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/860/2014	Nara Narasimhulu Naidu vs Nara Subramanyam Naidu	30 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/160/2014	D. Umadevi vs K. Lakshmi	27 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/396/2012	S.I.of Police, CCS Police station, Tirupati. vs M.Vijaya Kumar @ Vijaya Bhaskar @ Maharaja	25 Mar 2015	Order	—
OS/576/2012	P.Sudhakar vs T.Yamuna	23 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/1/2014	D.Munisekhar vs D.Ramesh Reddy	20 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/508/2011	Smt A.S.Subhashini vs Naraganti Rama Krishnaiah	19 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/752/2014	Shaik Mahaboob Basha vs S. Masthan	19 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/1/2012	Peddineni Bhaskar Rao vs Pellakuru Venkarao	18 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/534/2011	Ms Srivari Industries vs Ms Syko Gags, Rep. by its Proprietor	18 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/878/2014	Smt Kalahasti Geetha vs Battu Rajendra Reddy	18 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/42/2013	SK.mahu vs C.S.basha	17 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/418/2014	State Bank of India vs Syed Mahaboob Basha	17 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/96/2014	M.Madanamohan vs K. Srinivasulu Naidu	16 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/278/2014	A.Diwakar Reddy vs K.Sridhar	16 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/576/2014	State Bank of Hyderabad vs A.B. Karthik	16 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/86/2014	Shriram City Union Finance company vs R. Rupa	13 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/3/2015	M. Syamala vs Arunachalam	13 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/266/2014	I.C.I.C.I Bank Limited vs Kolakola Venkata Rama Reddy	13 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/250/2014	The Sub Inspector of Police vs Natarajan Ilango	13 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/254/2014	State Bank of India vs T. Venkatarami Reddy	12 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/352/2013	S.Padmanabhan 70yrs vs R.Murugesan 40yrs	10 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/321/2014	Sub Inspector of Police vs S. Rajesh	10 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/318/2014	E. Manohar Reddy vs M. Gopinatha Reddy	09 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/544/2012	Bodugu Chengaiah vs Bodugu Muniramaiah	09 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/2/2013	Kapil Chil Fund Pvt. Ltd. vs E.Ankama Naidu	03 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/2/2013	M. Vasudevdudu vs K. Lokesh	03 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/522/2014	K. Murali vs D.A. Anthonyamma	03 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/558/2014	Penikalapati Devanjaneya Chowdary vs Kaaniki Srinivasulu	03 Mar 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/68/2014	Margadarshi Chit Fund vs S. Shankar Naidu	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/6/2007	T.Subba Rathnamma vs T.Venkata Ramaiah	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/22/2012	Ch.Sankara Rao vs T.Pavan Kumar	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/228/2014	Kampa Reddappa vs P. Venkatesh	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/300/2014	Andhra Pradesh Ambedkar Yuvajana Sangham vs P. Pedda Siddaiah	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/394/2006	Amgikar Kumari vs T.Hara Gopal	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/536/2011	Ms Rrivari Industries vs Ms Venkata Sri Sai industries	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/788/2011	T.Madhavilatha vs P.Sridhar	27 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/15/2013	M.subba rao vs O.udaya kumar	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/36/2012	T.Chenchu Reddy vs M.Venkatasubbaiah	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/40/2009	B.Ramana vs V.Vishwaprasad	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/290/2012	Andhra Bank, Credit Card Center, Tirupati. vs Dr. Urimindi Venkateswarlu	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/404/2013	R.Uma Natajaran 55yrs vs D.Muralidhar Reddy 35 yrs	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/768/2014	State Bank of India vs Dr. E. Prasannakar	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
SC/298/2014	The Sub Inspector of Police vs S.P. Sankar	26 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
IP/8/2013	giri kumar vs G.ranganadh	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/20/2012	Yerramchetty Subramanyam vs Yerramchetty Sarojamma	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/416/2012	C.Venkata Ramana vs K.Rajesh	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/440/2014	K. Babu vs M.C. Narasimhulu	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/570/2014	State Bank of India vs Kalmara Zigiria	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/574/2014	P. Omprakash Reddy vs S. Khadar Basha	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/598/2014	Vedagiri Sivaiah Naidu vs Athuluri Ananda Naidu	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/664/2014	Mitta Suresh Kumar vs S. Vijaya Lakshmi	25 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/100/2014	Md. Azmathulla vs P.Jilani Basha	24 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/552/2014	C. Venkatesam vs APSRTC	24 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/672/2014	A. Nagaraja Naidu vs V. Nagaraja	24 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/191/2011	S.Aristanemi vs B.V.Ramana Murthy	23 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/846/2014	P. Venkatesh vs K. Balamma	23 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/564/2014	A. Umarani vs P. Niranjan Reddy	20 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/646/2014	Konepatti Sambhaiah Setty vs Yanamala Munaswamy	20 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/830/2014	T. Surendra Reddy vs Avula Sarada	20 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/244/2014	Kottidi Prasada Rao vs Dr. Kanipakam Munirathnam Chetty	19 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/140/2014	D. Sucharitha vs Mohammad Hussaian	18 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/656/2014	Kandala Rupavani vs Kandala Nageswara Naidu	18 Feb 2015	Order On Exgibit	—

Showing 100 of 611 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2015		3
Apr 2015		43
Mar 2015		39
Feb 2015		52
Jan 2015		38
Dec 2014		55
Nov 2014		41
Oct 2014		40
Sep 2014		31
Aug 2014		62
Jul 2014		39
Jun 2014		3

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO handled?

Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO has handled 700 court orders since 2010 at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 13 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO hear?

Based on available records, Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka).

Where is Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO currently posted?

Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO is posted as ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO dispose cases?

Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO disposes approximately 13 cases per month, based on 700 orders handled over their tenure at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka).

Since when is Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO serving?

Sri. O.VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO has been serving at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka) since 2010.

Case Types

OS 69%

EP 17%

SC 7%

IP 6%

Posting History

Dec 2010 — May 2015

ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE · 700 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 1

Other Judges at this Court

Sri M. Guru Nath

III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

982 orders

Smt. G. Archana

IV ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

763 orders

Sri. G.ramagopal

V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

1,544 orders

Sri S.Krishnan Kutty

X ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

0 orders

Smt. S P D Vennela

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

1 orders

Smt. B. Vanisree

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

3,171 orders

Sri C.K.V.Satyakanth Kumar

I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2,834 orders

P. Koteswara Rao

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2,177 orders

Smt. M. Sandya Rani

III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

950 orders

Sri G. Srinivas

IV ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

3,773 orders

← View all judges at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka)