Sri P Rajaram

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh

SRI P RAJARAM, SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ, is posted at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 834 court orders on record since 2025. 10 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles F, OP, CRLMP cases.

834

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

F.C.O.P/1243/2025

XXXXX vs XXXXX

11 May 2026

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 1 APFCVS0014872025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

This petition is coming on 23.02.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Trinadha Murthy and Miss G.Pravallika, Advocates for petitioners 1 and 2, and the same having been stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

2.Brief averments of the petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 2 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite Anjanaya Swamy

Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam District, as per Hindu rites and caste customs and out of their wedlock no children were born to them. After marriage, 2nd petitioner joined 1st petitioner at the residence of 1st petitioner at Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, thereafter they shifted to

Marikavalasa and they lived together happily till 1st week of April, 2024, thereafter some disputes arose between them and they are living separately since 15.05.2024. Mediations held by village elders and caste elders for their reunion but all their efforts proved futile. All possible attempts have been made by all the family members, relatives and well wishers for their reunion failed. As there is no possibility of reunion they decided to dissolve their marriage by way of mutual consent with terms and conditions agreed. 1st petitioner submit that as per oral agreement, 1st petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.3,50,000/-(Rupees Three Lakhs

Fifty Thousand only) towards full and final settlement and permanent alimony of the 2nd petitioner. Accordingly, they were settled. 1st petitioner submit that as per settlement terms at the time of filing this petition he paid an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- by way of DD bearing No.913615, dated.04-08-2025, drawn on State Bank of India, Dwarakanagar Branch and Rs.1,00,000/- by way of cash and today i.e., 23.02.2026 the remaining balance amount of Rs.1,50,000/- is paid by way of DD and the 2nd petitioner received the same. Both petitioners shall not initiate any kind of legal proceedings either judicial or quasi-judicial against each other and their family members under any circumstances directly or indirectly. Both petitioners agreed not to interfere with each other's personal life after taking divorce and they agreed to get married of their choice after getting divorce. Both petitioners decided to dissolve their marriage individually and none of the petitioners have influenced or forced

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 3 the other petitioner for giving consent for divorce and there is no collusion between them for taking divorce by mutual consent. 1st petitioner returned all the gold ornaments and sari samans to the 2nd petitioner and the 2nd petitioner received the same. The petitioners have not filed any similar petition in any Court of Law at anywhere in earlier and no such petition is pending in any Court of Law. Hence the petition.

3.As seen from the record this petition was filed on 04.08.2025, and matter posted to 23.02.2026. On 23.02.2026 both the petitioners appeared before the court and expressed their disinclination to lead conjugal life. The efforts made by the court for reconciliation/ reunion failed.

4.During enquiry of this petition, the first petitioner is examined as

PW1 and the second petitioner is examined as PW2 and got marked

Ex.A1 to A4.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This court had carefully gone through the pleadings and the oral and documentary evidence on record and considered the same.

6. Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their

marriage, dt. 02.03.2024 by mutual consent?

7. Point: As noted above, during enquiry, the petitioners 1 and 2 filed affidavits and the contents of the affidavits are found to be similar to the averments of the petition. Both of them mainly averred that their marriage was solemnized on 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite

Anjanaya Swamy Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam

District. After marriage they lived together for some time and due to differences they are living separately since 15.05.2024. The efforts made by the elders for their reunion failed and there is no chance of reunion

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 4 and possibility to continue their conjugal life and they decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

8.The evidence of Pws 1 & 2 coupled with documents marked are in conformity with the petition averments and translated the pleadings into direct evidence which is acceptable in the facts and circumstances of the case. The oral and documentary evidence proved that the marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 02.03.2024 and the same is an undisputed fact. The evidence on record further suggested that after considerable time after marriage they got separated due to disputes and it is the case of the petitioners that there is no possibility to adjust themselves to continue their conjugal life. Therefore, this court is left with no other option except to accept their contentions in the petition and grant a decree of divorce by mutual consent. In view of the above discussion coupled with reasons the point is accordingly answered holding that the petitioners are entitled for the relief of divorce on mutual consent.

9.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of first petitioner

Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy with the second petitioner Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni solemnized on 02.03.2024 is dissolved by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent. The petitioners shall bare their own costs.

Typed by the Stenographer Gr.III to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for Petitioners:

P.W.1 : Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy

P.W.2 : Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 5

Documents marked for petitioners: Petitioners: Ex.A1Wedding invitation card showing the date of marriage between petitioners 1 & 2, dt.02.03.2024

Ex.A2Wedding photo

Ex.A3Photocopy of Aadhar card of 1st Petitioner

Ex.A4Photocopy of Aadhar card of 2nd Petitioner

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 6

Date of Presentation: 04.08.2025

Date of Filing: 09.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I sch.II of A.P.C.F and

S.V.Act.

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 7

D E C R E E

1. that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed and the marriage of first petitioner Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy with the second petitioner Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni solemnized on 02.03.2024 is dissolved by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent; and

2. that the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

No cost memo is filed on either side.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

F.C.O.P/1243/2025

XXXXX vs XXXXX

11 May 2026

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 1 APFCVS0014872025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

O R D E R

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

2.Brief averments of the petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 2 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite Anjanaya Swamy

4.During enquiry of this petition, the first petitioner is examined as

PW1 and the second petitioner is examined as PW2 and got marked

Ex.A1 to A4.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This court had carefully gone through the pleadings and the oral and documentary evidence on record and considered the same.

6. Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their

marriage, dt. 02.03.2024 by mutual consent?

Anjanaya Swamy Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 4 and possibility to continue their conjugal life and they decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

9.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of first petitioner

Typed by the Stenographer Gr.III to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for Petitioners:

P.W.1 : Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy

P.W.2 : Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 5

Documents marked for petitioners: Petitioners: Ex.A1Wedding invitation card showing the date of marriage between petitioners 1 & 2, dt.02.03.2024

Ex.A2Wedding photo

Ex.A3Photocopy of Aadhar card of 1st Petitioner

Ex.A4Photocopy of Aadhar card of 2nd Petitioner

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 6

Date of Presentation: 04.08.2025

Date of Filing: 09.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I sch.II of A.P.C.F and

S.V.Act.

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 7

D E C R E E

2. that the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

No cost memo is filed on either side.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

F.C.O.P/1463/2025

XXXXX vs XXXXX

08 May 2026

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 1 APFCVS0014872025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

O R D E R

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

2.Brief averments of the petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 2 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite Anjanaya Swamy

4.During enquiry of this petition, the first petitioner is examined as

PW1 and the second petitioner is examined as PW2 and got marked

Ex.A1 to A4.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This court had carefully gone through the pleadings and the oral and documentary evidence on record and considered the same.

6. Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their

marriage, dt. 02.03.2024 by mutual consent?

Anjanaya Swamy Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 4 and possibility to continue their conjugal life and they decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

9.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of first petitioner

Typed by the Stenographer Gr.III to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for Petitioners:

P.W.1 : Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy

P.W.2 : Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 5

Documents marked for petitioners: Petitioners: Ex.A1Wedding invitation card showing the date of marriage between petitioners 1 & 2, dt.02.03.2024

Ex.A2Wedding photo

Ex.A3Photocopy of Aadhar card of 1st Petitioner

Ex.A4Photocopy of Aadhar card of 2nd Petitioner

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 6

Date of Presentation: 04.08.2025

Date of Filing: 09.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I sch.II of A.P.C.F and

S.V.Act.

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 7

D E C R E E

2. that the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

No cost memo is filed on either side.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

F.C.O.P/291/2026

XXXXX vs XXXXX

07 May 2026

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 1 APFCVS0014872025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

O R D E R

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

2.Brief averments of the petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 2 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite Anjanaya Swamy

4.During enquiry of this petition, the first petitioner is examined as

PW1 and the second petitioner is examined as PW2 and got marked

Ex.A1 to A4.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This court had carefully gone through the pleadings and the oral and documentary evidence on record and considered the same.

6. Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their

marriage, dt. 02.03.2024 by mutual consent?

Anjanaya Swamy Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 4 and possibility to continue their conjugal life and they decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

9.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of first petitioner

Typed by the Stenographer Gr.III to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for Petitioners:

P.W.1 : Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy

P.W.2 : Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 5

Documents marked for petitioners: Petitioners: Ex.A1Wedding invitation card showing the date of marriage between petitioners 1 & 2, dt.02.03.2024

Ex.A2Wedding photo

Ex.A3Photocopy of Aadhar card of 1st Petitioner

Ex.A4Photocopy of Aadhar card of 2nd Petitioner

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 6

Date of Presentation: 04.08.2025

Date of Filing: 09.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I sch.II of A.P.C.F and

S.V.Act.

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 7

D E C R E E

2. that the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

No cost memo is filed on either side.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

F.C.O.P/541/2026

XXXXX vs XXXXX

07 May 2026

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 1 APFCVS0014872025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

O R D E R

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

2.Brief averments of the petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are legally wedded husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 2 02.03.2024 at GVMC Kalyana Mandapam, Opposite Anjanaya Swamy

4.During enquiry of this petition, the first petitioner is examined as

PW1 and the second petitioner is examined as PW2 and got marked

Ex.A1 to A4.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This court had carefully gone through the pleadings and the oral and documentary evidence on record and considered the same.

6. Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners are entitled for dissolution of their

marriage, dt. 02.03.2024 by mutual consent?

Anjanaya Swamy Temple, Main Raod, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 4 and possibility to continue their conjugal life and they decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

9.In the result, petition is allowed and the marriage of first petitioner

Typed by the Stenographer Gr.III to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for Petitioners:

P.W.1 : Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy

P.W.2 : Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 5

Documents marked for petitioners: Petitioners: Ex.A1Wedding invitation card showing the date of marriage between petitioners 1 & 2, dt.02.03.2024

Ex.A2Wedding photo

Ex.A3Photocopy of Aadhar card of 1st Petitioner

Ex.A4Photocopy of Aadhar card of 2nd Petitioner

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 6

Date of Presentation: 04.08.2025

Date of Filing: 09.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE:: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

PRESENT: SRI PILLI RAJARAM,

Judge, Additional Family Court,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

F.C.O.P.1395 /2025

Between:

1.Sri Seerapu Satyananda Reddy, S/o.late Poli Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, R/at.D.No.53-20-8/2, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. Aadhar No.6297 3101 0302.

2.Smt Seerapu (Thadi) Chinni, W/o.Satyananda Reddy, D/o.late Ganga Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, Kotaburuju Veedhi, Saluru, Parvathipuram Manyam District. Aadhar No.2119 2935 5249.

...Petitioners.

And: – NIL –

...Respondent

The present petition is filed under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage

Act by the petitioners who are husband and wife seeking relief to grant divorce by dissolution of their marriage dt.02.03.2024 by way of mutual consent.

A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I sch.II of A.P.C.F and

S.V.Act.

AFC:VSP FCOP 1395/2025 7

D E C R E E

2. that the petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 28 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

No cost memo is filed on either side.

Sd/-Pilli Rajaram

JUDGE

ADDL. FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

Order Record 822 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
F.C.O.P/1243/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	11 May 2026	ORDER	—
CRLMP.BAIL/964/2026	Shaik Mubina (Sravani) vs SHO ANANDAPURAM POLICE STAION	08 May 2026	ORDERS	—
F.C.O.P/1463/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	08 May 2026	ORDER	—
CRLMP.BAIL/978/2026	Vachalapu Siva vs SHO IV TOWN POLICE STATION	07 May 2026	ORDERS	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1023/2026	Talabathula Jeevan Kumar vs SHO III TOWN POLICE STATION	07 May 2026	ORDERS	—
F.C.O.P/291/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	07 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/541/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	07 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1383/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	07 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1803/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	07 May 2026	ORDER	—
CRLMP.BAIL/912/2026	Guntu Arun Kumar vs SHO DUVVADA POLICE STATION	06 May 2026	ORDERS	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1002/2026	Madha Dhanaraju vs SHO NEW PORT POLICE STATION	06 May 2026	ORDERS	—
F.C.O.P/405/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/733/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/763/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1749/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/193/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1541/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1565/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1631/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1703/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1801/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	05 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/505/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	04 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/545/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	04 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1273/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	04 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1539/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	04 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2015/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	04 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1775/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	01 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1783/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	01 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2065/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	01 May 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/179/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	29 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/239/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	29 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1529/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	29 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1993/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	29 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/5/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/315/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1325/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1395/2025	Seerapu Satyanand Reddy vs Nil	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2067/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2141/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/305/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	27 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/401/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	27 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2077/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	27 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2109/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	27 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2159/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	27 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/679/2021	XXXXX vs XXXXX	25 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/39/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/127/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/493/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1287/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	23 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1401/2023	MONDEPU THRINADH KUMAR vs MONDEDPU DURGA BHAVANI	23 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1561/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	23 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1689/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	23 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/277/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	22 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1189/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	22 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1493/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	22 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1525/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	22 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/343/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	21 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/433/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	21 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1181/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	21 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1827/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	21 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/171/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	17 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/187/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	17 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/501/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	17 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1563/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	17 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/95/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	16 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/213/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	16 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/341/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	16 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/979/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	16 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/173/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	15 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/527/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	15 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1483/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	15 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1595/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	15 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1601/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	15 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/15/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/313/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1001/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1453/2025	XXXXX vs Nil	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1565/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2169/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	13 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1431/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1733/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1795/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	06 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1253/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	02 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1655/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	02 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1849/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	02 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2005/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	02 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/43/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/57/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/349/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1215/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1225/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1873/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
EP/36/2022	XXXXX vs XXXXX	28 Mar 2026	OTHER ORDERS	—
F.C.O.P/1367/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	25 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1481/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	25 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1705/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	25 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/2429/2024	XXXXX vs XXXXX	25 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/277/2020	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/499/2026	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
F.C.O.P/1429/2025	XXXXX vs XXXXX	24 Mar 2026	ORDER	—

Showing 100 of 822 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		30
Apr 2026		63
Mar 2026		65
Feb 2026		75
Jan 2026		45
Dec 2025		52
Nov 2025		56
Oct 2025		54
Sep 2025		82
Aug 2025		83
Jul 2025		57
Jun 2025		48

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SRI P RAJARAM handled?

SRI P RAJARAM has handled 834 court orders since 2025 at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam. The average disposal rate is 66 orders per month.

What types of cases does SRI P RAJARAM hear?

Based on available records, SRI P RAJARAM primarily handles Civil matters (Original Petitions, Execution Petitions) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Where is SRI P RAJARAM currently posted?

SRI P RAJARAM is posted as SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by SRI P RAJARAM available online?

Yes. 10 judgments by SRI P RAJARAM are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SRI P RAJARAM dispose cases?

SRI P RAJARAM disposes approximately 66 cases per month, based on 834 orders handled over their tenure at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Since when is SRI P RAJARAM serving?

SRI P RAJARAM has been serving at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam since 2025.

Case Types

F 98%

OP 1%

CRLMP 1%

EP 0%

Posting History

Apr 2026 — May 2026

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ · 5 orders
Apr 2026 — May 2026

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE
Apr 2026 — May 2026

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Apr 2026 — May 2026

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Apr 2025 — Present

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE · 829 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri Chinnamsetty Raju

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

1,274 orders

Sri M. Venkata Ramana

I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

5,391 orders

Kum. C.k.gayathri Devi

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

749 orders

Sri D.seshayya

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-ACB

0 orders

Sri M.srihari

IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE-SPL JUDGE ECONOMIC OFFENCES

2 orders

Sri S. Damodara Rao

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

11 orders

Sri S.Srinivasa Rao

VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

736 orders

Smt. P.sri Satya Devi

SPL. JUDGE FOR SC AND ST CASES

1,369 orders

Sri. K.Ratna Kumar

XII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

433 orders

Sri. D.vijay Goutam

SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL...

130 orders

Smt. M.sobha

XIV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri K Venkateswara Rao

XV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. M.Ramakrishnamraju

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

0 orders

Sri U.u.prasad

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT...

0 orders

Sri J Srinivas Rao

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRIC...

1 orders

Sri Y.gopal Krishna

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

0 orders

M D V N Sindhura

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

516 orders

Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

761 orders

Dr. Soni Dwarampudi

VI ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

525 orders

Smt. Dr. K. Sarada

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

515 orders

Smt. V.ganga Bhavani

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

790 orders

Smt. Y.Premalatha

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

385 orders

Sri G.Karthik

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

1,053 orders

Smt. Sindhu Gurram

V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

814 orders

Sri M.Pradeep Kumar

CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM

432 orders

Smt. P.Pradeepa

I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPAT...

14 orders

Sri K.Vasudeva Rao

IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPA...

251 orders

Smt K.Sruta Vinda

VII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS...

641 orders

Ms Sri Rajarajeswari Tejaswi Kalaharsti

SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR TRI...

0 orders

Sri P Rajendra Prasad

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT - I

334 orders

Y.Ganapathi Rao

SPL. MAGISTRATE COURT-III

399 orders

D.viswanadham

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT VI

10 orders

← View all judges at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam