Smt. V.ganga Bhavani

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh

Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI, III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION), is posted at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 962 court orders on record since 2023. 11 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, CC cases.

962

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/1175/2023

BANK OF BARODA vs GANTA MALLESWARI

21 Apr 2026

1 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP APVS020015952023

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION)

VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 21st day of April, 2026

O.S. No.1175 of 2023

Between:

Bank of Baroda, a Nationalized bank constituted and functioning under the provisions of Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 and having its Head Office at Mandvi, Baroda and Corporate Office at Baroda Corporate Centre, C-26, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 051 and its branches at various places and among one at Seethammadhara situated at Door No.50-53-11/8, Ravi Plaza, Visakhapatnam -530 013, represented by its Power of Attorney holder Sri Prakash Chandra Meher, S/o Sri Sudhakar Meher, Hindu, aged 52 years, presently working as Chief Manager, Bank of Baroda, Seethammadhara Branch, Visakhapatnam.

... Plaintiff

And

1. Smt Ganta Malleswari, W/o late G.Padmanabham, Door No.50-116-9, N.E. Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam – 530013.

2. Sri Ganta Venkata Shiva, S/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased Guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, 2 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 530013.

3. Sri Ganta Pooja, D/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam – 530013.

4. Smt Ganta Malleswari, W/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam - 530013

...Defendants

This suit is coming on this day before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Y.N.Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendants set exparte on 07.04.2026; and upon perusing the material on record, the Court delivered the following:-

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.6,46,508/-, along with subsequent interest thereon at 24% p.a, with quarterly rests from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

2.The averments of the plaint, in brief, are:

On 29.02.2016, defendant No.1 approached the plaintiff-bank and requested for sanction of term loan facility of Rs.8,00,000/- for the purpose of Home improvement loan. Accordingly, the plaintiff-bank sanctioned the same, defendant No.1 agreed to repay the same along with interest at under loan account No.27470600005824. Defendant

No.1 executed necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank. The deceased guarantor/G.Padmanabham, who is the husband of defendant

No.1, executed the guarantee agreement.

3 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP

(ii)Defendant Nos.1 and 2 executed gift settlement deed in their names vide document No.P110/3207/1989, dated 19.08.1989 and defendant No.1 got executed gift settlement deed in his name vide document No.4932 of 2011, dated 15.11.2011, registered before SRO,

Anakapalle and defendant Nos.1 and 2 executed extension of mortgage by deposit of title deed in favour of the plaintiff bank vide document

No.2836/2016, dated 21.05.2016, registered before SRO, Gajuwaka towards security to the loan.

(iii)On 16.04.2021, G.Padmanabham was demised leaving behind his wife and children i.e. defendant Nos.1 to 4. After the death of guarantor, the defendants failed to repay the amount inspite of repeated demands. The defendants are chronic defaulters. The loan account of the defendants became as NPA, on 22.12.2021. The plaintiff-bank got issued a legal notice on 22.06.2022, in vain. The outstanding amount is

Rs.6,46,508/- as on 22.08.2023. Hence, the suit.

3.Though the summons were served on the defendant No.1 to 4 by way of substituted service, they did not choose to appear and hence, they were set ex parte.

4.In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank examined PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A13.

5.Heard. Perused the material on record.

6.Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants, as prayed for?

7.P OINT:-

(i)According to the plaintiff-bank, defendants availed loan of

Rs.8,00,000/- on 07.12.2023, by executing necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank. The defendants failed to repay the loan 4 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP amount as agreed, in spite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice. In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank got examined its

Manager as PW.1, who in his affidavit filed in lieu of his examination-in- chief, has reiterated the plaint averments. He got marked Exs.A1 to A13 evidencing that the defendants availed loan and committed default in repayment of the loan amount, as agreed. As stated supra, the defendants remained ex parte. Thus, the evidence of PW.1 remained unchallenged.

(ii)On considering the evidence of PW.1, coupled with Exs.A1 to A13, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff-bank has established its case. Therefore, the plaintiff-bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff-bank.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed, with costs, and defendant Nos.1 to 4 jointly and severally shall pay a sum of Rs.6,46,508/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 9.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on

Rs.6,46,508/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation to the Stenographer Gr.II, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 21st day of April, 2026.

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Division) Visakhapatnam.

5 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendants:

P.W.1:B.Anand Ram Ex-parte

Documents Marked

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A2 is the sanction advise memo dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A3 is the loan agreement dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A4 is the letter of installment dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A5 is the declaration cum undertaking cum authority dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A6 is the general form of guarantee dated 29.02.2016. Ex.A7 is the extension of mortgage dated 21.05.2016. Ex.A8 is the legal notice issued to D1 dated 22.06.2022. Ex.A9 is the legal notice issued to D2 dated 22.06.2022. Ex.A10 is the legal notice issued to D3 dated 22.06.2022. Ex.A11 is the legal notice issued to D4 dated 22.06.2022. Ex.A12 is the statement of account bearing No.27470600005824 from 29.02.2016 to 18.08.2023. Ex.A13 is the authorization letter dated 15.04.2026.

For Defendants: -Nil-

I ACJ(JD), VSP.

6 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP Date of presentation:23.08.2023 Date of filing:04.09.2023

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION)

VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday, this the 21st day of April, 2026

O.S. No.1175 of 2023

Between:

... Plaintiff

And

1. Smt Ganta Malleswari, W/o late G.Padmanabham, Door No.50-116-9, N.E. Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam – 530013.

2. Sri Ganta Venkata Shiva, S/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased Guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 530013.

7 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP

3. Sri Ganta Pooja, D/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam – 530013.

4. Smt Ganta Malleswari, W/o late G.Padmanabham, (Legal heir of deceased guarantor) Door No.50-116-9, N.E.Layout, Behind Hill View Park, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam - 530013

...Defendants

This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.6,46,508/-, along with subsequent interest thereon at 24% p.a, with quarterly rests from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

Value of the suit is Rs.6,46,508/-, and a Court Fee of Rs.8,926/- is paid thereon u/Sec.20 Sch.1 Art.1(b&c) of APCF and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1.that the defendant Nos.1 to 4 jointly and severally do pay to the plaintiff-bank a sum of Rs.6,46,508/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 9.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs.6,46,508/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.; and

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff-bank a sum of Rs.9,208-00 towards institutional costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court, this the 21 st day of April, 2026.

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE(Jr.Division)

VISAKHAPATNAM

8 O.S. No.1175 of 202 I ACJ Court, VSP

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Stamp on Vakalat:2-00- No costs memo is filed -

Stamp on Plaint:8,926-00

Process Fees:80-00

Typing charges:200-00 ---------------- Insti.Costs of Rs: 9,208-00 ----------------

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

IACJ(JD):VSP.

OS/1550/2022

CANARA BANK vs VARDHINI ENTERPRISES

21 Apr 2026

1 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP

APVS020028492019

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION)

VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani

I Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam

Tuesday, this the 21st day of April, 2026

O.S. No.1550 of 2022

Between:

Canara Bank, Kancharapalem Branch, Visakhapatnam District, Being Represented by its Authorized Signatory P.Deepika, W/o Dilip, aged about 30 years, Branch Manager, Seethammadhara Branch, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.

... Plaintiff

And

1. Vardhini Enterprises represented by its Proprietor CDV Parimal, D/o Ch.Nageswara Rao, D.No.50-94-11, Santhipuram, Visakhapatnam – 530 016.

2. CDV Parimala, D/o Ch.Nageswara Rao, No.50-94-11, Santhipuram, Visakhapatnam – 530 016.

3.D.Nagireddy Flat No.104, Bharat Towers Dwaraka Nagar , 5th Line Visakhapatnam – 530 016.

...Defendants

2 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP

This suit is coming on 17.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Smt. P.Nagini, Advocate for plaintiff and Sri.S.Nanaji, Advocate for the Defendants: and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This suit is filed seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.11,06,153.04 ps, along with subsequent interest at the rate of 18% per annum and for costs.

2.The averments of the plaint, in brief, are:-

(i)Defendant No.2 is represented by defendant No.1. Defendant

Nos.1 and 2 approached the plaintiff-bank on 22.12.2015, for obtaining loan for the purpose of furniture business and on thorough verification, the plaintiff sanctioned term loan of Rs.4,40,000/- on 22.12.2015, under loan

Account No.5659766000003. Defendant Nos.2 and 3 stood as guarantors. They executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the same, together with interest at the rate of 10.65% per annum.

(ii)The defendants again approached for enhancment of loan facilities, by making an application on 01.01.2016 and accordingly, the plaintiff granted OCC loan of Rs.4,50,000/- on 01.01.2016. The defendants executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 10.15% per annum. The defendants again made an application for renewal of loan account on 01.01.2017 for the enhanced limit of Rs.2,50,000/-. The defendants executed letter of renewal in favour of the plaintiff for enhanced OCC limits, agreeing to repay the same with interest. However, the defendants failed to repay the amount due, inspite of repeated reminders. As on 09.10.2019, the total amount due is

Rs.11,06,153.04 ps. Subsequently, the defendants defaulted in repayment 3 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP of the loan amount, and the loan accounts were declared as Non

Performing Assets (NPA), as per the RBI guidelines. Hence, the suit.

3.Denying the plaint averments, defendant No.1 filed a written statement and defendant Nos.2 and 3 filed a memo adopting the written statement of defendant No.1. In the written statement, it is inter alia stated as under:-

The defendants have paid almost all instalments regularly and the defendants never received any notice for the alleged amount. The defendants sustained loss in their business and as such, they are not in a position to pay any amount as alleged in the suit. There is no cause of action for the suit. Hence, the suit is liable to be dismissed with costs.

4.Basing on the pleadings of both the parties, the following issues were settled for trial -

1.Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount with interest as prayed for?

2.To what relief?

5.During the course of trial, on behalf of the plaintiff, PW.1 is examined and Exs.A1 to A14 are marked. On behalf of the defendants, no oral or documentary evidence is adduced.

6.Heard. Perused the material on record.

7.Issue No.1 :-

(i)According to the plaintiff, the defendants availed loans on 22.12.2015, 01.01.2016 and 01.01.2017 of Rs.4,45,000/-, Rs.4,50,000/- and Rs.2,50,000/-, by executing necessary documents, agreeing to repay the same with interest. However, subsequently, they failed to repay the amount as agreed upon, inspite of repeated reminders. In support of its 4 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP case, the plaintiff got examined its Manager, as PW.1, who in her affidavit filed in lieu of her examination-in-chief, has reiterated the plaint averments.

She got marked Exs.A1 to A14 evidencing the suit transaction between the parties. PW.1 is not cross examined, inspite of granting sufficient time and passing conditional orders.

(ii)As stated supra, in the written statement, the defendants have taken a specific plea that they have paid almost all installments and they are not in a position to pay the amount as stated in the suit, as they sustained loss. However, they have not chosen to adduce evidence, either oral or documentary, in support of their case, inspite of granting ample opportunities and passing conditional orders. When the defendants did not enter into the witness box to deny the plea of the plaintiff and not presented themselves for cross-examination, an adverse inference can be drawn against them as contemplated under Section 114(g) of the Indian

Evidence Act, 1872 [see Iswar Bhai C. Patel & Bachu Bhai Patel v.

Harihar Behera and another (AIR 1999 SC 1341)]. As stated supra, they have not even chosen to cross examine PW.1, though ample opportunities were given.

(iii)Thus, this Court comes to the conclusion that the unshaken evidence of PW.1, coupled with Exs.A1 to A14, clearly establishes the case of the plaintiff and as such, it is entitled to a decree in its favour.

Issue No.1 is, accordingly, answered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.

8.Issue No.2:-

In view of the findings on Issue No.1, the suit has to be decreed with costs, as prayed for.

5 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP

9.In the result, the suit is decreed, with costs, and defendant Nos.1 to 3 jointly and severally shall pay a sum of Rs.11,06,153/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 10.15% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs.11,06,153/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 21st day of April, 2026.

Sd-V.Ganga Bhavani

I Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Division) Visakhapatnam.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendants:

P.W.1: B.Gowri Mahalakshmi-None-

Documents Marked

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is the authorization letter dated 03.07.2025.

Ex.A2 is the loan application dated 22.12.2015.

Ex.A3 is the sanction memorandum dated 22.12.2015.

Ex.A4 is the deed of agreement cum hypothecation dated 22.12.2015.

Ex.A5 is the guarantee agreement dated 01.01.2016.

Ex.A6 is the guarantee covering letter dated 01.01.2016.

Ex.A7 is the loan application dated 01.01.2016.

Ex.A8 is the sanction memorandum dated 01.01.2016.

Ex.A9 is the cash credit agreement dated 01.01.2016.

Ex.A10 is the demand promissory note dated 01.01.2016.

6 OS No.1550/2022, IACJC/VSP

Ex.A11 is the loan application dated 01.01.2017.

Ex.A12 is the letter of renewal dated 01.01.2017.

Ex.A13 is the sanction renewal dated 01.01.2017.

Ex.A14 is the statement of account bearing No.5659766000003 from 22.12.2015 to 09.10.2019.

For Defendants: Nil

Sd-V.Ganga Bhavani

I ACJ(Jr.Divn)/VSP.

OS/536/2023

CANARA BANK vs Percherla Vijaya Ananda Kumar

21 Apr 2026

1 OS 536/2023 IACJC/VSP APVS020024782022

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION): VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani I Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam

Wednesday, this the 22nd day of April, 2026

O.S. No.536 of 2023

Between:

M/s Canara Bank, (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank), a bank constituted and functioning under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 with their Head office situated at Benguluru in Karnataka State and having branch at Ramatalkies Road, Visakhapatnam represented by its Branch Manager, Sri Sudheer Durbha S/o Sri Durbha Narasimha Murthy, Hindu, aged 47 years, working as Branch Manager, Ramatalkies Road, Visakhapatnam.

... Plaintiff

And

1. Mr.Pericherla Vijaya Ananda Kumar, S/o Narayana Prathapa Varma, aged 54 years residing at D.No:37-11-10, Backside Govt. Polytechnic college, Pattabi Reddy Gardens, Visakhapatnam – 530 007.

2. Mr. Rajavatsavi Jagannadha Shivaji Jagapathi Raju, S/o Laxmana Jagapathi Raju, aged 58 years, residing at Flat No.206, RS Royal Apartments, Opp.Krishna College Main gate, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam – 530 022.

...Defendants

2 OS 536/2023 IACJC/VSP This suit is coming on 21.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Sanni Babu,Advocate for plaintiff and the Defendants remained set ex parte on 17.04.2026 and upon perusing the material on record, the Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.2,66,011.07ps with subsequent interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

2.The averments of the plaint, in brief, are:-

(i)On 30.03.2017, defendant No.1 approached the plaintiff bank for sanction of loan of Rs.4,00,000/- for purchase of TATA Ace Mega Mini Truck for carriage. Accordingly, on 30.03.2017, the plaintiff sanctioned the same vide loan Account No.35899910000341 and the defendants executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the said amount together with floating interest in 60 equated monthly installments of Rs.8,503/- each commencing from 30.04.2017 to 31.03.2022.

(ii)On 19.07.2017, again the defendants approached the plaintiff- bank for loan facility of Rs.65,000/-, for purchase of Honda Motor cycle CB

Sine SP DLX. Accordingly, on 19.07.2017, the plaintiff sanctioned the same vide loan Account No.35899790000135 and the defendants executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the said amount together with floating interest in 60 equated monthly installments of Rs.1,405/- each commencing from 31.08.2017 to 30.09.2022. Defendant No.2 stood as guarantor.

(iii)On 10.07.2020, again the defendants approached the plaintiff- bank for sanction of loan of Rs.40,000/-, for business investment.

Accordingly, the plaintiff sanctioned the same vide loan Account

No.35899160000349 and the defendants executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the said amount together with floating interest in 36 3 OS 536/2023 IACJC/VSP equated monthly installments of Rs.1111/- each commencing from 31.07.2021 to 30.06.2024.

(iv)After availing three loan amounts, the defendants did not adhere to the repayment. The defendants committed default in payment of the installments, as agreed by them. On 18.02.2020 and 06.01.2020, the defendants executed acknowledgment of debts. Thereafter, the plaintiff-bank issued recall notices on 02.08.2021 and 20.01.2022, in vain. There is outstanding amount of Rs.2,66,011.07ps (Rs.1,92,338.40ps +

Rs.28,175.99ps + Rs.45,496.68ps as on 31.08.2022. Hence, the suit.

3.Though the summons were served on the defendants, by way of substituted service, they did not choose to enter appearance and hence, they were set ex parte.

4.In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank examined PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A16.

5.Heard. Perused the material on record.

6.Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants, as prayed for?

7.P OINT:-

(i)According to the plaintiff-bank, the defendants availed three loans of Rs.4,00,000/- on 30.03.2017; Rs.65,000/- on 19.07.2017 and

Rs.40,000/- on 10.07.2020, by executing all necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank. The defendants failed to repay the loan amounts as agreed, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff. In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank got examined its Senior Manager as PW.1, who in his affidavit filed in lieu of his examination-in-chief, has reiterated the plaint averments. He got marked Exs.A1 to A16 evidencing that the defendants availed loan and committed default in repayment of the loan amounts, as 4 OS 536/2023 IACJC/VSP agreed. As stated supra, the defendants remained ex parte. Thus, the evidence of PW.1 remained unchallenged.

(ii)On considering the evidence of PW.1, coupled with Exs.A1 to

A16, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff-bank has established its case.

Therefore, the plaintiff-bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff-bank.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed, with costs, and defendant Nos.1 and 2 jointly and severally shall pay a sum of Rs.2,66,011.07ps with subsequent interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs.2,66,011.07ps from the date of decree till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation to the Stenographer Gr.II, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 22ndday of April, 2026.

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendants:

PW.1:U.Chaitanya Kumar-Ex parte-

Documents Marked

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 29.03.2017.

Ex.A2 is the composite hypothecation agreement dated 30.03.2017.

Ex.A3 is the office copy of loan recall notices dated 02.08.2021.

Ex.A4 is the statement of account bearing No. 35899790000135 from 01.01.2017 to 15.09.2022.

Ex.A5 is the acknowledgment of debt dated 18.02.2022.

5 OS 536/2023 IACJC/VSP Ex.A6 is the loan application dated 15.07.2017.

Ex.A7 is the composite hypothecation agreement dated 19.07.2017.

Ex.A8 is the guarantee agreement dated 19.07.2017.

Ex.A9 is the office copy of loan recall notices dated 02.08.2021.

Ex.A10 is the statement of account bearing No.35899160000349 from 01.01.2017 to 15.09.2022.

Ex.A11 is the acknowledgment of debt dated 06.01.2020.

Ex.A12 is the loan application dated 07.07.2020.

Ex.A13 is the agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 10.07.2020.

Ex.A14 is the office copy of loan recall notices dated 20.01.2022.

Ex.A15 is the statement of account bearing No.35899910000341 from 01.01.2017 to 15.09.2022.

Ex.A16 is the authorization dated 09.01.2025.

For Defendants:

-Nil-

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I ACJ (JD)/VSP.

OS/690/2020

CANARA BANK vs KOTTAPALLI PRATAP SINHA

21 Apr 2026

1 OS 690/2020 IACJC/VSP APVS020007352020

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION): VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani I Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam

Thursday, this the 23rd day of April, 2026

O.S. No.690 of 2020

Between:

M/s Canara Bank, (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank), a bank constituted and functioning under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 with their Head office situated at Benguluru in Karnataka State and having branch at Ramatalkies Road, Visakhapatnam represented by its Senior Branch Manager, Sri Vegesna Satya Narayana Raju, S/o Sri Vegesna Bangarraju, Hindu, aged 57 years, working as Senior Branch Manager, Ramatalkies Road, Visakhapatnam.

... Plaintiff

And

1. Mr.Kottapalli Pratap Sinha, S/o Kottapalli Ramadas Gandhi, Hindu, aged about 46 years, resident of D.No.46-18-23, Mandavari Street, Behind Big Bazar, Dondaparthy, Visakhapatnam -530 016.

2. Mr.Sista Suryanarayana Rao, S/o Sista Subramanya Sarma, Hindu, aged about 52 years, resident of D.No.LIG 555, LIC Apts, HB Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530 022. working as Foreman Operations Emp.No.116285 in C & CCD of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam.

...Defendants

2 OS 690/2020 IACJC/VSP

This suit is coming on 22.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Sanni Babu, Sri N.B.Naidu,Advocates for plaintiff and the Defendants remained set ex parte on 01.04.2022 and 17.04.2026 and upon perusing the material on record, the Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.9,04,193/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

2.The averments of the plaint, in brief, are:-

(i)On 11.05.2017, defendants approached the plaintiff bank for sanction of loan of Rs.7,50,000/- for purchase of Four wheeler. Accordingly, on 11.05.2017, the plaintiff sanctioned the same vide loan Account

No.35899910000378 and the defendants executed necessary documents, agreeing to repay the said amount together with floating interest in 84 equated monthly installments of Rs.12,526/- each commencing from 30.06.2017 to 31.05.2024. Defendant No.2 stood as guarantor.

(ii) After availing loan amount, the defendants did not adhere to the repayment. The defendants committed default in payment of the installments, as agreed by them. On 28.01.2019, the plaintiff got issued legal notice to the defendants and the same were returned. Thereafter, the plaintiff-bank issued recall notices on 03.06.2020 and 06.06.2020, in vain.

There is outstanding amount of Rs.9,04,193/- as on 31.08.2020. Hence, the suit.

3.Though the summons were served on the defendants, by way of substituted service, they did not choose to enter appearance and hence, they were set ex parte.

4.In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank examined PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A9.

3 OS 690/2020 IACJC/VSP

5.Heard. Perused the material on record.

6.Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants, as prayed for?

7.P OINT:-

(i)According to the plaintiff-bank, the defendants availed loan of

Rs.7,50,000/- on 11.05.2017, by executing all necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank. The defendants failed to repay the loan amounts as agreed, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff. In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank got examined its Senior Manager as PW.1, who in his affidavit filed in lieu of his examination-in-chief, has reiterated the plaint averments. He got marked Exs.A1 to A9 evidencing that the defendants availed loan and committed default in repayment of the loan amounts, as agreed. As stated supra, the defendants remained ex parte. Thus, the evidence of PW.1 remained unchallenged.

(ii)On considering the evidence of PW.1, coupled with Exs.A1 to

A9, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff-bank has established its case.

Therefore, the plaintiff-bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff-bank.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed, with costs, and defendant Nos.1 and 2 jointly and severally shall pay a sum of Rs.9,04,193/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on Rs.9,04,193/- from the date of decree till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation to the Stenographer Gr.II, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 23RDday of April, 2026.

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam.

4 OS 690/2020 IACJC/VSP

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendants:

PW.1:U.Chaitanya Kumar-Ex parte-

Documents Marked

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 18.04.2017.

Ex.A2 is the composite hypothecation agreement dated 11.05.2017.

Ex.A3 is the guarantee agreement dated 11.05.2017.

Ex.A4 is the acknowledgment of receipt of amount dated 11.05.2017.

Ex.A5 is the office copy of legal notice dated 28.01.2019, along with returned postal covers.

Ex.A6 is the office copy of loan recall notice dated 03.06.2020.

Ex.A7 is the office copy of loan recall notice dated 06.06.2020.

Ex.A8 is the statement of account bearing No.35899910000378 from 11.05.2017 to 31.08.2020.

Ex.A9 is the authorization dated 22.04.2026

For Defendants:

-Nil-

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I ACJ (JD)/VSP.

OS/535/2023

CANARA BANK vs M/S TIRUMALA HAIR AND BEAUTY PARTNERSHIP

21 Apr 2026

1 OS 535/2023 IACJC/VSP APVS020004202023

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION): VISAKHAPATNAM

Present: Smt. V.Ganga Bhavani I Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam

Wednesday, this the 22nd day of April, 2026

O.S. No.535 of 2023

Between:

... Plaintiff

And

1. M/s Tirumala Hair and Beauty, Partnership Firm represented by its Partners 1. Mr. Ayodhya Chinni Krishnaiah, S/o Chandra Sekhar Ayodhya and 2. Ms. Thotakura Soundarya Vani, D/o Kanaka Rao Totakura (Business address: D.No:7-5-82/1, Sea Shore Apartments, Pandurangapuram, Beach Road, Visakhapatnam – 530 003.)

2. Mr. Ayodya Chinni Krishnaiah, S/o Chandra Sekhar Ayodhya, aged about 35 years, residing at 3-5-9, Sivalayam Vidhi, Mylavaram, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521 230.

3. Ms. Thotakura Soundarya Vani, D/o Kanaka Rao Totakura, aged about 27 years, residing at Type-2 64/C, Railway Quarters, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530 018.

...Defendants

2 OS 535/2023 IACJC/VSP

This suit is coming on 21.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Sanni Babu,Advocate for plaintiff and the Defendants remained set ex parte on 17.04.2026 and upon perusing the material on record, the Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.13,68,368.89 ps with subsequent interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

2.The averments of the plaint, in brief, are:-

On 22.03.2017, defendants approached the plaintiff-bank for loan facility of Rs.12,00,000/-, for establishing Hair and Beauty Salon business.

Accordingly, on 22.03.2017, the plaintiff-bank sanctioned the same. The defendants executed all necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank, agreeing to repay the same along with floating rate of interest under the loan account No.35899910000322. After availing loan amount, the defendants had irregular in repayment of loan amount and thereafter, the defendants committed default in payment of the installments, as agreed by them. On 20.03.2020, the defendants executed acknowledgment of debt. Thereafter, the plaintiff-bank issued recall notice on 09.05.2022, in vain. There is outstanding amount of Rs.13,68,368.89ps as on 31.01.2023. Hence, the suit.

3.Though the summons were served on the defendants, by way of substituted service, they did not choose to enter appearance and hence, they were set ex parte.

4.In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank examined PW.1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A9.

5.Heard. Perused the material on record.

3 OS 535/2023 IACJC/VSP

6.Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants, as prayed for?

7.P OINT:-

(i)According to the plaintiff-bank, the defendants availed loan of

Rs.12,00,000/- on 22.03.2017, by executing all necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff-bank. The defendants failed to repay the loan amounts as agreed, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff. In support of its case, the plaintiff-bank got examined its Senior Manager as PW.1, who in his affidavit filed in lieu of his examination-in-chief, has reiterated the plaint averments. He got marked Exs.A1 to A9 evidencing that the defendants availed loan and committed default in repayment of the loan amount, as agreed. As stated supra, the defendants remained ex parte. Thus, the evidence of PW.1 remained unchallenged.

(ii)On considering the evidence of PW.1, coupled with Exs.A1 to

A9, this Court is of the view that the plaintiff-bank has established its case.

Therefore, the plaintiff-bank is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendants as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff-bank.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed, with costs, and defendant Nos.1 to 3 jointly and severally shall pay a sum of Rs.13,68,368.89ps with subsequent interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at the rate of 6% per annum on

Rs.13,68,368.89ps from the date of decree till the date of realization.

Directly typed to my dictation to the Stenographer Gr.II, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 22ndday of April, 2026.

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Visakhapatnam.

4 OS 535/2023 IACJC/VSP

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendants:

PW.1:U.Chaitanya Kumar-Ex parte-

Documents Marked

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is the loan application dated 02.03.2017.

Ex.A2 is the composite hypothecation agreement dated 22.03.2017.

Ex.A3 is the acknowledgment of debt dated 20.03.2020.

Ex.A4 is the office copy of recall notices dated 09.05.2022.

Ex.A5 is the office copy of loan arrears notice dated 01.10.2019

Ex.A6 is the office copy of loan arrears notice dated 15.06.2022.

Ex.A7 is the attested copy of partnership deed and KYC of the firm.

Ex.A8 is the statement of account bearing No.35899910000322 from 01.03.2017 to 16.02.2023.

Ex.A9 is the authorization dated 09.01.2025.

For Defendants:

-Nil-

Sd/-V.Ganga Bhavani

I ACJ (JD)/VSP.

Order Record 947 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/535/2023	CANARA BANK vs M/S TIRUMALA HAIR AND BEAUTY PARTNERSHIP	21 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/536/2023	CANARA BANK vs Percherla Vijaya Ananda Kumar	21 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/690/2020	CANARA BANK vs KOTTAPALLI PRATAP SINHA	21 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1175/2023	BANK OF BARODA vs GANTA MALLESWARI	21 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1550/2022	CANARA BANK vs VARDHINI ENTERPRISES	21 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/944/2023	ATTADA PRAVEEN vs MADDI KANAKA RAO	17 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/329/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs VIGNESWARA CLOTH SHOP	16 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/908/2024	SHAVALI KHAN vs CHERUKUPALLI PREM KUMARI	15 Apr 2026	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/1251/2025	State Bank of India rep by its Deputy Manager vs Kandregula Chiranjeevi	15 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/969/2022	INDIAN BANK vs K SRINIVASA RAO	10 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/970/2022	INDIAN BANK vs K SRINVASA RAO	10 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/971/2022	INDIAN BANK vs K SRINIVASA RAO	10 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/681/2024	BANK OF BARODA vs JAGUPILLA UMA MAHESWARI	08 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1301/2022	CANARA BANK vs GONNABATTULA PARAMESHWARA RAO	08 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1615/2021	CHITTIBOMMA VEERA VENKATA RAJU vs PEDDIREDDY SATTI RAJU ALIAS RAJABABU	08 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1078/2025	Regeti Prabhavathi vs Samareddy Damodhara	07 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1743/2021	INDIAN BANK vs KOKKIRA RAMANA	06 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1997/2022	Keerthi Apparao vs Pabbu Nageswara PRasad	02 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1664/2021	KOVVURI VEERA RAGHAVA REDDY vs NIDEGATLA BANGARAYYA	24 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/39/2025	V.B.R. CHOWDARY vs DOKKA APPALA RAJU	23 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
OS/1677/2021	BANK OF BARODA vs ATTA KUSUMA	23 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1127/2025	Canara Bank Represented by its Manager vs M/s Shine Beauty Parlour	18 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1961/2022	CANARA BANK vs G PRASANNA LAKSHMI	18 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/458/2025	TAMADA NAVEEN vs KARRI PARVATHI NAGA SRIDEVI	17 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/528/2017	Sri Venda Jagan Mohan Rao vs Smt. Banavath Vijaya Lakshmi	16 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/528/2017	Sri Venda Jagan Mohan Rao vs Smt. Banavath Vijaya Lakshmi	16 Mar 2026	DECREE	—
EP/105/2025	TARRA VENKATA LAKSHMI vs MUPIDDI APPARAO	13 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
EP/436/2024	CHALAPATHI CHIT FUND PRIVATE LTD vs MEENAKSHI ENTERPRISES	12 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
OS/1404/2023	KODA TULASI vs CHEPALA RAJU	12 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/170/2023	INDIAN BANK vs KARRI PRUDHVI	11 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/304/2023	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SRI DHANA SAI MEDICALS	11 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1231/2025	Patnala Subramanyam vs Dendeti Venkata Ramana	11 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1525/2025	Teella Venkata Ramana vs Viswanadha Srinivasa Rao	11 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/38/2026	Bheemarasetty Murali Krishna vs Kaligiti Raja Kumar	10 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/49/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA, SME CENTRE vs M/S.DANDAPANI ENGINEERING AND CONTRACTORS	10 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/355/2023	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SRI KANAKA DURGA SARI CENTRE	10 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1056/2025	Kalisetty Srinu vs Yagati Malleswari	10 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
OS/1162/2025	Tetala Srinivasa Reddy vs Sapala Srinivasa Rao	10 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/148/2025	TAMMAREDDY RAMAMOHAN RAO vs GUJJELI CHINABABU	09 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
EP/383/2022	M/s.Manichandana Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd. vs Sagina Lakshmi Padal	06 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
OS/1373/2024	BANK OF BARODA REP ITS SR.MANAGER G TRINATH vs KS ENTERPRISES REP PROPRIETOR BEEMPALLI SUNITHA SANE	06 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1402/2023	CHITHAKALA PADMA vs KOTTEDU PYDIRATNAM	05 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/958/2019	CHAMARTHI SRINIVASA RAO vs BALLANKI DHANA LAKSHMI	25 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/82/2023	CANARA BANK vs MUNUBARTHI SURI BABU	19 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1462/2022	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S AGS MANAGEMENT SERVICES	19 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/344/2023	TEEPARTHI PALLAPARAJU vs SAYED PARVEEN ALIAS PRAVEEN	18 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/20/2022	THONANGI VENU vs THONANGI RAMBAI	17 Feb 2026	ORDER	—
OS/901/2025	BOYA SUBBA RAO vs B D RAMATHALLI	17 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/593/2019	SURISETTI RAMANA BABU vs SURISETTI PRAKASH	16 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/659/2023	CANARA BANK vs M/S SUBHADRA ENTERPRISES	13 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/958/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA ,SEETHAMMADARA BRANCH,REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY BRANCH MANAGER vs NARAVA PADMA PRIYA	11 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/359/2022	PANTAM ADINARYANA vs RAJANA PAVAN KUMAR	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1387/2021	CANARA BANK vs RAMOLU NOOKA RAJU	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1694/2021	GADDIPALLI AMMORU vs NOLLU SATTIRAJU	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/378/2023	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs AMBATI ANURADHA	06 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1574/2021	NAGIREDDY SATISH KUMAR REDDY vs VADAREVU KRISHNA RAO	06 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1122/2020	REDDY VEERA APPA RAO vs DAMMU VENKATA SURYANARAYANA	30 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/853/2023	RATNALA PAPA RAO vs MIRIYALA SANDHAYA RANI	28 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1036/2025	Kinthalli Trinadhrao vs Kondra Hari kumar	22 Jan 2026	ORDER IN IA	—
CC/200076/2018	SHO Inspector of Police, Dwaraka PS, Visakhapatnam vs Ithi Pushparaju	22 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1176/2021	SABBISETTY SRINU vs DUMPA SRINIVASA REDDY	21 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/564/2023	BANK OF BARODA vs KOLUSU SRI KRISHNA MOHAN	20 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/197/2019	Uppili Satyavathi vs Badi Bhima Raju	19 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
CC/1824/2019	DWARAKA POLICE STATION vs MALAKA RAJ KUMAR	16 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
OS/827/2024	NARAM VENKAT NILIMA vs VANKAYALA PRASAD	09 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/474/2022	RAYAVARAPU VENKATA RAO vs KUCHIPUDI SARAT BABU	07 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1043/2025	Bayana Bhagya Lakshmi vs Kandikonda Srinivasa Rao	07 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/842/2025	KASARAPU VENKATA RAMANA vs KANCHARLA UPENDRA	06 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/865/2023	M/S PROTOB AC ENGINEERING vs PRINITHY CONSULTANTS	05 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1366/2025	Gorla Ramakrishna vs Ganagalla Yogi	05 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/27/2024	GUNTUBOYINA PRAKASH RAO vs CHEEKATI RAMBABU	02 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/100141/2018	State Reptd by Sri CH. Tirupathi Rao Inspector of police Task Force-1 vs Chippada Satish Chandra	12 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1693/2022	MEDCIAL CONCEPTS vs KAPIL SURI	11 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/313/2025	VV BALA SIVA KAMESWARI vs TALARI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA	10 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/795/2025	Botta Srinivasa vs Choppa Prasad	10 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/927/2024	T V SATYANARAYANA vs V V BALA SIVA KAMESWARI	10 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/890/2020	RAVVA LAKSHMI vs NIDAGATTU BANGARAYYA	09 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1101/2023	PADALA VENKATA REDDY vs MARUPILLI KUMAR	09 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/23/2023	ALTHI MURALI KRISHNA vs BANGARI SOBHA RANI	08 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1442/2023	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs MAHESH KUMAR VARMA	08 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/200038/2018	IV Town P.S vs Katapareddy Appala Raju	08 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/303/2023	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SRI RAMI REDDI CATERING AND COOKING	05 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/421/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S. REVIVE ADVANCED COSMETOLOGY CENTRE	05 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/711/2025	LOKANADAM ATCHUTA RAO vs MEGHADRI RAMA KOTESWARA RAO	05 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
OS/925/2021	MAA KARNI ENTERPRISES vs M N M MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED	05 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/960/2025	Moganti Naga Venkata Vara Prasad vs Bammadi (Jibbidi) sanyasamma	03 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1938/2022	KANDREGULA SURIBABU vs MIRIYALA SIRISHA	03 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/580/2025	DURGA RAMBABU vs KARRI VENKATA LAKSHMINARAYANA	01 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1327/2024	GOTTAPU VENUGOPAL NAIDU vs SONABARIKI SREERAMULU	01 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/100017/2018	Inspector of Police IV Town Police Station Visakhapatnam vs Gowri Bhaskar Rao Bhaskar Rao	01 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/367/2023	CHILLA SURYA KUMARI vs BORIKI KAMA RAJU	28 Nov 2025	ORDER	—
OS/1390/2024	DASARI VENESWARI vs STATE OF AP REP BY ITS COLLECTOR	28 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1964/2022	CANARA BANK vs B Y B SUMATHI	27 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/361/2022	NELAPARTHI VENKATESH vs MAK TARIQ ALIAS MALIK	26 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1048/2023	VERAVALLI VENKATA SURYANARYANA vs YARABATI SRINIVASA RAO	26 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1145/2021	BHAMIDIPATI SAMBA MURTHY vs BHAMIDIPATI VISWANADH	26 Nov 2025	ORDER	—
OS/1146/2021	BHAMIDIPATI SAMBA MURTHY vs BHAMIDIPATI VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY	26 Nov 2025	ORDER	—
OS/396/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs CHALLA RAJUKUMAR	24 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/200030/2018	IV Town P.S vs Balakrishna Bhatt	21 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/520/2022	ALLIPILLI SRINIVASA RAO vs KARRI LAKSHMI	20 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—

Showing 100 of 947 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2026		19
Mar 2026		26
Feb 2026		14
Jan 2026		16
Dec 2025		19
Nov 2025		29
Oct 2025		22
Sep 2025		43
Aug 2025		18
Jul 2025		33
Jun 2025		13
May 2025		22

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI handled?

Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI has handled 962 court orders since 2023 at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam. The average disposal rate is 80 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI hear?

Based on available records, Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Where is Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI currently posted?

Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI is posted as III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI available online?

Yes. 11 judgments by Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI dispose cases?

Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI disposes approximately 80 cases per month, based on 962 orders handled over their tenure at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Since when is Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI serving?

Smt. V.GANGA BHAVANI has been serving at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam since 2023.

Case Types

OS 77%

EP 12%

CC 11%

Posting History

Apr 2024 — May 2024

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) · 1 orders
Apr 2024 — May 2024

CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) -CUM- IX ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, GAJUWAKA
Nov 2023 — May 2025

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) · 171 orders
May 2023 — Present

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) · 790 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri Chinnamsetty Raju

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

1,274 orders

Sri M. Venkata Ramana

I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

5,391 orders

Kum. C.k.gayathri Devi

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

749 orders

Sri D.seshayya

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-ACB

0 orders

Sri M.srihari

IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE-SPL JUDGE ECONOMIC OFFENCES

2 orders

Sri S. Damodara Rao

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

11 orders

Sri S.Srinivasa Rao

VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

736 orders

Smt. P.sri Satya Devi

SPL. JUDGE FOR SC AND ST CASES

1,369 orders

Sri. K.Ratna Kumar

XII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

433 orders

Sri. D.vijay Goutam

SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL...

130 orders

Smt. M.sobha

XIV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri K Venkateswara Rao

XV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. M.Ramakrishnamraju

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

0 orders

Sri P Rajaram

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE

829 orders

Sri U.u.prasad

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT...

0 orders

Sri J Srinivas Rao

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRIC...

1 orders

Sri Y.gopal Krishna

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

0 orders

M D V N Sindhura

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

516 orders

Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

761 orders

Dr. Soni Dwarampudi

VI ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

525 orders

Smt. Dr. K. Sarada

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

515 orders

Smt. Y.Premalatha

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

385 orders

Sri G.Karthik

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

1,053 orders

Smt. Sindhu Gurram

V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

814 orders

Sri M.Pradeep Kumar

CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM

432 orders

Smt. P.Pradeepa

I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPAT...

14 orders

Sri K.Vasudeva Rao

IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPA...

251 orders

Smt K.Sruta Vinda

VII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS...

641 orders

Ms Sri Rajarajeswari Tejaswi Kalaharsti

SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR TRI...

0 orders

Sri P Rajendra Prasad

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT - I

334 orders

Y.Ganapathi Rao

SPL. MAGISTRATE COURT-III

399 orders

D.viswanadham

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT VI

10 orders

← View all judges at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam