Sri S. Nageswara Rao

1

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : KHAMMAM

Present: S.Nageswara Rao, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

Monday, the 2nd day of November, 2015

O.S.No. 342 of 2014

Between : Janga Seetha Ramaiah, S/o Narsaiah, Age: 86 Yrs, Occ: Agrl., R/o H.No: 6-2-133, Dwaraka Nagar, Khammam.

...Plaintiff.

And

Muthyala Phani Kumar @ Phaninder, S/o Prabhakar, Age:Adult, Occ: Pump operator, R/o H.No: 8-3-318, UPH Colony, Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam.

...Defendants.

This suit is coming before me today for hearing in the presence of Sri. Thotakura Srinivas Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri. K.S Charan, Advocate for Defendant ; upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing; ,this Court passed the following :

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit for recovery of Rs. 30,300/- with interest @ 24 % p.a from the date of the suit till the date of realisation and for costs.

The Plaintiff and Defendant are acquainted with each other. Out of the said acquaintance the Defendant borrowed a sum of Rs. 20,000/- from the Plaintiff on 05.08.2012 to meet his family necessities agreeing to repay the same together with interest @ 24 % p.a on demand and executed a promissory note in favour of the Plaintiff. Subsequently, inspite of repeated demands made by the Plaintiff, the Defendant failed to make payment of the amount covered by the promissory note including legal notice dated 10.07.2014.

2]The Defendant filed written statement denying the suit claim contending that he never borrowed money from the Plaintiff and never 2 executed any promissory note and that the same is brought into existence with the assistance of the scribe and attestor for wrongful gain and that suit document is forged and fabricated without consideration. Further it is contended that the name of the Defendant is not Phani Kumar and got materially altered by creating @ Phaninder before the name of Phani kumar. The Defendant did not receive any legal notice and signature of the postal acknowledgment is not that of the signature of the Defendant. The

Plaintiff has no cause of action to file the suit. Hence prayed to dismiss the suit with exemplary costs.

3]Basing on the above pleadings, the following issues were settled for trial.

i)Whether the Defendant borrowed Rs. 20,000/- from the Plaintiff on 05.08.12 and executed promissory note? ii)Whether the suit promissory note is forged one? iii)Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for? iv)To what relief?

4]On behalf of the Plaintiff, PW-1 examined and Exs A.1 to A.4 are marked. The Defendant No.1 though filed written statement, has not chosen to examine PW-1. No evidence is adduced on behalf of the

Defendant.

5]Heard the counsel for Plaintiff.

ISSUES NO.1 and 2 :- 6]The evidence of PW-1 is re-iteration of the plaint averments and it establishes the Plaintiff's claim. The same is also supported by the documents Exs A.1 to A.4. Ex.A.1 is Original Promissory note dated 05.08.2012 appearing to have been executed by the Defendant in favour of 3 the Plaintiff borrowing sum of Rs. 20,000/- for his family necessities agreeing to pay the same together with interest @ 24% p.a.

7].Ex.A.2 is Office copy of legal notice dated 10.07.2014 demanding the

Plaintiff to repay the debt amount and Ex.A.3 is postal receipt and Ex.A-4 is the Postal Acknowledgment dated 14.07.2015. The oral evidence of

PW-1 / Plaintiff coupled with Ex.A.1 to A-4 documents proves the case of the Plaintiff about the Defendant borrowing money from the Plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a and the efforts of the

Plaintiff in making demands for repayment of the amount.

8]So, the evidence of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A.1 to A.4 proves the plaintiff's claim over the Defendant. Though the Defendant has contended that the suit promissory note is forged and created one and he is not liable to pay the amount to Plaintiff, but he failed to rebut the plaintiff's evidence and to prove his claim over the Plaintiff. Defendant failed to place any evidence in support of his claim and he did not even enter into the witness box to establish his own case against the plaintiff. These two issues are accordingly held.

ISSUE NO.3:- 9]In view of findings on issues 1 and 2, Plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for. With regard to interest admittedly the suit debt was for family necessities. So, the Planitiff is not entitled for interest at the agreed contractual rate of interest from the date of suit, till the date of realization. The interest from the date of the suit, till the date of realization is within the discretion of the court and the interest from the date of decree, till the date of realization cannot exceed 6% p.a unless it is a 4 commercial transaction. Accordingly, it is held that the Plaintiff is entitled for interest only @ 12% from the date of suit, till the date of decree and @ 6% p.a till the date of realization thereafter on principal sum of Rs. 20,000/-.

This issue is accordingly held.

ISSUE NO.4:- 10]In view of findings on issues 1 to 3 above, the Plaintiff is entitled for decree with costs.

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the Defendant and the Defendant is directed to pay sum of Rs. 30,300/- together with interest @ 12% p.a from the date of filing of the suit, till the date of decree and @ 6% p.a from the date of decree till the date of of realization on the Principal amount of Rs. 20,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 2nd day of November, 2015.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Khammam.

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses Examined

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: P.W1. J.Seetha Ramaiah- None.-

Exhibits Marked

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT;

Ex.A1: Original promissory note dt: 05.08.2012 -Nil- Ex.A.2: Office copy of legal notice dt: 10.07.2014 Ex.A.3: Postal receipt Ex.A.4: Acknowledgment dt: 17.07.2015

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Khammam.

5 2

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : KHAMMAM

Present: S.Nageswara Rao, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam

Monday, the 2nd day of November, 2015

O.S.No. 342 of 2014

Presented on :26.08.2014 Filed on :01.09.2014 Between : Janga Seetha Ramaiah, S/o Narsaiah, Age: 86 Yrs, Occ: Agrl., R/o H.No: 6-2-133, Dwaraka Nagar, Khammam.

...Plaintiff.

And

Muthyala Phani Kumar @ Phaninder, S/o Prabhakar, Age:Adult, Occ: Pump operator, R/o H.No: 8-3-318, UPH Colony, Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam.

...Defendant.

CLAIM FOR:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of money of Rs. 30,300/- being the principal, interest and legal notice charges, basing on promissory note executed by Defendant infavour of plaintiff with future interest @ 24% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and to award costs of the suit.

CAUSE OF ACTION AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION:

Cause of action arose on 05.08.12, 10.07.14 at Khammam town and District

VALUATION OF THE SUIT AND COURT FEE:

This suit is valued at Rs. 30,300/-, upon which total court fee of Rs 1846/- is paid U/s.20 of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.

DECREE: This suit is coming before me today for hearing in the presence of Sri. Thotakura Srinivas Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri. K.S Charan, Advocate for Defendant ; upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing;, this court doth order and decree:

1. That the suit be and is hereby decreed with costs.

2. That the Defendants do pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.30,300/- (Rupees Thirty thousand three hundred only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of suit, till the date of decree and @ 6% p.a from the date of decree till the date of realization on Principal amount of Rs. 20,000/- 2

3. That the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court, on this the 2nd day of November, 2015.

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

PARTICULARS OF COSTS

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

1. Stamps on plaint

2. Stamps on power

3. Stamps on process

4. Stamps on petitions

5. Publication charges

6. Stamps on documents

7. Advocate fee

8. Misc. & type charges ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Rs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KHAMMAM.

2

IN THECOURTOFTHEPRINCIPALJUNIOR

CIVILJUDGE: KHAMMAM

Present:S.NageswaraRao,

Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam

Wednesday,4" day of theNovember,2015 0.S.No.278of2015

Between : Smt.Uppala Nirmala,W/o.Laxmanrao,Age.45Occu.Housewife, years, R/o.AmmaravaramVillage, Hujurnagar Mandal,NalgondaDistrict.

...Plaintiff.

And

ShaikChandPasha,S/o.Kashim,Age:40Occ:Salesmen, years, C/o.Sindhurshopat Kamanbazar,R/o. Sujruvarapupeta, KhammamTown&District. Defendant. ...

4 o

is coming Thissuitbeforetoday04-11-2015forPlaintiff'sevidenceinthe meon K. RajasekharA. Yugandhar ofSriReddy,AdvocateforplaintiffandSriRao, presence AdvocatefiledVakalathforDefendant,butV/rittenStatementnotfiled,hencesetexparte; the following perusingthematerialrecord,hearing;thisCourtpassed uponpapersonupon:

JUDGMENT

ThePlaintifffiledthissuitforof moneyofRs.15,800/-withfutureinterest@ recovery the ground that pa fromthedateof thesuittill thedateof realisationandfor coststhe 24%on his family necessities DefendantborrowedRs.10,000/-fromthePlaintiff19-02-2013for on promissoryagreeingthewithinterest@24%andthat executingnotetorepaysamep.a inspiteofrepeatedincluding legalnotice,theDefendantfailedtomakepaymentof demands promissorynoteamount.

Defendantbeingservedwithremainedex-parte. 2].Thesummons, examinedproducedExs.A.1to A.3 3].hisclaimhimselfPW.1and ThePlaintifftoproveas documents. 4].Heardthecounselfor Plaintiff.

i ; L

Plaintiffis entitledforof suit 5].pointforconsiderationis whethertherecovery Now,the ‘ amountprayedfor? as POINT:-

In. .

affidavitre-iteratedtheplaintaverments.

throughhischiefexamination 6].ThePlaintiff [OA eres9,

patforthet

ssame)is Original Promissory

hepresueedEx.A.1peat

Exs.A.1toA.3documents.=

“dated19:02-2013appearing

(hoie,ofthe

executedbytheDefendantin favour tohavebeen

i PlaintitfisumofRei15,800/-

borrowing

forhis family necessitiesagreeingtothesame pay

togetherwithinterest@24%p.a.(

one)

TA:Ex.A.2is Officeof legal copynoticeardPostalreceipt,dated 12-05-2015demanding thePlaintifftothedebtis Acknowledgment repayamountandEx./.3card,dated 14-05-2015.

Theoralevidenceof PW-1/ Plaintiff coupledwithEx.A.1to A-3documents the provescase.

of thePlaintiffabouttheDefendant borrowing moneyfromthePlaintiff agreeingtothe repay withinterest@24%and samep.atheeffortsofthePlaintiffinmakingdemands forate : repaymentof theamount.TheDefendanthaving remainedex-parte,theevidenceofPW-1 andExs.A-1to A-3remainedun-rebuttedand proved.

8].ThePlaintiffclaimedinterest@24%fromthe p.adateof thepromissorynotetill the dateof thesuitandit is in accordancewiththecontractbetweentheparties. Accordingly,the

Plaintiffprovedhis claimagainsttheDefendan:for recoveryof the amount.

With regard to interest 9].fromthedateof inesuittill thedateof Decreeandfromthedate - of realization,of the ofdecreetill thedateit iswithinthediscretionoftheIn view court.

betweentheparties regardingthe paymentof interest, agreementthePlaintiffis entitledfor interest@12%fromthedateof suit,subsequently, tilthedateofdecreeandheis p.a entitled-for only 6% till thedateofrealizationtransactionisnotcommercial /p.aasaone.

Accordingly,thepointis held.

10].In theresult,thesuitis decreedwithcostsandtheDefendantis directedto pay sum

be

of filing of the suit, till thedate. of Rs.15,800/- togetherwithinterest@12%p..a fromthedate the Principal ofdecreeand@6%fromthedateof decrzetill thedateof of realization— p.aon amountof Rs.10,000/-.

“ype:Hoiny:dictation,

correctedandpronouncedbyin thecourtthis meopenon

ing,a4"dayof‘Noveinber,2016.

Prin sipal JuniorCivil Judge, s ‘ {Khammam.

Appendixof Evidence

JMitnessesExamined

?

POREae,,:

PLAINTIFF?

FOURDEFENDANT:

PW4.22Smit:Hips-None.-

ExhibitsMarked

FORDEFENDANT;

FORPLAINTIFF

19- 02-2013. is Original promissorynote,dated Ex.A.1 of legal noticeandPostalreceipt,dated12-05-2015. Ex.A.2is Officecopy is Acknowledgment,dated14-05-2015.

Ex.A.3:

Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam.

IN THECOURTOFTHEPRINCIPALJUNIORCIVILJUDGE: KHAMMAM

Present:S.NageswaraRao, JuniorCivil Judge,

Principal

Khammam

Friday,the30"dayof October,2015

O.S.No.90of2014

Between :

NelluriVenkateswarRao,S/o.Kotaiah, Age: 60,Occ:Rtd.Employee,

Town & District.

R/o.SriRamNagar,Khammam

...Plaintiff.

And

DeetiNaga Ratnam,W/o.SunderRao, Age:50Occ:FemaleGeneralMazddor, years, Office,S & P.C Department,Corprate. O/o.ChiefSecurity Kothagudem,KhammamDistrict.

...Defendant.

is comingbeforetoday30-10-2015forPlaintiff'sevidenceinthe Thissuit meon K. Srinivasu,for plaintiff and ofSriAdvocateofDefendantsetexparte; presenceupon the following perusingthematerialrecord,hearing;thisCourtpassed papersonupon:

JUDGMENT

ThePlaintifffiledthissuitforof moneyofRs.66,000/-withfutureinterest@ recovery the ground that pafromthedateof thesuittill thedateof realisationandforcoststhe 24%on forhis family necessities DefendantborrowedRs.50,000/-fromthePlaintiff20.11.2012 on executing promissoryagreeingtothewithinterest@24%andthat noterepaysamep.a inspiteofrepeatedincluding legalnotice,theDefendantfailedtomakepaymentof demands promissorynoteamount.

TheDefendantbeingservedwithremainedex-parte. 2].summons, examinedhimselfPW.1andproducedExs.A.1to A.4 3].ThePlaintiffto provehis claimas documents. 4).thecounselforPlaintiff. Heard thePlaintiffis entitledforof suit 5].Now,thepointforconsiderationis whetherrecovery amountprayedfor? as POINT:- re-iteratedtheplaintaverments.In throughhischiefexaminationaffidavit 6].ThePlaintiff is Original Promissory Exs.A.1to A.4documents.Ex.A.1 of theheproduced supportsame, executedbytheDefendantin favourof the 20-11-2012appearingtohavebeen note,dated his familynecessitiesagreeingtothe ofRs.50,000/-forpaysame Plaintiffborrowing sum togetherwithinterest@24%p.a.

of legal notice,17-07-2013demandingthePlaintiffto repay

7).dated

Ex.A.2is Officecopy is postal receipt,17-7-2013andEx.A-4is thePostal Ex.A.3dated thedebtamountand

Cn

i "oN ( i2.

PW-1 /

Acknowledgment,dated25-07-2013.TheoralevidenceofPlaintiffcoupledwith

Ex.A.1toA-4documentstheofthePlaintiffabouttheDefendantborrowing provescase fromthePlaintiffagreeingtothewithinterest@24%andtheefforts moneyrepaysamep.a ofthePlaintiffin making demandsforrepaymentoftheamount.TheDefendanthaving remainedex-parte,theevidenceofPW-1andExs.A-1toA-4remainedun-rebuttedand

proved.

8].ThePlaintiffclaimedinterest@24%fromthedateof thepromissorynotetill the p.a dateof thesuitandit is in accordancewiththecontractbetweentheparties. Accordingly,the

Plaintiffprovedhis claimagainsttheDefendantforof theamount. recovery

With regard 9].tointerestfromthedateof thesuittill thedateof Decreeandfromthedate

it is within

ofdecreetill thedateofrealization,thediscretionofthecourt.Inviewofthe agreementbetweentheparties regardingtheof interest,thePlaintiffis entitledfor

payment

interest@12%fromof suit,‘ill thedateofdecreeandsubsequently,is p.athedatehe for only 6% entitledtill thedateof realizationtransactionisnotcommercial p.aasaone.

Accordingly,thepointis held.

10].

In theresult,thesuitis decreedwithcostsandtheDefendantis directedto pay sum of Rs.66,000/-together@of filing of the withinterest12%fromthedatesuit,till thedate p.a decreeand@6%the Principal offromthedateoftill thedateof of realization p.adecreeon of Rs. 50,000/-. amount

Typedtomy dictation,|and pronounced correctedbyin thecourtthis meopenon

the-30".dayof October,

2015.

Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam. Appendixof Evidence 4}WitnessesExamined peFORPLAINTIFF:; FOR_DEFENDANT:

Nelluri Venkateswar

~P.W1:.Rao

-None.-

ExhibitsMarked :

PLAINTIFF

“FORFORDEFENDANT; is Original Promissory Ex.A.1note,dated20-11-2012. Ex.A.2is Officeof legal notice, copydated17-07-2013. Ex.A.3is Postalreceipt,dated17-07-2013. Ex.A.4is Postalacknowledgment,dated25-07-2013.

Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam.

IN THECOURTOFTHEPRINCIPALJUNIORCIVILJUDGE: KHAMMAM

Present:S.NageswaraRao,

PrincipalCivil Judge,

Junior Khammam

Friday,the30" day of October, 2015

O.S.No.370of2014

Between :

BandaruSrinivasaRao,S/o.Veerabhadraiah,Age:45 years,Occ:Business,

Town &

R/o.H.No.7-5-94/A,PakabandaBazar,Khammam District.

...Plaintiff.

And

ShaikImam,S/o.SonduMiya,Age:40 years,Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.1-74, Velugumatla (V), Gollagudem (M), Khammam UrbanMandal, KhammamDistrict.

...Defendant.

Thisis coming suitbeforetoday30-10-2015forPlaintiff'sevidenceinthe meon of SriS.VenkateswarRao,Advocatefor plaintiff and presenceofDefendantsetexparte; perusingthematerialrecord,hearing;thisCourtthe following uponpapersonuponpassed :

JUDGMENT

ThePlaintifffiledthissuitforof moneyofRs.72,700/-withfutureinterest recovery@ 24%pa fromthedateof thesuittill thedateof realisationthe ground that andfor cosisthe on

DefendantborrowedRs.50,000/-his family necessities fromthePlaintiff21.11.2012for on executingpromissorynoteagreeingtothewithinterest@24%andthat repaysamep.a inspiteofrepeated demandsincluding legal notice,theDefendantfailedmakepaymentof to promissorynoteamount.

2]!

TheDefendantbeingservedwithremainedex-parte. summons, 3].ThePlaintifftohisclaimexaminedhimselfPW.1andproducedExs.A.1toA.4 proveas | documents.

4].Heardthecounselfor Plaintiff. Now,thepointfor consideration 5].is whetherthePlaintiffis entitledforof suit recovery amountprayedfor? as POINT:- 6].ThePlaintiffthroughhischiefexaminationaffidavitre-iteratedtheplaintaverments.In he producedis Original supportof theExs.A.1toA.4documents.Ex.A.1Promissory same, note,dated21-12-2012appearingtohavebeenexecutedbytheDefendantin favourof the ofRs.50,000/-forhis family necessitiesagreeingthe Plaintiffborrowingtopaysame sum togetherwithinterest@24% p.a.

of legal notice,demandingthePlaintiffto repay 7).Ex.A.2is Officedated28-06-2014 copy is postal receipt thedebtamountandEx.A.3aridIEx.A-4is thePostalAcknowledgment.The

gu

o\

a

-2-

of PW-1 /

theof coupledwithEx.A.1toA-4documentsprovescase evidencePlaintiff oral

Plaintiffagreeingtothe borrowingfromtherepay thePlaintiffabouttheDefendantmoney makingdemandsfor efforisofthePlaintiffin @24%andthe withinterestp.a same theevidenceofPW-1 Defendanthavingremainedex-parte, of theamount.The

repayment

and proved: to A-4remainedun-rebutted andExs.A-1 of thepromissorynotetill the @24%iromthedate ThePlaintiffclaimedinterestp.a 8]. the parties. Accordingly,the withtrecontractbetween of thesuitandit.isin accordance date

the Defendant

for recoveryof theamount.

provedhis claimagainst

Plaintiff

the date

dateof Decreeandfrom thedateof thesuittill the Withregardtointerestfrom

9].

thecourt.In viewof the withinthediscretionof ofrealization,it is ofdecreetili thedate

Plaintiffis entitledfor of interest,the

parties regarding thepayment

agreementbetweenthe andsubsequently,heis of suit,till thedateof decree @12%fromthedate interestp.a commercial of realizationtransactionisnotaone. for only6%till thedateas entitledp.a

Accordingly,thepointis held.

is directedto pay andtheDefendantsum suitis decreedwithcosts 10].In theresult,the of filingof thesuit,till thedate fromthedate of Rs. 72,700/- togetherwithinterest@12%:p.a

the Principal %

of of realization: of desreetill thedateon @6%fromthedate ofdecreeandp.a of Rs.50,000/-. amount

on this

and pronounced byin thecourt correctedmeopen Typedtomydictation, 30"dayof October,2015. the

Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam.

Appendixof Evi

WitnessesExamin

FOR_DEFENDANT:

PLAINTIFF :

FOR

-None.-

BandaruSrinivasaRao P.W1:

ExhibitsMarked

FORDEFENDANT;

FOR PLAINTIFF

21-11-2012.

is Original promissorynote,dated Ex.A.1 of legal notice,dated28-06-2014. Ex.A.2is Officecopy

Crag

is postal receipt.

Ex.A.3

is postal acknowledgment.

Ex.A.4Civil Judge,

PrincipalJunior

Khammam.

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khammam AT KHAMMAM URBAN ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by SMT. DEEPA KASARAGADDA

ORDER

Not Press Memo filed in this Execution Petition. Hence, this Execution Petition is Dismissed as Not Pressed.

(SMT. DEEPA KASARAGADDA)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Khammam

KHAMMAM URBAN ,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS