Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli

V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada · Krishna · Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli, V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, is posted at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,999 court orders on record since 2021. 6 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, CC, EP cases.

1,999

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/912/2020

Chaluvadi Seetarama Chandhra Rao vs Tadepalli Durga Srivani

01 May 2024

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -1- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER-CUM-IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION) :: VIJAYAWADA

Present :: Ms. L. Annapurna Sree,

V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Rent Controller-cum-IV Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2024

O.S.No.912/2020

Between:

Chaluvadi Seetarama Chandhra Rao

...Plaintiff

And

Smt. Tadepalli Durga Srivani

...Defendant

This suit came before me on 26-4-2024 for final hearing in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri V.Praveen Kumar, Advocate for the defendant, and upon perusing the material and hearing the counsel for plaintiff, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. This is a suit filed for recovery of Rs.13,04,828/- being the amount due on a two promissory notes dt. 17.06.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-), 17.05.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-), 09.07.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-), executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.2,50,000/- agreeing to repay the amount with interest @ 24% p.a. and for costs.

2. The averments of the plaint in brief as are follows:

The Defendant borrowed an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 17.06.2015 for the purpose of building repairs and after receiving

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -2- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 consideration, the defendant executed a promissory note No.1 on the even date i.e. 17.06.2015, in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the amount together with interest at the rate of 30% p.a. either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand.

3. The Defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- form the plaintiff on the same day i.e. 17.06.2015 for the purpose of building repairs and after receiving consideration through cheque bearing No.020522 drawn on Corporation Bank Ltd., the defendant executed a promissory note No.2 on the even date i.e. 17.06.2015, in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the amount together with interest at the rate of 30% p.a. either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand.

4. The Defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- form the plaintiff on 09.07.2015 for the purpose of building repairs and after receiving consideration through cheque bearing No.020523 drawn on Corporation Bank

Ltd., the defendant executed a promissory note No.3 on the even date i.e.

09.07.2015, in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the amount together with interest at the rate of 30% p.a. either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand. On 26.06.2018 the defendant paid part payment of Rs.2,000/- for the amount borrowed by her under the promissory note No.1 dt. 17.06.2015 and made payment endorsement on the reverse of the promissory note dt.

17.06.2015.

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -3- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

5. On 09.12.2016 the defendant paid part payment of Rs.5,000/- on 09.12.2016 through a cheque bearing No.451924 of S.B.I, paid part payment of Rs.15,000/- on 21.12.2016 through a cheque bearing No.441433 of S.B.I., and paid part payment of Rs.2,000/- on 02.06.2018 for the amount borrowed by her under the promissory note No.2 dt. 17.06.2015 and made separate payment endorsements on the reverse of the promissory note on the respective dates of part payments.

6. Defendant paid part payment of Rs.28,000/- on 09.12.2016 through a cheque bearing No.451427 of S.B.I., and paid part payment of

Rs.2,000/- on 03.07.2018 for the amount borrowed by her under the promissory note No.3 dt.09.07.2015 and made separate payment endorsements on the reverse of the promissory note on the respective dates of part payment. The defendant also borrowed amounts from the plaintiff on various dates by executing separate promissory notes on the dates of borrowing amounts.

7. Subsequently the defendant failed to clear the above said promissory notes amount to the plaintiff even though repeated demands made by the plaintiff. At last after repeated demands made by the plaintiff, towards part satisfaction of the suit promissory notes debt dt. 17.06.2015 (for

Rs.2,00,000/-), 17.05.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-), 09.07.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-), and another promissory note dt.09.11.2015 (for Rs.2,00,000/-) payable to him

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -4- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 the defendant issued three cheques one is for an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- and other cheques for Rs.2,00,000/- each all are dt.06.03.2016 in his favour as a specific representation and promise that he would get amount under the above said cheques and she is having sufficient funds in her account.

8. Believing defendant representations and promise he presented the cheques for collection subsequently the cheques were returned dishonored and the reason funds insufficient with three separate return memos all are dt.23.04.2019 issued by his bank Corporation Bank,

Vijayawada. Thus the defendant has issued above said cheques with sufficient funds, knowing fully well cheques will return dishonored.

9. Therefore, he got issued a statutory legal notice dt.10.05.2019 by registered post through his counsel to the defendant on 15.05.2019 demanding the defendant to pay the amount covered by the dishonored cheque to him within 15 days after receipt of the notice stating the offence committed by the defendant. The defendant received on 17.05.2019 and instead of clearing the amount covered under dishonored cheque the defendant got issued a reply noted dt.06.06.2019 with all false allegations. On that he filed a case against the defendant on the file of the Hon’ble Chief

Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Vijayawada, for the offence punishable

U/Sec.138 of N.I.Act and it is pending. Hence the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit.

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -5- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

10. Defendant filed written statement denying the averments of plaint and contending that the plaintiff doing an unauthorized chit fund and fiancé business at Vijayawada since 15 years onwards. The defendant husband by name Viswanadham running a gift article shop at 1 town Vijayawada in the name and style as Vijetha Enterprises. In the years, 2014 the plaintiff approached the defendants husband and requested him to join his new chit as a subscriber. After request of the plaintiff the defendants husband joining the defendant as a subscriber in the plaintiff chit for Rs.5,00,000/-. The period of chit is 20 months and as per the agreed terms the defendant has to pay of

Rs.25,000/- per month to the plaintiff as an installment after deducting dividends which allowed by the plaintiff. At the time of joining the above chit the plaintiff is obtained the signatures of the defendant on 5 blank promissory notes and to take 6 empty cheques bearing Nos.825783, 825784, 825785, 825786, 825789, and 825790 to drawn on State Bank of India, Vijayawada as collateral security. After completed of the above chit again the plaintiff approached the defendant and her husband and requested them to continue the sub scriber in new chit. As per request of the plaintiff in the month of

November, 2016 the plaintiff started a new chit the defendant also join as new scriber in the chit for Rs.5,00,000/- the period of chit is 20 months and as per the agreed terms the defendant has to pay of Rs.25,000/- per month to the plaintiff as installment after deducting dividends which allowed by the plaintiff.

Every month the plaintiff approached the defendant and collected the cash

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -6- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 from her and noted the amount on a pocket note book. After join the chit in 15 months the defendant regularly pays the installments amount to the plaintiff without default. On 10.03.2018 agreed to forego Rs.4,35,000/- from out of

Rs.5,00,000/- the plaintiff was announced the defendant as a prized subscriber. At the time of issuing the amount the plaintiff is again obtained the signatures of the defendant on 5 blank promissory notes and to take 12 empty cheques bearing Nos. 451911, 451921, 451926, 451927, 451929, 451930, 451932, 451943, 451944, 451945 to drawn on State Bank of India,

Vijayawada and Cheque bearing Nos.000003 and 000005 to drawn on HDFC

Bank, Vijayawada from the defendant as a collateral security.

11. It is further submitted that after received the prized amount form the plaintiff two installments was regularly paid by the defendant. After that the defendant is suffering with financial crises for which she was default to pay the instalment amount to the plaintiff. The defendant has due an amount of

Rs.75,000/- only to the plaintiff towards chit instalment. In the mean while the defendant husband was suffering from ill health and he join the hospital for treatment all of sudden on 11.12.2018 he was died, the defendant was shocked about his husband’s death and she goes to depression in this stage the defendant was stopped her business.

12. It is further submitted that on 15.03.2019 the repeated demands made by plaintiff, defendant approached along with elders by name Vempati

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -7- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Srinivasa Rao and Thalla Venkata Kanaka Subba Rao and requested the plaintiff after his willing the defendant paid an amount of Rs.85,000/- to the plaintiff towards balance amount of Rs.75,000/- in 3rd instalment along with interest of Rs.2/- per hundred. At the time of received the amount from the defendant as per request of elders the plaintiff categorically stated that to the defendant within 10 days he will return back the promissory notes and cheques obtained signatures by the defendant as collateral security of chit.

The defendant believes the words of plaintiff, she kept quiet.

13. It is further submitted that the defendant was shocked because the plaintiff gave a notice to the defendants for discharging the debt of

Rs.21,00,000/- but the17.06.2015, 17.06.2015, 09.07.2015, 09.11.2015, 03.05.2017, 09.05.2017, 13.05.2017, 15.05.2017, 03.10.2017, 05.10.2017, 07.10.2017 and 09.10.2017, 09.08.2015, 09.10.2015, 29.04.2016, 10.09.2016, 01.11.2016, 09.11.2016, 05.05.2017, 07.05.2017, 11.05.2017 mentioned by plaintiff in his legal notice dt.05.04.2019 the defendant never executed any endorsement on reverse of the above said promissory notes.

14. After received the court summons and case papers form this court the defendant thoroughly studied the pronote dt.29.04.2016 and she can identified it is true originally the defendant barrowed an amount of

Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 09.04.2016 for the purpose of her building repairs and she executed a promissory note on the even date with her own

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -8- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 hand writing in favour of the plaintiff. After one year the defendant approached the plaintiff and she was discharging the debt the plaintiff categorically stated to the defendant this promissory note and remaining promotes and cheques taken by the plaintiff from the defendant for security of chit business are kept the bank locker so after completed the chit the plaintiff return the all promotes and cheques along with this pronote to the defendant.

The defendant believe the words of plaintiff she kept quiet.

15. The plaintiff has no such capacity to lend the amount to the defendant because he is not an income tax asessee. There is no money transaction made on 17.06.2015 and 09.07.2015 between plaintiff and defendant. Without passing the consideration the plaintiff took an advantage of empty promotes and cheques obtained the signatures of the defendant as a collateral security taken by the plaintiff from the defendant at the time of joining the chit, he filed a false case against the defendant for unlaw full gain from the defendant. There is no cause of action to file the suit and prayed to dismiss the suit.

16. Based on the above pleading and following issues settled for trial.

1. Whether the suit promissory notes are true, valid and binding on the defendant?

2. To what relief?

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -9- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

17. During the course of trial the plaintiff himself examined as PW1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A10 on his behalf introduced the PW-2. Defendant did not choose to appear before the court for adducing any evidence on his behalf inspite of giving sufficient time. Hence the evidence of defendant treated as nil and closed.

18. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Defendant also did not choose come forward for arguments on his behalf based on the averments of his written statement even though conditional order passed. Hence the arguments of defendant are treated as heard.

19. ISSUES NOS.1 and 2:

Issues 1 and 2 are inter-related this Court inclines to discuss them jointly.

Initially, the burden is upon the shoulders of the plaintiff to establish the execution of Exs.A1, A3 and A7 by the defendant. Accordingly, part payments under Ex.A2, Ex.4, Ex.A5, A6 Ex.A8 and Ex.A9. In order to substantiate and to prove the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff himself examined as PW-1 and he has reiterated the suit facts in chief-examination affidavit and he placed reliance on Exs.A1 to A10. Further, in support of his claim PW-2 is examined. The evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 coupled with

Exs.A1 to A9 prove the execution of Exs.A1, A3, A7 as well as A2, A4, A5, A6,

A8 and A9. The evidence of PWs-1 and 2 is unchallenged. It is well settled

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -10- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 law that “Where a party to the suit does not appear in the witness box and states his own case on oath and does not offer himself to be cross-examined by the other side, a presumption would arise that the case set up by him/her, is not correct.” Therefore, this Court is in view that the plaintiff has entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for. These issues are answered in favour of the plaintiff.

20. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount a sum of Rs.13,04,828/- from the defendant with subsequent interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of decree till the date of realization on

principal amount of Rs.6,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, by the stenographer, prints are taken by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 1st day of May, 2024.

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC.IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

RCC-CUM-IV ACJ (J.D) COURT. -11- O.S.No.912/2020 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:- FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL

PW.1: Ch.Seetarama Chandhra Rao PW.2: Kancharla Ramesh

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIF:-

Ex.A1: 17.06.2015 : Original promissory note No.1 for Rs.2,00,000/- Ex.A2: 02.06.2018 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.2,000/- Ex.A3: 17.06.2015 : Original promissory note No.2 for Rs.2,00,000/- Ex.A4: 09.12.2016 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.5,000/- Ex.A5: 21.12.2016 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.15,000/- Ex.A6: 02.06.2018 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.2,000/- Ex.A7: 09.07.2015 : Original promissory note No.3 for Rs.2,00,000/- Ex.A8: 09.12.2016 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.28,000/- Ex.A9: 03.07.2018 : Part payment endorsement of Rs.2,000/- Ex.A10:10.05.2019 : Office copy of statutory notice

FOR DEFENDANT :- NIL

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC.IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

OS/2091/2022

M/S LAKSHMI FINANCE PVT LTD REP BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON GORRELA SURESH vs CHETTIPALLI GANGA AND 2 OTHERS

01 May 2024

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -1- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER-CUM-IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR

DIVISION) :: VIJAYAWADA

Present :: Ms.L. Annapurna Sree,

V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Rent Controller-cum-IV Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2024

O.S.No.2091/2022

Between:

M/s. Lakshmi Finance Private Limited, represented by its Authorized person Gorrela Suresh ….Plaintiff

And

1. Chettipalli Ganga

2. Chettipalli Durga Prasad

3. Nakka Krishna ….Defendants

This suit came before me on 1-5-2024 for final hearing in the presence of Sri I. Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendants 1 and 2 remained exparte, and upon perusing the material and hearing the counsel for plaintiff, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of

Rs. 1,41,000/- pleading that plaintiff is a private limited company duly incorporated under the Companies Act having its registered office at Visakhapatnam and doing finance business providing finance facility by hypothecating motor vehicles after entered into motor vehicle finance agreement for loan and guarantee. The 1st defendant approached the plaintiff for financial assistance in order to purchase Bajaj

Pulsar 150 motor cycle and after due verification, plaintiff provided finance of

Rs.1,04,000/- to the 1st defendant to purchase the same. 2nd and 3rd defendants stood as guarantors to the said loan and all the 3 defendants executed loan-cum- guarantee agreement and promissory note on 25.01.2021 for future liability of

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -2- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Rs.1,43,500/- in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the loan amount in 30 monthly installments commencing from 25.02.2021 to 25.07.2023 along with interest at 13.5% p.a. If the defendants failed to repay any installment within stipulated period i.e. within 30 days from the due date, plaintiff is entitled to take possession of vehicle.

The 1st defendant paid 4 monthly installments only and committed default from 5th installment onwards. As per the books of account of plaintiff as on 26.09.2022 an amount of Rs.1,40,732/- is payable by the defendants. In spite of several demands made by the plaintiff, defendants did not repay the loan and plaintiff came to know that defendants are making efforts to secret the vehicle beyond the reach of plaintiff.

Hence plaintiff got issued a registered legal notice dt.28.02.2022 to the defendants, and the same was refuged by the defendants 1 and 2, and 3rd defendant received the same but they kept quiet and did not pay the outstanding loan amount due by them. Hence the suit.

2.Defendants 1 and 2 failed to appear before the court in spite of issuance of summons through paper publication. Hence D1 and D2 are set exparte.

On 12.03.2024 suit against D3 is dismissed as not pressed.

3. On behalf of the plaintiff, its legal assistant is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A10.

4. Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

5. Now the point for consideration is whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for?

6. POINT:-

The Legal Assistant of plaintiff firm having Ex.A1 authorization in his favour examined as PW1 deposed reiterating the averments of the plaint and stated that on the application made by 1st defendant under Ex.A3 on dt.25.01.2021, he was given finance of Rs.1,04,000/- for purchase of Bajaj Pulsar 150 two wheeler and 2nd and 3rd defendants stood as guarantors to the loan taken by the 1st defendant.

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -3- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Having received the amount, all the defendants executed loan and guarantee agreement and promissory note in favour of plaintiff under Ex.A3 to A5 agreeing to repay the amount in 30 installments with interest at 13.5%. PW1 further deposed that 1st defendant paid 4 installments and as per the statement of account of plaintiff, marked as Ex.A10, 1st defendant has to pay an amount of Rs.1,40,732/- as on 26.09.2022, but failed to pay the said amount in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff and plaintiff came to know that defendants are trying to screen the vehicle beyond the reach of plaintiff. Hence, plaintiff issued legal demand notice on 28.02.2022, copy of which is marked as Ex.A6 to defendants 1 to 3 demanding to repay the outstanding amount and it was received by defendants 1 to 3, but they did not repay the outstanding loan amount due by them.

7. The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to A10 clearly proves the claim of the plaintiff that on Ex.A3 application made by 1st defendant, he was sanctioned an amount of Rs. 1,04,000/- for purchase of Bajaj Pulsar 150 two wheeler by plaintiff, for which 2nd and 3rd defendants stood as guarantors and all the defendants executed Ex.A4 loan and guarantee Agreement and Ex.A5 promissory note in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the amount in 30 monthly installments commencing from 25.02.2021 with interest @ 13.5 % p.a. and subsequently 1st defendant paid 4 installments and failed to repay the remaining installments. As per

Ex.A10 statement of account copy, he was due an amount of Rs.1,40,732/- as on 26.09.2022 and failed to pay the said amount in spite of several demands made by the plaintiff including issuance of Ex.A6 legal demand notice to defendants 1 to 3, received by D3 and D1 and D2 refused.

8. There is no rebuttal evidence from defendant’s side to deny Ex.A1 to

A10 and the oral evidence of PW1. Hence the evidence of PW1 with regard to sanction of loan of Rs.1,04,000/- to 1st defendant for purchase of Bajaj Pulsar 150 two wheeler for which D2 and D3 stood as guarantors to D1 for repayment of loan and execution of Ex.A4 loan and guarantee agreement and promissory note by D1 to

D3 in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the amount in 30 installments with interest at 13.5 % p.a. and subsequent default in payment of 5th installment on wards by 1st

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -4- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 defendant in spite of several requests and demands made by plaintiff including issuance of Ex.A6 legal notice . Therefore, the oral evidence of PW1, corroborated by Ex.A1 to A10 is sufficient to prove the contentions of plaintiff. Thus the plaintiff proved the suit claim and entitled for recovery of suit amount as claimed. The point is answered accordingly.

9. In the result the suit is decreed with costs for Rs.1,41,032/- against defendants 1 and 2 jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 12% pa. from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at 6% pa. from the date of decree till the date of realization on balance principal amount of Rs.1,04,000/-. Suit against D3 is dismissed on 12.03.2024.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2024.

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDEX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:- FOR DEFENDANTS:- EXPARTE

P.W.1: Gorrela Suresh

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:-

Ex.A-1:- 27-12-2016 : Certified copy of certificate of Incorporation of M/s. Lakshmi Finance Private Limited Ex.A-2:- 15-03-2021 : Authorization letter in favour of PW1 Ex.A-3:- 25-01-2021 :Application made by 1st defendant Ex.A-4:- 25-01-2021 :Loan-cum-Guarantee agreement Ex.A-5:- 25-01-2021 :Demand Promissory note Ex.A-6:- 28-02-2022 : Office copy of legal demand notice Ex.A-7:- 03-03-2022 : Registered postal receipts (3 in number)

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -5- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Ex.A-8:- 08-03-2022 : Postal acknowledgment from D1 Ex.A-9:- 08-03-2022 : Postal acknowledgment from D2 Ex.A10:- 26-09-2022 : Account copy

FOR DEFENDANTS:- EXPARTE

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

OS/2091/2022

M/S LAKSHMI FINANCE PVT LTD REP BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON GORRELA SURESH vs CHETTIPALLI GANGA AND 2 OTHERS

01 May 2024

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -1- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER-CUM-IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR

DIVISION) :: VIJAYAWADA

Present :: Ms.L. Annapurna Sree,

V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Rent Controller-cum-IV Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2024

O.S.No.2091/2022

Between:

M/s. Lakshmi Finance Private Limited, represented by its Authorized person Gorrela Suresh ….Plaintiff

And

1. Chettipalli Ganga

2. Chettipalli Durga Prasad

3. Nakka Krishna ….Defendants

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of

Pulsar 150 motor cycle and after due verification, plaintiff provided finance of

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -2- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

2.Defendants 1 and 2 failed to appear before the court in spite of issuance of summons through paper publication. Hence D1 and D2 are set exparte.

On 12.03.2024 suit against D3 is dismissed as not pressed.

3. On behalf of the plaintiff, its legal assistant is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A10.

4. Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

5. Now the point for consideration is whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for?

6. POINT:-

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -3- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

8. There is no rebuttal evidence from defendant’s side to deny Ex.A1 to

D3 in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the amount in 30 installments with interest at 13.5 % p.a. and subsequent default in payment of 5th installment on wards by 1st

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2024.

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDEX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:- FOR DEFENDANTS:- EXPARTE

P.W.1: Gorrela Suresh

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:-

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -5- O.S.No.2091/2022 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Ex.A-8:- 08-03-2022 : Postal acknowledgment from D1 Ex.A-9:- 08-03-2022 : Postal acknowledgment from D2 Ex.A10:- 26-09-2022 : Account copy

FOR DEFENDANTS:- EXPARTE

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

OS/1654/2021

ICICI Bank Ltd. rep by its Debt manager Adusumilli Srinivasa Rao vs Venkanna Babu Dukkipatti

01 May 2024

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -1- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER-CUM-IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION) :: VIJAYAWADA

Present :: Ms. L. Annapurna Sree,

V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Rent Controller-cum-IV Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2024

O.S.No.1654/2021

ICICI Bank Limited, represented by its GPA holder, Vijayawada Branch ….Plaintiff

And

Venkanna Babu Dukkipati ..Defendant

This suit came before me for final hearing on 26-4-2024 in the presence of Sri K.Rajasekhar, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte, and upon perusing the material, on hearing the counsel for plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff bank seeking recovery of

Rs.9,02.110/- pleading that on the application made by defendant to the plaintiff bank on 05.09.2018 for sanction of personal loan, the plaintiff bank sanctioned an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to defendant and disbursed the loan amount in the loan account of defendant bearing No.

LPNUZ00037788359 on 12.09.2018 opened by plaintiff bank. Defendant executed all necessary documents in favour of plaintiff Bank on 12.09.2018 and agreed to repay the loan amount with interest on monthly rests with interest at 11.99% p.a. in 48 equal monthly installments of Rs.26,312/- per month. Defendant agreed to pay penal interest, in case of default of payment of installments. Plaintiff bank debited the incidental charges and payments

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -2- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 made by him to his above said loan account as per the terms and conditions of loan and as per practice of bank. Defendant paid only 9 installments only and failed to repay the remaining installments amount. He is due an amount of

Rs.9,02,110/- as on 23.12.2019 as per the account of defendant maintained by plaintiff bank, but did not pay the same in spite of several demands made by the plaintiff bank. Hence the plaintiff bank filed this suit.

2.Defendant failed to appear before the court in spite of issuance of summons through paper publication. Hence he was set ex-parte.

3. On behalf of the plaintiff, its Manager is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A5.

4. Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

5. Now the point for consideration is whether plaintiff bank

is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for?

6. The Manager of plaintiff Bank, having GPA in her favour, marked as Ex.A5, examined as PW1 deposed reiterating the averments of the plaint and stated that on the application made by defendant on 05.09.2018, under

Ex.A1, the plaintiff bank sanctioned an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the defendant on 12.09.2018 towards personal loan . Defendant executed credit facility application form along with standard terms and conditions on 05.09.2018, marked as Ex.A2 and other documents in favour of plaintiff bank, agreeing to repay the amount in installments with interest at 11.99% p.a. in 48 equal monthly installments of Rs.26,312/- per month. PW1 further deposed that defendant did not pay the installments as agreed by him in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff and due an amount of Rs.9,02,011/-

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -3- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 as on 23.12.2019 as per the statement of account, marked as Ex.A4, to the plaintiff bank.

7. The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to A5 clearly proves the claim of the plaintiff that having received the loan of Rs.10,00,000/- sanctioned by the plaintiff bank towards personal loan, defendant executed Ex.A2 loan agreement and other connected papers in favour of plaintiff bank agreeing to repay the same with interest at 11.99 % agreeing to repay the said amount in 48 equal monthly installments, but he paid only 9 installments to the plaintiff bank, and did not pay the remaining installments amount in spite of several demands made by plaintiff and due an amount of Rs.9,02,110/- as on 23.12.2019.

8. There is no rebuttal evidence from defendant’s side to deny

Ex.A1 to A5 and the oral evidence of PW1, since the defendant failed to appear before the court even after issuance of summons through paper publication, since the summons sent through court and registered post to the defendant avoiding to receive summons intentionally since 10.11.2021. Hence the evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to A5 that plaintiff bank sanctioned personal loan to the defendant and having received the loan amount, defendant executed Ex.A2 credit facility application along with standard terms and conditions and other connected papers in favour of plaintiff bank agreeing to repay the amount with interest at 11.99% p.a. and that subsequent default in payment of installments by defendant in spite several requests and demands made by the bank remained unrebutted. Therefore, the oral evidence of PW1, supported by Ex.A1 to A5 and proved the contentions of plaintiff. Hence this court is of the opinion that the plaintiff proved the suit claim and entitled for recovery of suit amount thus claimed. The point is answered accordingly.

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -4- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

9. In the result the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff bank and against the defendant for Rs.9,02,110/- payable with interest at the rate of 6% pa. from the date of suit till the date of realization on Rs.9,02,110/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2024.

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDEX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:- FOR DEFENDANT:- EXPARTE

P.W.1 -T. Gnaneswari, Manager

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF :- Ex.A1: 05.09.2018 : Loan application Ex.A2: 05.09.2018 :Original credit facility application form along with standard terms and conditions executed by the defendant Ex.A3: 14.10.2019 :Office copy of the loan recall notice Ex.A4: 23.12.2019 :True copy of the statement of the account Ex.A5: 21.12.2016 :Notarized copy of the power of attorney

FOR DEFENDANT:- EXPARTE

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

OS/1654/2021

ICICI Bank Ltd. rep by its Debt manager Adusumilli Srinivasa Rao vs Venkanna Babu Dukkipatti

01 May 2024

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -1- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER-CUM-IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE

(JUNIOR DIVISION) :: VIJAYAWADA

Present :: Ms. L. Annapurna Sree,

V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) FAC Rent Controller-cum-IV Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada

Wednesday, the 1st day of May, 2024

O.S.No.1654/2021

ICICI Bank Limited, represented by its GPA holder, Vijayawada Branch ….Plaintiff

And

Venkanna Babu Dukkipati ..Defendant

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff bank seeking recovery of

2.Defendant failed to appear before the court in spite of issuance of summons through paper publication. Hence he was set ex-parte.

3. On behalf of the plaintiff, its Manager is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A5.

4. Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

5. Now the point for consideration is whether plaintiff bank

is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for?

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -3- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024 as on 23.12.2019 as per the statement of account, marked as Ex.A4, to the plaintiff bank.

8. There is no rebuttal evidence from defendant’s side to deny

RCC-CUM-IV AJCJ COURT. -4- O.S.No.1654/2021 VIJAYAWADA 1-5-2024

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 1 st day of May, 2024.

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

APPENDEX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:- FOR DEFENDANT:- EXPARTE

P.W.1 -T. Gnaneswari, Manager

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR DEFENDANT:- EXPARTE

V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FAC/IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION),

VIJAYAWADA.

Order Record 1,972 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/98/2020	S.K.Babavali vs Velagapudi Devika Rani	03 May 2024	Judgment	—
OS/912/2020	Chaluvadi Seetarama Chandhra Rao vs Tadepalli Durga Srivani	01 May 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1654/2021	ICICI Bank Ltd. rep by its Debt manager Adusumilli Srinivasa Rao vs Venkanna Babu Dukkipatti	01 May 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2091/2022	M/S LAKSHMI FINANCE PVT LTD REP BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON GORRELA SURESH vs CHETTIPALLI GANGA AND 2 OTHERS	01 May 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2352/2023	M/S Lakshmi Finance Rep by Prop V. Prabhu Kishore G P A Holder Gorrela Suresh vs Agothu Srinivasa Rao	01 May 2024	Judgment	—
OS/362/2021	Indukuri Subhadra vs Chilaka Suresh Kumar	24 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/1484/2020	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Nalam Hanumantha Rao	24 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/300/2021	Prathi Devendranath Guptha vs Kothuri Venkata Vara Prasada Rao Guptha	23 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
PRC/27/2023	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Gunji Raja	22 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
EP/380/2023	Raj Gopal Rathi vs Mohanlal Solanki	19 Apr 2024	Order	—
OS/542/2018	Nekkalapu Shobharani vs Ramanadham Vijaya Bhaskara Rao	19 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1746/2019	M/s. Lingamallu Silks, rep by prop. L.V.Sailesh Kumar vs Balaji Silks rep by partner Jilla Ram Mohan	19 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/408/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Gummadi Ramesh	19 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/887/2020	Desu Murali Manohar Rao vs Pokuri Bala Gangadhar and another	16 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2112/2019	Tiruvuru Satyendra Das vs Sadanala Kiran Kumar	16 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1852/2021	Dantu Srinivasa Kumar vs Bokka Lakshmi	15 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1853/2021	Tummala Vamsi Krishna vs Bokka Lakshmi	15 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2127/2023	Canara Bank, Gandhi Nagar Branch Manager Ganesh Shau vs Seelam Nageswara Ro	15 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/411/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Chirumamilla Adinarayana	15 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/523/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Maddela Siva Kumar	15 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/52/2023	Yenduri Venkata Naga Sailaja vs M. Kalpana Suneetha	12 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/824/2019	Chintala Lakshmi vs Kanakapudi Daniel	12 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1581/2022	G VENKATA RAO vs NARNI DURGA PRASAD	12 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1612/2023	Godha Ramanamma vs Chinta Srinivasa Rao	12 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1786/2023	Lakshmi Finance Pvt., Rep., Gorrela Suresh vs Vallepu Srinivas	12 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/1735/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam. vs Jonnakuti Yashvanth	10 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/6/2020	A.Vijay Kumar vs Shaik Mastan Vali	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/190/2021	M/s. New A.J.Textiles rep by its Chandrapati Venkata Chandra Sekhara Rao vs Garikipati Anil Kumar	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/201/2023	M/s Lakshmi Finance vs Banavathu Ravi	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1367/2019	ICICI Bank limi9ted rep by Srinvasa RAo vs K.Venkata Durga Kishore	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1690/2022	KANNA MANIKYAM vs KOKKILIGADDA MASTAN AND 3 OTHERS	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1763/2022	CANARA BANK REP BVVY ITS MANAGER KIRAN BABU DHARANIKOTA vs LAVANYA KAUMAR	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2040/2021	Gadi Rama Rao vs Maram Srinivasa Rao	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/925/2022	State Sub Inspector of Police Ibrahimpatanm P.S., Vijayawada City vs Yarlagadda Naga Siva	08 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1179/2019	Vanapalli VAhini vs Vanapalli Sarath BAbu	04 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1321/2023	Lashmi Finance Reptd, V. Prabhu Kishore vs Dharavatrhu Kotesh Nayak	04 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1837/2021	ICICI Bank limited represented by its authorized signatory, Syed Suneel vs Manikyamani Kumar Tadisetti	04 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1939/2019	Canara Bank rep by Branch Manager Duggani Sravana Kumar vs M/sd. Sai Baba Mahila Dwakra Group a Self help rep by Seelam Hymavathi	04 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
EP/329/2023	Chakka Ranga Sobhana Babu vs Vemula Yedukondalu	03 Apr 2024	Order	—
OS/266/2021	Bdeecha Venkata Satynarayana vs Kandukuri Prasada Rao and other	03 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2034/2023	Velagapudi Nagarjuna vs Sathi Nakshatra Reddy	03 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2150/2019	Andhra Bank, Siris Branch, Rep. by P. Neeraja vs Chiluvuru Ashok Kumar	03 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
CC/586/2021	Chakka Ranga Shobhana Babu vs Vemula Yedukondalu	03 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/232/2020	Kala SAnkar vs Dasari Veera Venkata Prasad	02 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/301/2024	Smt. Dasari Sai Annapurna vs Smt. Mikkilineni Padmaja	02 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1060/2022	Tummala Ravi Kumar vs Cherukuri Mallikharjuna Rao	02 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1332/2023	Lakshmi Finance Pve., Gorrela Suresh vs Chalamucherla Kanaka Durga	02 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1338/2020	Medanki Subba Rao vs Tumati Koteswaramma	02 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/296/2021	Nallamothu Sudhakar vs Puli Claimant	01 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
OS/594/2019	Ande Sridhar vs Kallepalli Sudha Rani	01 Apr 2024	Judgment	—
EP/12/2023	Koppula Rama Rao vs Sri Pochinapeddi Veera Venkata Sesha Satya Sayee Subrahmanyam	28 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/1208/2022	Madamanchi Chandramouli vs Vykuntapu Pradeep Kumar	28 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1556/2021	M.Ramana Kumar vs Chandu Shiva Kumar	28 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/56/2022	State Bank of India rep by its Chief Manager vs Riyaz Shaik	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/338/2019	Mukkamala Sindu vs The APSPDCL	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1160/2018	CHANDA KANAKA DURGA vs TAMBABATTULA CHINA KANAKAIAH	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1403/2022	BHUMULA SRINIVASA REDDY vs VANGARA USHA LAKSHMI AND ANOTHER	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/1705/2023	Lakshmi Finance PVt., Ltd., Rep, Gorrela Suresh vs Katari Satish	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
CC/485/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs PAGIDIPALLI VENKAIAH	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
CC/1068/2021	Danda Suneetha vs Chinnabathini Vardhana Rayalu	27 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
EP/379/2023	Y Venkata Reddy vs Talari Sabitha Rani	26 Mar 2024	Order	—
EP/387/2023	Garre Bhaskar Babu vs Sunkara Satyanarayana	21 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/30/2021	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Ravi Dheeraj Kumar @ Nani	21 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/296/2020	Ankith Kumar Golchha vs Moram Seetaramaiah	20 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/452/2019	Narnapti Sunitha @ Bobbili Sunitha vs Kodali Gracemma	20 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/119/2023	Polurothu Sambasiva Rao vs Kurakula Srinu @ Srinivasa Rao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/119/2023	Polurothu Sambasiva Rao vs Kurakula Srinu @ Srinivasa Rao	16 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/387/2020	Kinthada Venkateswara Rao vs Kadiyam Venkatachari	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/547/2023	Bellamkonda Raghu Nadha Swamy vs Korukonda venkateswara Rao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/640/2023	Nandanampati Venkateswara Rao vs Kotha Ravi Kumar	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/928/2021	Garikapati Anil Kumar vs New A.J. Textiles Rep by Chandrapati Venkata Chandra Sekhara Rao	16 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/928/2021	Garikapati Anil Kumar vs New A.J. Textiles Rep by Chandrapati Venkata Chandra Sekhara Rao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/8/2022	Anna Sreenu vs Vemula Yedukondalu	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/198/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Muddani Jagadeesh	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/199/2024	The SHO Ibraihmpatnam vs Muddani Jagadeesh	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/207/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Syed Afroz	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/212/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Kalakoti Vijay	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/226/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Badineni Nagaraju	16 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
CC/227/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Badineni Narasimha rao	16 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
CC/231/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Nallamothu Alex Saksena	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/236/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Songa Karthik	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/237/2024	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Thottimuti Srinivasa Rao	16 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
CC/275/2021	Chakka Ranga Shobhana Babu vs Korumili Raju	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/484/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam vs Uppatala Siva Krishna	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/638/2023	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Doppala Venkata Sai	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/890/2023	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Gundala Vamsi Krishna Reddy	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1304/2021	Yenute Sandeep vs N.Issac	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1309/2023	The SHO Ibrahimpatnam vs Kankaraboyina Samba Siva Rao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1385/2022	State Sub Inspector of Police Ibrahimpatnam P.S., Vijayawada City vs Bojja Nithesh Kumar @ Sunny	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1436/2020	Bezawada Srinivasa Rao vs Suda Visweswara Rao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1552/2022	SubInspector of Police, Ibrahimpatnam vs Posam Venkata Krishna	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1553/2022	Sub Inspector of police, Ibrahimpatnam. vs Challa Durgarao	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
CC/1736/2022	The Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam. vs Siddabathula Gopi	16 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/1033/2021	Desu Venkat Sudarsana Rao vs Pokuri Sambasiva Rao and another	15 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
OS/2188/2022	Vadavalli Rama Mohan Rao (died) and 6 others vs Kona Ravi Kumar	15 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
STC/40/2023	Mandava Raja Babu vs Chattu Srinivasa Rao	15 Mar 2024	Other	—
OS/178/2020	State Bank of India S.A.R Wing, R.A.C.P.C.rep by Chief Manager Bhamidipati Venkateswara Rao vs Kunchanapalli Srinivasa Prasad and another	14 Mar 2024	Judgment	—
RCC/3/2022	Badampudi Jourdhan vs Mamidi Santha Kumari	14 Mar 2024	Order	—
EP/368/2023	Kothapalli Siva Prasad vs Shaik Mahaboob Subhani	13 Mar 2024	Order	—
OS/1350/2021	Allabakshu Afroj Shaik vs Penti Nagaraju	12 Mar 2024	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 1,972 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2024		8
Apr 2024		45
Mar 2024		63
Feb 2024		63
Jan 2024		48
Dec 2023		78
Nov 2023		59
Oct 2023		41
Sep 2023		81
Aug 2023		58
Jul 2023		22
Jun 2023		65

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli handled?

Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli has handled 1999 court orders since 2021 at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada. The average disposal rate is 71 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli hear?

Based on available records, Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada.

Where is Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli currently posted?

Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli is posted as V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli available online?

Yes. 6 judgments by Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli dispose cases?

Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli disposes approximately 71 cases per month, based on 1999 orders handled over their tenure at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada.

Since when is Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli serving?

Smt. Suddapalli Komalavalli has been serving at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada since 2021.

Case Types

OS 47%

CC 40%

EP 7%

RCC 4%

STC 1%

PRC 1%

Posting History

Nov 2023 — Nov 2023

V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada · 2 orders
Jul 2021 — May 2024

IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada · 1,997 orders

Other Judges at this Court

M.Suneel Kumar

II Addl. District Judge-cum- Metropolitan Sessions...

15 orders

Smt. L. Thejovathi

III Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

0 orders

K.neelima

IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

0 orders

G.Rajeswari

V Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayaw...

686 orders

Bandela Abraham

VII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) V...

620 orders

N.padmavathi

VIII Additional District and Session Judge (FTC)...

3 orders

Sri G.Subrahmanyam

XII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC)...

3 orders

Smt M.Sudha

XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC)...

7 orders

Smt K. Madhavi Devi

Principal Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

218 orders

Smt.K.Vani

I Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri S.Venkateswara Reddy

II Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

458 orders

Smt.k.aruna

III Additional Senior Civil Judge Vijayawada

0 orders

Smt.M.Satya Kumari

IV Addl Senior Civil Judge cum V ACMM Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri K.P. Sai Ram

VI Addl Senior Civil Judge Vajayawada

408 orders

Sri.Ch.L.Srinivasa Rao

VII Addl Senior Civil Judge Vajayawada

377 orders

Sri Chapala Srinivasa Babu

Prl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- Metropolitan Magis...

1,336 orders

Ms. G.devika

I Addl Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Additional Metr...

301 orders

Sri S.Srikanth

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum- II Additional Met...

0 orders

Shaik Rehana

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- III Additional...

969 orders

T.anjani S.s.rama Aditya Rishik

IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- IV Additional M...

600 orders

Smt P Santhi

V Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- V Addition...

0 orders

B Radha Rani

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,518 orders

M.S.Karimulla

I Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,985 orders

Smt.Nettem Radhika

II Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

319 orders

Sri.P.Tirumala Rao

III Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vijayawada

1,555 orders

Sri U.Ram Mohan

IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada

15 orders

Sri.Marapu Sridhar

VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawad...

0 orders

Sri P.Ramana Reddy

IX Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada

0 orders

KP Sai Ram

XI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada

0 orders

Sri Kandepu Seeta Rama Krishna Rao

Special Judge for CBI Cases, Vijayawada

125 orders

A.anitha

Spl. Judge for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to...

18 orders

N Radhika

Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board Vijaya...

70 orders

Kampa Jayalakshmi

Special Judge for POCSO Act Vijayawada.

0 orders

Sri G.Bhupal Reddy

Special Judge for Commercial Disputes Vijayawada

28 orders

← View all judges at II Addl DJ Court Vijayawada