Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP, Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, is posted at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 591 court orders on record since 2016. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP cases.

591

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/779/2016

Syed Sadiq Hussain vs Noor Aeisha @ S.Aeisha

24 Apr 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANANTAPURAMU.

Present: Sri T.RAMACHANDRUDU., Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Monday, the 24th day of April, 2017.

O.S.No.779/2016

Between:-

Syed Sadiq Hussain ….Plaintiff

Noor Aeisha @ S.Aeisha ….Defendant

This petition coming for final hearing on this day before me in the presence of Sri C.Waheedulla Khan, Advocate for Plaintiff and the defendant called absent and remained ex-parte, upon hearing petitioner and upon perusing the material papers on record, the matter having stood consideration this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This is a Suit filed by the plaintiff with a prayer to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:-

The defendant is the legally wedded wife of the plaintiff and their marriage was performed on 8-7-2012 at Shadi Mahal, Near T.B.Cross,

Bagepalli as per Muslim rights and customs. After the marriage the defendant joined with the plaintiff at his residence and on very first day of the marriage, the defendant informed with the plaintiff, that she has not interested for matrimonial life as a plaintiff is black colour person, due to force of her parents plaintiff is a good welder and he got sufficient means to run the family. The plaintiff is very mild soft spoken and very obliging and pious having faith on god and he was not given any important to defendant’s words and lived together for a period of two months and thereafter the defendant demanded to the plaintiff to put-up a separate family then plaintiff shifted their family from his village to Anantapuramu City.

3. The plaintiff is very affectionate towards his wife. The defendant is a very peculiar woman and the defendant is unnecessarily picking up quarrel with the plaintiff. It is further stated that the defendant has no issued the 2 wedlock. The defendant has not changed her attitude, every time the defendant is dancing with the tune of her mother and she had developed illegal intimacy with another person and the defendant is left the company without the knowledge of the plaintiff, so many panchayats have been held in the presence of elders and relatives but in vain.

4. It is further stated that since 2013 the defendant deserted the plaintiff and residing along with her parent’s house at Pathapalya village, Bagepalli

Taluk, Chikabalapur District of Karnataka State. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff has no other option excepts file the present suit to dissolve his marriage with the defendant by granting decree of divorce. Hence the Suit.

5. The defendant remained ex-parte.

6. Plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 documents.

7. Heard Advocate for Plaintiff/Husband.

8. The point for determination is:-

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for decree of divorce by

dissolving the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant?

9. Point: -

With reference to Ex.A1-Original Marriage Certificate (Nikhanama),

dated 8-7-2012, Ex.A2-Translated copy of Nikhanama, Ex.A3-Original

Marriage invitation card and Ex.A4-Joint Photo of Marriage, PW1 re-iterated as per petition averments. He deposed that the defendant after two months of marriage, the defendant left the company of the plaintiff and went to parent’s house without any cause or reasons for the reasons best know to her and in this connection several panchayats also held by the elders and relatives and all of them advised the defendant to mend her attitude and join the plaintiff but the defendant bluntly refused to join the plaintiff to lead marital life. The plaintiff has no hope that the defendant will mend her attitude and join the plaintiff.

10. In view of this information elicited, it is shown that the marriage took place between the plaintiff and defendant in the year 2012 and after two months of the marriage, the defendant left the company of plaintiff and not returned till today and in this regard several panchayats took place but in vain. Nothing is shown to disbelieve the version of PW1. It is shown that defendant/wife without any reason deserted her husband. She has not chosen to contest the matter. It is a ground to grant decree of divorce.

11. In the result, this petition is allowed without costs, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 24th day of April, 2017.

Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

Plaintiff: - Defendant:- PW.1-Syed Sadiq Hussain -None-

Exhibits marked for plaintiff

Ex.A1- Original Marriage Certificate (Nikhanama), dated 8-7-2012. Ex.A2- Translated copy of Nikhanama. Ex.A3- Original Marriage invitation card. Ex.A4- Joint Photo of Marriage.

Exhibits marked for defendant

-NIL-

J.C.J.

OS/602/2016

Tadigotla Venkateswara Reddy vs Thummala Sudarshan Babu

24 Apr 2017

-1-

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

Present: Sri T.Rama Chandrudu

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Monday, the 24th day of April, 2017.

Original Suit No.602 of 2016

Between:- T.Venkateswara Reddy …. Plaintiff -Versus-

T.Sudarshana Babu …. Defendant

This suit is coming on 24.4.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri B.Narayana Reddy, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant have been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, upon having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2. The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 2-1-2015, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.20,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum. Thereafter, inspite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice, dated 11-7-2016, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3. The defendant was remained exparte.

4. The plaintiff is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 documents on behalf of plaintiff.

5. Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

-2-

6. Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7. Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed

for?

PW1/plaintiff stated in her/his affidavit filed in lieu of chief-examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.20,000/- on 2-1-2015 from the plaintiff, and executed Exs.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that inspite of repeated demands and legal notice, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote. Ex.A1 is the Original Suit Promissory Note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.20,000/-, dated 2-1-2015, Ex.A2 is the Office copy of the legal notice, dated 11-7-2016 and Ex.A3 is the Postal legal notice served acknowledgment.

8. Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 documents disclose that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.20,000/- on 2-1-2015 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1. If the defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 pronote, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But the defendant remained exparte.

9. The evidence of PW.1 coupled with documentary evidence discloses that the defendant borrowed amount and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, and later failed to discharge the debt covered under Exs.A1 pronote, hence the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for. Accordingly,

Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

-3-

10. Point No.2:-

To what relief?

In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for Rs.27,600/- with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.20,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 24th day of April, 2017.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

PW-1 T.Venkateswara Reddy --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

Ex.A-1 Original Promissory Note executed by --- --- the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.20,000/-, dated 2-1-2015. Ex.A-2 Office copy of the legal notice, dated --- --- 11-7-2016. Ex.A-3 Legal notice served acknowledgment --- ---

PJCJ

OS/811/2016

Nettam Anjineyulu vs H.Mallikarjuna

24 Apr 2017

-1-

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

Present: Sri T.Rama Chandrudu

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Wednesday, the 26th day of April, 2017.

Original Suit No.811 of 2016

Between:- N.Anjineyulu ….Plaintiff -Versus-

H.Mallikarjuna ….Defendant

This suit is coming on 26-4-2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri T.R.Narapa Reddy, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant have been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, upon having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2. The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 25-9-2013, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.45,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum. Thereafter, inspite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice, dated 14-9-2016, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3. The defendant was remained exparte.

4. The plaintiff is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 documents on behalf of plaintiff.

5. Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

-2-

6. Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7. Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed

for?

PW1/plaintiff stated in her/his affidavit filed in lieu of chief-examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.45,000/- on 25-9-2013 from the plaintiff, and executed Exs.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that inspite of repeated demands and legal notice, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote. Ex.A1 is the Original Suit Promissory Note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.45,000/-, dated 25-9-2013, Ex.A2 is the Office copy of the legal notice, dated 14-9-2016 and Ex.A3 is the Postal

Acknowledgment served on the defendant.

8. Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 documents disclose that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.45,000/- on 25-9-2013 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1. If the defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 pronote, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But the defendant remained exparte.

Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

-3-

10. Point No.2:-

To what relief?

In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for Rs.77,400/- with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.45,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26th day of April, 2017.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

PW-1 N.Anjaneyulu --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

Ex.A-1 Original Promissory Note executed by --- --- the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.45,000/-, dated 25-9-2013. Ex.A-2 Office copy of the legal notice, dated --- --- 14-9-2016. Ex.A-3 Postal Acknowledgment served on the --- --- defendant.

PJCJ

OS/430/2016

Muppuru Subbarayudu vs C.Eswar Reddy

26 Apr 2017

-1-

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

Present: Sri T.Rama Chandrudu

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Wednesday, the 26th day of April, 2017.

Original Suit No.430 of 2016

Between:- M.Subbarayudu ….Plaintiff -Versus-

C.Eswar Reddy ….Defendant

This suit is coming on 26.4.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri D.Shyam Prasad, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, upon having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2. The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 17-5-2013, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

Thereafter, inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3. The defendant was remained exparte.

4. The plaintiff himself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 document on behalf of plaintiff.

-2-

5. Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6. Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7. Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed

for?

PW1/plaintiff stated in his/his affidavit filed in lieu of chief-examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- on 17-5-2013 from the plaintiff, and executed Exs.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote.

Ex.A1 is the Original Suit Promissory Note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.1,50,000/-, dated 17-5-2013.

8. Ex.A1 document disclose that the defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.1,50,000/- on 17-5-2013 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1. If the defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 pronote, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But the defendant remained exparte.

Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

-3-

10. Point No.2:-

To what relief?

In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for Rs.2,58,000/- with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.1,50,000/-.

Directly typed to my dictation by the Steno-III, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26th day of April, 2017.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

PW-1 M.Subbarayudu --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

Ex.A-1 Original Suit Promissory Note executed --- --- by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.1,50,000/-, dated 17-5-2013.

PJCJ

OS/966/2016

D.Venkataramana vs Muntimadugu Laxminarayana Guptha

24 Apr 2017

-1-

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

Present: Sri T.Rama Chandrudu

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu.

Monday, the 24th day of April, 2017.

Original Suit No.966 of 2016

Between:- D.Venkataramana ….Plaintiff -Versus-

M.Laxmi Narayana Guptha ….Defendant

This suit is coming on 24.4.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri A.Raghavendra, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, upon having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1. This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2. The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 13-12-2013, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

Thereafter, inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3. The defendant was remained exparte.

4. The plaintiff himself examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 document on behalf of plaintiff.

-2-

5. Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6. Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7. Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed

for?

PW1/plaintiff stated in his/his affidavit filed in lieu of chief-examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- on 13-12-2013 from the plaintiff, and executed Exs.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that inspite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote.

Ex.A1 is the Suit Promissory Note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.1,50,000/-, dated 13-12-2013.

8. Ex.A1 document disclose that the defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.1,50,000/- on 13-12-2013 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1. If the defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 pronote, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But the defendant remained exparte.

Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

-3-

10. Point No.2:-

To what relief?

In the result, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant for Rs.2,57,600/- with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter, at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.1,50,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 24th day of April, 2017.

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

PW-1 D.Venkataramana --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendants

Ex.A-1 Original Suit Promissory Note executed --- --- by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.1,50,000/-, dated 13-12-2013.

PJCJ

Order Record 579 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/106/2016	Y.S.Guruprasad vs C.C.Obulesu	03 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/107/2016	Mesa Anthoni Prathap Kumar vs Bingi Ranganayakulu	02 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/270/2016	B.Rama Chandra Reddy vs T.Sudhakara Chari	02 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/401/2015	A.Madan Mohan vs D.Siva Rao	02 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/450/2013	Pidapa Rajeswari vs Sane Venkata Siva Reddy	02 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/38/2017	V.Venkatalakshmi vs R.Surendra Reddy	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/39/2017	V.Venkatalakshmi vs R.Bheemeswara Reddy	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/260/2011	P.Chandrakalavathi.Age30. vs M.S.Sajeed.Age35.	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/677/2016	R.Varadhi vs T.Nurjha @ Nurjuhan	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/751/2016	K.Venkatadri Naidu vs P.Venkata Subbaiah	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/960/2016	S.Muthylamma, 55 years vs T.N.Rasool, 47 years	01 May 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/165/2016	K.Manohar vs D.Rama Murthy	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/168/2009	P,Sreenivasa Reddy vs K,Nagamma	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/239/2016	S.Jaffar Saheb vs M.Venkataramudu	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/279/2016	Morusu Vasudeva vs S.Madhu Babu	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/319/2016	Jenne Govindu Narayana Swamy vs A.Govindu	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/51/2016	Dudekula Moulabhi vs A.Sunkanna	27 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/253/2016	Ms. Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd vs B.Eswarachari	26 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/386/2015	N.Mohammad Rafi vs J.Sanjappa	26 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/430/2016	Muppuru Subbarayudu vs C.Eswar Reddy	26 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/406/2015	K.Haseena vs P.Sadiq Peera	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/280/2016	Ummadisetty Siva Sankar Died Rep By LRs vs M.Ramanjuineyulu	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/602/2016	Tadigotla Venkateswara Reddy vs Thummala Sudarshan Babu	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/779/2016	Syed Sadiq Hussain vs Noor Aeisha @ S.Aeisha	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/811/2016	Nettam Anjineyulu vs H.Mallikarjuna	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/966/2016	D.Venkataramana vs Muntimadugu Laxminarayana Guptha	24 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/176/2012	P.Ramireddy vs Y.P.Kullayamma	21 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/794/2016	Rage Yallappa vs M.Pedda Lingappa	21 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/67/2016	M.Sivaiah vs Saribala Ranga Reddy	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/109/2016	Guvvala Narayana Reddy vs E.Ramanjaneyulu	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/169/2016	G.Prabhakar vs A.Rajeswari	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/89/2014	Prameela Jayaraj Theophilus vs Siva Sankar	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/865/2016	C.Nagaraju, 50 yers vs P.Mahaboob Basha, 60 years,	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/920/2016	A.shabina, 48 years vs B.Kurshed be, 51 years	20 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/335/2015	B.Nagabhushanam vs C.Peddakka	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/363/2010	M.ASHOKKUMAR vs V.ADINARAYANA OTHERS	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/10/2013	K. Bhargavi vs Bashkar alias Bachi	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/487/2014	K.Akkamma vs N.Narayana Swamy	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/650/2012	J.Narayanaswamy. vs Anke Guru Devi	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/776/2016	K.Peddaraju Vodde vs Vodde Terriswamy	19 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/27/2017	R.Nagaraju vs S.Chand Basha	18 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/45/2017	M.Sivareddy, 52 years vs M.Adisekharareddy, 50 years	18 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/179/2016	D.M.Maqbool Basha vs Krishnapuram Shahanaz @ Shahins	18 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/485/2016	N.S.Uma Bai vs T.Sreenivasulu	18 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/606/2014	Y.Malleswaraiah vs A.Venkataramana	18 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/13/2016	Akula Pedda Rajappa vs K.Venkata Siva Reddy	17 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/110/2016	M.Narayana Reddy vs K.L.N.V.Prasad Rao	17 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/9/2017	C.Rangaiah, 54 years vs V.Anjaneyulu, Major	17 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/826/2016	D.Somasekhar Naidu vs B.R.Meghanath	17 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/137/2014	B.Maheswar Reddy vs R.Prabhakar	13 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/59/2017	P.Ayub Khan, 46 years vs S.Govinarajulu, 48 years	13 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/496/2012	K.KamalBhushan vs C.Krishnababu.	12 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/107/2017	K.Bhagyalakshmi, 43 years vs C.Nagaraju, 50 yers	12 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/129/2014	K.Sreeramulu vs K.Murali	12 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/203/2016	K.Jayarami Reddy vs B.Mukesh Gowd	12 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/859/2016	K.Sreedevi, 38 years vs ARK Reddy, 54 years	12 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/12/2015	Ms. Kapil Chits Pvt Ltd Anantapur. vs Vasi Pavan Kumar	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/76/2017	Kapil chit funds private limited vs A.Hanumesh	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/397/2014	Vadumallu Ramanjineulu vs J.Sugali Devala Naik	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/69/2016	Ummannagari Raghava Reddy vs Ummannagari Sudhakar Reddy	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/87/2017	Y,Venkata Siva Babu vs Vsk.Sreedevi	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/153/2017	Y.Balaramaiah vs K.Noorjahan, @ Noora	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/647/2015	Nettam Venkataramaiah vs N.Rama Mohan	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/647/2015	Nettam Venkataramaiah vs N.Rama Mohan	08 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/81/2016	P.Khaja Mohiddin vs C.Suryanarayana	07 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/689/2016	B.Madhusudan vs D.Ramanjineyulu	07 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/797/2015	Dudekula Jareena vs Ediga Narasappa	07 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/199/2016	V.Mahananda Reddy vs B.Vara Prasad	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/222/2016	M.Nabirasool vs S.Abdulla Nabi Sab	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/244/2016	Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd. vs K.Vijay	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/255/2016	P.Harinath vs Venkatalakshmamma	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/894/2016	Ankireddy Nagapratap reddy vs M.Ramu	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/978/2016	S.Lakshmiram Naik vs S.Swathi @ Swathi Bai @ Kamala bai	06 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/333/2015	K.Bala Subramanyam vs M.Sai Vara Prasad	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/24/2017	S.Pavam Kumar, 32 years vs K.Ramu Naik, 30 years	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/293/2016	D.Ghouse Mohiddin vs N.Kariyappa	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/507/2016	K.Radha vs C.Sathyanarayana	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/585/2015	Shaik Dadavali vs A.Bandu Sab	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/875/2016	K.Shanmukha Kumar, aged 21 years vs B.Vijaya bhaskar ,52 years	03 Apr 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/112/2016	G.Pothulaiah @ G.Pothappa vs A.Ramanjineyulu	31 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/254/2015	Pasupulati Ravindranath vs K.Aslam	31 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/301/2015	Thota Hanumantha Reddy vs V.Suryanarayana Achari	31 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/9/2017	T.Venkata Reddy vs A.Akkamma	30 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/66/2016	V.C.Kesava Reddy vs K.Bala Sanjappa	30 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/28/2017	B.Mariyamma, 60 years vs B.Pedda Pullanna, 50 years	30 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/299/2011	Dasari Sujatha vs D.Narasimha Reddy	30 Mar 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/386/2012	V.Amrutha Lakshmi vs A.Prasad aliasa A.Prasad Babu	30 Mar 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/97/2013	S. Nagabhushanam vs G.C.Surendranath	28 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/140/2016	Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd. vs D.Bhaskar	28 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/941/2016	M.Veeranarappa, 45 years vs K.Murali krishna, 48 years	28 Mar 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/149/2016	A.Suryanarayana vs D.Siva Sankar Reddy	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/175/2013	U.K.Muneeswari vs J. Nagabhushanam	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/396/2010	E.Savithramma vs K.Nagamani	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/441/2014	Y.Anil Kumar vs D.Suseelamma	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/445/2015	The Rural Development Trust Anantapur. vs Y.Chandrasekhar	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/458/2016	State Bank of India vs B.Ramulamma	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/556/2016	Balusa Naga Sriramulu vs S.Prabhakar	27 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/179/2016	Donti Narayanamurthy vs G.Nageswara Rao	24 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/224/2016	B.Chandrasekhara Raju vs Balija Venkataramana	24 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/403/2015	M.Lakshmikanthamma vs G.C.Sreenivasulu	24 Mar 2017	Copy of Order	—

Showing 100 of 579 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2017		11
Apr 2017		69
Mar 2017		97
Feb 2017		84
Jan 2017		100
Dec 2016		74
Nov 2016		103
Oct 2016		53

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP handled?

Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP has handled 591 court orders since 2016 at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District). The average disposal rate is 92 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP hear?

Based on available records, Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Where is Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP currently posted?

Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP is posted as Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP dispose cases?

Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP disposes approximately 92 cases per month, based on 591 orders handled over their tenure at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Since when is Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP serving?

Sri T.Rama Chandrudu, PJCJ, ATP has been serving at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) since 2016.

Case Types

OS 58%

EP 42%

Posting History

Oct 2016 — May 2017

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class · 591 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. E Bhima Rao

Principal District and Sessions Judge

1,187 orders

Smt. C. Satya Vani

I Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Sri D. Ramulu IIADJ

II Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Smt N Satyasri

III Addl. District Judge

0 orders

B.babu Naik

IV Addl. District Judge

3 orders

T.kesava

SC/ST Court Cum Addl. District Judge

19 orders

Sri G Sridevi

Chairman Cum Labor Court, Anantapur

185 orders

Sri C.N.Murthy

VII ADJ - Cum - Judge Family Court

0 orders

Smt A Padma

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

635 orders

G.shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

833 orders

Sri K Bala Koteswara Rao

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistra...

1,158 orders

Smt. Harika Ravuri

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge Cum I Addl. Judl. Magist...

704 orders

D. Pavani

Spl.JFCM Mobile for trial of cases under PCR Act C...

41 orders

← View all judges at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District)