Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka) · Chittoor · Andhra Pradesh

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao, V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, is posted at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,581 court orders on record since 2019. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles F, EP, MVOP cases.

1,581

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

F.C.O.P/223/2021

Mopuru Mohana Kumari vs Nil

09 Apr 2022

In the court of the Judge, Family Court – cum V Additional District

Judge, Tirupati

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

Judge, Family Court–cumV Addl. District Judge,

Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9th) day of April, Two Thousand Twenty Two

F.C.O.P.No. 223 of 2021

Between:

1 Mopuru Mohana Kumari, W/o. K. Gurunadham, D/o. M. Munirathnam Reddy,Hindu, aged about 39 years, House wife, Residing at D.No. 20433D, Kothapalli, Akkaram palli post, Tirupati urban mandal, Aadhaar No. 379988881661.

2 Kamasani Gurunadham, S/o. K. Narasimha Reddy, Hindu, aged about 39 years, Residing at D. No.2 82, Jandlapet village, Allamadugu post, Karvetinagaram mandal, Chittoor district. Aadhaar

No. 205729270626. ...Petitioners

And

Nil …Respondent.

This petition coming on this day before me for hearing in the presence of Sri G.Thimma Reddy, Advocate for petitioners, and of respondent NIL and having stood over for consideration, this court made the following: :: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed by the petitioners under section 13B of

Hindu Marriage Act to dissolve the marriage held between them on 18022005 and to grant a decree of divorce.

2 The brief averments of the petition are as follows: The marriage of the petitioners was performed on 18022005 at Block No.1, Srinivasa

Kalyana Mandapam, Tiruchanur road, Tirupati as per Hindu religious rites and marriage customs prevailing in their community and the said marriage was duly consummated and out of their lawful wedlock they begot a son by name K. Charan Theja.

(i) The petitioners further pleaded that after the marriage the 1st petitioner herein joined the 2nd petitioner and thereafter they started their marital life at Kothapalli village of Akkaram Palli post, Tirupati urban

Mandal and lead their marital life. At the time of marriage, the 2nd petitioner is a private employee and in the year 2008, the 2nd petitioner selected in Indian Overseas Bank as a clerk and he was posted at

Bangarupalem branch and there after he was transferred to

Gajulamandyam Branch and later he was transferred to M.R. Palli branch

Tirupati and after got promotion as a Assistant Manager and transferred to

Chinthamani Branch at Karnataka state and later he was transferred to

Gowri Bindanur branch at Karnataka state. The petitioners further pleaded that the petitioners setup family at Hindupuram of Anantapuram district and stayed there for one year and thereafter the petitioners returned to

Tirupati and residing in the above said address. In year 2017 the 2nd petitioner addicted for all the bad vices and the parents of the petitioner

No.2 also supported to him for his unlawful acts and the 2nd petitioner addicted for online rummy game and used his salary for his bad habits and online rummy game and he has not shown any interest to his family and for their day to day necessities. On 12022018 the 2nd petitioner left the house by leaving the 1st petitioner and her son for their fate and joined their parents house at Jandlapet.

(ii) The petitioners further pleaded that while the 2nd petitioner is working at Indian Overseas Bank, Tirumala branch and he has transferred bank amount of Rs. 10,00,00000 to the account of the 1st petitioner without her knowledge and withdraw the same without her 3 consent and used the said amount for his online rummy game and lost all the amounts,, hence the Tirumala II town police registered as case in

Crime No. 288 of 2019 against the petitioners and the police people arrested the 2nd petitioner and sent him to judicial custody. Though the the 1st petitioner requested the 2nd petitioner to change his attitude and also made so many mediations with the elders, but the 2nd petitioner has not cooperating with the 1st petitioner in any aspect and the 2nd petitioner has not changed his mind, because of the cruel nature of the 2nd petitioner, the 1st petitioner suffers with mental agony and the 2nd petitioner himself deserted the 1st petitioner and living separately at their village at

Jandlapet. The 1st petitioner lost her hopes for reunion. Hence, the petition.

3.Later the petitioners filed their affidavits in lieu of their chief examination as PWs1 and 2 and got marked Exs.A1 and A2. Ex.A1 is wedding invitation card, Ex.A2 is marriage photograph.

4.Heard the petitioners and perused the record.

5.Now the point for consideration is: Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief of decree of divorce by mutual consent as prayed in the petition?

6.Point: Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief of decree of divorce by mutual consent as prayed in the petition?

The averments of the petition filed by the petitioners clearly goes to show that the 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the 2nd petitioner and their marriage was performed on 18022005 at Block No.1,

Srinivasa Kalyana Mandapam, Tiruchanur road, Tirupati as per Hindu religious rites and marriage customs prevailing in their community and the 4 said marriage was duly consummated and out of their lawful wedlock they begot a son by name K. Charan Theja. The averments of the petition further goes to show that after the marriage the 1st petitioner joined the 2nd petitioner and they started their marital life at Kothapalli village of

Akkaram Palli post, Tirupati urban Mandal. At the time of marriage, the 2nd petitioner is a private employee and in the year 2008, the 2nd petitioner was selected in Indian Overseas Bank as a clerk and he was posted at

Bangarupalem branch and later he was got promoted as a Assistant

Manager and transfer to Chinthamani Branch at Karnataka state and later he was transfer to Gowri Bindanur branch at Karnataka state. The averments of the petition further goes to show that the petitioners put up their family at Hindupuram of Anantapuram district and stayed there for one year and thereafter they returned to Tirupati and residing in the above said address. The averments of the petition further goes to show that in year 2017 the 2nd petitioner addicted for all the bad vices and the parents of the petitioner No.2 also supported to him for his unlawful acts and the 2nd petitioner was addicted for online rummy game and used his salary for his bad habits and online rummy game and he has not shown any interest to his family and for their day to day necessities and on 12022018 the 2nd petitioner left the house by leaving the 1st petitioner and her son for their fate and joined their parents house at Jandlapet. The averments of the petition further goes to show that while the 2nd petitioner is working at

Indian Overseas Bank, Tirumala branch and he has transferred bank amount of Rs.10,00,00000 to the account of the 1st petitioner without her knowledge and withdraw the same without her consent and used the said 5 amount for his online rummy game and lost all the amounts, hence the

Tirumala II town police registered as case in Crime No. 288 of 2019 against the petitioners and the police people arrested the 2nd petitioner and sent him to judicial custody. Though the the 1st petitioner requested the 2nd petitioner to change his attitude and also made so many mediations with the elders, but the 2nd petitioner has not cooperating with the 1st petitioner in any aspect and the 2nd petitioner has not changed his mind, because of the cruel nature of the 2nd petitioner, the 1st petitioner suffers with mental agony and the 2nd petitioner himself deserted the 1st petitioner and living separately at their village at Jandlapet. The 1st petitioner lost her hopes for reunion.

7 In order to prove their case, the petitioners filed their affidavits in lieu of their chief examination as PWs1 and 2 and got marked

Exs.A1 and A2. Ex.A1 is wedding invitation card, Ex.A2 is marriage photograph.

8PW1 deposed in her evidence that the she is the legally wedded wife of 2nd petitioner and their marriage was performed on 18022005 at Block No.1, Srinivasa Kalyana Mandapam, Tiruchanur road,

Tirupati as per Hindu religious rites and marriage customs prevailing in their community and the said marriage was duly consummated and out of their lawful wedlock they begot a son by name K. Charan Theja. The evidence of PW1 further goes to show that after the marriage she joined the 2nd petitioner and they started their marital life at Kothapalli village of

Akkaram Palli post, Tirupati urban Mandal and at the time of marriage, the 2nd petitioner is a private employee and in the year 2008, the 2nd petitioner 6 is selected in Indian Overseas Bank as a clerk and he was posted at

Bangarupalem branch and later he got promoted as a Assistant Manager and transferred to Chinthamani Branch at Karnataka state and later he was transferred to Gowri Bindanur branch at Karnataka state. The evidence of

PW1 further goes to show that they put up their family at Hindupuram of

Anantapuram district and stayed there for one year and thereafter they were returned to Tirupati and residing in the above said address. The evidence of PW1 further goes to show that in year 2017 the 2nd petitioner is addicted for all the bad vices and the parents of the 2nd petitioner also supported to him for his unlawful acts and the 2nd petitioner is addicted for online rummy game and used his salary for his bad habits and online rummy game and he has not shown any interest to his family and for their day to day necessities and on 12022018 the 2nd petitioner left the house by leaving her and her son for their fate and joined their parents house at

Jandlapet. The evidence of PW1 further goes to show that while the 2nd petitioner is working at Indian Overseas Bank, Tirumala branch and he has transferred bank amount of Rs.10,00,00000 to her account without her knowledge and withdraw the same without her consent and used the said amount for his online rummy game and lost all the amounts, hence the

Tirumala II town police registered as case in Crime No. 288 of 2019 against the petitioners and the police people arrested the 2nd petitioner and sent him to judicial custody. The evidence of PW1 further goes to show that though she requested the 2nd petitioner to change his attitude and also made so many mediations with the elders, but the 2nd petitioner has not cooperating with her in any aspect and the 2nd petitioner has not changed 7 his mind, because of the cruel nature of the 2nd petitioner, she suffered with mental agony and the 2nd petitioner himself deserted her and living separately at their village at Jandlapet, as such she lost her hopes for reunion. The evidence of Pw1 is well corroborated by the evidence of PW2 i.e., 2nd petitioner in all aspects except transfering of amount of

Rs.10,00,00000 and registering of crime by II town police, Tirumala. The evidence of PWs1 and 2 clearly goes to show that they are unable to live jointly and lead marital life and that the petitioners proved that on account of lack of adjustment and misunderstandings, the petitioners are unable to live together and they are residing separately and that the petitioners are entitled for divorce by mutual consent as prayed for. Accordingly, I answer this point.

9 In the result, the petition is allowed and the marriage held between the petitioners on 18022005 is hereby dissolved and a decree of divorce is granted by mutual consent.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 9 th day of April, 2022.

Judge,

Family Court –cumV.Addl. District Judge, Tirupati. Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined on behalf of

Petitioners: Respondents:

PW1: M.Mohana Kumari NONE PW2: K. Gurunadham Exhibits marked on behalf of Petitioners: Ex.A1: Wedding invitation card Ex.A2: Marriage photograph.

Respondents: NONE

Judge,

Family Courtcum V Addl D.J., TPT.

Fair order F.C.O.P.No.223 of 2021

Dated 09042022

F.C.O.P/292/2021

P.Meena @ P.Meenakshi vs P.Subramanyam

09 Apr 2022

In the Court Of The Judge, Family Court CUM V Additional

District Judge :: Tirupati.

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

Judge, Family Court–cumV Addl. District Judge,

Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9th) day of April, Two Thousand Twenty Two

F.C.O.P.No.292 of 2021

Between: P.Meena @ P.Meenakshi, W/o.P. Subramanyam, D/o. M. Mani, Hindu, aged 40 years, residing at D.No.136658, Peddakapu Layout, Tirupati,

Chittoor District, Aadhaar No. 830717224951,... Petitioner

And:

P. Subramanyam, S/o. P. Krishnaiah, Hindu, Aged about 42 years, residing at D.No.1309, Veluru

village, Pichatur Mandal, Chittoor District....Respondent

This petition coming on this day before me for hearing in the presence of Sri Y.Suresh Raju, Advocate for Petitioner and of Sri B.Ravi, Advocate for respondent and having stood over for consideration, this court made the following: :: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13(1)(ib) of

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to dissolve the marriage held between the petitioner and respondent on 06032011 and to grant a decree of divorce.

2. The brief averments of the petition are as follows: The petitioner is his legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was performed on 06032011 at Karimariamma Temple, Tiruverucadu,

Chennai as per Hindu rights and customs and the marriage was duly consummated and out of their wedlock a male child by name Rishi Kiran was born on 05052012.

(i) The petitioner further pleaded that immediately after the marriage they put up family at respondent's house at Veluru village, 2

Pichatur Mandal, Chittoor District and lived happily for eight months and after the petitioner was conceived, the respondent left the petitioner at her parents house and since then he did not act as a dutiful husband and he left her for her own fate. The petitioner's son was born with fits. After birth of child the petitioner was informed the same to the respondent, but the respondent did not see his son. The petitioner's mother was bear all the delivery expenses and also given treatment to her son for fits.

(ii) The petitioner further pleaded that after her marriage she came to know that the respondent was addicted for all sorts of bad vices by consuming heavy Alcohol daily. The petitioner's mother made several mediation to join the petitioner and respondent with their son. But the said mediations were failed. Since all the mediations were failed, the petitioner lost her all hopes to rejoin with the respondent. The petitioner went to

Kuwait on 26042015 as a servant maid. There is no chance for reunion.

Hence, the petitioner is constrained to file this petition.

3 After appearance of the respondent before this court, the matter was referred to mediation center, Tirupati. Before mediator the both parties have settled their dispute and both of them agreed to dissolve their dispute.

Both parties have entered into a memorandum of agreement and agreed to dissolve their marriage. Both parties have filed their affidavits as PW1 and

RW1 reiterating the terms of compromise held between them stating that they have no objection to allow the present petition and marked Ex.A1 and A2.

4Heard both sides and perused the record.

3 5Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief as

prayed for?

6Point: Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief as prayed for? Both parties have mutually settled their dispute before Mediation

Center, Tirupati and entered into memorandum of agreement. The petitioner and respondent filed their affidavits in lieu of their chief examination reiterating the terms and conditions incorporated in the terms of agreement entered before Mediation Center, Tirupati. As per the memorandum of agreement dated 25032022 the petitioner and respondent agreed to dissolve their marriage held on parties agreed to die their manage which was performed on 06032011 at Karimariamma

Temple, Tiruverucadu, Chennai and to take divorce. As per the terms of memorandum of agreement the Petitioner herein relinquished her right to claim past, present and future maintenance against the Respondent and both parties agreed not to claim any movable or immovable properties of each other in future. As per the terms of memorandum of agreement they shall not have any claim if any mode or against each other. As per the terms of memorandum of agreement after divorce both parties shall not interfere with each others life and they shall be at liberty to lead their independent life and both parties shall not file any civil or criminal cases against each other. As per terms of agreement, both parties are hereby categorically declared that they will not interfere with the personal liberty of each other and also shall not canvas, advertise or communicate to the media etc. The memorandum of agreement entered in between the petitioner and respondent is recorded. In view of memorandum of 4 agreement entered by the petitioner and respondent, the marriage held between the petitioner and respondent is hereby dissolved and the matter is disposed of as per the terms of the memorandum of agreement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree. Accordingly, I answer the point.

7 In the result, the petition is allowed as per the terms of the memorandum of agreement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent before Mediation Center, Tirupati by dissolving the marriage held between the petitioner and respondent held on 06032011. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 9 th day of April, 2022.

Judge,

Family Court –cumV.Addl. District Judge, Tirupati. Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined on behalf of Petitioner: Respondent: PW1: P.Meena @ P.Meenakshi RW1: P. Subramanyam Exhibits marked on behalf of Petitioner: Ex.A1: Wedding card Ex.A2: Marriage photograph

Respondent: NIL.

Judge,

Family Courtcum V Addl D.J., TPT.

Fair order in F.C.O.P.No.292 of 2021 Dt.09042022

F.C.O.P/21/2022

V.Aruna vs Varada Bhanodaya

09 Apr 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT CUM V ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT JUDGE :: TIRUPATI.

Present : Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, Family Court cum

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9 th ) day of April, 2022.

F.C.O.P. No. 21 of 2022

Between:

1) V.Aruna, W/o Varada Bhanodaya, Hindu, aged about 50 years, House wife;

2) Minor V.Chaithanya, S/o Varada Bhanodaya, Hindu, aged about 17 years, Student, rep. by his mother/natural guardian/1st petitioner herein, Both are residing at Door No.18856i1, Madura Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

… Petitioners.

And:

Varada Bhanodaya, S/o V.Vasudevulu, Hindu, aged about 56 years, presently residing and working as Deputy General Manager at L & T Hydro Carbon Engineering Ltd., Sindhu Palace, Near Sahid Bhagat Singh Sabha Asthal, Opp. Fire Station, POBalotra, Barmer District, Rajasthan State, PIN code: 344022.

… Respondent.

This petition is filed by the petitioners U/Sec.125 CrPC, with a prayer to direct the respondent to pay maintenance to the 1st petitioner and 2nd petitioner monthly maintenance of Rs.50,000/, and for the 2nd petitioner education fee, book and other expenses maintenance amount of Rs.30,000/ per month, in total Rs.80,000/ towards their maintenance from the date of this petition and onwards and for costs of the petition.

This petition is coming before me today for appearance of both parties, and of Petitioner No.1 and Respondent present in person, and the petitioner No.1 having filed a petition not pressing the petition, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

Petitioner No.1 present. Respondent present. Petitioner filed a

Memo stating that after conducting mediation, herself and her husband are willing to rejoin to lead marital life and that she is not pressing the petition.

Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 09th day of April, 2022.

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, Family Court cum

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, F.C.cum

V ADJ, Tirupati.

Fair/Draft

Order in

F.C.O.P. No.21 of 2022

Dt.09042022.

EP/300188/2021

M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., Tirupati vs P.Muni Krishnaiah

08 Apr 2022

IN THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :: TIRUPATI

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Friday, the Eighth (8 th ) day of April, 2022.

E.P.No.188 of 2021

Arbitration Case No.5/2015

Between:

M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd, having its Regd. Office at No.123, Angappa Naicken Street, Chennai, being represented by its Branch collection Manager of Tirupati Branch and SPA holder B.Nageswar Rao, S/o. B.Yerraiah, Hindu, Aged about 35 years having office at D.No.19313/K Near Hero Honda Show Room, Renigunta Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

.... D.Hr./Defendant No.1.

And:

1) P.Muni Krishnaiah, S/o P.Ponnuswamy, Hindu, aged about 55years, residing at D.No.603, Vinayaka Nagar, Tirupati, presently residing at D.No.2050S2337/2, Korlagunta, Kattakindapalli, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

2) G.Babu, S/o G.Desaiah, Hindu, aged about 40 years, residing at D.No.205390/C, Korlagunta, Sanjay Gandhi Colony, Tirupati, Chittoor District. (E.P. is filed against JDr.No.1 only)

J.Drs/Respondents.

This petition is filed by the D.Hr/Claimant U/Or.XXI, Rule 22, 48 and 60 CPC, with a prayer to attach the salary of JDr.1 subject to provision of Sec.60 CPC for the realization of the E.P. amount of Rs.8,77,999/ with further interest and costs.

This petition is coming before me on today for hearing of D.Hr., and the D.Hr., called absent, and on perusal of record, Sri P.Ravi, Advocate holding vakalath for D.Hr., and notice to JDr.1 returned unserved as died, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

D.Hr called absent. No representation on behalf of D.Hr. Hence this petition is dismissed for default without costs.

Pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 8th day of April, 2022.

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao, V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Appendix of Evidence

Nil

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

V A.D.J.,

Tirupati.

F.C.O.P/20/2022

V. Aruna vs Varada Bhanodaya

09 Apr 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT CUM V ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT JUDGE :: TIRUPATI.

Present : Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, Family Court cum

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9 th ) day of April, 2022.

F.C.O.P. No. 20 of 2022

Between:

V.Aruna, W/o Varada Bhanodaya, Hindu, aged about 50 years, House wife, residing at Door No.18856i1, Madura Nagar, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

… Petitioner.

And:

… Respondent.

This petition is filed by the petitioner U/Sec.13(1)(i), 13(1)(ia), 13(i)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, with a prayer to dissolve the marriage held between the petitioner and respondent held on 22071993 at Madhu Auditorium, Srikalahasti, and to grant permanent alimony of Rs.50,00,000/ to the petitioner and for costs of the petition.

This petition is coming before me today for appearance of both parties, and of Petitioner and Respondent present in person, and the petitioner having filed a petition not pressing the petition, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

Both parties present and petitioner filed a Memo stating that after conducting mediation, herself and her husband willing to lead marital life and petitioner is not pressing the petition. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 09th day of April, 2022.

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, Family Court cum

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil

Sd/ V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

Judge, F.C.cum

V ADJ, Tirupati.

Order Record 1,558 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
F.C.O.P/20/2022	V. Aruna vs Varada Bhanodaya	09 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/21/2022	V.Aruna vs Varada Bhanodaya	09 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/223/2021	Mopuru Mohana Kumari vs Nil	09 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/292/2021	P.Meena @ P.Meenakshi vs P.Subramanyam	09 Apr 2022	Order	—
EP/300188/2021	M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., Tirupati vs P.Muni Krishnaiah	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/30/2019	K.Kumaraswamy Reddy vs Smt. G.Priyanka Reddy	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
EP/300091/2018	Shiram Transport Finance Ltd., vs P.Venkataramana	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
OS/159/2015	Sri Om ShivaShakthi Traders, rep by H.Chandrasekar vs S.Mumthaj Begum,	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/164/2022	Ambati Santhosh @ Prasad vs The State, rep. bythe SHO of Alipiri PS, Tirupati	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/180/2022	Subramani Duraisamy vs The State, rep. by the SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati.	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/294/2021	A.Dilli Kumar vs A.Padma @ Padmavathi	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
EP/300008/2021	M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited vs K.Nagaraja	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
EP/300009/2020	H.D.F.C. Bank Limited vs Kunchala Chandra Sekhar	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/170/2022	P.Ankaiah vs The State, rep. by its SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/177/2022	S.Kaushik vs The State of A.P. rep. by SHO, Women PS, Tirupati.	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/121/2021	Sharab Divya Teja Kumari vs K.Prasanna Kumar	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/256/2021	P.Deepa vs Bandi Chandra Kumar	04 Apr 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/163/2022	Koyambedu Ravi @ Thalari Ravi vs The State, rep. by the SHO of KVB Puram PS	31 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/165/2022	Bolloru Chengaiah vs The State, rep. by the SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati	31 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/72/2020	N.Priyanka vs M.Premchand	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/78/2020	M.S.Chandrababu vs Lakshmi @ Prmeela	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/3000009/2022	M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Com., Ltd., rep. by its SPA holder B.Nageswara Rao vs Ch.Mahesh	29 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/311/2015	Sappani Subramanyam vs K.Pedda Palani	29 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLRP/20/2021	C.M.Muni Rajamma vs The State, rep. by Sub-Inspector of Polcie, CCS PS, Tirupati.	29 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300189/2021	V.Purushotham Reddy vs V.SUbbamma	28 Mar 2022	Order	—
MVOP/144/2014	Smt.Chandragiri Hemalatha vs T.Sai Subramanyam	28 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/11/2020	C.Manzoor vs Kowsar	28 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/329/2021	K.Gnana Prasanna vs V.Manokar @ Manohara Achari	28 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300020/2019	Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited, rep by its GPA holder, G.Chaitanya, vs S.Rusheyndran (JDR-1)	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/145/2022	T.Rambabu vs The State, rep. by the SHO of SEB Karvetinagaram PS	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/151/2022	S.Mathiyazagan vs The State, rep. by its SHO, RSASTF PS, Tirupati	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/152/2022	Mogarala Nadhamuni @ Venkatamuni vs The State of AP rep. by SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/159/2022	Sridhar @ Lokanadham @ Bichitra @ Peela Lokhanand (A.2) vs The State, rep. by its SHO of Alipiri PS, Tirupati	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/17/2021	P.Hemalatha vs G.Subramanyam	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/203/2021	Pulicherla Ramakrishna Reddy vs Nil	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/56/2020	Dr.G.S.Harsha vs Dr. P.Srujana	24 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/284/2021	T.Manjula vs T.Gangadharam	24 Mar 2022	Order	—
AS/82/2016	T.Vijaya vs B.Jagadeeswar Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
AS/83/2016	P.Indira Lakshmi vs B.Jagadeeswar Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
AS/84/2016	P.V.Prasad Rao vs B.Jagadeeswar Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/135/2022	Elumalai Govindhan vs The State, rep. by Inspector of Police, RSASTF PS, Tirupati.	23 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/141/2022	Govada Muthyala Naidu @ Bujji vs The State, rep. by SHO of Alipiri PS, Tirupati	23 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/142/2021	R.C.Anand vs NIL	23 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/171/2019	P.Sailaja vs P.Jayachandra Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300041/2021	M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited vs V.Chandra Sekhar	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
OP/182/2021	E.Suresh Babu, vs E.Sunitha	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/109/2018	K.Sarath Chandra vs D.Satya	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/120/2021	Bommisetty Bhuvaneswara vs Kaki Jasmin	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/198/2018	A.Lalitha vs A.Padmakar @ Santhosh	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/327/2021	N.Sathish vs B.Chandana	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/134/2022	Bolloru Chengaiah vs The State, rep. by the SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/31/2022	P. Niharika Kiran @ Lohitha vs M. Uday Kumar	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/58/2018	Subramanyam Ambika vs Kummara Nagaraja	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/170/2020	Soora Gaeshnika vs K.Naresh Kumar Reddy	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/193/2021	P.Priyanka vs Nil	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/199/2021	C.Siva Kumar vs Nil	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300092/2021	E.Nagaraju (Died) vs R.M.Vishnu Prasad	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300151/2021	M/s. Mahaveer Finance India Ltd., vs K.Babu,	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/36/2020	K.Sowmya vs D.Sivasankar Reddy	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/161/2018	C.Balaji vs B.Priya	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/229/2018	V.Jyothi vs K.Sunil Kumar	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300163/2021	M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., vs Shaik Ahmad	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/130/2022	K.Kodandaraman vs The State of AP., rep.by its SHO of Karvetinagaram PS	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/18/2022	K. Rakesh vs Sunija Venadan	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/39/2020	Ashok Nandi vs M.Ramay @ Divya	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/196/2021	B.R.Saraswathi vs Nil	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/322/2021	Biyyam Sukumar Reddy vs Pulluru Chandana	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/114/2022	C.Thirumal vs The State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, RSASTF PS, Tirupati	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/115/2022	Mogarala Nadhamuni @ Venkatamuni vs The State rep. by SHO of RSASTF PS, Tirupati	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/119/2022	S.Mathiyazagan vs The State, rep. by its SHO, RSASTF PS,Tirupati.	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/129/2022	Y. Leelakumar (A.1) vs The State, rep.by SHO of Yerpedu PS	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/135/2021	Kaki Sneha Priya vs NIL	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/138/2021	K.Harish vs NIL	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/153/2021	Penubala Srikanth vs Penubala Praveena	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/194/2021	K.Bharadwaja Krishna vs Nil.	14 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300071/2018	M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited vs G.Shobha Devi	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
MVOP/168/2021	P.Kataiah vs MD. Nur Alam Bhuyan @ MD.Noor Amin	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
OS/1/2022	Nagaveti Ranjith Kumar vs Nagaveti Subramanyamachari	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
OS/1/2022	Nagaveti Ranjith Kumar vs Nagaveti Subramanyamachari	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/86/2021	Vani Krishna Kumar vs I.Siddaiah Naidu	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
OS/86/2021	Vani Krishna Kumar vs I.Siddaiah Naidu	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/191/2016	Thota Lella Kumari vs Chennuru Sunitha alias Jayasree	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
OS/258/2015	Chennuru Sunitha alias Jayasree vs Thota Leela Kumari	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
CRLA/97/2019	Smt.P.Srimathi vs Smt.Y.Reddi Kumari	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
F.C.O.P/39/2021	T.Suhasini vs P.Raja	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/50/2021	Shaik Mumtaj vs L.Baba Fakruddain	12 Mar 2022	Other	—
F.C.O.P/50/2021	Shaik Mumtaj vs L.Baba Fakruddain	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/159/2021	P.Ramya Krishna vs C.P.Karthik	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OP/207/2021	N.Madhavi @ Ch.K.Madhavi vs Ch.K.Amrutha Raj	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/3/2021	Thota Leela Kumari vs K.Sreedhar	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLRP/17/2020	M.Narasimha @ D.M.Narsimham vs A.S.Sambabandam	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/68/2020	S.Shakthi vs S.Erasendra	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/183/2021	C.Lakshmi vs NIl	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/216/2021	Vardhanagari Jyothi vs Nil	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
F.C.O.P/184/2021	S.Venkatesu vs Nil	10 Mar 2022	Order	—
AS/64/2021	V RAJAKUMAR vs RAZIYA @ RAZIYA BHI	09 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
EP/300147/2021	M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., vs D.Diwakar	09 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300159/2021	M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited, vs Royal Agencies Prop. R.Ravi Kumar	09 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/300191/2021	M/s.Shriram City Union Finance Limited, vs N.Shanmugam	09 Mar 2022	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/113/2022	Kamalakannan Chinaswamy vs The State, rep.by the SHO, RSASTF PS, Tirupati	09 Mar 2022	Order	—

Showing 100 of 1,558 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2022		17
Mar 2022		103
Feb 2022		62
Jan 2022		68
Dec 2021		105
Nov 2021		95
Oct 2021		55
Sep 2021		55
Aug 2021		13
Jul 2021		27
Jun 2021		6
Apr 2021		17

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao handled?

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao has handled 1581 court orders since 2019 at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 44 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao hear?

Based on available records, Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Execution Petitions, Appeal Suits) and Motor Accident matters (Motor Accident Claims) and Criminal matters (Criminal Appeals) at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka).

Where is Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao currently posted?

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao is posted as V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka), Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao dispose cases?

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao disposes approximately 44 cases per month, based on 1581 orders handled over their tenure at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka).

Since when is Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao serving?

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao has been serving at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka) since 2019.

Case Types

F 40%

EP 16%

MVOP 12%

AS 10%

CRLMP 7%

OS 7%

CRLA 6%

G 2%

Posting History

Apr 2019 — Apr 2022

V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE · 1,581 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri M. Guru Nath

III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

982 orders

Smt. G. Archana

IV ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

763 orders

Sri. G.ramagopal

V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

1,544 orders

Sri S.Krishnan Kutty

X ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

0 orders

Smt. S P D Vennela

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

1 orders

Smt. B. Vanisree

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

3,171 orders

Sri C.K.V.Satyakanth Kumar

I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2,834 orders

P. Koteswara Rao

II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2,177 orders

Smt. M. Sandya Rani

III ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

950 orders

Sri G. Srinivas

IV ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

3,773 orders

← View all judges at III Addl. District Court,, Tirupathi (Taluka)

Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

F.C.O.P.No. 223 of 2021

Petitioners: Respondents:

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao

F.C.O.P.No.292 of 2021

Whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief as

Present : Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9 th ) day of April, 2022.

F.C.O.P. No. 21 of 2022

O R D E R

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

­ Nil ­

Fair/Draft

Order in

F.C.O.P. No.21 of 2022

Dt.09­04­2022.

Present: Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Friday, the Eighth (8 th ) day of April, 2022.

Arbitration Case No.5/2015

O R D E R

Appendix of Evidence

­ Nil ­

V A.D.J.,

Present : Sri V.Gopala Krishna Rao,

V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

Saturday, the Ninth (9 th ) day of April, 2022.

F.C.O.P. No. 20 of 2022

O R D E R

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

­ Nil ­

Nil

Dt.09042022.

Nil

Nil