Smt V. Shiva Ranjani

Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex · Karimnagar · Telangana

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani, Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, is posted at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex, Karimnagar, Telangana, India. 53 court orders on record since 2021. 15 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, STC cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/34/2022

State of Telangana vs Vsashok reddy

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. ::AT:: HUZURABAD

Present:  Smt. P.Sai Sudha, Prl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagar I/C II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of F.C., Huzurabad Saturday, this the 12th day of March, 2022

C.C No. 34 OF 2022

Between:

The State of Telangana, through The SubInspector of Police, Kamalapur P.S.( Cr.No. 202/2021) AND …Complainant

1) ashok reddy Address Kamalapur,Kamalapur,Kamalapur,Warangal,Telangana

2) Samba Rao ex ZPTC pangidipally,Pangidipally,Pangidipally,Kamalpur,Warangal,Telangana

3) Ex mpp Mtla Ramesh kamalapur,Kamalpur,Kamalpur,Kamlapur,Kamalapur,Warangal,Telangana

4) kondem srinivas Nerrella,Nerrella,Kamalapur,Nerella,Warangal,Telangana

5) Mekala Ravi Gundedu,Gundedu,Kamalapur,Gunderu,Warangal,Telangana

6) Palle venkareddy others Gopalpoor,Gopalpoor,Kamalapur,Gopalpur,Warangal,Telangana

...Accused

OFFENCE UNDER SECTION:188 of IPC, SEC.51(B) DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT This case is coming before me on this day for hearing in the presence of learned APPO for the State, and having heard and having perused the record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

O R D E R

Accused no.1 to 6 are present. Copies furnished to them and are examined U/sec.251 Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of accusation for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 and 269 of IPC for which they pleaded guilty voluntarily. Hence accused No.1 to 6 are found guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 and 269 of IPC. Accused No.1 to 6 are questioned with regard quantum of punishment, A1 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A1, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC. A2 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A2, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A2 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC. A3 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A3, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A3 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC. A4 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A4, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A4 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC.A5 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A5, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A5 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC.A6 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A6, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A6 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.188 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.269 of IPC.Total fine amount is Rs.4200/ Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12thday of March, 2022

Prl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagar, I/C II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of F.C., Huzurabad

CC/151/2022 Convicted

State of Telangana vs Panogoth upender

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. AT HUZURABAD

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

I Addl. Judl Magistrate of F.C. Huzurabad.

Saturday, the 12th day of March, 2022.

C. C.No. 151 OF 2022

Between: The State of through the SubInspector of Police, P.S. Keshavapatnam.

...Complainant.

// AND //

1) Panogoth Upender Address – Palelu, Kahmmam, Telangana

2) Mandava Yellaiah Address Akkaldevigudem, Chivvemla, Suryapet, Telangana

...Accused.

OFFENCE UNDER SECTION: U/Sec. 337, 279 of IPC and Sec. 3 R/w. 181, 180 of

M.V. Act

The Accused Nos.1 and 2 are called present. The offence alleged against the Accused Nos. 1 is punishable U/Secs. 337, 279 of IPC and Sec. 3 R/w. 181 of M.V. Act and Accused No.2 is punishable U/Sec. 180 of M.V. Act. The Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are examined U/Sec. 251 of Cr.P.C. The substance of accusation leveled against them for the abovementioned offences is read over and explained to them in Telugu, to which, they pleaded guilty. Satisfied that the plea of guilt tendered by the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 is voluntary. Accordingly, the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are found guilty U/Sec.251 Cr.P.C. Heard the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 on the quantum of sentence. They submitted that this is the first offence committed by them and that they belong to a very weak financial background. They further submitted that they shall not repeat such acts in the future. They prayed for the Court to take a lenient view by considering the same. Considering the plea of the Accused persons, this Court is of the view that sentencing the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 to pay fine would meet the ends of Justice. In the result, the Accused No. 1 is found guilty for the offences U/Sec. 337, 279 of IPC and Sec. 3 R/w. 181 of M.V. Act and the Accused No.2 is found guilty for the offence U/Sec. 180 of M.V. Act and are convicted U/Sec. 251 of Cr.P.C. The Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are sentenced to pay a fine of 1. A1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000/ (Rupees One Thousand Only/)each, in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 279 of IPC. 2. A1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ (Rupees Five Hundred Only/)each, in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 337 of IPC. 3. A1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ (Rupees Five Hundred Only/), in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 3 R/w. 181 of M.V. Act. 4. A2 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000/ (Rupees One Thousand Only/)each, in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 180 of M.V. Act. Total fine of Rs.3000/ (Rupees Three Thousand only/). The office is directed to issue receipt of payment of fine, if paid, and also to remit the received fine amount to the State forthwith. Accordingly, this case is disposed of and the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are set at liberty. Their bail bonds shall stand canceled after expiry of appeal time.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 12 th day of March, 2022. Sd/ IAddl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Huzurabad.

CC/19/2022

State of Telangana vs Bolla Divya Alias pittala Divya

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. ::AT:: HUZURABAD

Present:  Smt. P.Sai Sudha, Prl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagar I/C II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of F.C., Huzurabad

Saturday, this the 12th day of March, 2022

C.C No. 19 OF 2022

Between: The State of Telangana, through The SubInspector of Police, Jammikunta P.S.( Cr.No. 428/2021) …Complainant AND

1) Bolla Divya Alias Pittala Divya Address 77/104/1,Krishna Colony,Jammikunta,Jammikunta,Karimnagar,Telangana

2) Bolla Swarupa 77/104/1,Krishna colony,Jammikunta,Jammikunta,Karimnagar,Telangana

3) Bolla Ravinder 77/104/1,Krishna colony,Jammikunta,Jammikunta,Karimnagar,Telangana ….Accused [ OFFENCE UNDER SECTION:290,323,34,448 of IPC

This case is coming before me on this day for hearing in the presence of learned APPO for the State, and having heard and having perused the record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

O R D E R

Accused no.1 to 3 are present. Copies furnished to them and are examined U/sec.251 Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of accusation for the offence punishable U/Sec.448,290 and 323 of IPC, for which they pleaded guilty voluntarily. Hence accused No.1 to 3 are found guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.448,290 and 323 of IPC. Accused No.1 to 3 are questioned with regard quantum of punishment, A1 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A1, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A1 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.448 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.100/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.290 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.323 IPC. A2 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A2, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A2 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.448 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.100/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.290 of IPC. and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.323 IPC. A3 requested to take lenient view stating that he is sole earning member of his family. Considering the nature of the offence and circumstances submitted by A3, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing punishment. Hence, A2 is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/Sec.448 IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.100/ in default to suffer simple imprisonment for (30) days and also for the offence punishable U/sec.290 of IPC and further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.200/ in default to suffer S.I. for a period of (30) days for the offence punishable U/sec.323 IPC. Total fine amount is Rs.2400/. Written and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12thday of March, 2022

Prl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagar I/C II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of F.C., Huzurabad

CC/91/2021 Convicted

State of Telangana vs Vslankadasari karthik

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. AT

HUZURABAD

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

I Addl. Judl Magistrate of F.C. Huzurabad.

Saturday, the 12th day of March, 2022.

C. C.No. 91 OF 2021

Between: The State of through the SubInspector of Police, P.S. Saidapur.

...Complainant.

// AND //

1) Lankadasari Karthik Address Gundlapalli, Saidapur, Karimnagar, Telangana

2) Md Gouse Address Ammanagurthy, Saidapur, Karimnagar, Telangana

3) Elkapalli Srikanth Address – Gundlapalli, Saidapur, Karimnagar, Telangana

4) Sripathi Koti Address – 170, Gundlapalli, Saidapur, Karimnagar, Telangana

...Accused.

OFFENCE: U/Sec.188 of IPC & Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act

This case is coming before me on this day for hearing in the presence of learned APP for the state and accused in person, and having heard and having perused the record, having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following: :: ADMISSION OF CLAIM :: This Case is suomoto advanced to this day. The Accused Nos.1 to 4 are called present. The offence alleged against the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 is punishable U/Sec.188 of IPC and Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act. The Accused Nos. 1 to 4 are examined U/Sec. 251 of Cr.P.C. The substance of accusation leveled against them for the abovementioned offences is read over and explained to them in Telugu, to which, they pleaded guilty. Satisfied that the plea of guilt tendered by the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 is voluntary. Accordingly, the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 are found guilty U/Sec.188 of IPC and Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act. Heard the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 on the quantum of sentence. They submitted that this is the first offence committed by them and that they belong to a very weak financial background. They further submitted that they shall not repeat such acts in the future. They prayed for the Court to take a lenient view by considering the same. Considering the plea of the Accused persons, this Court is of the view that sentencing the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 to pay fine would meet the ends of Justice. In the result, the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 are found guilty for the offence U/Sec.188 of IPC and Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act and are convicted U/Sec. 251 of Cr.P.C. The Accused Nos. 1 to 4 are sentenced to pay a fine of 1. Rs.400/ (Rupees Four Hundred Only/)each, in default, to suffer SI for a period of (1) days for the offence U/Sec.188 of IPC. 2. Rs.100/ (Rupees One Hundred Only/)each, in default, to suffer SI for a period of (1) days for the offence U/Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act. Total fine of Rs.2000/ (Rupees Two Thousand only/). The office is directed to issue receipt of payment of fine, if paid, and also to remit the received fine amount to the State forthwith. Accordingly, this case is disposed of and the Accused Nos. 1 to 4 are set at liberty. Their bail bonds shall stand canceled after expiry of appeal time.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 12 th day of March, 2022.

Sd/ IAddl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Huzurabad.

CC/338/2020 Convicted

State of Telangana vs Vssayyad Habibur rahman

12 Mar 2022

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. AT

HUZURABAD

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

I Addl. Judl Magistrate of F.C. Huzurabad.

Saturday, the 12th day of March, 2022.

C. C.No. 338 OF 2020

Between: The State of through the SubInspector of Police, P.S. Keshavapatnam.

...Complainant.

// AND //

Sayyad Habibur Rahman, Address – 2109, Ambalapur, Shankarapatnam, Telangana.

...Accused.

OFFENCE: U/Sec. 196, 180 and 181 of M.V. Act

The matter is suomoto advanced to this day. The Accused is called present. The offences alleged against the Accused is punishable U/Secs.196, 180 and 181 of M.V. Act. The Accused is examined U/Sec. 251 of Cr.P.C. The substance of accusation leveled against him for the abovementioned offences is read over and explained to him in Telugu, to which, he pleaded guilty. Satisfied that the plea of guilt tendered by the Accused Person is voluntary. Accordingly, the Accused is found guilty U/Sec.251 Cr.P.C. Heard the Accused on the quantum of sentence. He submitted that this is the first offence committed by him and that he belongs to a very weak financial background. He further submitted that he shall not repeat such acts in the future. He prayed for the Court to take a lenient view by considering the same. Considering the plea of the Accused, this Court is of the view that sentencing the Accused to pay fine would meet the ends of Justice. In the result, the Accused is found guilty for the offence U/Secs.196, 180 and 181 of M.V. Act and is convicted U/Sec. 252 of Cr.P.C. The Accused is sentenced to pay a fine of 1. Rs.500/ in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 196 of M.V. Act. 2. Rs.200/ in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec.180 of M.V. Act.3. Rs.300/ in default, to suffer SI for a period of () days for the offence U/Sec. 181 of M.V. Act. Total fine of Rs.1000/ (Rupees One Thousand only/). The office is directed to issue receipt of payment of fine, if paid, and also to remit the received fine amount to the State forthwith. Accordingly, this case is disposed of and the Accused is set at liberty. His bail bonds shall stand canceled after expiry of appeal time.

Written and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 12 th day of March, 2022.

Sd/ IAddl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Huzurabad.

Order Record 52 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/48/2019	Bakarapu Mallaiah vs Nerella Ramakrishna	15 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100308/2013	ARSHIYA TARANNAM vs MD. AMJAD KHAN	14 Mar 2022	Order	Acquitted
CC/91/2021	State of Telangana vs Vslankadasari karthik	12 Mar 2022	Order	Convicted
CC/151/2022	State of Telangana vs Panogoth upender	12 Mar 2022	Order	Convicted
CC/338/2020	State of Telangana vs Vssayyad Habibur rahman	12 Mar 2022	Order	Convicted
CC/697/2020	State of Telangana vs Samudrala Parameshwar	12 Mar 2022	Order	Convicted
CC/785/2021	State of Telangana vs Galibu Anji @ Anjeneyulu	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/836/2019	KOLUPULA ILAIAH vs AGGIDI KOMURAIAH	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/862/2021	State of Telangana vs Goskula Harish	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/891/2021	State of Telangana vs Thokala Sanjay Sanjay Kumar	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/893/2021	State of Telangana vs Thogaru Kumaraswamy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1156/2021	State of Telangana vs Dommati Anjaneyulu	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1174/2021	State of Telangana vs Gaddam ramesh	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1379/2019	Boga Aravind vs Tamtam Sikanth	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100016/2018	KONDABATHINI RAMESH vs VEMULA SRIHARI	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100073/2016	KODARI SUGUNA vs GANDU THIRUPATHI	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100297/2018	MEDIPALLI MOGILI vs PULLA VIJAY KUMAR @ PULLA VIJAY	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100324/2015	VELAGANDULA RAMULU vs KESHAVENI SWAMI	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100462/2016	MOHAMMED AFSAR vs MOHAMMED DULE PASHA	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/100510/2018	BODDU RAJAIAH vs BODDU KLPOCHAIAH @ SANJEEV	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
STC-NI/37/2021	Lankadasari Kalyan vs Chittampally Nagaraju	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/11/2022	State of Telangana vs Muske Ashok	12 Mar 2022	Order	Acquitted
CC/19/2022	State of Telangana vs Bolla Divya Alias pittala Divya	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/20/2022	State of Telangana vs Pingili Shankar	12 Mar 2022	Order	Acquitted
CC/34/2022	State of Telangana vs Vsashok reddy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/37/2022	State of Telangana vs Alimi Kumaraswamy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/39/2022	State of Telangana vs Matla Kalyan	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/40/2022	State of Telangana vs Porandla Srikanth	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/46/2022	State of Telangana vs Shaik Imran	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/47/2022	State of Telangana vs Ambala Raju kumar	12 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
CC/82/2022	State of Telangana vs Akunuri Vinay	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/84/2022	State of Telangana vs Bitla Sanjay	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/85/2022	State of Telangana vs Raparthi Satish	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/95/2022	State of Telangana vs Vsnimmala sammaiah	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/136/2022	State of Telangana vs Elkati Ashok	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/137/2022	State of Telangana vs Girimalla Amar	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/138/2022	State of Telangana vs Gattu Suresh	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/139/2022	State of Telangana vs Pembarthi Prashanth	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/141/2019	Ponaganti Ravikumar vs Reddymalla Veeraiah	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/158/2022	State of Telangana vs Naddunuri Prashanth	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/160/2022	State of Telangana vs Shaik Thajoddin	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/161/2022	State of Telangana vs Karanam Mahender Reddy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/162/2022	State of Telangana vs Gourishetty Ramesh	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/163/2022	State of Telangana vs Akunuri Tharun	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/164/2022	State of Telangana vs Bongoni Ramesh	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1046/2021	State of Telangana vs Vsmaram komal reddy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1077/2020	State of Telangana vs Dasarapu Johnson	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
CC/1106/2021	State of Telangana vs Gade Srinivas	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/118/2019	Annam Laxmi vs Vutkuri Chandramouli	09 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/25/2022	Sonaboina Srikanth vs Bagavathula Ramadevi	03 Mar 2022	Order	Compromised
CC/200424/2016	Matta Kejiya, W/o Venkata Nagaraju @ Poulu, 26 yrs vs Matta Venkata Nagaraju @ poulu, S/o Siddaiah, 32 yrs	22 Feb 2022	Order	—
OS/85/2018	Kundra Thirupathi Reddy vs Ponaganti Sampath	05 Jan 2022	Order	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Mar 2022		50
Feb 2022		1
Jan 2022		2

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt V. Shiva Ranjani handled?

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani has handled 53 court orders since 2021 at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 16 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt V. Shiva Ranjani hear?

Based on available records, Smt V. Shiva Ranjani primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt V. Shiva Ranjani currently posted?

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani is posted as Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex, Karimnagar, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt V. Shiva Ranjani available online?

Yes. 15 judgments by Smt V. Shiva Ranjani are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt V. Shiva Ranjani dispose cases?

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani disposes approximately 16 cases per month, based on 53 orders handled over their tenure at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt V. Shiva Ranjani serving?

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani has been serving at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex since 2021.

Case Types

CC 89%

OS 8%

STC 2%

EP 2%

Posting History

Feb 2022 — Apr 2022

Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class · 3 orders
Feb 2022 — Mar 2022

I Addl Junior Civil Judge · 20 orders
Feb 2022 — Mar 2022

II Addl Junior Civil Judge · 28 orders
Dec 2021 — Jan 2022

Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class · 2 orders
Dec 2021 — Jan 2022

I Addl Junior Civil Judge
Dec 2021 — Jan 2022

II Addl Junior Civil Judge

Outcomes on Record

Convicted 4

Acquitted 3

Compromised 1

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. P.B. Kiran Kumar

Senior Civil Judge Karimnagar

536 orders

Ms. Padma Sai Sree

Prl Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of...

287 orders

Ms. K.Veena Pranathi

II Addl Junior Civil Judge

7 orders

← View all judges at Huzurabad, SCJ Court Complex

Smt V. Shiva Ranjani

C.C No. 34 OF 2022

Between:­

O R D E R

Present: ­ MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

OFFENCE UNDER SECTION: U/Sec. 337, 279 of IPC and Sec. 3 R/w. 181, 180 of

M.V. Act

C.C No. 19 OF 2022

O R D E R

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. AT

HUZURABAD

Present: ­ MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

OFFENCE: U/Sec.188 of IPC & Sec. 76 of Hyderabad City Police Act

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. AT

HUZURABAD

Present: ­ MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

OFFENCE: U/Sec. 196, 180 and 181 of M.V. Act

Between:

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA

Present: MS. PALADUGULA ALEKHYA