V.Usha Kranthi

SCJ 1 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT JANGAON

Monday, this the 20th day of April, 2026

Present:-Smt. E.Sucharitha,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JANGAON.

H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2026

Between:-

1) Sadam Karunakar, S/o. Siddulu, Aged about: 32 years, Occupation: Agriculture, Caste: Yadava, R/o. Shamirpet village. Jangaon mandal, Jangaon District. Petitioner No-1

2)Sadam @ Thotte Pavani @ Kavitha, W/o. Sadam Karunakar. D/o. Thotte Yadagiri, aged about: 27 years, Caste: Yadava, occupation: Housewife, R/o. Shamirpet village, Jangaon town and district, presently residing at her parent's house R/o Rampur village Khazipet mandal, Hanamkonda District. ….Petitioner No-2

And

NONE .…Respondent

-o0o-

This petition came before me on 15/04/2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. Gajula Ravinder, counsel for the Petitioner No-1 and Petitioner No-2 and there is no Respondent; upon perusing the material papers available on record and upon hearing the arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

: : O R D E R : :

1.This is an application filed U/s.13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioners no-1 and 2 praying this Court to grant divorce of mutual consent by dissolving their marriage held on 23-03-2022.

2.The brief averments of the petition are that, the petitioners No-1 and 2 got married on 23-03-2022 at Rampur village, Khazipet mandal, Hanamkonda

District, as per the customs and traditions of Hindu marriage. Their marriage was

SCJ 2 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

consummated, out of their wedlock they are blessed with a male child by name

Puneeth, aged about 3 years 3 months (Date of Birth on 06.01.2023).

3. The petitioners further stated that they lead marital life happily for a period of one (1) year only. Thereafter, due to serious differences between them, they are unable to live together, which resulted in the petitioners living separately since

June, 2023 till today. The matter was placed before elders and that several panchayats were held before caste elders, well-wishers and village elders and they have advised them to live happily without any disturbance, but the petitioners did not head their advice and the marriage between the petitioners broke irretrievably and there is no possibility of re-union. Keeping in view the disturbed family life of petitioners and that the couple have been living separately from June, 2023 till today, the elders advised them to approach competent court for dissolution of their marriage on mutual consent. It is further stated that, in view of their compromise, they declared that they would not file any further cases against each other either civil or criminal, they further declared that they shall not interfere in the family affairs of each other and there is no collusion between them. As both the petitioners wish to lead their independent life without effecting other parties private life they filed this petition with mutual consent without any coercion or any force.

4.During enquiry both the petitioners submitted that they have already exchanged their belongings, cloths, gold ornaments, and articles of each other and nothing is left over to be exchanged as agreed by them. The petitioners undertake that, they will not file any criminal and civil cases against each other and their family

SCJ 3 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

members either in movable or in immovable properties. The petitioner No.2 shall not file any cases against the petitioner No.1 and his family members either against movable or immovable properties at any point of time, hereinafter they shall not interfere in the individual life of each other and liberty to lead their lives with their own choice.

5.While the matter stood pending for six (6) months statutory period observation the petitioners filed waive petition U/s 13-B, with a prayer to waive off six (6) months statutory period by relying on a decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in Civil Appeal No.1158/2017, dt.12/09/2017 between Amardeep Singh

Vs. Harveen Kaur wherein it is held that:

“The court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Sec.13 B(2), it can do so after considering the following:

i) the statutory period of six months specified in Sec.13 B (2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13 B (1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself; ii) all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order XXXIIA Rule 3 CPC/ Section 23 (2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to reunite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts; iii) the parties have genuinely settled their differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties. iv) the waiting period will only prolong their agony.

6. In view of the guide lines noted above, the parties, were made to attend counseling but none of them got materialized. The parties were found not living as husband and wife. Both parties genuinely settled their disputes including alimony of Rs.1,00,000/- and for children welfare Rs.3,00,000/- filed receipt as

Ex.P2 for Rs.4,00,000/-. There is no possibility of reunion of parties and further waiting period amounts to prolonging agony among parties.

SCJ 4 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

7.Both the petitioners appeared before Court on 20-04-2026and filed their respective chief-affidavits. This court again tried them for re-conciliation, but both the petitioners expressed, that they are living separately since June, 2023 till today, and there is no possibility of re-union and their intention to live separate is not changed since their separation and even after filing this petition. Hence, both the petitioners were examined before this Court as PWs1 and 2 and Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 got marked.

8. Heard the counsel for the petitioners.

9. Now the point for consideration is:

Point No.1: Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief

of dissolution of their marriage held on 23/03/2022

by way of granting divorce on mutual consent?

10. POINT No: 1

The petitioners No-1 and 2 got married on 23-03-2022 at Rampur village,

Khazipetmandal, Hanamkonda District, as per the customs and traditions of Hindu marriage. Their marriage was consummated, out of their wedlock they are blessed with a male child by name Puneeth, aged about 3 years 3 months (Date of

Birth on 06.01.2023).

11.The oral evidence of PW1 and PW2 remained undisputed and the fact that both the parties are wiling to dissolve their marriage between them that took place on 23-03-2022, also remained undisputed and unchallenged. Further, it is seen that all reconciliations went in vain and there is no possibility of re-union between them. The record further reveals that, the petitioner No.1 and 2 are not living as wife and husbandfromJune, 2023 till today, and all the disputes and

SCJ 5 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

claims among them were genuinely settled as agreed between them. In view of the oral evidence of PW1 and PW2, this court is of the opinion that, the petitioners No.1 and No.2 are entitled for dissolving their marriage that took place on 23.03.2022. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of both the petitioners.

12.In the result the petition is allowed without costs. The marriage which took place between the petitioners No. 1 and 2 on 23-03-2022 is hereby dissolved from this day i.e. on 20-04-2026 by way of court decree by mutual consent under Sec. 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade-I, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 20th day of April, 2026.)

Sd/-xxxxxxx

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JANGAON

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

PW.1: Sadam karunakar -None- PW.2: Sadam @ Thotte Pavani@ Kavitha

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner: For Respondent :

Ex.P1: Original Wedding card - Nil - Ex.P2: Receipt, dt.20.04.2026

Sd/-xxxxxxx

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JANGAON.

// True copy//

Sd/-xxxxxxx

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JANGAON.

SCJ 6 of 6 HMOP 41/2026

Jgn Fair Copy Dt.20.04.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT JANGAON

Monday, this the 20th day of April, 2026

Present:-Smt. E. Sucharitha

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

JANGAON.

O.S.No.46/2025 (New)

( Received on Transfer to Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Jangaon )

( O.S.No.41/2017 (Old))

(Transferred from Addl. Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Jangaon)

Between:-

Lonka Devaiah ….Plaintiff

And

1. Lonka Rajaiah

2. Lonka Bhagyamma

3. Lonka Ilaiah

.....Defendants

*****

This is a suit filed for Permanent Injunction, plaint presented under section 26 R/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC

This Suit is coming for before me for disposal in the presence of Sri. G. Naga Rajeshwar Rao and Smt. B. Sree Devi, counsel for plaintiff and Sri. Y. Satyanarayana, Sri Musthyala Srinivasulu, Sri Billa Prabhakar, counsel for defendants No-1 to 3. Upon hearing both sides and perusing the material on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following :

:: DOCKET ORDER ::

Plaintiff called absent. No evidence adduced. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

(Written and pronounced by me on the 20th day of April, 2026 )

Sd/-

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

JANGAON