Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP, Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, is posted at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,878 court orders on record since 2022. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

1,878

Total Orders

Judgments

156

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/1212/2022

Aviligonda Poleraiah vs Kotla Ramana Reddy died by LRs Kotla Rama Devi

24 Apr 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: ANANTHAPURAMU.

Present: SRI. V. VIJAYA KUMAR REDDY,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

Monday, this the 24th day of April, 2023.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.1212 of 2022

Aviligonda Poleraiah S/o Aviligonda Pullanna, Aged 39 years, Agriculturist, Madigubba Village and Post, Atmakuru Mandal, Ananthapuramu District.

...Plaintiff

- Vs -

Kotla Ramana Reddy (Died by L.Rs. Defendants 1 to 3).

1. Kotla Rama Devi W/o Late Kotla Ramana Reddy, Aged 35 years, Hindu.

2. Kotla Bhuvana Reddy, D/o Late K.Ramana Reddy, Aged 16 years, Hindu.

3. Kotla Syraya Reddy, D/o Late K.Ramana Reddy, Aged 13 years, Hindu. (Defendants 2 and 3 are Minors represented by their Guardian Mother 1st defendant). Defendants 1 to 3 are residents of D.No.35-4, Near AL Church, Bhagya Nagar, 2nd Cross, Papampeta, Kalyandurgam Road, Ananthapuramu.

..Defendants

This suit came up on 18.04.2023 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri A.Raghavendra, learned counsel for the Plaintiff and of Sri B.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the Defendants No.1 to 3 and the defendants are remained set exparte and upon perusing the material papers on the record and upon hearing the learned counsel for plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the estate of the deceased borrower/Kotla Ramana Reddy which is lying in the hands of defendants for recovery of Rs.3,09,479/- (Rupees Three lakhs nine thousand four hundred and seventy nine Only) being the principal and interest due on ‘A’ and ‘B’ marked suit promissory notes, dated 23.05.2018 said to be executed by Late K.Ramana

Reddy, in favour of plaintiff for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh Only) and

Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand only) respectively agreeing to repay the same with an interest of 24% per annum and for costs.

PJCJ, ATP.,2 of 5 OS No.1212 of 2022

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

That on 23.05.2018 one Kotla Ramana Reddy S/o K.Chinna Narayana

Reddy of Madigubba village has borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh Only) in cash for his family necessities from the plaintiff and executed ‘A’ marked promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same to the plaintiff or to his order on demand with interest at 24% per annum. On the same day i.e. on 23.05.2018, the said Kotla Ramana Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy of Madigubba village again borrowed a sum of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand only) in cash for his family necessities from the plaintiff and executed ‘B’ marked promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same to the plaintiff or to his order on demand with interest at 24% per annum. Inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff, the said Kotla Ramana Reddy has not paid any amount due under suit promissory notes.

(b) That the said Kotla Ramana Reddy died on 08.01.2021 leaving behind him the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 as his legal heirs to succeed to his estate.

The defendant Nos. 1 to 3 who are the wife and daughters respectively have succeeded to the estate of deceased K.Ramana Reddy and they are responsible for all assets and liabilities of deceased borrower. The plaintiff made several demands on the defendants to repay the amount borrowed by late Kotla Ramana

Reddy and they promised to repay the same. But they are postponing the repayment on some pretext or the other. Inspite of several demands, the defendants failed to pay the amount due to the plaintiff under suit promissory notes and intentionally evading to repay the due amount. The defendants are not agriculturists and the amount borrowed by Kotla Ramana Reddy is for his family necessities and hence the defendants who are his legal heirs are liable to repay the amount due with interest at contracted rate and they are not entitled for any reliefs under Act, IV 1938. Hence the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of the suit amount out of estate/assets of late K.Ramana Reddy, lying in the hands of the defendants with subsequent interest and costs.

3.The defendants appeared through their counsel, but failed to file the written statement within the statutory period and they remained exparte to the suit proceedings on 31.01.2023. Hence, posted to plaintiff’s evidence.

PJCJ, ATP.,3 of 5 OS No.1212 of 2022

4.The plaintiff in support of his contention got examined himself as

PW1. He also got exhibited Exs.A1 and A2. Ex.A1 is the ‘A’ marked promissory note, dated 23.05.2018 executed by late Kotla Ramana Reddy in favour of the plaintiff. Ex.A2 is the ‘B’ marked promissory note, dated 23.05.2018 executed by late Kotla Ramana Reddy in favour of the plaintiff.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff. Perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point for determination is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of

entire suit amount from the defendants, out of the

estate of Late K.Ramana Reddy, which is lying in the

hands of defendants as prayed for ?

7. POINT:

It is the contention of the plaintiff that the deceased borrower

K.Ramana Reddy borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.80,000/- on 23.05.2018 for his family necessities and executed Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 promissory notes agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum as and when demanded by the plaintiff. Said K.Ramana Reddy died on 08.01.2021 leaving behind him the defendants as his legal heirs to his estate and therefore, the defendants, being the legal heirs of deceased borrower are liable to pay

Rs.3,09,479/- (Rupees Three lakhs nine thousand four hundred and seventy nine only) under 'A' and 'B' marked suit promissory notes dated 23.05.2018 with subsequent interest, out of the assets or estate of the deceased K.Ramana Reddy.

To substantiate the same, he got examined himself as PW.1 and filed proof affidavit which is accepted on oath as his chief examination. The said chief- examination is nothing but just replica of his pleadings. The evidence of PW.1 coupled with the contents of Exs.A1 and A2 goes to show that the original borrower K.Ramana Reddy, during his lifetime borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh Only) on 23.05.2018, in cash from the plaintiff (PW.1) for his family necessities and on the same day, after receiving the said amount, he executed Ex.A1-suit promissory note for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) in favour of plaintiff and again on the same day i.e. on 23.05.2018, the original borrower K.Ramana Reddy borrowed a sum of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty

PJCJ, ATP.,4 of 5 OS No.1212 of 2022 thousand only) in cash from the plaintiff (PW.1) for his family necessities and on the same day, after receiving the said amount, he executed Ex.A2-Suit promissory note for Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand only) agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum and in spite of his repeated demands, the original borrower late K.Ramana Reddy did not discharge the debt covered under Exs.A1 and A2-promissory notes.

8.The evidence of PW.1 further goes to show that the said Kotla

Ramana Reddy/original borrower died leaving behind him the defendants as legal heirs to him and to his estate. The defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are being the wife and daughters of late K.Ramana Reddy respectively and so, they are liable to pay the debt amount due under Exs.A1 and A2-promissory notes and in spite of his demands, the defendants who are the legal heirs to the deceased K.Ramana

Reddy, did not repay the amount due under suit promissory notes as mentioned above. Hence he filed the suit for recovery of money out of the estate of the deceased borrower.

9.Since the evidence of PW.1 as well as the contents of Exs.A1 and A2 promissory notes, remained unchallenged and unrebutted by the defendants, this

Court do not find any reason to disbelieve the same. Therefore, this Court holds that the plaintiff with his evidence is able to establish that Exs.A1 and A2-Suit promissory notes are true, valid and executed by the deceased Kotla Ramana

Reddy and binding upon his legal representatives i.e., defendant Nos. 1 to 3.

Apparently, the suit is filed within the period of limitation (three years). Since the defendants appeared through their counsel, but failed to file the written statement within the stipulated period to disprove the contentions of the plaintiff, regarding their liability, this Court is inclined to draw an adverse inference against the defendants. Therefore, this Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount from the defendants out of the estate of Kotla Ramana

Reddy which is lying in the hands of defendants. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

10.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff and against the estate of deceased borrower Kotla Ramana Reddy, directing the defendant Nos. 1 to 3 to pay a sum of Rs.3,09,479/- (Rupees Three lakhs nine

PJCJ, ATP.,5 of 5 OS No.1212 of 2022 thousand four hundred and seventy nine only) to the plaintiff with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the suit i.e. 27.06.2022 till the date of decree and thereafter interest at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realization on principal amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh Only) and Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty thousand Only) under the ‘A and B’ marked Suit promissory notes out of the assets of deceased Kotla Ramana Reddy, lying in the hands of defendant Nos. 1 to 3.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr.III, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 24th day of April, 2023.

Sd/- Sri V.Vijaya Kumar Reddy.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANTS :

PW.1: A.Poleraiah. - EXPARTE -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A1:Original ‘A’ marked promissory note, dated 23.05.2018 executed by late Kotla Ramana Reddy in favour of the plaintiff. Ex.A2:Original ‘B’ marked promissory note, dated 18.06.2018 executed by late Kotla Ramana Reddy in favour of the plaintiff.

FOR DEFENDANTS: -Nil-

Sd/- Sri V.Vijaya Kumar Reddy.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

OS/457/2022

Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Kuderu Repd by tits Manager vs K.Mallesu

24 Apr 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: ANANTHAPURAMU.

PRESENT: SRI. V.VIJAYA KUMAR REDDY,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

Monday, the 24th day of April, 2023.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.457 of 2022

Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Kuderu Branch, Rep. by its Manager, Head Office, Kadapa.

...Plaintiff

- Vs -

1. K.Mallesu S/o K.Mareppa, Aged 55 years, Hindu, Cultivation, Jayapuram Village, Kuderu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District.

2. T.Marri Swamy S/o Late Marenna, Aged 46 years, Hindu, Cultivation, Jayapuram Village, Kuderu Mandal, Ananthapuramu District.

...Defendants

This suit came up on 18.04.2023 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri T. Ranga Reddy,Advocate for the Plaintiff Bank and the defendants remained exparte and upon perusing the material papers on the record and upon hearing the learned counsel for plaintiff bank and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

::J U D G M E N T ::

This suit is filed by the plaintiff bank for recovery of a sum of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) from the defendants being the outstanding loan amount, with future interest and for other appropriate reliefs.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

(a) That the plaintiff’s bank constituted and functioning under

R.B.I. Act 1976 under the name and style of “Andhra Pragathi Grammeena

Bank” having its Head office at Kadapa District and branches in different places and one of such branch is the plaintiff bank at Kuderu Village and

Mandal. The defendants 1 and 2 approached to the plaintiff bank for financial accommodation for the purpose of Agriculture and the 1st defendant availed loan for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs Only) under terms and conditions of the Bank and 2nd defendant agreed to stand as guarantor and executed guarantee agreement on 12.06.2017 for loan transaction. Accordingly, the 1st defendant executed Loan Agreement in favour of the plaintiff bank for

PJCJ, ATP.,2 of 5 OS No.457 of 2022

Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs) on 12.06.2017 agreeing to repay the same with interest at 7% per annum or as per guidelines of RBI.

(b) That the 1st defendant availed loan from the bank on 12.06.2017 and passed a receipt for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs Only).

Subsequently, the defendants 1 and 2 failed and neglected to repay the amount due in accordance with agreed terms and conditions of the loan agreement. On that, the 1st defendant executed acknowledgment of debt on 10.06.2020 in favour of the plaintiff bank. Later, the plaintiff bank made several demands on the defendants for repayment of amount of due, but they have not paid. As per account extract, the defendants are due a sum of

Rs.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) as on 18.03.2022. Since the plaintiff is a bank, the defendants are not entitled to the benefits under Debt Relief Laws or any other enactment and the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the suit amount as per terms of the loan agreement. Hence, the suit.

3.The defendant No.2 appeared through his counsel, but he failed to file the written statement within the statutory period and he remained exparte to the suit proceedings on 12.12.2022. Despite service of summons on defendant No.1, the defendant No.1 did not appear before the Court and remained exparte to the suit proceedings on 27.01.2023. Hence, posted to plaintiff’s evidence.

4.The plaintiff bank got examined its Branch Manager representing the said bank as PW.1 and also got marked Exs.A1 to A4. Ex.A1 is the Loan

Agreement, dated 12.06.2017 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the plaintiff bank. Ex.A2 is the Guarantee Agreement, dated 12.06.2017 executed by 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank. Ex.A3 is the Acknowledgment of the debt, dated 10.06.2020 executed by 1st defendant. Ex.A4 is the

Account extract, dated 18.03.2022.

5.Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the Plaintiff bank.

Perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point for determination is :

PJCJ, ATP.,3 of 5 OS No.457 of 2022

Whether the plaintiff bank is entitled for recovery of entire suit amount from the defendants as prayed for ?

7. P O I N T:

It is the contention of the plaintiff bank that defendant No.1 being the principal borrower and the defendant No.2 being the guarantor for the loan availed by the defendant No.1 from the plaintiff bank are liable to pay the outstanding debt amount of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) as on 18.03.2022 with subsequent interest to the plaintiff bank. To substantiate the same, the

Branch Manager of the plaintiff bank who is representing the said bank is examined as PW.1 and filed his chief-affidavit which is accepted on oath as his chief-examination. The said chief-examination is nothing but just replica of his pleadings. It shows that the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 approached the plaintiff bank on 12.06.2017 for financial accommodation for the purpose of

Agriculture and the defendant No.1 has executed a Loan Agreement, dated 12.06.2017 (Ex.A1) and obtained Loan of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs

Only) and defendant No.2 stood as guarantor for the said loan availed by the defendant No.1 and he executed Ex.A2-Guarantee Agreement on the same day i.e., 12.06.2017 in favour of plaintiff bank. His evidence further goes to show that the 1st defendant availed loan from the bank on 12.06.2017 and passed a receipt for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs Only) and

Subsequently, the defendants committed default and not paid the amount due to the plaintiff bank and therefore, the defendant No.1 got executed Ex.A3

Acknowledgment, dated 10.06.2020 in favour of the plaintiff bank acknowledging his debt. Subsequent to that the defendants did not choose to repay the loan amount due till 18.03.2022 and hence, the plaintiff bank is constrained to file the suit for recovery of outstanding of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees

Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) with future interest rate of contract rate.

8.Since the evidence of PW.1 as well as the authenticity of Ex. A1 to

A4 are undisputed and unrebutted by the defendants, this Court finds no

PJCJ, ATP.,4 of 5 OS No.457 of 2022 reason to discard the same. As discussed above, the contents of Ex.A1 Loan agreement, Ex.A2 Guarantee Agreement and Ex.A3-Acknowledgment shows that the defendant No.1 obtained loan from the plaintiff bank and the defendant No.2 stood as guarantor to the said loan and as they committed default in payment, the defendant No.1 acknowledged the debt on 10.06.2020. Further, Ex.A4 computerized statement of account extract of the defendant No.1 shows that the defendant No.1 did not make any payments till 18.03.2022 to discharge the loan amount as agreed upon and that the defendants have to pay outstanding balance amount of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees

Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) as on 18.03.2022 to the plaintiff bank.

9.In such circumstances, when the evidence adduced by the plaintiff’s bank remains unchallenged, this Court holds that the plaintiff bank is able to establish that the defendant No.1, being borrower and the defendant

No.2, being the guarantor are jointly and severally liable to pay the outstanding balance amount of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) as agreed under Exs.A1 to A4 with subsequent interest, where under they admitted their co-extensive liability to pay the loan amount. Apparently, the suit is filed within the period of limitation (three years). Since the defendants did not pay the outstanding loan amount and did not even turn up to disprove the contentions of the plaintiff bank, regarding their liability, this Court is inclined to draw an adverse inference against the defendants. Therefore, this Court holds that the plaintiff bank is entitled for recovery of the suit amount from the defendants.

Accordingly, the point is answered against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiff bank.

10.In the result, suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff bank, directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay a sum of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only) to the plaintiff bank with subsequent interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit ie., 23.03.2022 to till the date of

PJCJ, ATP.,5 of 5 OS No.457 of 2022 realization on principal adjudged sum of ₹.3,67,517/- (Rupees Three lakhs sixty seven thousand five hundred and seventeen Only).

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gt-III, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 24th day of April, 2023.

Sd/- Sri V.Vijaya Kumare Reddy.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANTS :

PW.1: K.Raja Sekhar. - EXPARTE - (Branch Manager)

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A1:Loan agreement, dated 12.06.2017 executed by 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff’s bank. Ex.A2:Guaranty agreement, dated 12.06.2017 executed by 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff’s bank. Ex.A3:Acknowledgment of the debt, dated 10.06.2020 executed by defendant No.1. Ex.A4:Account extract, dated 18.03.2022.

FOR DEFENDANTS :

- NIL -

Sd/- Sri V.Vijaya Kumar Reddy.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Ananthapuramu.

OS/457/2020

D. Mallikarjuna vs K. Nagappa

26 Apr 2023

OS/451/2018

Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank vs U.Swathi Priya

25 Apr 2023

CC/339/2023

State represented by Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs Naguladinne Mahaboob Vali

27 Apr 2023

Order Record 1,847 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/339/2023	State represented by Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs Naguladinne Mahaboob Vali	27 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/52/2022	V.Madhava Krishna Reddy vs K.Peddaiah @ C.Peddaiah	26 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/263/2021	Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Chit Funds (Andhra)Pvt.Ltd.,Ananthapuramu. vs P.Varadappa and Others	26 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/278/2022	Margadarsi Chit fund Pvt Ltd vs Z Abdul Rahim	26 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/320/2022	P ERamesh Chandra Babu vs B Suri	26 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/457/2020	D. Mallikarjuna vs K. Nagappa	26 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/157/2020	Shriram Raghavendra Chits pvt Ltd., vs S. Anjineyulu	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/162/2022	M/s Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd vs G Venkata Narayana	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/180/2022	Sri Raghuvaran Chits Pvt Ltd vs M Prasad	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/281/2018	P.Prakash Naik vs D.Venkatesh Naik	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/307/2022	M/s Kapil Chits HYD PVT LTD vs E Siddaiah	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/427/2022	Talary Sudhakar vs S. Khaja Hussain	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/451/2018	Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank vs U.Swathi Priya	25 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/246/2021	Raghuvaran Chits Pvt.,Ltd.,Anantapur vs K.Abdul Khaliq and Others	24 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/346/2019	M.Gangadhar Cowdary vs K.Vijay Kumar	24 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/457/2022	Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Kuderu Repd by tits Manager vs K.Mallesu	24 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1212/2022	Aviligonda Poleraiah vs Kotla Ramana Reddy died by LRs Kotla Rama Devi	24 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/73/2020	B. Sankara Narayana vs Y.V. Ranganatham	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/82/2021	C.Rami reddy vs S. Anjaneyulu	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/331/2022	M/S Shirram Raghavendra Chits pvt ltd., vs C.C.Bhaskar reddy	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/890/2020	G. Ganganna died by LRs G. Malleswari vs Shaik Rizwana Begum	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/916/2022	Canara Bank Reptd by authorised office Garldainne Branch, Ananthapuramu. vs Yeddula Ravi Chandra Reddy	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/121/2022	The State Represented through Sub Inspector of Police, Ananthapuramu I Town PS. vs Shaik Saddam Hussain(A1)	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/132/2022	The State Represented through Sub Inspector of Police, Ananthapuramu I Town PS. vs Shaik Nabirasool(A1)	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/1070/2022	The State Repd by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ananthapuramu I Town PS. vs Dudekula Mahaboob Basha @ Tailor Basha(A1)	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/1096/2022	The State Repd. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Ananthapuramu I Town PS. vs Chakala Chalapathui(A1)	19 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/2/2022	B.Obi Reddy vs K.Sreeramulu	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/53/2022	Chaitra Peddanna vs K.Ujjinaiah	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/54/2022	G.Shanthamma vs R.Anjineyulu	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/160/2020	Shriram Raghavendra Chits pvt Ltd., vs V. Ram Mohan	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/829/2021	Smt G.Rukmini vs T.Viswanatham	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/872/2020	B. Lakshmi Narasamma vs Shaik Riyaz hussain died by LRs S. Rizwana Begum	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1491/2022	Degala Vijay Kumar vs Doppa Ramu	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100222/2018	S.H.O I town PS, Anantapuramu vs Sake Sreenivasulu	18 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/18/2020	Y. Purushotham Naidu vs B. Venaktesulu	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/44/2022	M/s Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd, Anantapuramu vs E.Sunitha	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/84/2022	M/s Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs M Naresh	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/105/2022	M/s Kapil Chits Hyd PVT LTD vs Guggilla Padmanabha Reddy	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/143/2017	Thammineni Vasantha Naidu vs Kacheri Mohammad Younus	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/323/2022	M/S Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs C Obulesu	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/330/2022	M/S Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs K Ramachnadra Reddy	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/371/2021	Shaik Ameena, aged 45 years vs Shaik Mansoor Basha, aged 52 years	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/607/2019	M.Saraswathi vs S.Ramachandra	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/923/2019	C.Lakshmi Devi vs K.Sadrasan Reddy	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1256/2019	A.Krishna Murthy vs Vs	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/301/2023	State represented by SHO,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs C.Gopal Reddy S/o C.Adinarayana Reddy	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/302/2023	State represented by SHO,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs Jatadhara Industries Pvt.Ltd.,Bangalore.	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100137/2018	The SHO I Town PS Anantapuramu vs K.Amnarnath Reddy	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100415/2018	The SHO Narpala PS vs M.Chandrabadu Naidu	17 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/329/2022	M/S Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs S Nazeer	12 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/365/2022	M/s Sri Raghuvar chits Pvt Ltd., vs G. Thimmappa and 3 others	12 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/640/2019	B.Mani vs S.Venkata Siva Reddy (died by Lrs) S.Neelavathi	12 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/919/2022	Orichintala Zeelan Basha vs Shaik Babajan	12 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/332/2021	State Represented by Sub Inspector of police, Ananthapuramu I Town PS. vs Sirigiri Suresh @ Sirisala Suresh @ Suri, aged 32 years(A1)	12 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/339/2022	M/S Shirram Raghavendra Chits pvt ltd., vs C.Bhaskar reddy	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/14/2023	S. Thaheer vs D. Mehar Banu	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/76/2021	Canara Bank Reptd by its Branch Manager vs T.Obulamma	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1093/2022	A.Mallikarjuna Reddy vs G.Adi Lakshmi	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1292/2021	Y.S.Sekhar Reddy vs V.Nageswar Reddy	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100368/2018	The SHO Narpala Police Station vs Vennapusa Lakshmi Reddy	11 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/88/2021	M/S Manikrishna Chits P Ltd., Rep By Legal Officer vs P. Thulasamma	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/195/2022	M/s Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd vs G Sai Krishna	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/816/2015	A.Krishnamurthy vs M.Vakeel Bai	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1388/2022	S.P.Abdul Hasam Sab vs D.Baba Fakruddin @ D.Babu	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1440/2022	A. Narasimha Murthy vs S. Kiran Kumar	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1503/2022	A.Sulochanamma vs Pullannagari Subadramma	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/26/2021	T.Noushad vs S.Mahaboob Basha	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100270/2018	SHO I Town P.S., Ananthapuramu. vs Bandi Parasuram	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100446/2018	The SHO, Narpala P.S vs Patnam Hanumesh	10 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/325/2021	S.Sreenivasa Rao vs P.Kamala	07 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/107/2021	Kapil Chits pvt ltd., vs Rajula Ranganayakulu	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/117/2021	M. Vasudeva vs D.Surendra	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/450/2022	K.Khasim Naidu vs L.Chenna Reddy	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/892/2016	H.Ananthamma@Y.Ananthamma vs M.Obuleshu	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1109/2019	K.Murali Krishna vs P.P.Chandra sekhar	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/386/2021	State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Narpala PS. vs Meesala Bandi Nallappa, aged 48 years(A1)	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100433/2019	SHO Narpala P.S. vs D.Ramanjineyulu	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100434/2019	SHO Narpala P.S. vs D.Ramachandra	04 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/2/2021	C. Sreeramulu vs C. Nagaraju	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/105/2021	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyd. Pvt. Ltd., vs K.K. Devaraju	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/143/2021	M/S Sri Raghuvaran chit fund Pvt Ltd., vs C.Lakshmi Nagaendra	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/280/2022	G Narayana Swamy vs B Venkatesu	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/421/2022	M. Nagaraju vs N. Syed Rasool	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/1253/2021	U.Bhakthavathsala Reddy, aged 38 years vs K.Subbamma, aged 72 years	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/1454/2019	M.Narayana vs P.Pushpamma	03 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/261/2023	State represented by Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs Jatadhara Industries Pvt.Ltd.,Bangalore.	01 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/262/2023	State represented by Sub Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town P.S. vs JC Uma Reddy	01 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/263/2023	State represented by SUB Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town PS vs J.C.Uma Reddy	01 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/264/2023	State represented by SUB Inspector of Police,Ananthapuramu I Town PS vs J.C.Uma Reddy	01 Apr 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/135/2019	E.Venkata Reddy vs K.Adinarayana	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/161/2020	V. Narasimhulu vs L.R. Ramesh	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/8/2021	M/S Sri Ram City Union Finance Ltd., vs V. Devi	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/791/2021	The State Represented by Sub Inspector of Police AnanthapuramuTraffic PS, vs Mota Rangaswamy	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100044/2019	The SHO Narpala PS Anantapuramu vs Shikari Naga @ Elcha	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
CC/100253/2019	SHO NARPALA P.S., Narpala vs Shikari Naga @ Elcha	31 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/371/2018	P.Muneer Basha vs M.Shaiksha Vali	29 Mar 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/507/2019	Andra Pragathi Grameena Bank., vs K. Aruna	29 Mar 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/179/2019	R.Eswara Reddy vs G.Ramachari	29 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/255/2018	B.Lalitha Sumitra vs G.Lakshmi Narasamma	29 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/406/2012	N.Parameswara Reddy vs G.Venakataramudu aliasK.Venkataramudu	29 Mar 2023	Copy of Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 1,847 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2023		89
Mar 2023		81
Feb 2023		195
Jan 2023		77
Dec 2022		128
Nov 2022		212
Oct 2022		106
Sep 2022		123
Aug 2022		297
Jul 2022		152
Jun 2022		237
May 2022		158

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP handled?

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP has handled 1878 court orders since 2022 at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District). The average disposal rate is 156 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP hear?

Based on available records, Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Where is Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP currently posted?

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP is posted as Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP dispose cases?

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP disposes approximately 156 cases per month, based on 1878 orders handled over their tenure at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Since when is Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP serving?

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP has been serving at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) since 2022.

Case Types

CC 42%

OS 30%

EP 24%

PRC 2%

STC 1%

MC 0%

ELECOP 0%

Posting History

Apr 2022 — Apr 2023

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class · 1,878 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. E Bhima Rao

Principal District and Sessions Judge

1,187 orders

Smt. C. Satya Vani

I Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Sri D. Ramulu IIADJ

II Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Smt N Satyasri

III Addl. District Judge

0 orders

B.babu Naik

IV Addl. District Judge

3 orders

T.kesava

SC/ST Court Cum Addl. District Judge

19 orders

Sri G Sridevi

Chairman Cum Labor Court, Anantapur

185 orders

Sri C.N.Murthy

VII ADJ - Cum - Judge Family Court

0 orders

Smt A Padma

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

635 orders

G.shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

833 orders

Sri K Bala Koteswara Rao

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistra...

1,158 orders

Smt. Harika Ravuri

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge Cum I Addl. Judl. Magist...

704 orders

D. Pavani

Spl.JFCM Mobile for trial of cases under PCR Act C...

41 orders

← View all judges at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District)

Sri V.Vijaya kumar Reddy PJCJ ATP

ORIGINAL SUIT No.1212 of 2022

:: J U D G M E N T ::

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of

entire suit amount from the defendants, out of the

estate of Late K.Ramana Reddy, which is lying in the

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANTS :

EXHIBITS MARKED

ORIGINAL SUIT No.457 of 2022

::J U D G M E N T ::

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANTS :

EXHIBITS MARKED

1

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 457 of 202 0

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 451 of 201 8

:: J U D G M E N T ::

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED