Vacant Fac A.geetha Vani, Ajcj Atp

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP, Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, is posted at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 98 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, RCC cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/185/2017

Jinne Govenda Narayanaswamy vs A.Chand Basha

22 Sep 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU

Present: A.Thousheed Hussain,

Spl. Judicial First Class Magistrate,

(Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu,

FAC Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu

Friday, the 22nd day of September, 2017

Original Suit No.185 of 2017

Between:-

Jenne Govindu Narayana Swamy, S/o J.Govindu, Hindu, aged about 34 years, Business, residing at Door No.6-1-267,

Lakshminagar, Ananthapuramu ... Plaintiff

And

1) A.Chand Basha, S/o A.Abdul Rahiman (late), Muslim, aged about 57 years, working as Senior Assistant, O/o Deputy Executive Engineer, TBP HLC, PABR, Sub Division No.1, HLC Colony, Ananthapuramu – 515 001

2) J.Govindu, S/o J. Narappa (late), Hindu, No relief is claimed aged about 67 years, Pensioner, Door against D.2. No.6-1-267, Lakshminagar, Ananthapuramu – 515 001

..Defendants

This suit is coming on 19.9.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri N.P.Sreenivasulu and Sri K.Jagadeeswar Reddy, advocates for the plaintiff and the defendants having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the 1st defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2.The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

OS 185 of 2017 -2- PJCJ Court, Atp

On 17.2.2015, the 1st defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.40,000/- from the 2nd defendant and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the 2nd defendant agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

The 2nd defendant took entire promissory note amount of

Rs.56,000/- from the plaintiff on 17.10.2015 and made over the said promissory note in favour of the plaintiff and the same is informed to the 1st defendant.

Thereafter, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff and issuance of legal notice dated 9.12.2016, the 1st defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the 1st defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3.The 1st defendant set exparte.

4.The plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked

Exs.A.1 to A.4 documents on behalf of plaintiff.

5.Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7.Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

8.PW1/plaintiff stated in his affidavit filed in lieu of chief- examination that the 1st defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.40,000/- on 17.2.2015 from the 2nd defendant, and executed Ex.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per

OS 185 of 2017 -3- PJCJ Court, Atp

annum, and that the 2nd defendant took entire promissory note amount of Rs.56,000/- from the plaintiff on 17.10.2015 and made over the said promissory note in favour of the plaintiff and the same is informed to the 1st defendant. Ex.A.2 is the endorsement made by the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff; and that in spite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice dated 9.12.2016, the 1st defendant failed to pay the suit amount under suit pronote. Ex.A1 is the original suit promissory note executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant for Rs.40,000/-, dated 17.2.2015. Ex.A.2 is the endorsement made by the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff.

Ex.A.3 is the office copy of legal notice. Ex.A.4 is the postal acknowledgment signed by the 1st defendant.

9.Exs.A1 to A.4 documents disclose that the 1st defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.40,000/- on 17.2.2015 from the 2nd defendant and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the 2nd defendant, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that the 2nd defendant took entire promissory note amount of Rs.56,000/- from the plaintiff on 17.10.2015 and made over the said promissory note in favour of the plaintiff and the same is informed to the 1st defendant; and that the 2nd defendant failed to repay the debt under

Ex.A1.

10.If the 1st defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 promissory note, and did not execute the same in favour of the 2nd defendant, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But, the 1st defendant set exparte.

11.The evidence of PW.1 coupled with documentary evidence discloses that the 1st defendant borrowed amount and executed Ex.A1

OS 185 of 2017 -4- PJCJ Court, Atp

pronote in favour of the 2nd defendant, who transferred Ex.A.1 in favour of the plaintiff on receiving Rs.56,000/-, and later the 1st defendant failed to discharge the debt covered under Ex.A1 pronote, hence the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for. Accordingly, Point

No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

12.Point No.2:- To what relief?

13.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant is directed to pay suit amount of Rs.59,406/- (Rupees fifty nine thousand four hundred and six only) with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization over the principal amount of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only).

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 22nd day of September,

2017.

Spl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, (Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu, FAC Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS

PW-1 Jenne Govindu Narayana --- --- Swamy

OS 185 of 2017 -5- PJCJ Court, Atp

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS

Ex.A1/ Original suit promissory note --- --- executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant for Rs.40,000/-, dated 17.2.2015.

Ex.A2/ Endorsement dated 17.10.2015 made --- --- by the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff.

Ex.A3/ Office copy of the legal notice dated --- --- 9.12.2016 issued by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant.

Ex.A4/ Postal acknowledgment signed by the --- --- 1st defendant.

PJCJ (FAC)

OS/387/2017

Meghavat Prasad Naik vs Nalanam Naresh Kumar

22 Sep 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU

Present: A.Thousheed Hussain,

Spl. Judicial First Class Magistrate,

(Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu,

FAC Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu

Friday, the 22nd day of September, 2017

Original Suit No.387 of 2017

Between:-

Meghavath Prasad Naik, S/o Ramaswamy Naik, aged about 38 years, Hindu, residing at Door No.3-668-A, Somnath

Nagar, Ananthapuramu City ... Plaintiff

and

Nalanam Naresh Kumar, S/o N.Muthyalappa, aged about 42 years, working as Conductor in APSRTC, Guntakal Depot, residing at Door No.6-1-

475, Lakshmi Nagar, Ananthapuramu City ..Defendant

This suit is coming on 19.9.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri S.K. Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, upon having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ marked suit promissory notes.

2.The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 12.10.2015 at morning, noon and evening hours, the defendant herein borrowed an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from the plaintiff at Ananthapuramu and executed ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ marked suit

OS 387 of 2017 -2- PJCJ Court, Atp

promissory notes for Rs.50,000/- each in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum. Thereafter, in spite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount.

Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3.The defendant was remained exparte.

4.The plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked

Exs.A.1 to A.4 documents on behalf of plaintiff.

5.Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7.Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

8.PW1/plaintiff stated in his affidavit filed in lieu of chief- examination that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- on 12.10.2015 at morning, noon and evening hours from the plaintiff, and executed Exs.A.1 to A.4 promissory notes for Rs.50,000/- each in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that in spite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote.

9.Exs.A1 to A.4 documents disclose that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- on 12.10.2015 from the plaintiff and executed Exs.A.1 to A.4 promissory notes for Rs.50,000/- each in favour

OS 387 of 2017 -3- PJCJ Court, Atp

of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Exs.A.1 to A.4. If the defendant did not borrow amount under Exs.A1 to A4 promissory notes, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But the defendant remained exparte.

10.The evidence of PW.1 coupled with documentary evidence discloses that the defendant borrowed amounts and executed Ex.A1 to

A.4 promissory notes in favour of the plaintiff, and later failed to discharge the debt covered under Exs.A1 to A.4 promissory notes, hence the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for.

Accordingly, Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

11.Point No.2:-

To what relief?

12.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The defendant is directed to pay suit amount of Rs.2,78,400/- (Rupees two lakhs seventy eight thousand four hundred only) with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization over the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only).

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 22nd day of September,

2017.

Spl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, (Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu, FAC Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu

OS 387 of 2017 -4- PJCJ Court, Atp

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PW-1 Meghavath Prasad Naik --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF defendant

Ex.A1/ ‘Á’ marked promissory note dated --- --- 12.10.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-.

Ex.A2/ ‘B’ marked promissory note dated --- --- 12.10.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-.

Ex.A3/ ‘C’ marked promissory note dated --- --- 12.10.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-.

Ex.A4/ ‘D’ marked promissory note dated --- --- 12.10.2015 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-.

PJCJ (FAC)

OS/104/2017

K.Ramathulasamma, 63 years vs K.Nagaraju, 50 years

22 Sep 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU

Present: A.Thousheed Hussain,

Spl. Judicial First Class Magistrate,

(Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu,

FAC Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu

Friday, the 22nd day of September, 2017

Original Suit No.104 of 2017

Between:-

K.Rama Thulasamma, W/o K.P. Venkata Reddy, Hindu, aged 63 years, resident of Bukkacherla village, Rapthadu Mandal,

Ananthapuramu district ... Plaintiff

and

K.Nagaraju, S/o K. Basappa, aged 50 years, Hindu, resident of Vidapanakal

village and Mandal, Ananthapuramu ..Defendant

district

This suit is coming on 19.9.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri G.Ranganayakulu, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2.The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

On 2.4.2015, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

Thereafter, in spite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice

dated 4.6.2016, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence,

OS 104 of 2017 -2- PJCJ Court, Atp

the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3.The defendant set exparte.

4.The plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked

Exs.A.1 and A.2 documents on behalf of plaintiff.

5.Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7.Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

8.PW1/plaintiff stated in her affidavit filed in lieu of chief- examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 2.4.2015 from the plaintiff, and executed Ex.A1 promissory note in her favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that in spite of repeated demands and issuance of legal notice dated 4.6.2016, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote. Ex.A1 is the original suit promissory note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-, dated 2.4.2015.

Ex.A.2 is Office copy of the legal notice dated 4.6.2016.

9.Exs.A1 and A.2 documents disclose that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 2.4.2015 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1.

OS 104 of 2017 -3- PJCJ Court, Atp

10.If the defendant did not borrow amount under Ex.A1 promissory note, and did not execute the same in favour of the plaintiff, then nothing prevented him to contest the suit denying the averments of plaint by filing written statement. But, the defendant set exparte.

11.The evidence of PW.1 coupled with documentary evidence discloses that the defendant borrowed amount and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, and later failed to discharge the debt covered under Ex.A1 pronote, hence the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for. Accordingly, Point No.1 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

12.Point No.2:- To what relief?

13.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The defendant is directed to pay suit amount of Rs.71,900/- (Rupees seventy one thousand and nine hundred only) with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization over the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only).

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 22nd day of September,

2017.

Spl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, (Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu, FAC Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu

OS 104 of 2017 -4- PJCJ Court, Atp

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PW-1 K.Rama Thulasamma --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

Ex.A1/ Suit promissory note executed by the --- --- defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-, dated 2.4.2015.

Ex.A2/ Office copy of the legal notice dated --- --- 4.6.2016.

PJCJ (FAC)

OS/85/2017

C.Venkata Naidum 49 years vs M.Peere Naik, 45 years

22 Sep 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

ANANTAPURAMU

Present: A.Thousheed Hussain,

Spl. Judicial First Class Magistrate,

(Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu,

FAC Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu

Friday, the 22nd day of September, 2017

Original Suit No.85 of 2017

Between:-

Chimbili Venkata Naidu, S/o late C.Rangappa, Hindu, aged 49 years, agriculture, residing at Door No.28-6-402,

APHB Colony, Ananthapuramu town and ... Plaintiff

district

and

M.Peere Naik, S/o M.Bheemla Naik, aged about 45 years, Hindu, working as Junior Assistant, residing at Govt. Degree College, Madakasira, Ananthapuramu

district ..Defendant

This suit is coming on 20.9.2017 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri M.Manohar Naidu, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant having been called absent and remained exparte, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff, having perused the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed on behalf of the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of amount basing on promissory note.

2.The averments of the plaint are in brief as follows:-

OS 85 of 2017 -2- PJCJ Court, Atp

On 8.2.2014, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from the plaintiff and executed the suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum.

Thereafter, in spite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount. Hence, the plaintiff is constrained to file the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount.

3.The defendant set exparte.

4.The plaintiff himself examined as PW.1 and got marked

Ex.A.1 promissory note on behalf of plaintiff.

5.Heard the arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the points for consideration are:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

7.Point No.1:-

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit amount as prayed for?

8.PW1/plaintiff stated in his affidavit filed in lieu of chief- examination that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 8.2.2014 from the plaintiff, and executed Ex.A1 promissory note in his favour, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, and that in spite of repeated demands, the defendant failed to repay the suit amount under suit pronote. Ex.A1 is the original suit promissory

OS 85 of 2017 -3- PJCJ Court, Atp

note executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-,

dated 8.2.2014.

9.Ex.A1 promissory note discloses that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 8.2.2014 from the plaintiff and executed Ex.A1 pronote in favour of the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% per annum, later failed to repay the debt under Ex.A1.

12.Point No.2:- To what relief?

13.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The defendant is directed to pay suit amount of Rs.85,700/- (Rupees eighty five thousand and seven hundred only) with costs and subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of

OS 85 of 2017 -4- PJCJ Court, Atp

realization over the principal amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only).

Directly typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 22nd day of September,

2017.

Spl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, (Prohibition & Excise Cases), Ananthapuramu, FAC Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PW-1 Chimbili Venkata Naidu --- ---

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

Ex.A1/ Suit promissory note executed by the --- --- defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-, dated 8.2.2014.

PJCJ (FAC)

EP/49/2015 Dismissed Disposal Date:22-09-2017

M.Nagalingaiah vs K.Nadipi Ganganna

22 Sep 2017

Order Record 97 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/49/2015	M.Nagalingaiah vs K.Nadipi Ganganna	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	Dismissed Disposal Date:22-09-2017
EP/196/2017	M/s. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt Lts., vs B.Ramana Naik	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/357/2015	Araveti Nagamalleswari vs Cherukuri Kondanna	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/85/2017	C.Venkata Naidum 49 years vs M.Peere Naik, 45 years	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/104/2017	K.Ramathulasamma, 63 years vs K.Nagaraju, 50 years	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/185/2017	Jinne Govenda Narayanaswamy vs A.Chand Basha	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/387/2017	Meghavat Prasad Naik vs Nalanam Naresh Kumar	22 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/381/2017	C.Adinarayana vs S.Mohammed Rafi	21 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/678/2016	P.Nagaratnamma vs C.Lakshmi Devi	21 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/380/2017	Balagonda Bodamallu vs K.Rama Mohan	20 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/421/2017	G.K.Sulochanamma vs E.Anjaneyulu	20 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/280/2017	Mallemputi Chandra Mouli vs Chintalapalli Sudheer	19 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/373/2017	Sake Venkatamma vs Koduru Nagamanemma	19 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/383/2015	K.Nagaraju vs M.Sushanntha Lakshmi	18 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/349/2017	Balagonda Bodamallu vs M.Lalithamma	18 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/584/2016	K.Kullayappa vs M.Narasamma	18 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/210/2017	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyd Pvt Ltd., vs Vaparalapilli Jessy Sulochana	15 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/120/2014	S.Abdul Sukkur, 62 years vs S.Md.Ali	14 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/242/2017	Bulle Lakshmidevamma vs B.Lingeswaramma	14 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/163/2017	P.Nagesh vs G.Pthulaiah	13 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/346/2015	Pannarasu Nagesh vs Gujjapa Pothalaiah	13 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/166/2017	M.Narayana Reddy vs K.Pavan Kumar	13 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/405/2016	Lingutla Parvathi vs The Superintendent, R and B Department	12 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/121/2017	I.Venkata Naidu vs B.Prameela	11 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/105/2016	B.Ujinappa vs B.Madana Mohan	08 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/351/2017	Bathala Surendra Babu vs P.Chiranjeevi	08 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/769/2016	M.Nagaratnamma vs P.Narasimha Murthy	08 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/219/2016	Kondeti Venkata naidu vs G.Madhu	07 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/33/2017	K.Savithramma vs Kummara Giramma	07 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/171/2017	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyd., Pvt Ltd., vs Thatakula Nagendra	06 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/293/2016	T.Shakuntala vs P.Shaikshavali	06 Sep 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/208/2015	A.Sashibushan vs Y.Ramana	06 Sep 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/724/2016	D.Kondanna vs B.Ramanjaneyulu	31 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/252/2016	Pasala Narasimhulu vs Meenuga Bhaskar	26 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/21/2017	Chalapathi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. vs Gali Venkata Narayana Reddy	24 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/271/2017	Sri Kollamoram Chennakesava Reddy @ Chennakesavulu vs H.Gopal	23 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/367/2017	Smt K.Govindamma vs K.Linga Reddy	23 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/31/2015	Chalapthi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. vs Bachineni Nagamuni	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/75/2017	M/s. Kapil Chits Pvt Ltd. vs Sake Sreenivasulu	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/151/2017	N.Chenna Reddy vs G.Adinarayana	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/172/2017	B.Prabhakar Reddy vs Ragipindi Ramachandra Reddy	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/346/2017	M.Varalakshmi vs S.Adam	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/452/2017	Vanganuru Narayana Swamy vs S.Bhagya Lakshmi	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/732/2016	Thammineni Vasantha Naidu vs Y,Sharfuffin	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/908/2016	T.Vasantha Naidu, 45 years, vs G.Saritha devi, 38 years,	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/977/2016	M.Rupla Naik, 75 years vs K.Allabakash, 49 years	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
RCC/7/2014	Bojja Venakatalakshmamma vs T.Raghuramaiah	22 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/12/2012	K.Yerriswamy. vs P.C.Venkatesu.	21 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/179/2017	B.Adinarayana Reddy vs M.Rajeswari	21 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/917/2016	S.Alievelamma, 35 years vs E.Nagabhushanam, 58 years	21 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/226/2017	K.Manikyam vs P.Lakshmi Devi	17 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/133/2017	A.Hanumantha reddy, 47 years vs M.Adisesha reddy, 50 years	16 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/199/2016	R.S.Raj Gopal vs Radhika	16 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/161/2017	S.Alivelamma vs S.Madhu Babu	08 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/43/2014	Margadari Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. vs Talari Dhanalakshmi	08 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/266/2017	Thammineni Vasanatha naidu vs N.Chandra Sekhar	08 Aug 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/173/2016	M.A.Rangaiah vs A.B.Narayana	01 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/337/2015	Seelaka Varada Reddy vs C.Eswaraiah	01 Aug 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/972/2016	H.Lakshmakka @ Jenne Lakshmakka vs Greenko Group	26 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/110/2017	G.Ramalakshmamma, 42 years vs C.D.Nagaraju, 43 yars	25 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/638/2016	Thammineni Vasanthanaidu vs M.Shaikshavali	25 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/2/2017	Guvvala Pullanna vs J.Siva Reddy	24 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/207/2016	A.Mahesh Babu vs S.Anjaneyaprasad	24 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/223/2017	Mantri Anuradha vs K.Laksjmakka	24 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/228/2017	C.V.naidu vs N.Thippaiah	24 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/261/2017	V.Jaya Lakshmi vs Vs	24 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/386/2017	P.Prakash Naik vs Y.Sudhakar	19 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/481/2013	B. Cehennamaiah vs Dr. M.Veerabhadraiah	19 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/143/2017	S.Alivelamma vs E.Gopal	18 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/760/2016	R.Eswara Reddy vs V.Subbarayudu Achari	18 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/99/2017	S.Ramaiah vs T.Khaja Hussain	08 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/265/2015	Y.Venkata Rao vs A.Suryanarayana Gowd	08 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/315/2011	S.Mahaboob Bee vs N.Masoodvali	08 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/322/2017	Kummara Ramesh vs Kummara Venkatalakshmi	08 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/273/2017	Thammineni Vasanathanaidu vs J.Sateesh Kumar	05 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/192/2016	N.Basheer Begum vs S.Baba Jan	04 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/81/2017	M/s. Kapil Chits Hyd. Pvt. Ltd. Ananthapuramu. vs Karuru Baba Fakruddin	03 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/303/2017	Kasula Chandra Sekhar vs Kasula Sreenivasulu	03 Jul 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
OS/770/2016	Harijana Linganna vs Chinna Kullayappa	03 Jul 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/103/2016	Haldi Inayathullah vs Ayesha @ Mubeen @ Mubeena Taj	30 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/521/2012	M. Suryanarayana Reddy vs Vscomissioner	30 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/669/2010	K.Venkataramanamma vs H.Narayana	30 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/191/2014	Kapil Chits Fund Pvt Limited Anantapur Rep By Its vs K.Raghunatha Reddy	27 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/664/2010	K.NARAYANASWAMY vs V.Dharmendra REddy	22 Jun 2017	Copy of Judgment	—
EP/157/2017	Chalapathi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. vs Goothy Konda Sreeramulu	19 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/71/2017	B.R.Venkatesulu vs B.Nagarathnamma	16 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/10/2017	Ms. Kapil Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. vs Rageeri lakshmi Narasamma	14 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/28/2016	Buchireddygari Venkatarami Reddy vs B.Muthyalappa	12 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/119/2017	S.Ramayya vs K.Mallikarjuna Gowd	12 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/150/2016	Sree Sakthi Swarup Chits Pvt Ltd. vs K.Shaikshavali	12 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/226/2016	Ms. Margadarsi Chit fund Ltd. vs V.Nagalingam	08 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
OS/225/2016	N.Sirajud Dowla vs S.Baba Jan	08 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/202/2016	Ms. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. vs E.Satya Narayana	06 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/233/2016	S.Khaja Hussain vs K.Veera Narayana	06 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/303/2016	Morusu Lakshmi Reddy vs N.Sreerama Reddy	06 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/304/2016	M.Lakshmi Reddy vs N.Sreerama Reddy	06 Jun 2017	Copy of Order	—
EP/106/2016	Y.S.Guruprasad vs C.C.Obulesu	03 May 2017	Copy of Order	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Sep 2017		32
Aug 2017		26
Jul 2017		21
Jun 2017		18
May 2017		1

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP handled?

VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP has handled 98 court orders since 2017 at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District). The average disposal rate is 20 orders per month.

What types of cases does VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP hear?

Based on available records, VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Where is VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP currently posted?

VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP is posted as Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP dispose cases?

VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP disposes approximately 20 cases per month, based on 98 orders handled over their tenure at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District).

Since when is VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP serving?

VACANT FAC A.Geetha Vani, AJCJ ATP has been serving at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District) since 2017.

Case Types

OS 62%

EP 37%

RCC 1%

Posting History

May 2017 — Sep 2017

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class · 98 orders

Outcomes on Record

Dismissed Disposal Date:22-09-2017 1

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. E Bhima Rao

Principal District and Sessions Judge

1,187 orders

Smt. C. Satya Vani

I Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Sri D. Ramulu IIADJ

II Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Smt N Satyasri

III Addl. District Judge

0 orders

B.babu Naik

IV Addl. District Judge

3 orders

T.kesava

SC/ST Court Cum Addl. District Judge

19 orders

Sri G Sridevi

Chairman Cum Labor Court, Anantapur

185 orders

Sri C.N.Murthy

VII ADJ - Cum - Judge Family Court

0 orders

Smt A Padma

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

635 orders

G.shiva Prasad Yadav

Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur

833 orders

Sri K Bala Koteswara Rao

Principal Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistra...

1,158 orders

Smt. Harika Ravuri

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge Cum I Addl. Judl. Magist...

704 orders

D. Pavani

Spl.JFCM Mobile for trial of cases under PCR Act C...

41 orders

← View all judges at Prl. District & Sessions Court, ANANTHAPURAMU (District)