Legal Q&A Property Law Selling my allotted share in family property without ph...

Selling my allotted share in family property without physical possession – Brother refusing to vacate

Property Law Asked by Ramesh Kumar from Sambhal 🕐 3 weeks ago 👁 62 views
I am a Hindu based in Sambhal, UP. My father passed away intestate in 2013, leaving behind a residential-cum-commercial property. Initially, we had an unregistered family settlement in 2018, which later faced disputes. This was eventually resolved through a Court Compromise Decree in 2023, where the court finalized the division of the property. Based on this decree, my name is already in the Nagarpalika revenue records, and I am paying house and water taxes for my specific share. However, due to family wishes at the time, we never physically partitioned the property (no separate walls or entrances were built). We remained in joint possession for "love and affection." I have been living in another city for work, and my younger brother has been staying on the portion that was legally allotted to me. Now that I have retired and am facing health issues, I want to sell my share and move to Pune to live with my son. My brother is refusing to vacate my portion. I have a buyer ready to purchase my share on an "as is where is" basis—meaning the buyer will handle the legal process of taking possession after the sale. I need clarification on the following: Can I legally execute a registered sale deed for my share without the consent of my brother or other family members? Will the sale deed be valid if I do not hand over physical possession at the time of registration? Since the property was already divided by a court decree, is my share still considered "undivided"? Is my brother still a "co-owner" just because he is occupying my portion? My brother claims he has a "preferential right" to buy my share, but he is offering a very low price in installments. Am I legally bound to sell to him at his price, or can I sell to the outside buyer who is offering a fair market rate?
📤 Share question
1 Answer
✅ Best Answer — Marked by the asker
🏛
Team Legistro Official
🏛 Legal Information Team · Legistro.com
3 weeks ago
This is a common predicament where legal ownership and physical possession are at odds. Since you already have a Court Compromise Decree, your legal position is significantly stronger than a typical "undivided family" dispute. Here is the legal breakdown of your situation: 1. Right to Sell Without Consent Yes, you can legally sell your share. Since the 2023 Court Decree has already identified your share and mutated your name in the revenue records, you are the absolute owner of that portion. Under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, a co-owner (or in your case, an owner of an allotted share) can transfer their interest without seeking permission from others. You do not need your brother's consent to register the sale deed. 2. Validity of "As Is Where Is" Sales A sale of immovable property is legally completed under Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act once the sale deed is registered and consideration is paid. Physical possession is not a mandatory prerequisite for a valid sale. You can explicitly mention in the deed that the property is being sold on an "as is where is" basis and that the buyer is responsible for seeking physical possession. This does not make the sale "conditional." It simply transfers your legal "Right to Possession" to the buyer. The buyer can then use the 2023 Decree to file an Execution Petition or a Suit for Possession against your brother. 3. Ownership vs. Occupation Because of the Court Decree, your share is legally divided but physically unpartitioned. Your brother is not a co-owner of your share; he is technically a "Licensee" (someone staying with permission) or an "Occupant in Possession." However, until a physical wall is built (partition by metes and bounds), the law treats the possession as joint. This is why the buyer must be made aware that they are buying the legal title and will need to handle the physical separation later. 4. The "Preferential Right" (Pre-emption) Under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, Class I heirs (siblings) do have a preferential right to acquire property if one heir intends to sell. However, this is not an absolute right to force a low price. The Market Value Rule: Your brother's right only exists if he is willing to match the fair market price offered by the outsider. He cannot force you to accept a lower price or installments. Recommendation: To protect yourself from future litigation, send your brother a Formal Legal Notice via Registered Post. State the price the outside buyer is offering and give your brother a specific timeframe (e.g., 15 days) to match that exact price in full. If he fails to do so, his preferential right is legally exhausted, and you are free to sell to the outsider. Final Advice: Ensure your Sale Deed drafted very carefully. It should clearly reference the 2023 Compromise Decree and the fact that the buyer is accepting the property without current physical possession. This prevents the buyer from later claiming you "concealed" the fact that your brother was living there. Once the deed is registered, the buyer legally "steps into your shoes" and can evict your brother through the court.
⚖️ This is general legal information, not legal advice for your specific situation. For personalised advice, consult an advocate directly.

Are you a verified advocate? Answer this question to get discovered by individuals seeking assistance.

Login to Answer
✍️ Ask Your Own Question