Share Q.60:
Q.60
Constitutional Law Medium Knowledge-Based

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India has pointed out that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity ?

A Sahni Silk Mills (P) Ltd. v. Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, (1994) 5 SCC 346
B In Re: Delhi Laws Act, AIR 1951 SC 332 44
J. Mohapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa, (1984) 4 SCC 103 Answer
D Union of India v. G. Ganayutham, (1997) 7 SCC 463
📋

Explanation & Strategy

Click any section to expand · only one open at a time

In J. Mohapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa (1984), the Supreme Court examined the principle of nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be judge in their own cause) — the rule against bias in administrative and judicial proceedings. The case highlighted that even a reasonable suspicion of bias is sufficient to vitiate proceedings.

At a Glance
Subject Constitutional Law
Difficulty Medium
Answer (C) Knowledge-Based
Paper AIBE XX — November 2025
Progress in Paper
Q.60 100 questions

60% through paper

📚 Carry these bare acts to the exam: Set 1 on Amazon ↗  ·  Set 2 on Amazon ↗
You're on Legistro
AIBE Prep is just one part of Legistro
India's advocate directory, court records, and legal tools — all free
⚖️
Advocate Directory
Find verified advocates by city, court & practice area
🏛️
Judge & Court Records
5,848 judge profiles with order history & disposal rates
🧮
Court Fee Calculator
State-wise court fees for 25+ states — gazette verified
📋
Join as Advocate — Free
Case diary, cause list, client management & verified profile
Explore Legistro →