Smt.Girija Tirandasu

1 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair)

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-

XII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Present:Smt. GIRIJA TIRANDASU, I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally

WEDNESDAY, 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

CALENDAR CASE No.2920 of 2024

Between: The State through The Sub Inspector of Police, Kukatpally

...Complainant

A N D

Pule Srikanth S/o Chandraiah, Age 28 years, Occ: Labour, R/o Shanthi Nagar, Kukatpally N/o Thumpally Village of Jilledu Choudarigudem Mandal, Ranga Reddy District …Accused

This case is coming on 30-03-2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of learned Asst. Public Prosecutor for the State-complainant and G. V Suseela, Advocate, counsel for the accused, having been heard and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police Station filed a Charge Sheet in

Crime No.74/2023 against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code.

2.The brief facts of the case are that:-

On 19-01-2024 at 1500 hours received a complaint from Lw.1 in which he stated that on 12-01-2024 the LW.1 and her family members went to their hometown and they

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 2 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair) locked the house while leaving on 19-01-2024 the Lw.1 and their family members re- turned from their hometown and noticed that their locks were broken and found 1. One pair of Gold Ear rings (2 grms), 2. Laptops (2) 3. Silver chain (2), approx 2 tulas, 4. Sil- ver leg Anklets (one pair), approx 4 tulas, 5. one Camera were missing from cupboard.

Hence, the report. Basing on the contents of the above complaint LW.7 registered a case in Cr. No.74/2024, U/Sec.457, 380 of Indian Penal Code and entrusted the investigation to LW.8. After completion of investigation LW.8 filed charge sheet.

3.This Court took the cognizance for offence punishable under Section 457, 380 of

Indian Penal Code against the accused. On appearance of the accused, copies of the case records furnished to him as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C. Accused examined under

Section 239 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable under Section 457, 380 of Indian Penal

Code, the substance of the accusation was read over to him in vernacular language, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

4.During the trial, the prosecution has examined PWs.1 to 4 and got marked Ex.P1 to P6. The evidence of LW.2 to 4 and 7 given up by the learned APPO. After closure of prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under section 313 of Criminal

Procedure Code, and incriminating evidence is read over and explained to him, having understood the same, he denied the incriminating evidence and reported no defence evidence on his behalf.

5.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 3 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair)

6.The point for consideration is:-

“Whether the prosecution could prove the guilt of the accused for the

offence punishable under Section 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code?”

POINT:

7. Pw.1 who is the defacto complainant of this case deposed that he is the resident of Sangeethnagar, he went to his village on the occasion of Sankranthi festival along with his wife by locking the door of his house. When he returned from his village he have seen the lock of his house was broke open and also he have noticed in his house that all the articles are helter and shelter condition and also found missing of two

Laptops, one Camera, Two silver ankles, Silver Chain, one pair of Gold ear rings. Later they approached the police and lodged the report. Ex.P1 is the Report. Police examined him and recorded his statement. Later he came to know that the police recovered all the items and he have obtained the same from the Hon’ble Court as interim custody. MO.1 one pair gold rings, MO.2 Two Laptops of Dell company, MO.3 Silver Chain, MO.4

Silver Anklets and MO.5 one Canon Camera. During his cross-examination he admitted that at the time of this incident he was not present in his house. He admitted that he have not seen that the accused committed the alleged offence. He admitted that he did not testify at what date he came to his house. He denied that, the accused is no way concerned with this case and he is deposing false.

8.PW.2 and 3 who are the panch witnesses for confession cum seizure panchanama turned hostile by deposing that they don’t know anything about this case. They went to

Kukatpally Police station, they obtained their signature on some papers. During their cross-examination they denied the suggestions given by learned APPO.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 4 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair)

9.PW.4 who is the Investigating Officer deposed that on 19-01-2024 at 15:00 hours

Lw7 received the report from Pw1. Basing on the same Lw7 register a case in Cr.

No.74/2024 U/Sec.457, 380 of IPC and entrusted to him. During the course of investigation, he examined and recorded detailed statement of Pw1. Later he visited the scene of offence and recorded the statement of Lw2 and secured the presence of two mediators Lw3 and 4 and also drawn rough sketch by way of CDF. On 20-01-2024 at about 10:00 hours while the crime team were doing vehicle checking at Bhagyangar,

Metro Station, Kukatpally meanwhile one person holding the one white cloth bag and proceeding towards Bhagyanagar, from Shanthinagar, Kukatpally by walk in suspicious manners, immediately the crime team apprehended him and questioned about his identity and checked in bag and found in one pair of Gold Ear rings, 2. Laptops (2), 3.

Silver chain (2), 4. Silver leg Anklets (one pair) and 5. One camera in bag, when asked about articles, he did not give proper answer. The Crime team brought him to PS and produced before him. On interrogation, he revealed his name and identify particulars and also confessed this case. In the mean while he summoned two mediators Pw2 and 3 and in the presence of them recorded the confession cum seizure panchanama of the accused person. In his confession he have voluntarily confessed to have committed this offence.

Basing upon the confession statement of accused, he seized 1. One pair of Gold Ear rings (2 grams), 2. Laptops (2), 3. Silver chain -2 (approx 2 tulas), 4. Silver leg Anklets (one pair) and 5. One Canon company camera from the possession of the accused in presence of the above mediators i.e., Pw2 and 3 and pasted panchs signed chits on it.

Then he effected arrest to accused by issuing notice U/sec.50, 50(A) Cr.P.C. after medical examination he was sent for Judicial remand on the same day. After completion of the investigation he have filed charge sheet before the Hon’ble Court. Ex.P4 is the

FIR. Ex.P5 is the Scene of offence panchanama along with rough sketch and Ex.P6 is

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 5 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair) the confession cum seizure panchanama. During his cross-examination he denied all the suggestions given to him by defence counsel.

Conclusion:

10.The case of the prosecution is that on 18.01.2024 at midnight 0100 hours the accused entered into the house of Pw.1 and opened the cupboard and committed the theft of 1) One pair of Gold Ear rings, 2) Laptops (2), 3) Silver chain -2, 4) Silver leg Anklets (one pair) and 5) One camera and fled away from the spot. Pw.1 who is the defacto complainant narrated the version of prosecution in vivid manner with regard to the theft of above five articles, but, however on perusal of Ex.P1 he mentioned that some unknown persons committed the theft by break opening the locks of his house during night hours in their absence and also deposed that admittedly he have not seen who committed the theft. Hence, it can be said that there is no eye witness to the case of the prosecution.

11.In these type of cases, the evidence of Investigating Officer who conducted the confession and seizure panchanama of the accused and the evidences of panch witnesses who were said to have present at the said panchanama plays a vital role to the case of the prosecution. Pw.4 who is the Investigating Officer categorically reveals that, the accused was apprehended by crime team and brought him to Police Station and produced before him, on his interrogation the accused confessed about the commission of the offence, hence, he secured the presence of PW.2 and 3 and conducted confession cum seizure panchanama of the accused, wherein the accused voluntarily confessed to have commit this offence and basing on his confession statement Pw.4 seized the above articles from his possession which were marked as MO1 to 5 through Pw.1. However, both panchas

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 6 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair) were examined before this Court as Pw.2 and 3 who turned hostile by deposing that they do not know anything about this case and police obtained some signatures when they went to the Police Station, Kukatpally. Hence, it can be said that there is no corroboration with the evidence of PW.4 with respect to the conducting of confession cum seizure panchanama of the accused. Accordingly, prosecution failed to prove the seizure of MO.s1 to 5 from the possession of accused.

12.Considering the above stated facts and circumstances, there is no evidence on record to connect the accused with the offence alleged against him U/Sec.457, 380 of

Indian Penal Code. In the absence of such evidence by the Prosecution, it is not possible to hold that the accused committed the alleged offence and consequently, it may held that the accused entitled to be acquitted. Point is accordingly answered in favor of the accused and against the prosecution.

13.In the result, the accused found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.457, 380 of Indian Penal Code, and he has been acquitted of the said offence U/Sec.248 (1) of

Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months as contemplated U/Sec.437-A of Cr.P.C. The case property MO1 to 5 which has been given to PW.1/Defacto Complainant as interim custody vide Crl.M.P No.183 of 2024 shall made absolute, after expiry of appeal period.

Typed to my dictation by stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 15 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 7 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair)

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE

PW1: G Rambabu-NIL- PW2: V Raju PW3: K Kumar PW4: T Indrasena Reddy (I.O)

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: Ex.P1 is the Report

Ex.P2 is the signature of PW.2 on confession cum seizure panchanama

Ex.P3 is the signature of PW.3 on confession cum seizure panchanama

Ex.P4 is the First Information Report

Ex.P5 is the Scene of offence panchanama along with rough sketch

Ex.P6 is the confession cum seizure panchanama

FOR THE DEFENCE:

-NIL-

Material Objects

MO.1 is the one pair gold rings

MO.2 is the Two Laptops of Dell company

MO.3 is the Silver Chain

MO.4 is the Silver Anklets

MO.5 is the one Canon Camera

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally 8 C.C No.2920 of 2024 (Fair)

FORM No.73

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-

XII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Judgment in Calendar Case No.2920 of 2024 1 Name of Complainant:: The State through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kukatpally 2 Name of Accused :: Pule Srikanth S/o Chandraiah 3 Nature of Offence:: Sec.457, 380 of Indian Penal Code 4 Finding:: Found not guilty 5 Sentence :: Acquitted 6 Date of Occurrence of offence:: 18-01-2024 7 Date of Complaint:: 19-01-2024 8 Date of 239 of Cr.P.C served on Accused :: 17-12-2025 9Date of Commencement of trial:: 06-01-2026 10 Date of Closure of trial:: 23-03-2026 11 Date of Sentence or Order:: 15-04-2026 12 Explanation of delay:: ---

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, M.M District, Kukatpally

1 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-XII

ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Present:Smt. GIRIJA TIRANDASU, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally MONDAY, 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

Original Suit No.1748 of 2022

BETWEEN:

Smt. R.V.D Nageswari Rettiganti W/o B. Shyam Kumar, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.4-35-163/A, Madhavaram Nagar Colony, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District …Plaintiff

And

1. All concerned

2. Executive Engineer (Housing) Western Division, Telangana Housing Board, 4th Floor, T.H.B Commercial Complex, Opp. Shiva Parvathi Theater, Main Road, Kukatpally, Medchal Malkajgiri District Earlier known as Executive Engineer (Housing) Western Division, AP Housing Board

3. Sub Registrar, Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District

…Defendants

The suit coming before me on 17-02-2026 for final hearing and for disposal in the presence of M/s D Vijaya Kumar, V Chandrasekar, Advocates, Counsels for the Plaintiffs and T. Satyanarayana Advocate for the defendant No.2 and Defendant No.1 and 3 remained set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This suit filed by the Plaintiff herein seeking to declare her as Legal heir of Late

Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar.

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally 2 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022

2.The averments of the plaint in brief are that, the Plaintiff is the Wife of Late

Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar who died on 25-06-2022 and they are not having any children.

The parents of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar were pre-deceased in the year 1983 and 2017, thus the plaintiff is sole legal heir of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar. During the lifetime of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar, he acquired the Flat Br.No.211, Block No.B8, phase IV, Venture-II, KPHB colony from O/o Executive Engineer (Housing), Western

Division, AP Housing Board, Kukatpally, the Executive Engineer (Housing) handed over the physical possession of the Suit Schedule A property to the Late Bhamidipati Shyam

Kumar on 15-11-2016 but due to technical reason he has not registered the same, since then the plaintiff is in possession without any interruption and he also purchased open plot by depositing the title deeds before IDBI Bank, open plot Br.No.227 admeasuring 267 sq. yards situated at Sy.No.24 (P) and 32 (P) “Suprabath Heights” at Bhongir Town and Mandal,

Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District under Registered Sale Deed dated 30-11-2021 document

Br.No.13020 of 2021 from M/s Dhruva Sai Infrastructure Private Limited registered and 2 others at SRO Bhongir. Till the death of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar he is in possession over the schedule property there after the plaintiff is in possession without any interruption.

3.After his death, she approached the Defendant No.2 on 01-10-2022, to execute registered Sale Deed in her favour, for which defendant No.2 insisted her to produce Legal

Heir Certificate from competent Court. Plaintiff is not having any job as she is only housewife and have no other source of income for her maintenance, she entered into an

Agreement of Sale with the third party/family friend namely Gaffar, on 01-10-2022 both approached the IDBI Bank to get back original documents, but they refused to return and directed her to produce legal heir certificate. On 06-10-2022 both went to SRO, Bhongir to execute Sale Deed, but the SRO refused to register the same, since the property is in the

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally 3 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022 name of deceased and that she is not competent to execute the Sale Deed, they also directed plaintiff to produce the Legal Heir Certificate. Therefore, the plaintiff have approached this

Hon’ble Court to obtain Legal Heir Certificate stating that the plaintiff is the only legal heir

of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar. Hence, this suit.

4.Summons were duly served on defendants No.1 to 3 and the defendant no.1 is set exparte. The right to file Written statement for Defendant No.3 as well as right to file

Defence evidence is forfeited. The defendant No.2 filed his Written Statement by denying all the averments of the plaint. It is contended by the defendant No.2 that the plaintiff never submitted the original Will and Legal Heir Certificate and Original Nomination Form in

Form-10 issued by the Original allottee to the defendant No.2. The plaintiff has to submit

Legal Heir Certificate for taking necessary action.

5. On the above pleadings and material available on record, the following issues were framed.

i) Whether the plaintiff entitled to be declared as legal heir of the deceased Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar?

ii) To what relief?

6.During the trial, the plaintiff examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A9 and

Ex.B1. PW.1 filed her affidavit-in-chief which is nothing but repetition of the entire contents of the plaint. According to PW1, she is only the legal heir of late Bhamidipati

Shyam Kumar, since the deceased and herself does not have issues and the parents of the deceased who were predeceased to him. During lifetime of late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar had acquired Schedule A and B Properties. During her cross examination by Learned counsel for defendant, Pw1 testified that she have no issues during her marital life with the deceased and her husband had not executed Will Deed. She have been residing in the

A Schedule Property. The learned counsel for defendant confronted marriage photograph

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally 4 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022 to PW.1 who admitted it as the same pertains to their marriage and the same marked as

Ex.B1.

7.The defendant No.2 did not choose to file his defence evidence, as such his defence evidence is closed.

8.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and learned counsel for the Defendant

No.2. I have carefully gone through the material documents marked as Ex.A1 to Ex.A9,

Ex.B1.

9.Now the point for consideration is “Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for the relief of declaration of Legal Heir of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar”?

10.The contention of the learned counsel for the Plaintiff is that, the plaintiff is the

Legal Heir of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar, during his life time he acquired A & B

Schedule Properties, due to technical reasons A Schedule Property was not registered on deceased name, but, he had been in continuous possession without any interruption and after his death the plaintiff has been in possession of the same, as such prayed to declare her as the Legal Heir of late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar by succeeding his estate.

However, on perusal of documents submitted by the plaintiff i.e., Ex.P4 and P6 which categorically discloses the plaintiff is wife of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar and during cross examination of Pw.1 the defence counsel himself confronted the marriage photograph of PW.1, who admitted the same pertains to their marriage, which is marked as

Ex.B1. Hence the plaintiff successfully proved her relation with the deceased. Therefore, to the extent of declaration of status of plaintiff in respect of deceased person she is entitled to be declare as the legal heir of late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar basing on the documentary evidence submitted by her which is undisputed. Further, Ex.A2 and A3 categorically reveals that A Schedule Property handed over to the deceased and that he

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally 5 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022 had been in the possession of the same. It is also evident from the contents of the plaint that, A schedule property was not registered on the name of late Bhamidipati Shyam

Kumar due to technical reasons. Hence, the question of succeeding property of the deceased is concerned the title in respect of the A Schedule Property through which the deceased is said to have acquired is not submitted. Further, as on the date of death of deceased there is no transfer of title in respect of A Schedule Property in favour of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to succeed the property which is said to have handed over to the deceased. In so far as the B Schedule Property is concerned, as per the recital of document i.e., Ex.A1 categorically reveals that the Schedule B Property registered in faovur of deceased namely Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar vide Sale Deed Doc.

No.13020/2021, dated 30-11-2021 and that the possession of the same delivered to the deceased and after his death the plaintiff has been in possession of the same, as such the plaintiff is entitled to succeed the B Schedule Property.

11.So, considering the discussion made above, the plaintiff is entitled to declare as the Legal Heir of late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar to succeed in respect of Schedule B

Property, the rest of the claim in respect of Schedule A Property is dismissed. Therefore, the suit is allowed partly.

12.In the result, the suit is decreed partly with no costs. The plaintiff is declared as the Legal Heir of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar to succeed in respect of B Schedule

Property.

Typed to my dictation by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 20 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally 6 of 6 OS No. 1748 /2022

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

PW1 – RVD Nageswari Rettiganti

FOR DEFENDANTS: - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

1.Ex.A1 the Certified Copy of Sale Deed Dt:30-11-2021

2.Ex.A2 the Original Handing over letter dated 15-11-2016 issued by Executive Engineer (Housing) APHB, Kukatpally

3.Ex.A3 is the Original Handing over letter dated 16-11-2022 issued by Executive Engineer (Housing) TSB, Kukatpally

4.Ex.A4 is the Original Death Certificate of Late Sri Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar issued by GHMC dated 08-07-2022

5.Ex.A5 is the Original Encumbrance Certificate dated 20-10-2022

6.Ex.A6 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff

7.Ex.A7 is the Original Aadhar Card of Late Sri Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar

8.Ex.A8 is the Original Market Value Certificate issued by SRO, Kukatpally dated 04-10-2022

9.Ex.A9 is the Original Market Value Certificate issued by SRO, Bhongir dated 07- 10-2022

FOR DEFENDANTS: Ex.B1 marriage photograph

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District, at Kukatpally

1 C.C No.8595 of 2022 (fair)

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-

XII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Present:Smt. GIRIJA TIRANDASU, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally. MONDAY, 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

CALENDAR CASE No.8595 of 2022

Between: The State through The Sub Inspector of Police, Kukatpally …Complainant

A N D

BM Sudarshan S/o Late B. Narayana, Age 64 years, Occ: Lawyer, R/o Flat No.201, Sai Srinivasa Enclave, AS Raju Nagar, Kukatpally …Accused

This case is coming on 17-04-2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of learned Asst. Public Prosecutor for the State-complainant and K.S Sarma, counsel for the accused, having been heard and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police Station filed a Charge Sheet in Crime

No.627/2020 against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 338 of Indian Penal

Code.

2. The brief facts of the case are that:-

On 21-08-2020 at about 1930 hours received a complaint from complainant daughter/ injured person by name Patnala Meri Rathnakumari in which she stated that, on 21-08-2020 at about 1930 hours went outside from home on her two wheeler B.No.TS 08 HB 5826 to go to metro shopping mall, in the meantime while she is crossing the Y Junction, Kukatpally sud-

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, Kukatpally 2 C.C No.8595 of 2022 (fair) denly one Car Br.No.AP 28 CL 5260 rider who drove his car in a rash and negligent manner and hit to victim vehicle B.No.TS 08 HB 5826, from backside, then injured person fell down on the road, by which she had injuries on her right shoulder and other places and her scooty also got damaged, then injured made a call to the complainant explained the entire episode to her, knowing of which information complainant rushed to the scene and shifted the injured to the Soujanya Hospital, IDPL for treatment, at that time accused rider of the vehicle made a promise to the injured that he will bear all expenditures towards her treatment and then after he ran away from there, as the complainant is the only one to lookafter the injured she is unable to come forward to PS at that time, now complainant came to P.S and requested to take necessary action. Basing on the contents of the above complaint LW.6 registered a case in Cr.

No.627/2020 U/Sec.337 of Indian Penal Code and entrusted the investigation to LW.7. The in- juries received by LW.2 are grievous in nature, therefore section was altered from 337 IPC to 338 IPC. After completion of investigation LW.7 filed charge sheet.

3.This Court took the cognizance for offence punishable under Section 338 of Indian

Penal Code against the accused. On appearance of the accused, copies of the case records were furnished to him as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C. Accused was examined under Section 251 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable under Section 338 of Indian Penal Code, the substance of the accusation was read over to him in vernacular language, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

4.During the trial, the prosecution has examined Pw1 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P5.

The evidence of LW.1 and 2 closed on the basis of report filed by the concerned Police stating whereabouts of them not known. The evidence of LW.3 to 7 given up by learned APPO. After

Closure of prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under section 313 of Criminal

Procedure Code, and incriminating evidence is read over and explained to him, having understood the same, he denied the incriminating evidence and reported no defence evidence

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, Kukatpally 3 C.C No.8595 of 2022 (fair) on his behalf.

5.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

6. The point for consideration is:-

“Whether the prosecution could prove the guilt of the accused for the offence

punishable under section 338 of Indian Penal Code ?”

POINT:

7.The case of the prosecution is that, on 21-08-2020, when the LW.2 was crossing the

Y Junction, Kukatpally on her two wheeler B.No.TS 08 HB 5826, the accused drove his car

Br.No.AP 28 CL 5260 in a rash or negligent manner and hit the victim from backside, due to which Lw.2 fell down on the road and sustained injuries on her right shoulder and other places and her scooty also got damaged. The evidences of LW.1 / defacto complainant who set the law into motion and LW.2/injured were closed on the basis of report filed by the concerned

Station House Officer stating whereabouts of them not know. The evidences of Lw.3 to 7 given up by the prosecution. No steps have been taken by the prosecution to recall the evidences of LW.1 and 2. Therefore, the prosecution has relied on the evidence of LW.8 who is

Investigating Officer examined as PW.1, deposed the line of investigation done by him and during cross examination he denied all the suggestions given to him by the defence counsel. Hence, there is no evidence on record to prove that the accused is the driver of the crime vehicle at relevant point of time and he caused the injury to LW.2 due to rash or negligent driving.

8.In view of the above stated facts and circumstances, there is no evidence on record to connect the accused with the offence alleged against him U/Sec.338 of Indian Penal Code. In the absence of such evidence by the Prosecution, it is not possible to hold that the accused committed the alleged offence and consequently, it may held that the accused entitled to be acquitted. Point is accordingly answered in favor of the accused and against the prosecution.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, Kukatpally 4 C.C No.8595 of 2022 (fair)

9.In the result, the accused found not guilty for the offence punishable under Section 338 of Indian Penal Code and acquitted of the said offence under Section 255 (1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of accused shall be in force for a period of six months as contemplated U/Sec.437-A

Cr.P.C.

Typed to my dictation by stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 20 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE:

PW1: T. Shankar (I.O) -NIL-

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE:

Ex.P1 is the Report -NIL- Ex.P2 is the First Information Report Ex.P3 is the Scene of Offence Panchanama and rough sketch Ex.P4 is the Medical Certificate Ex.P5 is the Section alteration memo

Material Objects -NIL-

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, Kukatpally 5 C.C No.8595 of 2022 (fair)

FORM No.73

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-

XII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Judgment in Calendar Case No.8595 of 2022 1Name of Complainant:: The State through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kukatpally 2Name of Accused :: BM Sudarshan S/o Late B. Narayana 3Nature of Offence:: Sec.338 of Indian Penal Code 4Finding:: Found not guilty 5Sentence :: Acquitted 6Date of Occurrence of offence:: 21-08-2020 7Date of Complaint:: 23-08-2020 8Date of 251 of Cr.P.C served on Accused :: 02-12-2024 9Date of Commencement of trial:: 17-12-2024 10Date of Closure of trial:: 06-01-2026 11Date of Sentence or Order:: 20-04-2026 12Explanation of delay:: ---

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ – cum –XII AJMFC, Kukatpally

1 of 5 CC No.1788/2020 (fair)

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-XII

ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Present:Smt. GIRIJA TIRANDASU, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally. MONDAY, 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

CALENDAR CASE No.1788 of 2020

Between:

The State of Telangana, represented by Sub-Inspector of Police P.S Sanathnagar …Complainant

And

Shakti Swamy S/o Late Shakti Yellaiah, Age 54 years, Occ: Binding Machine Operator at Sharada Industries, Suchitra, R/o H.No.11-131,

Pardhi Basthi, Fathe Nagar, Balanagar, Cyberabad ...Accused

This case is coming on 17-04-2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of learned Asst. Public Prosecutor for the State-complainant and Md. Khaleel Pasha and Advocates, counsel for the accused, having been heard and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sanathnagar Police Station has filed a Charge Sheet in

Crime No.136/2020 against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 354, 506 of In- dian Penal Code.

2. The brief facts of the case are that:-

On 29-02-2020 at 1830 hours received a complaint from Lw.1 in which she stated that, on 28-02-2020 at 0300 hours while the LW.1 sleeping in her house in meantime her neighbor

Swamy illegally entered into her house and hold her hand and forced her to perform marriage with him, further he threatened her that he will kill her if she denies. Then she escaped from there. Earlier two time also he had done this way. Hence the complaint. Basing on the above

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District at Kukatpally 2 of 5 CC No.1788/2020 (fair) complaint, LW.7 registered a case in Crime No.136 of 2020 U/Sec.354, 506 of Indian Penal

Code and investigation entrusted to LW.8. After completion of investigation LW.8 filed charge sheet.

3.This Court took the cognizance for offence punishable under Section 354, 506, 509 of

Indian Penal Code against accused. On appearance of the accused, copies of the case records were furnished to him as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C. Accused examined under Section 239 Cr.P.C for the offence punishable under Section 354, 506, 509 of Indian Penal Code, the substance of the accusation was read over to him in vernacular language, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

4.During the trial, the prosecution has examined PWs.1 to 4 and got marked Ex.P1 to P4.

The evidence of LW.3, 4, 6 and 7 given up by the prosecution. After closure of prosecution evidence, the accused examined under section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, and incriminating evidence is read over and explained to him, having understood the same, he denied the incriminating evidence and reported no defence evidence on his behalf.

5.Heard both sides.

6.Now the point that arises for consideration herein is:

“Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused for the offence punishable under Section 354, 506, 509 of Indian Penal Code?”

POINT:

7.Pw1 who is the defacto complainant of this case, she herself destroyed the case of the prosecution by deposing that she compromised the case with accused and she do not know anything about this case and she did not lodge any report against the accused but on the instructions of elders she put her thumb impression on white paper. Police neither examined nor recorded her statement. Pw2 who is the circumstantial witness turned hostile by deposing that they compromised the case with accused and she do not know anything about this case and

PW.3 who is panch witness also turned hostile by deposing that he do not know anything about

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District at Kukatpally 3 of 5 CC No.1788/2020 (fair) this case, Police never conducted any panchanama in his presence but obtained his signature on some papers. During their cross-examination by the learned APPO nothing elicited to support the version of prosecution. Pw.4 who is the Investigation Officer of this case deposed the line of the investigation done by him and denied all the suggestions given to him.

8. On perusal of the entire evidence on record and facts and circumstances of the case, there is absolutely no legal evidence on record to connect the accused with the crime. In the absence of such evidence adduced by the prosecution, it is not possible to hold that the accused committed the alleged offence and consequently, it may be held that the accused is entitled to be acquitted. Accordingly, point is answered in favour of the accused and against the prosecution.

9.In the result, the accused found not guilty for the offence punishable under Section 354, 506, 509 of Indian Penal Code and acquitted of the said offence under Section 248 (1) Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of accused shall be in force for a period of six months as contemplated

U/Sec.437-A Cr.P.C.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 20 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District at Kukatpally 4 of 5 CC No.1788/2020 (fair)

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR THE PROSECUTION: FOR THE DEFENCE:

PW1:Lalitha - NIL -

PW2: Jayamma

PW3: K Ganesh

PW4: M Venkateshwarlu(I.O)

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR THE PROSECUTION:

Ex.P1 is the Signature of PW.3 on Scene of offence panchanama

Ex.P2 is the First Information Report

Ex.P3 is the Report

Ex.P4 is the Scene of offence panchanama

FOR THE DEFENCE:

NIL

Material Objects:

NIL

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District at Kukatpally 5 of 5 CC No.1788/2020 (fair)

FORM No.73

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-XII

ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MEDCHAL-

MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Judgment in Calendar Case No.1788 of 2020

1. Name of complainant ::The State through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Sanathnagar

2. Name of Accused ::Shakti Swamy S/o Late Shakti Yellaiah

3. Nature of Offence ::Sec. 354, 506, 509 Indian Penal Code

4. Finding::Found not guilty

5. Sentence ::Acquitted

6. Date of Occurrence of offence::28-02-2020

7. Date of Complaint::29-02-2020

8. Date of 239 of Cr.P.C served on ::21-04-2025 Accused

9. Date of Commencement of trial::02-05-2025

10. Date of Closure of trial::17-02-2026

11. Date of Sentence or Order::20-04-2026

12. Explanation of delay:: ---

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum- XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

I AJCJ–cum–XII A JMFC M.M District at Kukatpally

1 OF 3 O.S.No.1748 OF 2022

DECREE IN ORIGINAL SUIT

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM-

XII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT, AT KUKATPALLY

Present:Smt. GIRIJA TIRANDASU, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally. MONDAY, 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

Original Suit No.1748 of 2022

BETWEEN:

Smt. R.V.D Nageswari Rettiganti W/o B. Shyam Kumar, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.4-35-163/A, Madhavaram Nagar Colony, Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District …Plaintiff

And

1. All concerned

2. Executive Engineer (Housing) Western Division, Telangana Housing Board, 4th Floor, T.H.B Commercial Complex, Opp. Shiva Parvathi Theater, Main Road, Kukatpally, Medchal Malkajgiri District Earlier known as Executive Engineer (Housing) Western Division, AP Housing Board

3. Sub Registrar, Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District

…Defendants

Claim:This suit filed by the Plaintiff herein seeking to declare her as Legal heir of Late

Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar.

Cause of Action:The cause of action arose on 15-11-2016 and 30-11-2021 when the late

Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar purchased purchased the suit schedule properties, on 25-06-2022 when the Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar died, and finally when the authorities insisted to produce the legal heir certificate and on all other dates as mentioned in the plaint.

1 OF 3 O.S.No.1748 OF 2022

Suit Valuation:The suit is valued at Rs.10,92,350/- and court fee of Rs.15,952/- is paid under

Sec.24 (d) of TS Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, which is sufficient, and the same is valued for the purpose of Jurisdiction.

Suit Presented on: 25/11/2022

Suit Numbered on: 01/12/2022

This Suit came before me final hearing and for disposal in the presence of M/s D. Vijay Ku- mar, Advocates for the Plaintiff and T. Satyanarayana Advocate for the defendant No.2 and Defendant No.1 and 3 remained set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth ordered and decreed.

1) That the suit of the plaintiff be and the same is hereby decreed.

2) That The plaintiff is declared as the Legal Heir of Late Bhamidipati Shyam Kumar to succeed in respect of B Schedule Property.

3) That there shall be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this court on this the 20th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

COSTS OF SUIT

For PlaintiffsFor Defendants 1Stamp on PlaintRs.15,952-00Exparte 2Stamp on PowerRs. 2-00- 3Service of Process FeeRs. 75-00- 4Advocate FeeRs. -- 5Misc. ChargesRs. -- 6Publication ChargesRs. -- 7F.CRs. -- Rs.16,029-00Exparte

Sd/-

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.

1 OF 3 O.S.No.1748 OF 2022

SCHEDULE – B OF THE PROPERTY

All that part of property open plot bearing No. 227 admeasuring 267 sq yards or 223.12 sq mtr forming part of Sy. 24 (P) & 32 (P) situated at Suprabhat Heights, Bhongir Town and Mandal,

Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, and bounded as follows:

North:Plot No. 226

South:30’ Wide Road

East:Plot No. 220

West:30’ Wide Road

Sd/-

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- XII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally.