Sri M.Srinivasa Rao

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh

Sri M.Srinivasa Rao, III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION), is posted at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,141 court orders on record since 2021. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, CC, EP cases.

1,141

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/1517/2023

Bhemarasetty Murali Krishna vs Madabathula Swaroop @ Kumar

22 Apr 2024

//FAIR//

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1517/2023

Monday, this the 22nd day of April, 2024 Between :

Bhemarasetty Murali Krishna, S/o Govindha Rao, Hindu, aged 52 years, residing at D.No.49-32-16/17, Ramakrishna Nagar, Visakhapatnam,CellNo.8341890189,Aadhar No.951072274609. ...Plaintif And :

1. Madabathula Swaroop @ Kumar, S/o Narayana, East Coast Railway employee, Hindu, aged about 36 years, residing at D.No.16-887, G.V.M.C Layout, Arilova, Visakhapatnam and Office Address P.F.No.53107040270, Designation : A.C. Mechanic, Department: Electrical, C/o S.S.E/A.C Electrical General, East Coast Railway, New Coaching Complex, Subash Nagar,Kancharapalem,VisakhapatnamandCell No.9550085917 and Aadhar No.851260960388.

2. Kaparapu Bhunu Prakash, S/o Papa Rao, East Coast Railway Employee, Hindu, aged about 39 years, residing at Door No.36- 65-3, Reddy Kancharapalem, Jashuvanagar, Visakhapatnam and Office Address P.F.No.53107040088, Designation : Assistant (TL/AC), Department: Electrical C/o S.S.E/A.C Electrical General, East Coast Railway, New Coaching Complex, Subash Nagar, Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam and Cell No.9390948988 and Aadhar No.296442601451.

...Defendants

This suit is coming on 22-04-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri. P.Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for Plaintif and the Defendants No.1 and 2 are remained exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendants No.1 and 2 for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Ten Thousand only) with future interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the realization and for costs of the suit.

2.The brief facts of the plaint in brief are as follows :

The defendants No.1 and 2 approached the plaintif and jointly borrowed an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) from the plaintif on 13-12-2020 for the purpose of their family expenses and to discharge of sundry debts, after receiving the said consideration in cash, the defendants No.1 and 2 jointly executed a demand promissory note in favour of the plaintif at the residence of plaintif, and the defendants No.1 and 2 agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. to the plaintif or his order on demand, inspite of repeated demands and requests made by the plaintif personally and also through elders for repayment of the promissory note, but the defendants No.1 and 2 did not choose to repay principal or interest and kept postponing the same on some pretext or other. The defendants are not an agriculturists or arson as such they are not entitled to any of the debts benefit relief under Act 4 of 1938 and Act 7 of 1977. Hence, this suit.

3.Written statement of defendant No.1 not filed, statutory period of 90 days already expired, but the defendant No.1 called absent, no representation. Summons to defendant No.2 through Court served personally, but the defendant No.2 called absent, no representation. As such, the defendants No.1 and 2 are remained exparte.

4.To substantiate his claim, the plaintif examined himself as P.W.1 and Ex.A1 is marked.

5. Now, the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintif is entitled to suit claim as prayed for or not ?

6.POINT :

The plaintif to prove the suit transaction, examined himself as P.W.1, reiterated the contents of plaint in his examination-in-chief, and marked the original suit promissory note, Dt.13-12-2020, jointly executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintif. Thereafter, the plaintif orally demanded the defendants No.1 and 2, but the defendants No.1 and 2 did not choose to pay the amount.

7.As observed from the evidence available on record, the plaintif by examining himself as P.W.1 and marked Ex.A1 initially proved that the defendants No.1 and 2 jointly borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) from the plaintif on 13-12-2020 and jointly executed Ex.A1 in favour of plaintif, agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. Thereafter, the defendant did not make any payment towards discharge of the suit debt, inspite of repeated demands, the defendants

No.1 and 2 did not make any payment either towards the discharge of the principal or interest. Further, the defendants No.1 and 2 were remained exparte, hence, the version of the plaintif remained unchallenged, undisputed and uncontested. Thus, there is nothing before this court to disbelieve the version of the plaintif. Hence, the plaintif is entitled for decree as prayed.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintif and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Ten

Thousand only) with interest at 12 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till its realization on the principal sum of

Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only).

Dictated to Typist directly on system, corrected and pronounced by me in the open

Court, this the 22nd day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

No. of witnesses examined

For Plaintiff : For Defendants : Nil

P.W.1 : B.Murali Krishna (Plaintiff)

No. of Exhibits marked

For Plaintiff : For Defendants : Nil

Ex.A1 : Original Promissory note, Dt.13-12-2020.

III AJCJ/VSP

Date of Presentation : 27-11-2023 Date of Filing : 05-12-2023

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1517/2023

Monday, this the 22nd day of April, 2024 Between :

Bhemarasetty Murali Krishna, S/o Govindha Rao, Hindu, aged 52 years, residing at D.No.49-32-16/17, Ramakrishna Nagar, Visakhapatnam,CellNo.8341890189,Aadhar No.951072274609. ...Plaintif And :

...Defendants

This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendants No.1 and 2 for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Ten Thousand only) with future interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the realization and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.5,10,000/- and Court Fee of Rs.7,526/- is paid under section 20 r/w Article I (b & c) of schedule I of A.P. CF and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the defendants No.1 and 2 do pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.5,10,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Ten Thousand only) with interest at 12 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till its realization on the principal sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) and ;

2. that the defendants No.1 and 2 do also pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.16,164/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Four only) towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 22nd day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

For Plaintiff :For Defendants :

Vakalat: 2-00No Cost Memo is filed

Stamp on Plaint: 7,526-00

Stamp on Process: 136-00

Advocate Fee: 8,500-00 ---------------- Costs allowed: 16,164-00 ----------------

III AJCJ/VSP

OS/170/2024

KALSETTY VENKATA LAKSHMI vs MOOLA SUBHASHINI

12 Apr 2024

//FAIR//

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.170/2024

Friday, this the 12th day of April, 2024 Between :

Kalsetty Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Venkata Ramana, Hindu, aged 47 years, residing at D.No.44-37-13, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam-16,AadharNo.576677310525,Phone No.7036701142. ...Plaintif And :

Moola Subhashini, W/o late Suryarao, Hindu, aged 60 years, Railway employee, residing at D.B.K. 4/2 Out House Bunglow, Wireless Colony, Railway Quarters, Visakhapatnam-530004, Aadhar No.740328540257.

...Defendant

This suit is coming on 12-04-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri. S.S.Vasu, T.Devi Prasad, R.L.Madhusudhana Rao and V.Sreenivas, Advocates for Plaintif and the Defendant was remained exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendant for recovery of a sum of

Rs.5,42,400/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred only) with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. till the realization and for costs of the suit.

2.The brief facts of the plaint in brief are as follows :

The defendant approached the plaintif and borrowed an amount of

Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) from the plaintif on 28-08-2022 for the purpose of her family expenses and to discharge the sundry debts, after receipt of consideration, the defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of the plaintif in the presence of witnesses, and the defendant agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. to the plaintif or her order on demand, inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif for repayment of the promissory note, but the defendant did not failed to repay principal or interest and kept postponing the same on some pretext or other. The defendant is not an agriculturist nor rural artisan and she is not entitled for any of the benefits and reliefs under Act 4 of 1938 and Act 7 of 1977. Hence, this suit.

3.Summons to defendant through Court returned as refused, service of summons against defendant is held sufficient, but the defendant called absent, no representation. As such, the defendant is remained exparte.

4.To substantiate his claim, the plaintif examined himself as P.W.1 and Ex.A1 is marked.

5. Now, the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintif is entitled to suit claim as prayed for or not ?

6.POINT :

The plaintif to prove the suit transaction, examined herself as P.W.1, reiterated the contents of plaint in her examination-in-chief, and marked the original suit promissory note, Dt.28-08-2022, executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif. Thereafter, the plaintif orally demanded the defendant, but the defendant did not choose to pay the amount.

7.As observed from the evidence available on record, the plaintif by examining herself as P.W.1 and marked Ex.A1 initially proved that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) from the plaintif on 28-08-2022 and executed Ex.A1 in favour of plaintif, agreed to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. Thereafter, the defendant did not make any payment towards discharge of the suit debt, inspite of repeated demands, the defendant did not make any payment either towards the discharge of the principal or interest. Further, the defendant was remained exparte, hence, the version of the plaintif remained unchallenged, undisputed and uncontested. Thus, there is nothing before this court to disbelieve the version of the plaintif. Hence, the plaintif is entitled for decree as prayed.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintif and against the defendant for a sum of Rs.5,42,400/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred only) with interest at 12 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till its realization on the principal sum of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only)

Dictated to Typist directly on system, corrected and pronounced by me in the open

Court, this the 12th day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

No. of witnesses examined

For Plaintiff : For Defendant : Nil

P.W.1 : Kalsetty Venkata Lakshmi (Plaintiff)

No. of Exhibits marked

For Plaintiff : For Defendant : Nil

Ex.A1 : Original Promissory note, Dt.28-08-2022.

III AJCJ/VSP

Date of Presentation : 20-02-2024 Date of Filing : 20-02-2024

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.170/2024

Friday, this the 12th day of April, 2024 Between :

Kalsetty Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Venkata Ramana, Hindu, aged 47 years, residing at D.No.44-37-13, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam-16,AadharNo.576677310525,Phone No.7036701142. ...Plaintif And :

Moola Subhashini, W/o late Suryarao, Hindu, aged 60 years, Railway employee, residing at D.B.K. 4/2 Out House Bunglow, Wireless Colony, Railway Quarters, Visakhapatnam-530004, Aadhar No.740328540257.

...Defendant

This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendant for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,42,400/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred only) with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. till the realization and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.5,42,400/- and Court Fee of Rs.7,926/- is paid under section 20 r/w Article I (b & c) of schedule I of A.P. CF and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.5,42,400/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Forty Two Thousand and Four Hundred only) with interest at 12 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a. till its realization on the principal sum of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) and ;

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintif a sum of Rs.16,907/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Seven only) towards the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, this the 12th day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

For Plaintiff :For Defendant :

Vakalat: 2-00No Cost Memo is filed

Stamp on Plaint: 7,926-00

Stamp on Process: 90-00

Advocate Fee: 8,989-00 ---------------- Costs allowed: 16,907-00 ----------------

III AJCJ/VSP

OS/702/2023

CANARA BANK vs M/S HELLO MOBILES

22 Apr 2024

//FAIR//

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.702/2023

Monday, this the 22nd day of April, 2024

Between :

Canara Bank, a Nationalised Bank constituted and functioning under the provisions of Banking Companies (Acquisitioned and Transfer of undertaking) Act V of 1970 with its Head Office at 112, Jayachamarajendra Road, Bangalore-2, and a Branch among others at Dabagardens main road, D.No.30-15-414, Pavan Commercial complex, Visakhapatnam-530020, Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Chief Manager, Chouta Gangadhara Rao, S/o Vasantha Rao, Hindu, Male, aged 47 years, Authorized officer of Dabagardens Branch-2, Visakhapatnam 530020. ...Plaintif And :

1. M/s. Hello Mobiles, represented by its Proprietor Shaik Khaja Mohiddin, S/o Shaik Karimulla and doing its business at D.No.30-15-135,SriLakshmiNarasimhaComplex, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam-530020.

2. Shaik Khaja Mohiddin, S/o Shaik Karimulla, Muslim, Aged about 32 years and doing business at D.No.30-15-135, Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Complex, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam- 530020 and also residing at D.No.45-54-3/4, 4th floor, Venu Gopalam Apartment, AbidNagar, 3rd line, Near Abidnagar Park, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam-530016.

...Defendants

This suit is coming on 22-04-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri J.Vinay Kumar, Advocate for Plaintif and the suit against defendant No.1 is dismissed and the defendant No.2 was remained exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration and this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is the suit filed by the plaintif against the defendants for a recovery of a sum of Rs.2,01,920.45/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty and Forty Five paise only) with interest at the rate of 10.01% with monthly rests on the suit amount from the date of of suit till the date of realization and to pass an order against the defendants to pay the debt as mentioned in default to pass an order directing the sale of schedule property i.e., movables for the realization amount due to the plaintif and draw a certificate for the same and for costs of the suit.

2.The plaintif called absent, no representation, inspite of repeated conditions on costs and costs not paid, and the plaintif failed to file exparte evidence. It seems that the plaintif has no interest to proceed with the suit.

3.In the result, the suit is dismissed for default without costs.

Dictated to Typist and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 22nd day of

April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

No oral or documentary evidence adduced.

III AJCJ/VSP

Date of Presentation : 11-05-2022Date of Filing : 19-05-2022

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.702/2023

Monday, this the 22nd day of April, 2024

Between :

1. M/s. Hello Mobiles, represented by its Proprietor Shaik Khaja Mohiddin, S/o Shaik Karimulla and doing its business at D.No.30-15-135,SriLakshmiNarasimhaComplex, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam-530020.

...Defendants

This is the suit filed by the plaintif against the defendants for a recovery of a sum of Rs.2,01,920.45/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty and Forty Five paise only) with interest at the rate of 10.01% with monthly rests on the suit amount from the date of of suit till the date of realization and to pass an order against the defendants to pay the debt as mentioned in default to pass an order directing the sale of schedule property i.e., movables for the realization amount due to the plaintif and draw a certificate for the same and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.2,01,920.45/- and a court fee of Rs.4,626/- is paid under section 20 Schedule I Article 1 (b & c) of AP Court Fee and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and same is hereby dismissed for default and ;

2. that there no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 22nd day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

NIL

III AJCJ/VSP.

OS/1459/2023

BANK OF BARODA vs M/S XPRESS TRAVELS

29 Apr 2024

//FAIR//

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1459/2023

Monday, this the 29th day of April, 2024

Between :

BANK OF BARODA is a Body Corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970 having its Head Office at Baroda Bhavan, RC Dutt Road, Alkapuri, Vadodara-390007, Gujajrat and represented through its branch office, and having one among other Branches as Dwarakanagar Branch, opposite to Budhil Park, situated at Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam consequent on the merger of Vijaya Bank the Plaintiff Bank is filing this Suit represented by its, Chief Manager and Authorized Signatory Mr. Rajeshwar Manoj Sinha S/o Awadhesh Sinha Hindu aged 45 years.

...Plaintiff

And :

1.M/s Xpress Travels, represented by its Proprietor, Chikkam Sandeep, S/o Ch.Uday Bhaskara Rao, LIG-15, Phase-1, Madhavadhara, Vuda Colony, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam- 530018.

2. Yarlagadda Ravini, W/o Ch. Uday Bhaskara Rao, LIG-15, Phase-1, Madhavadhara, Vuda Layout, Visakhapatnam-530018.

3. Yarlagadda Raja Kumari, W/o J.Venkata Prabhakar, Door No.39-33-45, Phase-1, LIG-15, Madhavadhara Vuda Colony, near R & B Office, Visakhapatnam 530018.

...Defendants

This suit is coming on 29-04-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. Sunkara(M) Padmaja and Sri. N.Tarakeswara Rao, Advocates for Plaintiff and the matter having stood over for consideration and this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is the suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for a recovery of a sum of Rs.7,31,587.29/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Seven and Twenty Nine paise only) together with subsequent interest at 18% from the date of the suit till the date of realization and for costs of the suit.

2.The counsel for the plaintiff filed a FS memo stating that the plaintiff received an amount of Rs.7,55,672/- towards full and final satisfaction of the suit amount and prays to record the same. Full Satisfaction is recorded.

3.In the result, the suit is dismissed as settled out of the Court without costs.

Dictated to Typist and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 29th day of April,

2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

No oral or documentary evidence adduced.

III AJCJ/VSP

Date of Presentation : 15-11-2023Date of Filing : 21-11-2023

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1459/2023

Monday, this the 29th day of April, 2024

Between :

BANK OF BARODA is a Body Corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970 having its Head Office at Baroda Bhavan, RC Dutt Road, Alkapuri, Vadodara-390007, Gujarat and represented through its branch office, and having one among other Branches as Dwarakanagar Branch, opposite to Budhil Park, situated at Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam consequent on the merger of Vijaya Bank the Plaintiff Bank is filing this Suit represented by its, Chief Manager and Authorized Signatory Mr. Rajeshwar Manoj Sinha S/o Awadhesh Sinha Hindu aged 45 years.

...Plaintiff

And :

1.M/s Xpress Travels, represented by its Proprietor, Chikkam Sandeep, S/o Ch.Uday Bhaskara Rao, LIG-15, Phase-1, Madhavadhara, Vuda Colony, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam- 530018.

2. Yarlagadda Ravini, W/o Ch. Uday Bhaskara Rao, LIG-15, Phase-1, Madhavadhara, Vuda Layout, Visakhapatnam-530018.

3. Yarlagadda Raja Kumari, W/o J.Venkata Prabhakar, Door No.39-33-45, Phase-1, LIG-15, Madhavadhara Vuda Colony, near R & B Office, Visakhapatnam 530018.

...Defendants

This is the suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for a recovery of a sum of Rs.7,31,587.29/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Seven and Twenty Nine paise only) together with subsequent interest at 18% from the date of the suit till the date of realization and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.7,31,587.29/- and a court fee of Rs.9,826/- is paid under section 20 Schedule I Article 1 (b & c) of AP Court Fee and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and same is hereby dismissed as settled out of the Court and ;

2. that there no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 29th day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

NIL

III AJCJ/VSP.

OS/1429/2023

REDDY PARVATHI DEVI vs THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

29 Apr 2024

//FAIR//

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1429/2023

Monday, this the 29th day of April, 2024

Between :

Reddy Parvathi Devi, W/o K.V.S.S.Prasad, Hindu, aged 47 years, Teacher, Resident of Door No.37-17-18/2, Srivatsa Residency, Madhavadhara,Visakhapatnam-530018,Aadhar No.922802915734, Mobile No.8328626998. ...Plaintif And :

The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Tenneti Bhavan, Asilmetta Junction, Visakhapatnam-530002.

...Defendant

This suit is coming on 29-04-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri. D.V.V.R.Pratap and Smt. R.Sarada, Advocates for Plaintif and of Smt. Y.Vasantha Kumari, Advocate for the Defendant and the matter having stood over for consideration and this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is the suit filed by the plaintif against the defendant for granting permanent and prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant’s authority and its men from ever interfering with the construction activity, peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property of the plaintif in any manner and whatsoever and for costs of the suit.

2.The counsel for the plaintif filed a not press memo stating that the plaintif is hereby not pressing the present suit and prays to dismiss the same. Not press memo is recorded.

3.In the result, the suit is dismissed as not pressed without costs.

Dictated to Typist and pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 29th day of April,

2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side.

III AJCJ/VSP

Date of Presentation : 14-11-2023 Date of Filing : 14-11-2023

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri. M.Srinivasa Rao, III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

O.S.1429/2023

Monday, this the 29th day of April, 2024

Between :

The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Tenneti Bhavan, Asilmetta Junction, Visakhapatnam-530002.

...Defendant

This is the suit filed by the plaintif against the defendant for granting permanent and prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant’s authority and its men from ever interfering with the construction activity, peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property of the plaintif in any manner and whatsoever and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.3,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.5,426/- is paid under section 26(c) Schedule I Article 1 (b & c) of AP Court Fee and SV Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and same is hereby dismissed as not pressed and ;

2. that there no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 29th day of April, 2024.

III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

NIL

III AJCJ/VSP.

Order Record 1,126 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/1429/2023	REDDY PARVATHI DEVI vs THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION	29 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1459/2023	BANK OF BARODA vs M/S XPRESS TRAVELS	29 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/702/2023	CANARA BANK vs M/S HELLO MOBILES	22 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1517/2023	Bhemarasetty Murali Krishna vs Madabathula Swaroop @ Kumar	22 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/170/2024	KALSETTY VENKATA LAKSHMI vs MOOLA SUBHASHINI	12 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/580/2023	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S. RIDDHI SIDDHI ENTERPRISES	12 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/157/2024	TADI DURGA REDDY vs MALLI SAMUEL	03 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1346/2023	DUDA NARASING RAO vs POLAVARAPU SATYANARAYAN ALIAS SATTI BABU	03 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/83/2024	State Bank of India vs M/s. Pruthvi Steels	02 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1356/2022	INDIAN BANK vs B APPALRAJU	01 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1481/2021	JARUGUBILLI PAPESH vs THE TAHASILDAR (URBAN)	01 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1529/2023	DONEPUDI TULASI KRISHNA vs NAREDDLA TIRUPATHI REDDY	01 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1701/2022	INDIAN BANK vs B APPALA RAJU	01 Apr 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/165/2020	SYNDICATE BANK vs MADIM MANIKANTA SWAMY	28 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/34/2023	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs BOJJA LAKSHMI PRASAD	27 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/454/2022	SESETTI GOVINDA RAJU vs PEDDADA NAGALAKHSMI	27 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/866/2023	M/S UNITED CORPORATION vs M/S CHEMIC LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED	27 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1294/2023	KAMUJU VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAO vs TARAPATLA MARY VIJAYA SUSEELA	27 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1526/2022	INDIAN BANK vs B APPALA RAJU	27 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/37/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA, SME CENTRE vs M/S. VISAKHA MASALA	25 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1396/2023	SHAIK SULTHANA BEGAM vs RESHMA PARVIN	25 Mar 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/196/2023	INDIAN BANK vs KONA SATYA	22 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/810/2022	BORA SRINIVAS REDDY vs ALLURI SATYANARYANA RAJU	22 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/324/2023	Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt Ltd rep by its Manager, Y.B.Rajendra Prasad vs Boggu Srinivasa Rao	20 Mar 2024	ORDER	—
OS/1400/2021	INDIAN BANK vs B APPALARAJU	20 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1471/2021	INDIRA BANK vs B APPALARAJU	20 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/59/2021	Padala Veera Venkata Satyanaraya vs Yennamreddy Neelakantha Reddy	19 Mar 2024	ORDER	—
OS/21/2024	DASARI APPARAO vs KALLA KRISHNA KUMARI	18 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1004/2023	BANK OF BARODA vs RAJ KUMAR KANURI	18 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1168/2022	MARGANA CHINNA BABU vs ALLU NOVAL KUMAR	15 Mar 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/17/2024	MADDI SRINIVASA RAO vs BONI GOPALA RAO	14 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/149/2023	NAGIREDDY SRINU SANKARA YELLAJI vs AKULA PUNYAVATHI	11 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1422/2023	VEMAGIRI RAJA BABU vs THALLURI RAJ KUMAR	11 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/314/2020	VARRI NOOKARAJU vs B SANTHA KUMARI	07 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/525/2022	MULA MAHESWARA RAO vs ALLURI SATYANARAYANA RAJU	07 Mar 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/1606/2023	M/S UNION BANK OF INDIA vs KILLU LIKITHA	07 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/559/2022	SARIPALLI VIMALA DEVI vs KONA NOOKA RAJU	06 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1266/2023	M/S AROMATIC CHEMICAL AND OIL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S P SAHADEVAN AND SONS	06 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/340/2021	PATNALA SUBRAMANYAM vs SOMU SRINIVASA RAO	04 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/962/2022	MALLEMADUGULA S S R K N SARMA vs U V S SARMA	04 Mar 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/1274/2021	THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LIMITED vs KADEM JANA REDDY	04 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1834/2022	CANARA BANK vs BHARTU PRAVEEN KUMAR	04 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1861/2022	CANARA BANK vs BOGAPURAPU MUNU SWAMY	04 Mar 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1260/2022	SINGAMPALLI DEMUDUBABU vs MADAGALA LAKSHMI	22 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1591/2022	KARUR VYSYA BANK vs SRI CHINTADA VENKATA CHANDRA MOULEWARA RAO	22 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/803/2022	VINNAKOTA VENKATA RAMANA vs AITHIREDDY APPALA NAIDU	21 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1050/2020	PUREDDY LAKSHMI vs YELAMANCHILI NARASINGA RAO	21 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1050/2020	PUREDDY LAKSHMI vs YELAMANCHILI NARASINGA RAO	21 Feb 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/1619/2022	GANDRETI UGADI vs BEZAWADA SARADA	21 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/419/2019	BANDI KARUNA vs MUNAPARTHI MOSHE	20 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/442/2023	DEVARA ARUN KUMAR REDDY vs MANYALA ESWARA RAO	20 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1120/2022	DANTHULURI SANYASI RAJU vs GUTHULA SRINIVASA RAO	20 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1566/2023	PULAGAM SURYANARAYANA REDDY vs CHETLA KRISHNA REDDY	20 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1196/2019	Canara Bank vs Divya wooden manufactures	19 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/267/2023	B.Harimatha vs V.Srinivasa Rao	16 Feb 2024	ORDER	—
OS/340/2023	KONA JOSEPH vs PANCHADI JAGANNADHAM	16 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/345/2021	CANARA BANK vs RAGATHI ATCHUTHA RAO	16 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/408/2023	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs POTTI POLA RAO	16 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/685/2021	CANARA BANK vs PALAVALASA NARAYANA RAO	16 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1240/2023	MUDUNURU SUNITHA vs CHANDANATI SIMHACHALAM	16 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1675/2019	SMT. BATTARUSETTY LAKSHMI vs SMT. SHAIK JAHANAR	16 Feb 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
EP/602/2022	Akbarsha Khan vs K.Eswara Rao	15 Feb 2024	ORDER	—
EP/217/2021	Kapil chits (Kosta) Pvt. Ltd., Waltair branch, rep. bny its foreman/Authorized person, VSP vs Bajjangi Namitha Bhagyalatha	13 Feb 2024	ORDER	—
OS/751/2023	LAKSHMI FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED vs YARANAGULA JAGAN MOHAN	13 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1860/2022	LAKSHMI FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNIVERSAL MINING CORPORATION	13 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1862/2022	LAKSHMI FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED vs UNIVERSAL MINING CORPORATION	13 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1093/2019	M RAMANA MURTHY vs M T PRASADA RAO	12 Feb 2024	ORDER IN IA	—
OS/1201/2023	NALLAMILLI RAMA LINGA REDDY vs SATHI VASANTHA KUMARI	09 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1477/2022	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S MADHURI LIGHTS	09 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/453/2023	CANARA BANK vs M/S SWETHA SAI SHYAMANTAK KIRANA AND GENERALS	08 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1478/2022	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S MARY JOSE TRAVELS	08 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/67/2023	INDIAN BANK vs UPADHYULA PHANI KUMAR	02 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/162/2020	SYNDICATE BANK vs NUNNA VISHALI ANURDHA	02 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1355/2022	INDIAN BANK vs UPADHYULA PHANI KUMAR	02 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1413/2022	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs AKULA VENKATA NAGA GOPI	02 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1417/2023	MOTURI SRINIVASA RAO vs LAVETI APPANA	01 Feb 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1202/2023	KALLA SURYAKANTHAM vs KATHILA GOPAL REDDY	31 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1355/2023	KOMARAGIRI HANUMANTH RAMA VENKATA BRAHMA ANAND vs M/S.BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON SASIKALARAGHUPATHY	31 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/400251/2018	Pedala Srinivasa Reddy vs P.Subba raju	31 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1247/2022	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SRI VENKATESWARA KIRANA	29 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/526/2018	Pragada Kondala Rao vs Gurrala Babau	25 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1381/2023	GADAGAMMA SREEDHAR BABU vs NAMMI APPALAKONDA	24 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/362/2023	Kosuru Krishna Babu vs Gorisetty Srinivasa Rao	23 Jan 2024	ORDER	—
OS/1106/2023	DOWLAPALLI YELLAJI vs VADISALA VENKATA RAO	23 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/793/2023	CHIRIKI JAYALAKSHMI vs BOMMALI PADMA	22 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/820/2018	Thummala Venu Babu vs K.Rama Krishna Rao	22 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1910/2022	PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs M/S AXIS WELD CONSUMABLES	09 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/993/2023	SHAIK SYED vs BANTUPALLI RAMANAMMA	08 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/165/2022	KASARAPU SARANYA SWAROOPA SREE vs MODU SRINIVAS	05 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/282/2022	KUPPILI BABU RAO vs KUPPILI ALIAS CHLLA DHAN SREE	05 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1435/2022	NEW VINAYAKA CORPORATION vs M/S. SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED	05 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1124/2023	PILAKA VENKATA RATNAM vs KESUBOYINA SURYANARYANA	04 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/55/2022	KUNCHA RAMULAMMA vs SUNKANA KALIDAS	03 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/871/2021	GADU SUJATHA vs ROMALA SRINIVASA RAO	03 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1075/2023	KARRI VENKATA REDDY vs VADDADHI POLA RAJU	03 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/831/2022	DHANALA SAVITRI vs CHENGALA SRINIVAS	02 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1300/2023	BANDARU SATYANARAYANA vs BOSA YELLAYYAMMA	02 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1387/2023	RAVURI SANTOSH KUMAR vs KADIYALA PRASAD ALIAS VARA PRASAD	02 Jan 2024	JUDGEMENT	—
CC/400233/2018	p. srinivasa reddy vs Perarapu veeranna @ Chanti	22 Dec 2023	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1674/2022	M/S STATE BANK OF INDIA vs M/S STAR ENTERPRISES	19 Dec 2023	JUDGEMENT	—

Showing 100 of 1,126 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2024		13
Mar 2024		30
Feb 2024		34
Jan 2024		22
Dec 2023		44
Nov 2023		39
Oct 2023		41
Sep 2023		36
Aug 2023		57
Jul 2023		35
Jun 2023		35
May 2023		42

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri M.Srinivasa Rao handled?

Sri M.Srinivasa Rao has handled 1141 court orders since 2021 at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam. The average disposal rate is 35 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri M.Srinivasa Rao hear?

Based on available records, Sri M.Srinivasa Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Where is Sri M.Srinivasa Rao currently posted?

Sri M.Srinivasa Rao is posted as III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri M.Srinivasa Rao available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri M.Srinivasa Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri M.Srinivasa Rao dispose cases?

Sri M.Srinivasa Rao disposes approximately 35 cases per month, based on 1141 orders handled over their tenure at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Since when is Sri M.Srinivasa Rao serving?

Sri M.Srinivasa Rao has been serving at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam since 2021.

Case Types

OS 85%

CC 9%

EP 6%

Posting History

Aug 2021 — Apr 2024

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) · 1,141 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri Chinnamsetty Raju

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

1,274 orders

Sri M. Venkata Ramana

I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

5,391 orders

Kum. C.k.gayathri Devi

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

749 orders

Sri D.seshayya

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-ACB

0 orders

Sri M.srihari

IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE-SPL JUDGE ECONOMIC OFFENCES

2 orders

Sri S. Damodara Rao

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

11 orders

Sri S.Srinivasa Rao

VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

736 orders

Smt. P.sri Satya Devi

SPL. JUDGE FOR SC AND ST CASES

1,369 orders

Sri. K.Ratna Kumar

XII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

433 orders

Sri. D.vijay Goutam

SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL...

130 orders

Smt. M.sobha

XIV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri K Venkateswara Rao

XV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. M.Ramakrishnamraju

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

0 orders

Sri P Rajaram

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE

829 orders

Sri U.u.prasad

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT...

0 orders

Sri J Srinivas Rao

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRIC...

1 orders

Sri Y.gopal Krishna

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

0 orders

M D V N Sindhura

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

516 orders

Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

761 orders

Dr. Soni Dwarampudi

VI ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

525 orders

Smt. Dr. K. Sarada

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

515 orders

Smt. V.ganga Bhavani

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

790 orders

Smt. Y.Premalatha

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

385 orders

Sri G.Karthik

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

1,053 orders

Smt. Sindhu Gurram

V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

814 orders

Sri M.Pradeep Kumar

CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM

432 orders

Smt. P.Pradeepa

I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPAT...

14 orders

Sri K.Vasudeva Rao

IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPA...

251 orders

Smt K.Sruta Vinda

VII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS...

641 orders

Ms Sri Rajarajeswari Tejaswi Kalaharsti

SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR TRI...

0 orders

Sri P Rajendra Prasad

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT - I

334 orders

Y.Ganapathi Rao

SPL. MAGISTRATE COURT-III

399 orders

D.viswanadham

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT VI

10 orders

← View all judges at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam