Sri N Anand Rao

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh

Sri N Anand Rao, V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE, is posted at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 65 court orders on record since 2012. 11 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OP, OS cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OP/1467/2010

Garikina Yellaji vs Smt.Garikina Lalitha

26 Apr 2012

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI N.ANANDA RAO, BSc., LL.M.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

THURSDAY, the 26 th day of APRIL, 2012

O.P.1467/2010

Between Garikina Yellaji, S/o Venkanna, Hindu, Aged 29 years, Residing at D.No.2-7-210, Near Appu Ghar, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatna-530017. ……. Petitioner And: Smt.Garikina Lalitha, W/o Yellaji, Hindu, Aged 25 years, Presently residing at C/o Dasari Yellayya, D.No.2-5-135, Moolapalem, Sector-9, Near Appu Ghar, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam- 530017. …….Respondent

This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Voona Vijaya Kumar, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri M.Venkatesh, Advocate for respondent and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed under section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Act, by the petitioner with a prayer to dissolve the marriage 23.11.2008 and for costs of the petition.

Chief examination affidavit of petitioner as P.W.1 is filed and Exs.A1 is marked. No further evidence is reported. Heard the Advocate for petitioner. Perused the petition and chief examination affidavit of petitioner and Ex.A1. This petition is filed by the petitioner/husband against the respondent/wife under Section 13 (1) (ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce to dissolve their marriage dt.23.11.2008. The unchallenged evidence of petitioner both oral and documentary evidence very well proved the contention of the petitioner and the allegations made against the respondent. There is no evidence on record for the respondent and there is no material to disbelieve the contention of the petitioner. The docket shows that the respondent was set ex-parte and remained ex-parte as he did not file counter though opportunity was given for more than 6 months. In the circumstances, petition is allowed without costs granting divorce as requested dissolving the marriage between petitioner and the respondent dated 23.11.2008.

Pronounced in open Court, this the 26th day of APRIL, 2012.

Sd/- N.Ananda Rao,

J U D G E,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

//T.C.B.O.//

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Date of Presentation: 07.12.2010

Date of Filing : 14.12.2010

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI N.ANANDA RAO, BSc., LL.M.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

THURSDAY, the 26 th day of APRIL, 2012

O.P.1467/2010

This petition is filed under section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Act, by the petitioner with a prayer to dissolve the marriage 23.11.2008 and for costs of the petition. A fixed Court fee of Rs.10/- is paid u/Art.I (iii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.

D E C R E E

i)that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed and divorce is granted to the petitioner, dissolving their marriage dt.23.11.2008 without costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 26th day of APRIL, 2012.

J U D G E,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Memorandum of Costs

No costs memo filed on either side.

J U D G E,

AFC., VSP.

O.P.751/2011 1st petitioner is present. 2nd petitioner is called absent. Advocate for petitioners is present and requests to adjourn the matter stating that 2nd petitioner is in Delhi preparing for Civil Service Examinations. This petition is filed by the petitioners under section 13 –B of Hindu Marriage Act for decree of divorce by mutual consent. This was filed on 19.07.2011 and petitioners were asked to appear before this Court on 16.01.2012. The docket shows that on 16.01.2012, this matter was not called as that day was public holiday and it was called on 17.01.2012, on that day parties did not attend the Court, then posted to 15.02.2012 and on that day both the petitioners were absent and from that date, the matter was posted to today. So nearly 3 months time is given from 16.01.2012 for the petitioners for their appearance. But they have not appeared on 17.01.2012 and 15.02.2012 and today only 1st petitioner appeared. There are no grounds to keep the matter still pending. As the 2nd petitioner is called absent since a long time, it is deemed that she is not interested in decree of divorce by mutual consent and for that reason only she is not attending the Court. Hence, petition is dismissed.

OP/270/2012

Sri.Poosalra kama raju vs Smt.Poosrla Bhavani

27 Apr 2012

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE: FAMILY COURT AT VISAKHAPTNAM

PRESENT: SRI N.ANANDA RAO, B.Sc., L.L.M.,

JUDGE: ADDL FAMILY COURT

FAC JUDGE FAMILY COURT

FRIDAY THE 27th DAY OF APRIL, 2012 O.P.270/2012 Between: Poosarla Kama Raju, @ Raja, S/o Rama Swamy, Hindu, aged 35 years, r/at D.No.40-1-16/94, Kailasapuram, Visakhapatnam.

..Petitioner:

And: Poosarla Bhavani W/o Kamaraju, Hindu, aged 30 years, r/at D.No.14-86 Dhobi Colony, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. ..Respond ent:

This petition is coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri. D. N. S. Guptha Advocate for petitioner and respondent having been called absent and set exparte and having stood over for consideration this court made the following:

O R D E R

This petition is filed under Sec. 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act.

The petitioner is husband of the respondent and he prays the court to pass an order in his favour and against the respondent for the grant of

Order and Decree by dissolving the petitioners marriage with the respondent that took place on 10-8-2005 situated at Chittayyapalem

Anakapalle Mandal Visakhapatnam and for costs of the petition.

Chief examination affidavit of petitioner as P.W 1 is filed. Ex.A.1 to

A.3 are marked. No further evidence is reported for the petitioner.

Heard the Advocate for the petitioner. Perused the petition, chief examination affidavit and Ex. A.1 to 3.

This petition is filed by the petitioner/husband against the respondent/wife under Sec. 13 (1) (ia) & (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act for grant of divorce on the ground that his wife deserted him and subjected into cruelty.

The Docket shows that the respondent having received the notice through R.P., did not attend the court and therefore she was set exparte on 24-4-2012. The un-challenged evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Ex.A.1 to A3 very well support the contention of the petitioner and all the allegations made against the respondent.

Therefore, the petition is allowed without costs in favour of the petitioner ad against the respondent, granting decree of divorce as requested dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent dated 10-8-2005.

Pronounced by me in the open court this the 27th day of April, 2012

JUDGE: ADDL FAMILY COURT

FAC: JUDGE: FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNAM

List of Witness examined

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P. W.1 Poosarla Kama Raju @ Raja. NIL

List of Documents marked

For Petitioner:

Ex. A.1is the positive photograph showing me and respondent. Ex.A.2 is the office copy of lawyers notice got issued by through respondent. Ex.A.3 is the returned postal cover containing original of Ex. A.2.

JUDGE

Date of presentation: 17-2- 2012: Date of filing: 12-3-2012

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDGE: FAMILY COURT AT VISAKHAPTNAM

PRESENT: SRI N.ANANDA RAO, B.Sc., L.L.M.,

JUDGE: ADDL FAMILY COURT

FAC JUDGE FAMILY COURT

FRIDAY THE 27th DAY OF APRIL, 2012 O.P.270/2012 Between: Poosarla Kama Raju, @ Raja, S/o Rama Swamy, Hindu, aged 35 years, r/at D.No.40-1-16/94, Kailasapuram, Visakhapatnam.

..Petitioner:

And: Poosarla Bhavani W/o Kamaraju, Hindu, aged 30 years, r/at D.No.14-86 Dhobi Colony, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. ..Respond ent:

This petition is filed under Sec. 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act.

The petitioner is husband of the respondent and he prays the court to pass an order in his favour and against the respondent for the grant of

Order and Decree by dissolving the petitioners marriage with the respondent that took place on 10-8-2005 situated at Chittayyapalem

Anakapalle Mandal Visakhapatnam and for costs of the petition.

A Fixed Court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Article I (vii) Schedule II of

A.P.C.F. and S. V. Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the petition be and is here by allowed.

2. that the Marriage dated 10-8-2005 held between the petitioner and respondent be and is here by dissolved.

3. that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the court this the 27th day of April, 2012.

JUDGE: ADDL FAMILY

COURT FAC: JUDGE: FAMILY COURT

VISAKHAPATNA

OP/193/2012

Badireddi Lalitha vs Ravi George

24 Apr 2012

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI N.ANANDA RAO, BSc., LL.M.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

TUESDAY, the 24 th day of APRIL, 2012

FCOP.193/2012

Between Smt.Badireddi Lalitha, W/o Ravi George, Converted Christian, Aged 31 years, R/at D.No.15-283, Lakshmi Nagar, F-Block, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam-27. ……. Petitioner And: Ravi George, S/o Solmon Raju, Christian, Aged 37 years, R/at Plot #6, Te Rock, B-Main, D-Block, Giddamm Layout, Akashnagar, A Nayanapura, Bangalore-16. …….Respondent

This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.D.Ramesh Kumar (Raja), Advocate for petitioner and of respondent called absent, set ex-parte and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed under section 10 (ix) and (X) of Indian Divorce Act, by the petitioner with a prayer to dissolve her marriage dt.17.09.1999 with respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the petition. Chief examination affidavit of petitioner as P.W.1 is filed and Exs.A1 to A11 are marked as mentioned in the affidavit. No further evidence is reported. Heard the Advocate for petitioner. Perused the petition and chief examination of petitioner and Ex.A1 to A11. This petition is filed by the petitioner/wife against the respondent/husband under Section 10 (ix) and (x) of Indian Divorce Act for grant of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A11 very well proved the contention of the petitioner and the allegations made by the petitioner against the respondent. The record shows that the respondent has not claimed the notice which was sent through registered post and therefore he was set ex-parte and remained ex-parte. There is nothing on record to disbelieve the contention of the petitioner. In the result, petition is allowed with costs against the respondent granting decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent dt.17.09.1999.

Pronounced in open Court, this the 24th day of APRIL, 2012.

Sd/- N.Ananda Rao,

J U D G E,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

//T.C.B.O.//

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Date of Presentation: 23.02.2012 Date of Filing : 24.02.2012

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI N.ANANDA RAO, BSc., LL.M.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

TUESDAY, the 24 th day of APRIL, 2012

FCOP.193/2012

This petition is filed under section 10 (ix) and (X) of Indian Divorce Act, by the petitioner with a prayer to dissolve her marriage dt.17.09.1999 with respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the petition. A fixed Court fee of Rs.30/- is paid Article II (vii) Schedule II of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act. This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.D.Ramesh Kumar (Raja), Advocate for petitioner and of respondent called absent, set ex-parte and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order; and

D E C R E E

i)that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed and divorce is granted to the petitioner, dissolving their marriage dt.17.09.1999; and ii)that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 24th day of APRIL, 2012.

J U D G E,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Memorandum of Costs

No costs memo filed on either side.

J U D G E,

AFC., VSP.

OP/85/2012

Rrrrravilla Santhosh Kumar vs Smt.Ravilla Thulasi

26 Apr 2012

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI G.RAMA KRISHNA, BSc., B.L.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

FRIDAY, the 4 th day of MAY, 2012

FCOP.85/2012

Between Ravilla Santhosh Kumar, S/o R.Appala Swamy Naidu, Hindu, Aged 30 years, Residing at LIG-532, Vinayaka Nagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ……. Petitioner And: Smt.Ravilla Thulasi, W/o Santhosh Kumar, Hindu, Aged 30 years, Residing at D.No.43-5-15, Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam. …….Respondent

This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri T.Venkata Ratnam, Advocate for petitioner and respondent called absent, set ex-parte and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

O R D E R

This is a petition filed under section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act, to grant judicial separation between the petitioner – Santosh Kumar and the respondent –R.Thulasi. Respondent remained ex-parte.

The petitioner got filed his evidence affidavit as P.W.1.

The petitioner and respondent are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 24.02.2011 at Greater Visakha Municipal Corporation Community hall, Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam as per the Hindu Rites and Caste Custom. Later respondent joined the petitioner in his house at Visakhapatnam. But always the respondent used to live isolate without talking with other inmates of the house including the petitioner. She is having suicidal tendency and always used to threaten him and his family members that she will commit suicide and implicated the petitioner and his family members as responsible for her death. It became difficult for petitioner to live with the respondent in the same house. Hence he approached this Court, filed this petition seeking judicial separation from the respondent. He filed the marriage invitation card and marriage photo. As the above evidence of petitioner remained unchallenged as it became difficult for the petitioner to live with the respondent, it is ordered for the petitioner and respondent shall live separately (judicial separation).

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court, this the 4th day of MAY, 2012.

J U D G E

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Date of Presentation: 27.01.2012 Date of Filing : 27.01.2012

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI G.RAMA KRISHNA, BSc., B.L.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

FRIDAY, the 4 th day of MAY, 2012

FCOP.85/2012

This is a petition filed under section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act, to grant judicial separation between the petitioner – Santosh Kumar and the respondent –R.Thulasi. A fixed Court fee of Rs.10/- is paid Article II (vii) Schedule II of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act. This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri T.Venkata Ratnam, Advocate for petitioner and respondent called absent, set ex-parte and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order; and

D E C R E E

I)that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed granting judicial separation; and ii)that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 4th day of MAY, 2012.

J U D G E

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

No costs memo filed on either side.

Judge,

AFC., VSP.

OP/1331/2011

Smt.Bonu Rama Lakshmi vs Bonu Rama Raju

25 Apr 2012

Date of Presentation: 08.11.2011 Date of Filing : 16.11.2011

IN THE COURT OF JUDGE: ADDL. FAMILY COURT, VISAKHAPATNAM

PRESENT:- SRI N.ANANDA RAO, BSc., LL.M.,

JUDGE, ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

WEDNESDAY, the 25 th day of APRIL, 2012

FCOP.1331/2011

Between

1. Smt.Bonu Rama Lakshmi, W/o Rama Raju, Hindu, Aged 26 years, Residing at D.No.16-575/42, Lakshmi Parvathi Nagar, Arilova, Visakhapatnam.

2. Bonu Komali, D/o Rama Raju, Hindu, Aged 8 years, Rest –do-

3. Bonu Srinivas, S/o Rama Raju, Hindu, Aged 6 years, Rest –do- (Petitioners 2 and 3 being minors rep. by their mother and natural guardian i.e. 1st petitioner) ……. Petitioners And: Bonu Rama Raju, S/o Suru Demudu, Hindu, Aged 32 years, residing at D.No.16-547/1, LakshmiParvathiNagar,Arilova, Visakhapatnam. …….Respondent

This petition is coming for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Duppala Venkatesh, Advocate for petitioners and of respondent having appeared in person and the same having been stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed under section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, by the 1st petitioner on behalf of petitioners 2 and 3 who are wife and children of the respondent praying the Court to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month to the 1st petitioner and Rs.2,000/- per month each to the petitioners 2 and 3 for their shelter, educational expenses and maintenance and for costs of the petition. Chief examination affidavit of petitioner No.1 as P.W.1 is filed and Exs.A1 to A3 are marked. No further evidence is reported for the petitioner. Heard the Advocate for petitioner. Perused the petition and chief examination affidavit of petitioner and Ex.A1 to A3. This petition is filed by the petitioners 1 to 3 who are the wife and minor children of the respondent under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code for grant of monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.2,000/- each to the petitioners 2 and 3, stating that the respondent neglected and refused to maintain them and they have been living separately from the respondent and respondent is working in Visakha Municipal Corporation and drawing salary of Rs.20,000/- per month and he has every means to provide separate maintenance to them. The record shows that respondent was set ex-parte as he did not file his counter. The oral and documentary evidence adduced by the petitioner which is unrebutted, very well proved that 1st petitioner is the legally wedded wife and 2nd and 3rd petitioners are the children of the respondent and they were refused and neglected to be maintained by the respondent and respondent is working in Visakha Municipal Corporation and earning more than Rs.20,000/- per month and he has every means to provide the maintenance which is sought for in the petition. Hence, petition is allowed with costs in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent, directing the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.2,000/- each to the petitioners from the date of petition i.e.08.11.2011.

Pronounced in open Court, this the 25th day of APRIL, 2012.

J U D G E,

ADDL. FAMILY COURT,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Note: This petition is filed u/Sec.125 Cr.P.C. No decree prepared.

Order Record 53 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OP/270/2012	Sri.Poosalra kama raju vs Smt.Poosrla Bhavani	27 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/278/2012	Sri.Chollangi nageswara rao vs Smt.Chollangi madhavi	27 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/992/2008	Kodal sravanthi vs Kodal hari narayan	27 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/993/2008	Kodal Sravanthi and two others vs Kodal Hari Narayan	27 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1411/2009	Kodal harinarayan vs Vskodal shravanthi	27 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/374/2011	Pappala padmavathi vs Pappala Adinarayana	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/848/2011	Smt.Kinthada hemalatha@ Ramanamma vs Sri.Kinthada Marlababu@Murali	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1120/2011	Smt.Garikina nooka ratnam vs Sri.appalaraju	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1502/2011	P.Padmavathi vs Panduraju Pakeer Raju	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/85/2012	Rrrrravilla Santhosh Kumar vs Smt.Ravilla Thulasi	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1467/2010	Garikina Yellaji vs Smt.Garikina Lalitha	26 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/130/2012	Smt.Kandregula Durga Devi vs Sri.Kandregula Manohar	25 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/656/2011	P Renuka Deviand another vs P.Raghavendra	25 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1212/2011	Palla Appala Swamy vs Palla Venkata Lakshmi and another	25 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/522/2011	Sri.Mundada Venugopal vs MS.RRC Housing private limited rep. by rr chand	25 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1331/2011	Smt.Bonu Rama Lakshmi vs Bonu Rama Raju	25 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/258/2012	Smt.Debariki gowri and another vs Sri.Debarika Trinadha rao	24 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/348/2011	Borusu murali krishna vs BVVNB Bhavani	24 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/354/2011	Borusu murali krishna vs BVVNB Bhavani	24 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/193/2012	Badireddi Lalitha vs Ravi George	24 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1391/2010	Smt.Pydi Dhanasree vs Pydi Radhakrishna	24 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/114/2012	Smt.Allu vinuthna vs Sri.Allu siva prasad	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/206/2011	Paladugu Pitchayya vs Paladugu Vasundhara	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/534/2011	Manthena Prathibha vs Manthena Venkata rama Raju @ Srikanth	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1000/2011	Bandila Martin Samuel and another vs NIL	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1188/2011	Choppa Mallika Survar Chala and another vs NIL	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1524/2011	Smt.Mallareddy naga chandrakala vs Sri.Gudivada kannababu	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/117/2012	Harika vs Devupalli Sai Gangadhar	23 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/124/2012	Smt.Eswarapu Shilpa vs Sri.Eswarapu srinivas	20 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/126/2012	Smt.Eswarapu shilpa and another vs Sri.Eswarapu Srinivas	20 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/602/2009	Smt.Pothuraju vijaya lalta devi and another vs Sri. Pothuraju naveen babi	20 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/125/2012	Smt.Guduthuri Rama Lakshmi vs Giduthuri Badari Prasad	20 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1164/2011	Amara Lakshmudu and another vs NIL	18 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1318/2011	C.Kumar Koyye vs K.Arathi Devi	18 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/91/2012	Smt.Bondalapati-Vegunta-Sreelatha vs BondalapaiRaja Sarveswara Parasad	18 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/571/2009	Gudla Vasanti Kumari and another vs G.V.L.S.N. Murthy	17 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/219/2012	Doni Sathibabu vs Smt.Doni Satyavathi	17 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/94/2012	Smt.Sondavarapu manasa vs Sri.sodavarapu suman babu	16 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/748/2011	Siram pramila bai vs Vssiram konda	16 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/774/2011	Gandivalasa pentayya vs Vsgandivalasa sujatha	16 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/920/2011	Smt.Sangam yerramma vs Sri.Sangam Venkata rao	16 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/198/2009	SeelamEswarakumar vs Smt.Seelam Sridevi	16 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/62/2012	Sri.Panchumarthi lakshmi bheemesh vs Smt.Panchumarthi uma devi	13 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1432/2011	Smt.Narava lakshmi vs SRi.Narava Rambabu	13 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/774/2011	Gandivalasa pentayya vs Vsgandivalasa sujatha	12 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/69/2012	Kosuri Jagannadh vs Kosuri Satyavathi	12 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/843/2009	Teddy Sandhya and two other minors vs Teddy Venkanna @ Ramu	12 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/812/2007	Ch. Velugula varun raj rep. by K.Suman vs V Sridhar	11 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/383/2010	Smt.Karanam Lakshmi Prasanna vs Karanam Venugopal and three others	11 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/399/2006	Pulamarasetty Vani Janaki Haripriya vs Pulamarasetty Bala Kali Murali Krishna	11 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1305/2009	Redditha Lakshmi Bhanu and another vs Redditha Kasi Venkata Suresh	11 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1454/2011	Abdul Zafer vs Ayisha Bibi	10 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—
OP/1229/2011	Kothapalli Kanaka Rao vs Smt.Kothapalli Maha Lakshmi	10 Apr 2012	Order On Exgibit	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2012

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri N Anand Rao handled?

Sri N Anand Rao has handled 65 court orders since 2012 at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam. The average disposal rate is 65 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri N Anand Rao hear?

Based on available records, Sri N Anand Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Original Petitions, Original Suits) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Where is Sri N Anand Rao currently posted?

Sri N Anand Rao is posted as V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri N Anand Rao available online?

Yes. 11 judgments by Sri N Anand Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri N Anand Rao dispose cases?

Sri N Anand Rao disposes approximately 65 cases per month, based on 65 orders handled over their tenure at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Since when is Sri N Anand Rao serving?

Sri N Anand Rao has been serving at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam since 2012.

Case Types

OP 98%

OS 2%

Posting History

Apr 2012 — Apr 2012

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE · 48 orders
Apr 2012 — Apr 2012

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE · 17 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri Chinnamsetty Raju

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

1,274 orders

Sri M. Venkata Ramana

I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

5,391 orders

Kum. C.k.gayathri Devi

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

749 orders

Sri D.seshayya

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-ACB

0 orders

Sri M.srihari

IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE-SPL JUDGE ECONOMIC OFFENCES

2 orders

Sri S. Damodara Rao

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

11 orders

Sri S.Srinivasa Rao

VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

736 orders

Smt. P.sri Satya Devi

SPL. JUDGE FOR SC AND ST CASES

1,369 orders

Sri. K.Ratna Kumar

XII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

433 orders

Sri. D.vijay Goutam

SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL...

130 orders

Smt. M.sobha

XIV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri K Venkateswara Rao

XV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. M.Ramakrishnamraju

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

0 orders

Sri P Rajaram

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE

829 orders

Sri U.u.prasad

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT...

0 orders

Sri J Srinivas Rao

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRIC...

1 orders

Sri Y.gopal Krishna

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

0 orders

M D V N Sindhura

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

516 orders

Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

761 orders

Dr. Soni Dwarampudi

VI ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

525 orders

Smt. Dr. K. Sarada

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

515 orders

Smt. V.ganga Bhavani

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

790 orders

Smt. Y.Premalatha

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

385 orders

Sri G.Karthik

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

1,053 orders

Smt. Sindhu Gurram

V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

814 orders

Sri M.Pradeep Kumar

CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM

432 orders

Smt. P.Pradeepa

I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPAT...

14 orders

Sri K.Vasudeva Rao

IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPA...

251 orders

Smt K.Sruta Vinda

VII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS...

641 orders

Ms Sri Rajarajeswari Tejaswi Kalaharsti

SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR TRI...

0 orders

Sri P Rajendra Prasad

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT - I

334 orders

Y.Ganapathi Rao

SPL. MAGISTRATE COURT-III

399 orders

D.viswanadham

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT VI

10 orders

← View all judges at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam