CC.No.1626 of 2020
1
IN THE COURT OF THE I-ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE – CUM –I ADDL. JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, HANAMKONDA.
Present: P.Gopika Naga Sravya, I-Addl.Junior Civil Judge – Cum – I Addl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Hanamkonda.
Tuesday on this 2nd day of May, 2023
C.C. No.1626 of 2020
Between:
The State of Telangana, through Station House Officer, Police Station, Madikonda . . .Complainant. AND
Nagapuri Ramesh S/o Anjaiah, Age 32 years, Occ:Coolie r/o Madhavanagar Road, Hanamkonda N/o Ankushapur, Tharigoppula (M) of Jangaon District.
.... Accused
This case is coming on this day 01.05.2023 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri A.R.Srinivas, I/c Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the prosecution and of Sri M.Sridhar Goud, Counsel for the accused and having perused the evidence adduced on either side ,exhibits marked and the material papers available on record. Having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-
:: J U D G M E N T::
01.The State of Telangana through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S Madikonda filed charge sheet in Cr.No.143/2019 for the offences punishable U/sec. 457, 380 of Indian
Penal Code against the accused.
02. The brief facts of prosecution case are that :-
i) On 25.11.2019 at 15.30 hours, LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS Madikonda received the report from LW.1/Rajoju Ravindar stating that on 24.11.2019 at about 1830 hrs , he along with his family members proceeded to Kazipet to attend the house opening celebration and after completion of the function, he returned to his house on 25.11.2019 at about 07.30 A.M and found his house back side door was opened and inside the house Almirah door was opened, on searching, he found gold
CC.No.1626 of 2020
2 ornaments missing i.e. two pair of gold mateelu weighing 1/3 tula and three pairs of gold ear studs weighing of 1 tula, total worth of Rs.40,000/-, which are committed theft by unknown offenders who gained entrance into his house. LW.1 lodged a report for taking necessary action against the unknown culprits.
ii) On receipt of the complaint lodged by LW.1, LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS
Madikonda registered a case in Cr.No.143/2019 for the offences u.sec. 457, 380 of
Indian Penal Code and investigated into the case. During the course of investigation,
LW.13 examined and recorded the statement LW.1/Rajoju Ravinidar at Police station .
Later LW.13 visited scene of offence, drafted crime detail form and drew rough sketch of the scene of offence in the presence of LW.3/Avandla Mohan and LW.4/Arelli Kiran and also examined and recorded the statement of LW.2/Rajoju Sravanthi, wife of LW.1.
Further the FPB Unit Warangal City arrived at the scene of offence, developed chance prints on the almirah at the scene of offence for comparision for apprehension of real culprit.
iii)On 30.11.2019 at 14.00 hrs near Madhava Nagar Road No.1 while
LW.10/B.Ravinder, SI of police, PS KUC was conducting patrolling duty , he arrested the accused in Cr.No.266/2019 for the offences u.sec. 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code and interrogated him. On interrogation the accused revealed his identity and voluntarily confessed the commission of this offence in the presence of LW.5/Muppidi
Rohith Kumar and LW.6/Thouti shyamsunder . Immediately LW.10 recorded the statement of the accused under the cover of confession cum recovery panchanama in the presence of LW.5 and LW.6 and seized the stolen property i.e. 1) Seven small Laxmi goddess gold coins weighing 203 grams, 2) Three small gold rings weighing 0.5 grams,
3) Three pairs of gold ear studs weighing 9.5 grams, 4) Two pair of gold ear chains weighing 7.2 grams and 5) Three pairs of silver leg chains, weighing 144.5 grams pertaining to this case . After completion of confession cum recovery panchanama, accused is produced before the Hon’ble VI Addl.JFCM Court, Warangal for judicial remand in Cr.No.266/2019 u.sec. 457, 380 of IPC of PS KUC.
CC.No.1626 of 2020
3 iv)On 3.12.2019, LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS Madikonda, investigating officer in the present case filed PT warrant requisition u.sec. 267 Cr.PC to issue PT warrant against the accused to remand him for judicial custody in the present case and after obtaining PT warrant , he produced the accused before the Hon’ble Court for judicial remand. Subsequently, LW.12/K.Kumaraswamy, SI of police, PS Madikonda took up further investigation into this case. On 16.12.2019 LW.12 filed requisition before the
Hon’ble Court to grant police custody of accused for a period of (02) days i.e. on
17.12.2019 and 18.12.2019 for interrogation. Accordingly, LW.12 obtained police custody for (02) days i.e. from 18.12.2019 at 1000 am to 18.12.2019 till 5 pm vide
Dis.No.1001, dt 17.12.2019 and after completion of police custody, the accused is re- produced before the Hon’ble Court on 18.12.2019 for judicial custody.
v)On 08.01.2020, LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS Madikonda, investigating officer conducted identification panchanama by LW.1/Rajoju Ravindar in the presence of LW.7/Saidala Balram , LW.8/Sirikonda Ashok Kumar and LW.9/Bandi Nageshwar Rao,
IInd Executive Magistrate cumTahsildar, Kazipet , in whose presence LW.1 identified his entire stolen property which was recovered in this case. Accordingly the chance prints developed on almirah at the scene of offence and finger prints of accused were forwarded to FPB Unit Warangal City for comparison. Further LW.13 received the FPB report from LW.11/A.Raj Kumar, Inspector of police, FPB CID Unit,Warangal vide report
C.No.200/SOC/FB/Wrl-City/2019, dt 5.12.2019.
vi)Subsequently, LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS Madikonda deposited the the seized property i.e. 1) Seven small Laxmi goddess gold coins Wg. 2 gr.380 Ml.Grms,
2) Three small gold rings, Wg. 0.700 ml.gms, 3) One pair of gold ear studs wg. 4 gr. 500 ml.gr., 4) one pair of gold ear chains (mateelu) wg. 5gr.20 ml.gr., 5) One pair of gold ear chains(mateelu) 2 grams 150 ml.gr., 6) One pair of silver leg chains, wg. 53 gr.10 Ml.gr,
7) One pair of silver leg chains, Wg. 50 gr. 10 Ml.gr, 8) One pair of silver leg chains, Wg.
63 gr. 940 Ml.grm , which are weighed by Thanishka gold worker(Dharmakanta
Kothurujanda, Hanamkonda) through Form.60. After completion of entire investigatin,
LW.13 filed charge sheet against the accused for the offences u.sec. 457, 380 of Indian
Penal Code.
CC.No.1626 of 2020
4
03.Cognizance was taken by the then Presiding officer for the offences punishable u/sec 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code against accused.
04.On appearance of accused, copies of documents have been furnished to him as contemplated U/sec. 207 Criminal procedure code. Accused was examined U/sec. 239
Criminal procedure code and charges framed for the offences U/sec. 457, 380 of Indian
Penal Code , was read over and explained to him, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
05. To substantiate its case, the prosecution examined PW.1 to PW.11 and exhibited documents P.1 to P.9 as indicated in the appendix of evidence .
06. In this case, the prosecution has not examined LW.2/Rajoju Sravanthi, wife of LW.1,
LW.4/Arelli Kiran, panch witness for CDF.
07. After closure of prosecution evidence, accused is examined u/sec. 313 Cr.P.C, explaining the incriminating material available against him in the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses, for which he denied the same and reported no defense evidence on his behalf.
08. Now the point for determination is: -
“Whether the prosecution able to bring home the guilt of accused for
the offences punishable u/sec 457,380 of Indian Penal Code beyond all
reasonable doubts”?
09. In order to bring home guilt of accused, prosecution examined as many as eleven witnesses. Of these, PW.1/LW.1 is the complainant, PW.2/LW.3 is panch witness for CDF, PW.3/LW.7, PW.4/LW.8 and PW.7/LW.9 are panch witnesses for stolen property and identification panchanama by LW.1, PW.5/LW.5 and PW.6/LW.6, panch witnesses for confession and recovery of stolen property , PW.8/LW.11 is FPB
CID Unit Warangal who issued PB report, PW.9/LW.12, investigating officer who filed requisition for police custody, PW.10/LW.10, Investigating officer of PS KUC
CC.No.1626 of 2020
5 who arrested the accused in Cr.No.266/2019 u.sec. 457, 380 of IPC of PS KUC and
PW.11/LW.13, investigating officer who filed charge sheet against the accused.
10. Heard both sides and perused entire evidence on record.
11. To prove the offence under section 457, 380 IPC the prosecution has to prove that i) The accused committed theft in the night hours and ii) The accused committed theft in dwelling house by break opening the back door and almirah.
12. Now from the evidence on record:
i)PW.1/LW.1, defacto-complainant , in his chief-examination deposed that he is resident of Madikonda village and that LW.2/R.Sravanthi is his wife. PW.1 further deposed that on 24.11.2019 at about 6.30 PM he along with his family members went to his elder brother’s house warming ceremony at Kazipet by locking their house. PW.1 further deposed that on the next day morning at about 07.30 AM they returned back to their house and found the doors are opened, immediately they went inside the house and found that the doors of almirah were also broke opened by some unknown offenders who gained entry from their back door by breaking it. PW.1 further deposed that he noticed that three pairs of gold ear studs weighing 1 1/2 tulas, two pairs of mattes weighing is about 7 grms i.e. one 5 grms and another 2 grms, three gold finger rings weighing about 700 Milligrams, Seven Kasu billalu weighing about 1 grm, three pairs of Silver anklets weighing about 500 grms were stolen. PW.1 further deposed that he lodged a report under Ex.P1 in Madikonda police station and that police examined and recorded his statement. PW.1 further deposed that on 6.3.2020, the recovered stolen property were given for interim custody vide this office
Crl.MP.No.41/2020 and got marked as MO-1- one pair of gold Ear studs, MO.2- 3 gold
rings small, MO.3- one pair gold mattelu, MO.4- one pair long gold mattelu, MO.5- 7 gold Laxmi idol billalu, MO.-6-One pair silver anklets, MO.7- One pair silver anklets, MO- 8: is another pair of silver anklet, which worth of Rs.1,00,000/-.
ii)In Cross examination by the counsel for the accused, PW.1 admitted that he did not mention in Ex.P1 about all the items that have been lost and that he stated only a
CC.No.1626 of 2020
6 few of them. PW.1 contends that out of tension he forgot to mention about them in
Ex.P1. PW.1 admitted that he mentioned the weight of MO-3 and MO-4 together is about 10 gms in Ex.P1. PW.1 admitted that he did not show the receipts of jewellery at police station while giving Ex.P1. Further PW.1 stated that after lodging Ex.P1 he went to police station for 1-2 times. PW.1 further stated that the police officials informed him that they traced his lost jewellery and he recognized his lost jewellery in the court.
PW.1 admitted that he mentioned that the worth of jewellery items lost is Rs.40,000/- in Ex.P1 and in his 161 Cr.PC statement. PW.1 denied suggestion that no jewellery items were committed theft in his house and that he is deposing false at the instance of police.
iii)Further the prosecution examined PW.2/LW.3, panch witness for CDF simply deposed that about 2 years ago, police went near to his house and obtained his signatures on some blank papers under Ex.P2 and that no panchanama was conducted by the police officials in his presence and completely resiled from his earlier statement made before the police under Ex.P2, thereby failing to support the prosecution case in toto. The learned A.P.P. Cross-examined PW.2 but nothing useful has been elicited from his mouth against the accused and conducting of CDF.
iv)Further the prosecution examined PW.3/LW.7 and PW.4/LW.8, panch witnesses for stolen property identification panchanama deposed in their chief-examination that about 2 years ago, on one day while they went to Police station on their personal work, there the police obtained their photographs and also obtained their signatures on some written papers under Ex.P3 and Ex.P4 but they doesn’t know its contents. Pw.3 and PW.4 further deposed that no confession cum recovery panchanama was conducted by the police officials in their presence and completely resiled from his earlier statement made before the police , thereby failing to support the prosecution case in toto. The i/c learned A.P.P. Cross-examined PW.3 and PW.4 but nothing useful has been elicited against the accused and conducting of identification panchanama of stolen property.
v)Further the prosecution examined PW.5/LW.5 , panch witness for confession and recovery of stolen property in his chief-examination deposed that upon the
CC.No.1626 of 2020
7 instructions of his superior officer, he went to KUC police station , where the police officials took him to the room of the accused at Madhava Nagar, where he found one
TV, gold ornaments, immediately the police officials seized the TV and gold ornaments from the house of accused and prepared confession cum seizure panchanama in his presence. Further PW.5 deposed that he doesn’t remember the accused person due to lapse of time. In Cross examination by the counsel for the accused, PW.5 stated that he doesn’t know who scribed the panchanama and also he doesn’t know the contents of the panchanama but have signed on it. PW.5 denied suggestion that he did not go to scene of offence and that police officials did not seize
TV and gold ornaments at the house of accused and that he is deposing false to help the accused.
vi)Further the prosecution examined PW.6/LW.6 , panch witness for confession and recovery of stolen property in his chief-examination deposed that upon the instructions of his superior officer, he went to KUC police station , where the police officials took him to the room of the accused at Madhava Nagar, where he found one
TV, two other items, immedaitely the police officials seized the TV and two other items from the house of accused and prepared confession cum seizure panchanama in his presence. Further PW.5 deposed that he doesn’t remember the accused person due to lapse of time. In Cross examination by the counsel for the accused, PW.5 stated that he doesn’t know who scribed the panchanama and also he doesn’t know the contents of the panchanama but have signed on it. PW.5 denied suggestion that he did not go to scene of offence and that police officials did not seize TV and two other items at the house of accused and that he is deposing false to help the accused.
vii)Further the prosecution examined PW.7/LW.9, Executive Magistrate cum
Tahsildhar, Kazipet in his chief examination deposed that he is resident of
Hanamkonda. Further PW.7 deposed that on 8.1.2020 at 1.00 PM he received the call from SI of police, PS Madikonda and on the same day at 04.30 PM ,LW.13/Mohd.Sarwar,
SI of police, PS Madikonda along with PW.3 and PW.4 went to MRO office, Kazipet and conducted identification of stolen property under Ex.P5 by LW.2 in their presence who identified the stolen property i.e. one pair of gold Ear studs, 3 gold rings small, one pair
CC.No.1626 of 2020
8 gold mattelu, one pair long gold mattelu,7 gold Laxmi idol billalu, One pair silver anklets, One pair silver anklets, is another pair of silver anklet(already marked) in their presence.
viii)In Cross examination by the counsel for the accused, PW.7 stated that he did not receive any requisition letter from Madikonda police station and also he did not obtain any permission from his superior officer for attending identification of stolen property conducted by Madikonda police officials. PW.7 denied suggestion that no identification panchanama was conducted by LW.13 in his presence and that he is deposing false.
ix)Further the prosecution examined PW.8/LW.11 in his chief-examination deposed that previously he worked as ASI of Police, FPB, CID, Warangal Commissionerate from 24.04.2014 to 09.09.2020. Further PW.8 deposed that on receiving the telephonic information from the SHO, PS Madikonda on 25.11.2019, he visited the scene of offence situated at NGO’s Colony, Hanamkonda, examined and the crime scene, developed the articles suspected to be handled by the unknown culprits. Further PW.8 deposed that during the course of examination and development, two chance prints were disclosed on the articles, which are marked as A-II and C-II and aII disclosed on the latch and CII on inner side of the door and they got photographed at the scene of crime. Further PW.8 deposed that the developed chance prints are fit for the comparison and compared with the inmates and remained unidentified. Further PW.8 deposed that the chance prints AII and CII compared with the State Finger print bureau, Hyderabad data base and found unidentified. PW.8 further deposed that on 30.11.2019 the SHO, PS KUC arrested the accused namely Nagapuri Ramesh, S/o.
Anjaiah, age 32/2019 years, Caste: Gouda, N/o. Ankushapur village, Tharigoppula mandal of Jangaon district, arrested in crime No.284/2019 and 224/2019 of PS KUC u/s.457, 380 of IPC and they have taken his finger prints on live scanner and the same were received by him through online and have been processed for matching against the above unsolved chance prints of AII and CII and on verification, the unsolved chance prints CII found identical with the right thumb impression of the above accused/N.Ramesh, as such he have issued Report .
CC.No.1626 of 2020
9
x)In cross examination by the counsel for the accused, PW.8 admitted that originally he was posted in the Finger Print Unit, Warangal. PW.8 further stated that he collected the finger prints of the accused from the scene of offence by following the technical procedure and he have not submitted the photographs and its negatives collected at the scene of offence along with his report into the Court. Further PW.8 stated that after arresting the accused, he have received the intimation through on line. PW.8 admitted that he have not made any attempt to collect the finger prints of the accused when he was taken for police custody. PW.8 denied suggestion that the finger prints of the accused are morphed and they doesn’t belong to the accused and that he have issued false report in favour of the prosecution.
xi)Further the prosecution examined PW.9/LW.12, who filed police custody of accused, in his chief-examination deposed that previously he worked as SI of Police, PS
Madikonda from 18.3.2018 to 6.2.2021. Further PW.9 deposed that as the Investigation officer, who filed the charge sheet of this case under gone TOT training at TS Police
Academy, Hyderabad and as per the instructions of SHO, PS Madikonda, he took up the investigation of this case. PW.9 further deposed that on 16.12.2019 he filed a requisition before the Hon’ble Court for the police custody of the accused of this case.
PW.9 further deposed that as such, the Hon’ble Court granted police custody of the accused on 18.12.2019 from 10.00 AM to 5.00 PM, accordingly he deputed his staff to
Central Prison, Warangal to bring the accused to PS Madikonda. Further PW.9 further deposed that he interrogated the accused about the undetected property offences of the PS Madikonda but in vain and later, he produced the accused before the Hon’ble
Court for re-production of accused to judicial remand.
xii)In cross examination by the counsel for the accused, on 15.12.2019 he received the CD file of this case, also have collected the finger prints of the accused during police custody of the accused. Further PW.9 stated that he have not submitted the finger prints of the accused along with the Memo into the Court at the time of producing the accused before the Court after police custody. PW.9 admitted that the involvement of the accused was not found in any undetected property cases during his
CC.No.1626 of 2020
10 custody. PW.9 denied suggestion that he has niot collected the finger prints of the accused during his police custody.
xiii)Further the prosecution examined PW.10/LW.10, who arrested the accused in
Cr.No.266/2019 u.sec. 457, 380 of IPC of PS KUC, in his chief-examination deposed that previously he worked as SI of police, PS KUC from 25.6.2019 to 9.10.2020. PW.10 further deposed that on 30.11.2019 at 1400 hrs he apprehended the accused at
Madhavanagar, Road No.1, Gopalpuram, immediately secured the presence of PW.5 and PW.6. and got enquired the accused in their presence. Further PW.10 deposed that the accused revealed his identity and voluntarily confessed the commission of offence in Cr.No.266/2019 and the present case who confessed that the seized property is hidden in his rented house bearing No. 2-1-125, Madhavanagar, Road No.4 . Pw.10 further deposed that he conducted confession panchanama under Ex.P6 in the presence PW.5 and PW.6. PW.10 further deposed that immediately he along with his staff and the accused and panch witnesses proceeded to the above said house , where the accused shown the stolen property, as such he seized the following stolen property at the house of accused.
1. 7-Small Laxmi godess gold coins weighing 2 grams 380 Milligrams.
2. 3-Small gold rings weighing 0.5 milligrams
3. Two pair of gold ear studs weighing 7.2 grams
4. Three pair of gold ear chains weighing 9.5 grms.
5. Three pair of silver leg chains weighing 144.5 grms.
Further PW.10 deposed that immediately he conducted seizure panchanama under
Ex.P7 of above said property MO.1 to MO.5 in the presence of PW.5 and PW.6 .PW.10 further deposed that he affected the arreste of the accused in Cr.No.266/2019 of PS
KUC and produced him before the Hon’ble Court for judicial remand and he gave information to the SI of police, PS Madikonda regarding the arrest of the accused and recovery of the property.
xiv)In Cross examination by the counsel for the accused, Pw.10 stated that he did not collect any receipt of MO.1 to MO.5 as the case doesn’t pertains the jurisdiction of
KUC PS. PW.10 admitted that PW.5 and PW.6 are not local area witnesses and that he did not mention the boundaries in Ex.P6 and Ex.P7and also in Ex.P7 para No.2 doesn’t
CC.No.1626 of 2020
11 bear his signature. PW.10 denied suggestion that he did not conduct confession panchanama and that he conducted table investigation. PW.10 denied suggestion that the accused is no way concerned with the seized properties MO.1 to MO.5 and that the accused is no way concerned with this offence. PW.10 denied suggestion that he foisted false case against the accused for statistical purpose and that he is deposing false.
xv)Further the prosecution examined Pw.11/LW.13,investigating officer in the present case in his chief-examinaton narrated the chronological sequences of investigation done and got marked FIR under Ex.P8, Crime detail form under Ex.P9 and in cross examination, PW.11 stated that the distance between TNGOS colony and
Madikonda police station is 3 Kms. PW.11 admitted that there is delay of hours in receiving Ex.P1/report from PW.1. Further PW.11 stated that he did not examine and recorded the statements of nearby people at the scene of offence and he did not collect any evidence nor didn’t recovery anything at the scene of offence while conducting Ex.P9. PW.11 admitted that there is no mention of date of receiving of
MO.1 to MO.5 from PW.10. PW.11 denied suggestion that the property prepared by
PW.1 is being produced before MRO for identification of property and that he did not examine and record the statments of PW.2 to PW.7. PW.11 denied suggestion that the accused is no way concerned with this offence and that he foisted false charge sheet against the accused for statistical purpose and that he is deposing false.
13. It is settled principle in criminal law that the prosecution has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubts by leading reliable, cogent and convincing evidence, notwithstanding on any weakness, in the defence of the accused and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable doubt in the prosecution story and any such doubt in the prosecution case entitles the accused to acquittal.
14. From the entire evidence of PW.1 to PW.11 , this court observed the following:-
PW.1 in his chief-examination has stated that some unknown offenders committed theft, as such it is evident that he is not the eye witness to the incident. PW.2 panch witness for Crime Details Form did not support the case of prosecution. PW.3 and PW.4 panch witnesses for Stolen Property Identification
CC.No.1626 of 2020
12 panchanama conducted at police station turned hostile. Further PW.5 and Pw.6 who are the panch witnesses for confession and recovery of stolen property also did not support the case of prosecution. Though PW.8/Finger Print Expert has supported the case of prosecution no photographs or negatives have been produced before the court to prove that they are collected from the scene of offence and moreover on perusal of Ex.P1 and considering the chief-examination of PW.1, it is very much clear that PW.1 has failed to state all the ornaments which were committed theft in his house and the same was admitted by him in the cross-examination.
15.In view of the above discussion and on perusal of the entire evidence, this court opines that the identity of accused was not established beyond reasonable doubts through the evidence of prosecution. Under such circumstances, this court view that certainly there is infirmity in the investigation and the benefit of it is to be given in the favour of accused. Therefore, as the prosecution failed to bring home the guilt of the accused for the offences punishable U/Sec. 457, 380 of Indian Penal Code.
16. In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/sec.
457, 380 of Indian Penal Code and he is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall stand cancelled and the sureties shall be discharged after the expiry of six months as contemplated u/s 437-A Cr.P.C. The MO.1 to MO.8 given for interim custody to the owner of the property vide Crl.MP.No.41/2020 dt 6.3.2020 shall be made absolute after the expiry of appeal period.
(Typed to my dictation typed on the computer corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 2nd day of May, 2023).
Sd/-
I-Addl. Junior Civil Judge – cum – I – Addl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Hanamkonda.
CC.No.1626 of 2020
13
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESS EXAMINED
FOR THE PROSECUTION:FOR THE DEFENCE PW1/LW.1- Rajoju Ravindar -None-
PW.2/LW.3-Avandla Mohan
PW.3/LW.7-Saidala Balram
PW.4/LW.8- Sirikonda Ashok Kumar
PW.5/LW.5- Muppidi Rohith Kumar
PW.6/LW.6 - Thouti Shyamsunder
Pw.7/LW.9- Bandi Nageshwar Rao,Tahasildhar, Kazipet
PW.8/LW.11-A.Raj Kumar, Inspr.of police, FPB CID Unit Warangal
PW.9/LW.12- K.Kumaraswamy, SI of police, PS Madikonda.
PW.10/LW.10- B.Ravinder, SI of police, PS KUC
PW.11/LW.13- Mohd.Sarwar, SI of police, PS Madkonda, Investigating officer, who filed charge sheet.
EXHIBITS MARKED
FOR THE PROSECUTION:FOR THE DEFENCE: Ex.P1 is report --NIL—
Ex.P2 is signature of PW.2 on CDF
Ex.P3 is signature of PW.3 on confession cum seizure panchanama
Ex.P4 is signature of PW.4 on confession cum recovery panchanama
Ex.P5 is signature of PW.7 on Identification panchanama
Ex.P6 is Confession cum seizure panchanama
Ex.P7 is seizure panchanama.
MATERIAL OBJECTS
MO-1- one pair of gold Ear studs,
MO.2- 3 gold rings small,
MO.3- one pair gold mattelu,
MO.4- one pair long gold mattelu,
MO.5- 7 gold Laxmi idol billalu,
MO.-6-One pair silver anklets,
CC.No.1626 of 2020
14 MO.7- One pair silver anklets,
MO-8- is another pair of silver anklet,
Sd/-
I-Addl. Junior Civil Judge – cum – I – Addl.Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Hanamkonda.