Currently Serving

Smt. Shmmi Parvin Sultana Begum

Judge POCSO Court Guntur

PDJ Court Complex, Guntur · Guntur · Andhra Pradesh

SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM, Judge POCSO Court Guntur, is posted at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 441 court orders on record since 2025. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CRLMP, SC, CRL cases.

441

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CRLMP.BAIL/479/2026

YAKASIRI ANAND vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NALLAPADU P.S

23 Apr 2026

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), GUNTUR.

Present: Smt. Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum,

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Thursday, this the 23rd day of April, 2026

Crl.M.P.No. 479 / 2026

in

Crime No. 180 / 2026

of Nallapadu Police Station

Between:

Yakasiri Anand, S/o.Durga Rao, 22 years, R/o. 3rd ward, Potlurivari Street, Repalle, Bapatla District.…Petitioner/Accused

A N D

The State : Sub-Inspector of Police, Nallapadu P.S.…Respondent/Complainant

This Petition came up on 21.04.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Sai Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and Sri T.Durga Prasad, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/complainant and having heard both sides and having perused the record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is an application filed under Sections 480 & 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/Accused in

Cr.No.180/2026 of Nallapadu PS, to enlarge him on bail.

2.The averments of the petition in brief are that initially the police, Nallapadu P.S., registered a case on 08.03.2026 under girl missing 2

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

basing on the report given by the defacto-complainant/father of victim falsely alleging that prior to 08.03.2026, the defacto complainant is resident of SwarnaBharathi Nagar, Guntur, and the victim girl is working in Sakala sweet shop, Guntur. The accused studied upto 2nd year Degree at ABR

Degree College, Repalle. In the month of March, 2025, the accused came to Guntur, joined Sakala syam foods and sweet shop as a sales man and has been working there and then the victim girl used to talk with the accused freely and taking advantage of the same, he became friendly with her and decided to physical relation with her. The accused took the mobile number of the victim and from then onwards he used to speak with her over phone and he started telling the victim that he loved her, but she was not interested and the accused has forced her to talk with him over phone and threatened her that if she informed to her family members, he will harm her younger brother. The accused took the victim to his room and forcibly had sexual intercourse with her despite of her stiff resistance. After that the accused had physical relation with the victim several times in the same room. After persuading her with deceitful words that he will marry her. The last time the accused had physical relation with the victim girl was on 06.03.2026 in their room Devapuram 4th lane. The accused also threatened the victim not to disclose the matter to her family members. Since the victim girl had not come to the shop for about a week, on 07.03.2026 the accused went to her house. When the accused found the victim girl was coming outside of their house, he went to her and threatened her that if she did not come with him he would kill her there itself. Then the accused forcibly took the victim girl to Guntur Bus stand and from there to Ongole. About 4.00

PM, they reached Ongole and nearby Anjaneya Swamy temple, the accused forcibly tied a mangalsutra around the neck of victim to make her believe. From there the accused took the victim to his native place Repalle, 3

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

where his parents were not present at home. Later, the victim girl remembered her parents and on 09.03.2026 she reached her house at

Guntur without informing the accused. Basing on the said statement of victim, the section of law is altered as Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)(m), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 from girl missing.

The police falsely implicated the petitioner/accused in this case and he did not commit any offence. He is having fixed place of abode at Repalle of

Bapatla District and law abiding citizen and material part of investigation is completed. He requested to enlarge him on bail.

3.The case of prosecution in brief is that prior to 06.03.2026, the victim aged 17 years was working in Sakala sweet shop, Guntur and in the month of March, 2025, the petitioner/accused came to Guntur, joined

Sakala syam foods and sweet shop as a sales man and has been working there and took her mobile number and used to talk with her over phone and taking advantage of the same, the petitioner/accused followed and harassed the victim aged 17 years in the name of love and marriage and forced her to talk with him over phone and threatened her that if she does not talk with him, he will do something to her younger brother and forcibly used to take her to his room located in Gardens area and had sexual intercourse with her on several occasions under the guise of marriage by saying deceitful words and on 06.03.2026 he took the victim to his room and had sexual intercourse with her and on 07.03.2026 while the victim was going to shop, the petitioner/accused obstructed her and forced her to come along with him and threatened her that if she does not come along with him, he will kill her on the spot and took the victim to Ongole and tied thali around her neck at Anjaneyaswamy temple and from there he took her to

Repalle and on 09.03.2026 the victim went to her house and informed the 4

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

same to her parents. Then they all went to police station and there the statement of victim was recorded. Basing on the said statement, the police,

Nallapadu P.S., altered the section of law as Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)

(m), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 from girl missing.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and learned Special Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused has argued that the petitioner/Accused is falsely implicated in this case and he did not commit any offence. He further submitted that the petitioner/Accused is having fixed place of abode at Repalle of Bapatla District and he is law abiding citizen and material part of investigation is completed. He prays to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail.

6.On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor has argued that the petitioner/Accused committed heinous acts against the victim girl and the investigation still pending. He further argued that if the petitioner/Accused is released on bail, there is a chance of threatening the witnesses and tampering of evidence.

7.Point for determination :

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled to be

released on bail as prayed for?”

P O I N T :

8.On hearing both sides and on perusal of the record available is observed that the police of Nallapadu PS, registered a case in

Cr.No.180/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 5

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

64(2)(m), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, basing on the statement of victim alleging that prior to 06.03.2026,the victim aged 17 years was working in Sakala sweet shop, Guntur and in the month of

March, 2025, the petitioner/accused came to Guntur, joined Sakala syam foods and sweet shop as a sales man and has been working there and took her mobile number and used to talk with her over phone and taking advantage of the same, the petitioner/accused followed and harassed the victim aged 17 years in the name of love and marriage and forced her to talk with him over phone and threatened her that if she does not talk with him, he will do something to her younger brother and forcibly used to take her to his room located in Gardens area and had sexual intercourse with her on several occasions under the guise of marriage by saying deceitful words and on 06.03.2026 he took the victim to his room and had sexual intercourse with her and on 07.03.2026 while the victim was going to shop, the petitioner/accused obstructed her and forced her to come along with him and threatened her that if she does not come along with him, he will kill her on the spot and took the victim to Ongole and tied thali around her neck at Anjaneyaswamy temple and from there he took her to Repalle.

9.On perusal of the record, it is observed that the petitioner/accused repeatedly committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl by threatening her. The offences charged against the petitioner/Accused are grave in nature. The prosecution has made several serious allegations against the petitioner/Accused which constitutes serious offences with grave punishment in the POCSO Act which requires medical examination of both the parties and thorough investigation, for fair justice and investigation is still pending and this is the first bail application. At this stage, if the petitioner/Accused released on bail, there is possibility of 6

Crl.MP.No. 479/2026 in Cr.No.180/2026

of Nallapadu P.S., Dt: 23.04.2026

threatening the witnesses, escape from the clutches of the law and tampering of the evidence. Hence, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused. Accordingly, this point is answered.

10.In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation directly on computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23rd day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Copies to:

1) Sri B.Sai Chandra, learned counsel for petitioner/Accused

2) The Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur, through e-mail.

CRLMP.BAIL/571/2026

YELLEBOINA NARAYANA vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE DURGI P.S

29 Apr 2026

Crl.MP.No. 571/2026 in Cr.No. 24/20236

of Durgi P.S., Dt: 29.04.2026

IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), GUNTUR.

Present: Smt. Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum,

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Wednesday, this the 29th day of April, 2026

Crl.M.P.No. 571 / 2026

in

Crime No. 24 / 2026

of Durgi Police Station

Between: Yelleboyina Narayana, S/o.Peda Brahmaiah, 67 years. R/o.Adigoppala Village, Durgi mandal.…Petitioner/Accused

A N D

The State : Sub Inspector of Police, Durgi P.S.…Respondent/Complainant

This Petition came up on 23.04.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of M.Sai Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and Sri T.Durga Prasad, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/complainant and having heard both sides and having perused the record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is the 2nd bail application filed under Sections 480 & 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/accused in

Cr.No.24/2026 of Durgi P.S., to enlarge him on bail.

2.The averments of the petition in brief are that the police, Durgi

P.S., registered a case on 15.03.2026 against the petitioner/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 75(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 r/w 8 2

Crl.MP.No. 571/2026 in Cr.No. 24/20236

of Durgi P.S., Dt: 29.04.2026

of POCSO Act, falsely alleging that the defacto-complainant is the resident of

Adigoppula Village of Durgi Mandal and the petitioner/accused also same village. The petitioner/accused used to run milk collection center in that village. The defacto-complainant is a house wife and her husband is doing agricultural coolie work for eking out their livelihood. The victim girl aged 11 years is the daughter of defacto-complainant. The victim girl is studying 6th class in Z.P.H. School, Adigoppala Village. On 15.03.2026 at about 9.00 AM, the victim went to a nearby shop to purchase eatables. After purchasing chocolates from the shop of Gunda Nageswara Rao (LW.4), while she was returning to her house, the petitioner/accused called her to the milk collection centre stating that he will give the milk money. Believing the words of petitioner/accused, the victim went to the said milk collection center. The petitioner/accused checked the milk account and informed her that he gave an amount of Rs.515/- to the victim towards milk and asked her to sign. While the victim went inside the shop located at the milk collection center and was putting her signature, the petitioner/accused came from behind her and forcibly caught hold ger waist with his both hands and tightly hugged her from behind and thereby outraging her modesty. On that, the victim got frightened and started shouting loudly and crying, upon which the petitioner/accused left her. Thereafter, the victim ran away from that place due to fear and went to her house and narrated the entire incident to her mother/defacto-complainant by weeping. On hearing the same, the defacto-complainant informed the matter to her husband. Then they went to police station and lodged a report.

The police falsely implicated the petitioner/accused in this case and he did not commit any offence. He is having fixed place of abode and he is law abiding citizens. He undertakes that he will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any prosecution witness and material part of investigation is completed. He requested to enlarge him on bail.

Crl.MP.No. 571/2026 in Cr.No. 24/20236

of Durgi P.S., Dt: 29.04.2026

3.The case of prosecution in brief is that on 15.03.2026 at about 9.00 AM, the victim aged 11 years, went to the shop to purchase eatables and after purchasing chocolates from the shop and while she was returning to her house, the petitioner/accused called her to the milk collection centre stating that he will give the milk money. Believing the words of petitioner/accused, the victim went to the said milk collection center. The petitioner/accused checked the milk account and informed her that he gave an amount of Rs.515/- to the victim towards milk and asked her to sign. While the victim went inside the shop located at the milk collection center and when she was putting her signature, the petitioner/accused came from behind her and forcibly caught hold ger waist with his both hands and tightly hugged her from her back. Then she raised cries and went to her house by weeping and informed the same to her mother. On that, the victim got frightened and started shouting loudly and crying, upon which the petitioner/accused left her. In turn the defacto- complainant/mother of victim girl went to police station and lodged a report.

The police of Durgi P.S., registered a case in Cr.No.24/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 75(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 r/w 8 of

POCSO Act.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and learned

Special Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has argued that the petitioner/accused is aged about 67 years and has been suffering from old age ailments. He further argued that the petitioner/accused did not commit any offence and he was falsely implicated in this case. He further argued that the petitioner/accused is law abiding citizen and having fixed place of abode and material part of investigation is completed and prays to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail.

Crl.MP.No. 571/2026 in Cr.No. 24/20236

of Durgi P.S., Dt: 29.04.2026

6.On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor reported no objection and may pass appropriate orders.

7.Point for determination :

“Whether the petitioner/accused is entitled to be

released on bail as prayed for ?”

P O I N T :

8.On hearing both sides and on perusal of the record available is observed that the police of Durgi P.S., registered a case in Cr.No.24/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 75(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 r/w 8 of POCSO Act, basing on the report lodged by mother of victim/defacto- complainant on 15.03.2026 alleging that on 15.03.2026 at about 9.00 AM, the victim aged 11 years, went to the shop to purchase eatables and after purchasing chocolates from the shop and while she was returning to her house, the petitioner/accused called her to the milk collection centre stating that he will give the milk money. Believing the words of petitioner/accused, the victim went to the said milk collection center. The petitioner/accused checked the milk account and informed her that he gave an amount of Rs.515/- to the victim towards milk and asked her to sign. While the victim went inside the shop located at the milk collection center and when she was putting her signature, the petitioner/accused came from behind her and forcibly caught hold ger waist with his both hands and tightly hugged her from her back.

9.On perusal of the record, it is observed that as many as five witnesses are examined and the statement of victim under Section 183 of

BNSS is recorded. It seems that most of the investigation is completed except filing charge sheet. The learned Spl.PP also reported no objection for grant of bail. In view of the above stated reasons, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused. Accordingly, this point is answered.

Crl.MP.No. 571/2026 in Cr.No. 24/20236

of Durgi P.S., Dt: 29.04.2026

10.In the result, this petition is allowed and the petitioner/Accused shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of this Court.

Typed to my dictation directly on computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 29th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur. Copies to:

1) Sri M.Sai Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused.

2) The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Gurazala, through e-mail.

CRLMP.BAIL/577/2026

tulasi nagarjuna vs Vsthe state dy supdt of police guntur dt arundelpet p.s

28 Apr 2026

Crl.MP.No.577/2026 in Cr.No.64/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), GUNTUR.

Present: Smt. Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum,

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Tuesday, this the 28th day of April, 2026

Crl.M.P.No. 577 / 2026

in

Crime No. 64 / 2026

of Arundelpet Police Station

Between:

Tulasi Nagarjuna, S/o.Lakshmaiah, 33 yrs, D.No.302, Pedapalakaluru village, Guntur Rural mandal. …Petitioner/A1 A N D

The State : SHO, Arundelpet PS.…Respondent/Complainant

This Petition came up on 23.04.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.Subbarao, learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 Sri T.Durga Prasad, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/complainant and having heard both sides and having perused the record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is the 2nd bail application filed under Sections 480 & 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/A1 and others in Cr.No.64/2026 of Arundelpet PS, to enlarge him on bail.

2.The averments of the petition in brief are that the police,

Arundelpet PS, registered a case on 14.2.2026 against the petitioner/A1 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 137(2), 79 of BNS, 2023, 2

Crl.MP.No.577/2026 in Cr.No.64/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

Section 6 r/w 5(l), 5(j)(i) of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (POA) Act falsely alleging that the victim is studying 8th class in Oxford School at SVN colony, Guntur and the petitioner/A1 has been working as teacher in the same school, teaching social subject and he has been harassing the victim as he likes her, he cannot live without her, intimidates her as he will die if she did not talk with him, obtained her father mobile number, making phone calls and on 09.02.2026 the petitioner/A1 took the victim to hotel at Vijayawada on his motorcycle by threatening her in the name of suicide and there the petitioner/A1 forcibly committed rape on her thrice and on knowing the same, the family members of victim questioned the petitioner/A1, for which the petitioner/A1, his mother and his sister abused the victim and her family members in filthy language by mentioning their case and threatened them with dire consequences. The police falsely implicated the petitioner/A1 in this case and he did not commit any offence. He is the sole breadwinner of his family and he is having fixed place of abode and material part of investigation is completed. He requested to enlarge him on bail.

3.The case of prosecution in brief is that prior to 09.02.2026, the petitioner/A1 being teacher in the school of the victim, followed and harassed the victim aged 13 years, in the name of love and he has been harassing her as he likes her, he cannot live without her and threatened her that if she did not talk with him, he will die and obtained her father mobile number and making phone calls and on 09.02.2026 the petitioner/A1 took the victim to hotel room at Vijayawada on his motorcycle by threatening her and there the petitioner/A1 forcibly committed rape on her thrice and later he dropped the victim at her house and she informed the same to her parents and on knowing the same, on 13.2.2026 the parents of the victim 3

Crl.MP.No.577/2026 in Cr.No.64/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

went to the house of petitioner/A1 along with victim and when questioned the petitioner/A1, the petitioner/A1 and his family members abused them in filthy language by mentioning their case and threatened them with dire consequences. Then they went to police station and lodged a report. The police, Arundelpet P.S., registered a case in Cr.No.64/2026 under Sections 64(2)(m), 137(2), 79 of BNS, 2023, Section 6 r/w 5(l), 5(j)(i) of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (POA) Act.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 and learned

Special Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 has argued that the petitioner/A1 is falsely implicated in this case and he has been in judicial custody from 05.03.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner/A1 is the sole breadwinner of his family and is having fixed place of abode and the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and prays to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail.

6.On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor has argued that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and this Court may pass appropriate orders.

7.Point for determination :

“Whether the petitioner/A1 is entitled to be

released on bail as prayed for?” 4

Crl.MP.No.577/2026 in Cr.No.64/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

P O I N T :

8.On hearing both sides and on perusal of the record available is observed that the police of Arundelpet P.S., registered a case in

Cr.No.64/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 137(2), 79 of BNS, 2023, Section 6 r/w 5(l), 5(j)(i) of POCSO Act, 2012 and

Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (POA) Act, basing on the report of the victim on 14.02.2026 alleging that prior to 09.02.2026, the petitioner/A1 being teacher in the school of the victim, followed and harassed the victim aged 13 years, in the name of love and he has been harassing her as he likes her, he cannot live without her and threatened her that if she did not talk with him, he will die and obtained her father mobile number and making phone calls and on 09.02.2026 the petitioner/A1 took the victim to hotel room at Vijayawada on his motorcycle by threatening her and there the petitioner/A1 forcibly committed rape on her thrice and later he dropped the victim at her house and she informed the same to her parents and on knowing the same, on 13.2.2026 the parents of the victim went to the house of petitioner/A1 along with victim and when questioned the petitioner/A1, the petitioner/A1 and his family members abused them in filthy language by mentioning their case and threatened them with dire consequences.

9.On perusal of the record, it is observed that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and the petitioner/A1 has been in judicial custody from 05.03.2026. In view of the above stated reasons and completion of the investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/A1. Accordingly, this point is answered.

Crl.MP.No.577/2026 in Cr.No.64/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

10.In the result, thispetition is allowed and the petitioner/A1 shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of this Court.

Typed to my dictation directly on computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 28th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Copies to:

1) Sri P.Subbarao, learned counsel for petitioner/A1

2) The Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur, through e-mail.

CRLMP.BAIL/525/2026

TATHA VENKATA PAVAN vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE ARUNDELPET P.S

28 Apr 2026

Crl.MP.No. 525/2026 in Cr.No. 40/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), GUNTUR.

Present: Smt. Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum,

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Tuesday, this the 28th day of April, 2026

Crl.M.P.No. 525 / 2026

in

Crime No. 40 / 2026

of Arundelpet Police Station

Between:

Tatha Venkata Pavan, S/o.Prasad, 23 years, R/o.Valiveru village, Tsundur mandal, Bapatla District.…Petitioner/A1

A N D

The State : Sub-Inspector of police, Arundelpet P.S.…Respondent/Complainant

This petition came up on 22.04.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Immanuel Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 and Sri T.Durga Prasad, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/complainant and having heard both sides and having perused the record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is the 2nd bail application filed under Sections 480 & 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/A1 in

Cr.No.40/2026 of Arundelpet P.S., to enlarge him on bail.

2.The averments of the petition in brief are that initially the police, Arundelpet P.S., registered a case on 23.01.2026 filed by the defacto-complainant under girl missing falsely alleging that on 10.02.2026 around 17.30 hours, the defacto-complainant brought the victim girl to

Arundelpet P.S and there the statement of victim girl was recorded by 2

Crl.MP.No. 525/2026 in Cr.No. 40/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

woman SI of police and the same was videographed. Basing on the said statement of victim girl, the section of law was altered as Sections 64(1), 137(2), 49 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 & 17 of POCSO Act from girl missing by filing an alteration memo. The police falsely implicated the petitioner/A1 and he did not commit any offence and he is having fixed place of abode and material part of investigation is completed. He requested to enlarge him on bail.

3.The case of prosecution in brief is that prior to 23.01.2026, the petitioner/A1 followed and harassed the victim aged 17 years in the name of love and threatened her that if she does not love him, he will kill her parents and also threatened her with dire consequences to take money and gold ornaments and accordingly on 23.01.2026 at about 3.00 AM (early morning) the victim taken the gold ear studs and gold chain and cash of

Rs.50,000/- and went to Guntur railway station and from there the petitioner/A1 along with his friend Ajay took her to Mindore village of

Repalle mandal and from there the petitioner/A1 took the victim to

Vijayawada and from there he took her to the house of Sivakrishna at

Hyderabad and there the petitioner/A1 forcibly had sexual intercourse with her under the guise of marriage and detained her till 08.02.2026. On 09.02.2026 the petitioner/A1 took the victim to Guntur railway station and when the victim asked the petitioner/A1 to marry her, he abused her in filthy language and beat her with hands and escaped from there. Then the victim returned to her house and informed about the incident to her parents.

Then the parents of victim took her to police station and there the statement of victim was recorded. Basing on the said statement of victim, police of

Arundelpet P.S., altered section of law as Sections 64(2)(m), 87, 49 of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 r/w 5(l) and 17 of POCSO Act.

Crl.MP.No. 525/2026 in Cr.No. 40/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 and learned

Special Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 has argued that the petitioner/A1 did not commit any offence and he is falsely implicated in this case. He further argued that the petitioner/A1 is law abiding citizen and the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and prays to enlarge the petitioner/A1 on bail.

6.On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor has argued that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and this Court may pass appropriate orders.

7.Point for determination :

“Whether the petitioner/A1 is entitled to be

released on bail as prayed for?”

P O I N T :

8.On hearing both sides and on perusal of the record available is observed that the police of Arundelpet P.S., registered a case in

Cr.No.40/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 87, 49 of BNS, 2023 and Section 6 r/w 5(l) and 17 of POCSO Act, basing on the statement of victim alleging that prior to 23.01.2026, the petitioner/A1 followed and harassed the victim aged 17 years in the name of love and threatened her that if she does not love him, he will kill her parents and also threatened her with dire consequences to take money and gold ornaments and accordingly on 23.01.2026 at about 3.00 AM (early morning) the victim taken the gold ear studs and gold chain and cash of Rs.50,000/- and went to Guntur railway station and from there the petitioner/A1 along with his friend Ajay took her to Mindore village of Repalle mandal and from there the 4

Crl.MP.No. 525/2026 in Cr.No. 40/2026

of Arundelpet P.S., Dt: 28.04.2026

petitioner/A1 took the victim to Vijayawada and from there he took her to the house of Sivakrishna at Hyderabad and there the petitioner/A1 forcibly had sexual intercourse with her under the guise of marriage and detained her till 08.02.2026. On 09.02.2026 the petitioner/A1 took the victim to

Guntur railway station and when the victim asked the petitioner/A1 to marry her, the petitioner/A1 abused her in filthy language and beat her with hands and escaped from there.

9.On perusal of the record, it is observed that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and the petitioner/A1 has been in judicial custody from 14.02.2026. In view of the above stated reasons and completion of the investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/A1. Accordingly, this point is answered.

Typed to my dictation directly on computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 28th day of March, 2026.

Sd/- Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur Copies to:

1) Sri G.Immanuel Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner/A1.

2) The Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur, through e-mail.

CRLMP.BAIL/534/2026

UPPUTHALA KANAKARAO@ VEMULA GOVINDU S/O ANJANEYULU vs THE SHO, OLD GUNTUR PS

24 Apr 2026

Crl.MP.No. 534/2026 in Cr.No.253/2025

of Old Guntur P.S., Dt: 24.04.2026

IN THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), GUNTUR.

Present: Smt. Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum,

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur.

Friday, this the 24th day of April, 2026

Crl.M.P.No. 534 / 2026

in

Crime No. 253 / 2025

of Old Guntur Police Station

Between: Upputhala Kanakarao @ Vemula Govindu @ Maccha, S/o.Anjaneyulu @ Yedukondalu, 24 years, R/o.Backside of New Guntur Railway Station, 8th lane, Sivanagaraju Colony, Arundalpet, Guntur Town. …Petitioner/Accused

And

The State : SHO, Old Guntur P.S.... Respondent/complainant

This petition having come up on 21.04.2026 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.Rajesh, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and Sri T.Durga Prasad, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/complainant and having heard both sides and having perused the record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is an application filed under Sections 480 & 483 of

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the petitioner/Accused in

Cr.No.253/2025 of Old Guntur P.S., to enlarge him on bail.

2.The averments of the petition in brief are that the police,

Old Guntur P.S., registered a case on 21.08.2025 against the petitioner/accused for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of

BNS, 2023 and Section 8 POCSO Act 2012, falsely alleging that the alleged 2

Crl.MP.No. 534/2026 in Cr.No.253/2025

of Old Guntur P.S., Dt: 24.04.2026 incident took place on the intervening night of 20/21.08.2025 at about 12.00

AM alleging that the accused took the victim girl from her residence situated at 4th Lane, Ambedkar Nagar, Old Guntur. The police arrested the petitioner/accused and produced him before the concerned Court on 16.09.2025 for judicial remand and since then the petitioner/accused has been in judicial custody. The police falsely implicated the petitioner/accused and he is innocent and he is law abiding citizen and he is having fixed place of abode and material part of the investigation is completed. He requested to enlarge him on bail.

3.The case of prosecution in brief is that on 20.08.2025 at midnight 12.00 AM, while the victim girl aged 9 years was sleeping, the petitioner/accused trespassed into her house and kidnapped her and took her to railway track near to his house in Abhyudaya Nagar, Guntur, beat her, kissed her, touched her chest and misbehaved with her and after noticing someone coming on bike, he escaped from there. Then the victim went to her house and informed about the incident to her grandmother.

Then they went to police station and lodged a report. Basing on the said report, the police, Old Guntur P.S., registered a case in Cr.No.253/2025 for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 8

POCSO Act 2012.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and learned Special Public Prosecutor.

5.The learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused has argued that the the investigation is completed and the police already filed charge sheet and prays to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail.

Crl.MP.No. 534/2026 in Cr.No.253/2025

of Old Guntur P.S., Dt: 24.04.2026

6.On the other hand, the learned Special Public Prosecutor has argued that the petitioner/accused is involved in other seven crimes of different police stations and once he is released, it is difficult to secure his presence and there is every possibility of escaping from the jurisdiction of this Court.

7.Point for determination :

“Whether the petitioner/A1 is entitled to be

released on bail as prayed for ?”

P O I N T :

8.On hearing both sides and on perusal of the record available is observed that the police of Old Guntur P.S., registered a case in

Cr.No.253/2025 for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 8 POCSO Act 2012, basing on the report filed by the defacto-complainant/mother of victim alleging that on 20.08.2025 at midnight 12.00 AM, while the victim girl aged 9 years was sleeping, the petitioner/accused trespassed into her house and kidnapped her and took her to railway track near to his house in Abhyudaya Nagar, Guntur, beat her, kissed her, touched her chest and misbehaved with her and after noticing someone coming on bike, he escaped from there.

9.The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused has argued that the the investigation is completed and the police already filed charge sheet.

But the learned Spl.PP has seriously objected for grant of bail contending that the petitioner/accused is involved in other seven crimes of different police stations and once he is released, it is difficult to secure his presence and there is every possibility of escaping from the jurisdiction of this Court.

Crl.MP.No. 534/2026 in Cr.No.253/2025

of Old Guntur P.S., Dt: 24.04.2026

10.On perusal of record, it is observed that the petitioner/accused committed heinous acts against the girl of 9 years. This is a case where the petitioner/accused has indecently misbehaved with the small girl of 9 years and taking her to the railway track near to his house in Abhyudaya

Nagar, Guntur town. It is also the allegations that the petitioner/accused has threatened the victim, kissed her, touched her chest and after noticing someone coming on bike, he escaped from there. Admittedly the charge sheet is filed after completion of investigation by the police. But as per the contention of the learned Spl.PP, the petitioner/accused is involved in seven crimes of different police stations and the investigation in those cases is so far not completed and if he is released on bail, there will be a threat to the victim and her family members. In view of the involvement of the petitioner/accused in several cases and difficult to secure his presence in case of release for investigation in total seven cases, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused. Accordingly, this point is answered.

11.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation directly on computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 24th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Shammi Parvin Sulthana Begum

Judge,

Special Court for Speedy Trial of Offences under POCSO Act, Guntur Copies to:

1) Sri K.Rajesh, counsel for the petitioner/Accused.

2) The Superintendent, District Jail, Guntur, through e-mail.

Order Record 440 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CRLMP.BAIL/571/2026	YELLEBOINA NARAYANA vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE DURGI P.S	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/525/2026	TATHA VENKATA PAVAN vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE ARUNDELPET P.S	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/577/2026	tulasi nagarjuna vs Vsthe state dy supdt of police guntur dt arundelpet p.s	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/534/2026	UPPUTHALA KANAKARAO@ VEMULA GOVINDU S/O ANJANEYULU vs THE SHO, OLD GUNTUR PS	24 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/479/2026	YAKASIRI ANAND vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NALLAPADU P.S	23 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/524/2026	MADDIRALA AKHIL vs THE SHO INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHILAKALURIPET(T)P.S	23 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/477/2026	MEERJA SHAKEER BAIG vs SDPO WEST SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	22 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/478/2026	PEDDARAPU SATHISH vs THE STATE SHO RENTACHINTALA P.S	22 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/485/2026	PERUPOGU KOTESWARA RAO vs THE STATE SHO MACHERLA RURAL P.S	22 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/494/2026	THENALI TESWANTH KUMAR vs THE STATE SHO MAHILA P.S GUNTUR	22 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/495/2026	CHUKKA RAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF AP SDPO THULLURU SUB DIVISION	22 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/450/2026	KETHAVATH DURGA PRASAD NAIK vs THE STATE SHO BANDLAMOTTU P.S	10 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/469/2026	YELLEBOYINA NARAYANA vs THE STATE REP BY SI OF POLICE DURGI P.S	10 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/426/2026	TULASI NAGARJUNA vs THE STATE DY SDPO SUPDT OF POLICE WEST SUB DIVISION ,GUNTUR	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/464/2026	VADDALA RATNA RAJU(A1) vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET(T)P.S	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/465/2026	NAMATHOTI KALYAN vs STATE OF AP REP BY PP	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/419/2026	TAKKELLA SAI TEJA(A1) vs THE STATE REP BY SHO MACHERLA TOWN P.S	01 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/448/2026	BANDARU BALAIAH(A1) vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NADENDLA P.S	01 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/293/2026	MEERJA SHAKEER BAIG vs SDPO WEST SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/376/2026	MEERA GOUSYA BEGUM(A2) vs SDPO WEST SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/392/2026	CHUKKA RAJKUMAR vs THE STATE AP SDPO THULLURU SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/393/2026	TATHA VENKATA PAVAN vs STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARUNDELPET P.S	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/427/2026	UPPALADINNE PAWAN KUMAR vs THE STATE DY SUPDT OF POLICE SDPO GURAZALA PALNADU DT	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/377/2026	NAMATHOTI KALYAN(A1) vs THE STATE SHO TADIKONDA P.S	17 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/394/2026	VADDALA RATHANA RAJU(A1) vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET TOWN P.S	17 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/255/2026	SHAIK FAYAZ vs THE SDPO TENALI P.S	12 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/264/2026	PASUPULETI SAI KUAMR vs THE STATE SHO NALLAPADU P.S	12 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/314/2026	SHAIK JILANI S/O NAVVABU vs THE STATE OF AP, Rep by its public prosecutor, NARASARAOPET i tOWN ps	12 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/356/2026	PERECHARLA SRIKANTH S/O VEERANJANEYULU vs SHO, MAHILA PS	11 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/315/2026	UPPALADINNE PAWAN KUMAR S/O THURUMALAN GIRI BABU vs TEH STATE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SDPO GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT	09 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/345/2026	BANDARU BALAIAH S/O EDUKONDALU vs TEH STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADENDLA PS	09 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/287/2026	BANKA BENZIMAN vs THE STATE SHO INSPECTOR OF POLICE TADIKONDA P.S GUNTUR DT	03 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/338/2026	BANKA JHANSI(A2) vs THE STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TADIKONDA P.S	03 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/253/2026	VADDALA RATHANA RAJU(A1) vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET TOWN P.S	26 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/292/2026	LANJAPALLI SAMUEL(A1) vs SI OF POLICE VINUKONDA RURAL CIRCLE	26 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/252/2026	VADAREVU KARTHIK vs THE STATE DY SUPDT OF POLICE PATTABHIPURAM P.S GUNTUR DT	25 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/265/2026	MEERJA GOUSYA BEGUM(A2) vs SDPO WEST SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	25 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/288/2026	DEVARA KOTESWARA RAO(A1) vs STATE SI OF POLICE SATTENAPALLI TOWN P.S	25 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/200/2026	PERECHARLA SRIKANTH vs THE STATE SHO MAHILA P.S	24 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/226/2026	PAGELLI TIRUPATHAIAH vs THE STATE SHO PATTABHIPURAM P.S	24 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/227/2026	SHAIK KHADER BASHA(A1) vs THE STATE OF AP REP BY SHO MANGALAGIRI TOWN P.S	23 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/268/2026	KOTA NASARABABU(A3) vs THE STATE SHO BANDLAMOTU P.S	23 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/229/2026	BANDARU ADI vs THE STATE ROMPICHERLA P.S	19 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/228/2026	BANDARU BALAIAH vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NADENDLA P.S	18 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/176/2026	KOLANTI MADHU(A1) vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NALLAPADU P.S	17 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/180/2026	UPPALADINNE PAWAN KUMAR vs THE STATE DEPUTY SUPDT OF POLICE SDPO GURAZALA PALNADU DT	11 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/135/2026	Vudara Narasimha Rao vs The State Rep. by SDPO Nagaralu ps West Sub Division Guntur Urban	10 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/52/2026	SHAIK JILANI vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH NRT I TOWN P.S	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/86/2026	RAYAPUDI DEVA RAJU S/O SAMBAIAH vs SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, THULLURU SUB DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT.	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/134/2026	Devalla Konda vs The State Sub Inspector of Police Nallapadu ps	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/170/2026	KATHI JOSHI vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET P.S	09 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/99/2026	BANKA BENZIMAN vs THE SI OF POLICE TADIKONDA P.S	06 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/127/2026	SYED IMRAN LAL AHAMED(A1) vs THE STATE SHO TADEPALLI P.S	06 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/133/2026	Nirudi Swaroop Kumar vs The State SHO Kothapet ps	06 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/38/2026	SHAIK KHADER BASHA(A1) vs THE STATE SHO MANGALAGIRI(T) P.S	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/79/2026	PASUPULETISAI KUMAR vs THE STATE SHO NALLAPADU P.S	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/80/2026	KOTA NASARABABU vs THE STATE SHO BANDLAMOTU P.S	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/126/2026	DEVARA KOTESWARARAO(A1) vs SI OF POLICE SATTENAPALLI(T)P.S	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/128/2026	LANJAPALLI SAMUEL(A1) vs SI OF POLICE VINUKONDA(R)	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/979/2025	Chiluvuri Pavankumar vs Vsstate sub divisional police officer east sub division guntur	03 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/40/2026	NAMATHOTI KALYAN(A1) vs THE STATE SHO TADIKONDA P.S	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/69/2026	MUNGI GOPI KRISHNA vs THE STATE SHO BELLAMKONDA P.S	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/155/2026	ACHANTA VEERA RAGHAVAIAH vs THE STATE DY SUPDT OF POLICE PATTABHIPURAM P.S	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2119/2025	PAGELLI TIRUPATHAIAH vs THE STATE SHO PATTABHIPURAM P.S	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2126/2025	BANDARU ADI S/O DURARAO vs SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET SUB DIVISION, ROMPICHERLA PS	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/29/2026	KANCHERLA DEVA RAJU S/O RAMESH vs THE STATE KOTHAPET PS	28 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/60/2026	KAKUMANU TULASI KRISHNA S/O ADI NARAYANA vs SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI TOWN PS	28 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/26/2026	VENNAGIRI SRI HARSHA vs THE STATE SHO BELLAMKONDA P.S	27 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/28/2026	MAHANKALI ANJANEYULU S/O NARASIMHAM vs STATE SHO, LALAPET PS	27 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/11/2026	KATHI JOSHI vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET(R)P.S	23 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/27/2026	KOLANTI MADHU(A1) vs THE STATE SI OF POLICE NALLAPADU P.S	23 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/58/2026	KORIVI SAMSON S/O KOTAIAH ( A2) vs SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SOUTH SUB DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT	23 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/59/2026	KORIVI DANIYELU S/O SAMSON (A1) vs SOUTH SUB DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT	23 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/68/2026	CHEEMAKURTHI DEVA RAVI KIRAN vs THE STATE SHO PONNURU RURAL P.S	22 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1974/2025	NIRUDI SWAROOP KUMAR S/O KARUNAKAR vs THE STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAPET PS	16 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2127/2025	SYED IMRAN LAL AHAMED (A1) S/O SALAM vs THE STATE SHO, TADEPALLI PS	16 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2148/2025	DEVARA KOTESWARA RAO S/O RAJA (A1) vs STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI PS	12 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRL.MP/1/2026	ISLAVATH MOSHE NAYAK vs THE STATE SHO MACHERLA(U)P.S	12 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRL.MP/45/2025	MALLELA GOPI(A2) vs THE STATE SHO PONNUR(T)P.S	12 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2120/2025	LANJAPALLI SAMUEL(A1) vs SI OF POLICE VINUKONDA(R)CIRCLE	09 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2079/2025	DEVALLA KONDA S/O SRINIVASA RAO vs THE STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NALLAPADU PS	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2086/2025	KANCHARLA ANIL KUMAR(A3) vs THE STATE SHO NALLAPADU P.S	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2089/2025	SYED JILANI vs SDPO NORTH SUB DIVISION MANGALAGIRI P.S	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC/610/2023	THE STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARUNDALPET P.S vs KONDEPAGA SUNIL	07 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1918/2025	VADDE PRAKASH S/O RAVI KUMAR vs THE STATE SHO, ARUNDELPET PS, GUNTUR.	06 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1926/2025	KAKARLA GOPALA KRISHNA(A1) vs SI OF POLICE PONNURU(R)P.S	06 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1939/2025	KORIVI DANIYELU(A1) vs SDPO SOUTH SUB DIVISION GUNTUR DT	06 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1954/2025	CHALAVADI UMA SHANKAR S/O SAMBASIVA RAO vs STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GURAZALA TOWN PS	05 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2041/2025	KAKUMANU TULASI KRISHNA vs SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTENAPALLI(T)P.S	05 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1989/2025	NUBOTU TARAKESH vs THE STATE SHO TADEPALLI P.S	02 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2078/2025	MUNGI GOPI KRISHNA S/O HANUMANTHA RAO vs THE STATE SHO, BELLAMKONDA PS	02 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC/523/2021	SDPO, East Sub-Division, Guntur Urban vs Shaik Sharu	30 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1875/2025	GANGAPATHI BANNI(A1) vs THE STATE SHO NALLAPADU P.S	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1895/2025	BURSU ANJANEYULU vs THE STATE SDPO SATTENAPALLI P.S	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1903/2025	SANGIREDDY SRINIVASARAO vs THE STATE SHO CHILAKALURIPET TOWN P.S	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1940/2025	KANCHERLA DEVA RAJU S/O RAMESH vs THE STATE KOTHAPET, SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, EAST SUB DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1956/2025	MAHAMKALI ANJANEYULU S/O NARASIMHAM vs SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, EAST DIVISION , GUNTUR DISTRICT.	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1987/2025	VENNAGIRI SRI HARSHA vs THE STATE SHO BELLAMKONDA P.S	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2040/2025	GANGAPATHI SUBBAMMA(A2) vs THE STATE SHO NALLAPADU P.S	30 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1955/2025	JONNALAGADDA RAJESH S/O CHENCHU BABU vs THE STATE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISHA WOMEN PS	17 Dec 2025	Order	—

Showing 100 of 440 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2026		18
Mar 2026		15
Feb 2026		27
Jan 2026		31
Dec 2025		12
Nov 2025		45
Oct 2025		40
Sep 2025		34
Aug 2025		44
Jul 2025		64
Jun 2025		41
May 2025		54

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM handled?

SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM has handled 441 court orders since 2025 at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur. The average disposal rate is 33 orders per month.

What types of cases does SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM hear?

Based on available records, SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM primarily handles Criminal matters (Sessions Cases, CRL) at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur.

Where is SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM currently posted?

SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM is posted as Judge POCSO Court Guntur at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM dispose cases?

SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM disposes approximately 33 cases per month, based on 441 orders handled over their tenure at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur.

Since when is SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM serving?

SMT. SHMMI PARVIN SULTANA BEGUM has been serving at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

CRLMP 70%

SC 27%

CRL 2%

CRLA 1%

Posting History

Apr 2025 — Present

Judge POCSO Court Guntur
Apr 2025 — Present

Pocso Court, Guntur · 441 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri B Sai Kalyan Chakravarthi

Prl. District and Sessions Judge

866 orders

Smt. V.A.L. Sathyavathi

I Addl. District and Sessions Juge

2,279 orders

Sri Y.Nagaraja

II Addl. District and Sessions Judge

721 orders

Chilam Venkata Naga Srinivasa Rao

III Addl. District and Sessions Judge

396 orders

Vusa Srinivasa Rao

IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge

3 orders

Smt. K. Neelima

V Addl. District and Sessions Judge

1,452 orders

Sri K. Seetharama Krishna Rao

VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge

1 orders

Smt. B. Manjari

VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge

0 orders

Sri K. Jayakumar

X Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Gurazala

2 orders

Sri M. Vengaiah

XI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Tenali

0 orders

Sk Sikinder Basha

XII Addl. Dist Judge cum Judge Family Court

0 orders

D Ramulu

Chairman, Industrial Tribunal

0 orders

Smt. K. Radha Ratnam

Prl. Asst. Sessions Judge, Bapatla

0 orders

Sri. M. Gurunath

Asst., Sessions Judge, Gurazala

0 orders

Sri. O.V. Nageswar Rao

Prl. Asst., Sessions Judge, Guntur

0 orders

Smt. M.V. Ramana Kumari

I Addl. Asst., Sessions Judge, Guntur

0 orders

Smt. G. Anandi

II Addl. Asst., Sessions Judge FTC, Guntur

0 orders

Smt. Nagamani

Addl Asst. Sessions Court, Bapatla formerly III AS...

0 orders

Smt. P. Kamala Devi

IV Addl. Asst., Sessions Judge, Guntur

0 orders

Sri K. Chiranjeevulu

Asst., Sessions Judge, Mangalagiri

0 orders

Sri. Ch. Madhava rao

Prl. Asst., Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet

0 orders

Smt. A. lakshmi

Addl. Asst., Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet

0 orders

Sri. K. Satya Naga Bala Prasad

Asst., Sessions Judge, Repalle

0 orders

High Court

High Court of A.P.

0 orders

A.Solomon

Asst., Sessions Judge, Sattenapalli

0 orders

Sri D. Vijaya Saradhi Raju

Addl. Family Court Guntur

0 orders

Sri T.V.Rajesh Kumar

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

Smt. A. Sunitha Rani

I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

Mohd. Ishrath Fathima

II Addl. Senior Civil Judge FTC, Guntur

68 orders

Post kept vacant

III Addl. Senior Civil Judge FTC, Guntur

0 orders

C. Ramana Reddy

IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

K. Chidananda

VI Additional District Judge FTC

0 orders

Sri Rajasekhar Pallagani

Prl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur

0 orders

Ms. M.jagadeeswari

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

408 orders

Dhanaraju Dammalapati

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

275 orders

V.raghunath

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

K.V.Mahalakshmi

I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

2 orders

Post Vacant

II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

A. Satyanand

IV Addl. Senior civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

N. Solomon

V Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Guntur

0 orders

M. Sobha Rani

IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

273 orders

Smt. Kolar Latha

V Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

626 orders

Mohammad Gouse

VI Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur

203 orders

Smt. B Mary Sara Danamma

Spl.Judl.Magistrate of I Class for Excise, Guntur

397 orders

Miss. V.deepthi

Spl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class for Mobile, Guntu

0 orders

K.Kiran kumar

Judicial Magistrate of I class for Railways

0 orders

← View all judges at PDJ Court Complex, Guntur