Sri Syed Kaleemulla

VII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh

SRI SYED KALEEMULLA, VII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION), is posted at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 454 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, ATA cases.

454

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/806/2017

Smt. Mokkaralu uma sankari vs Muddana Damodara Rao

24 Jan 2019

OS NO.806/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP 1

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA,

VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Thursday, the 24th day of January, 2019

O.S.NO.806/2017

Between

Smt. Mokkarala Uma Sankari, W/o M.Nagendra Nath, Hindu, aged 46 years, residing at D.No.49-24-25/A, beside Ramalingeswara SwamyTemple,RamakrishnaNagar,Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam-530 016. …. Plaintif And :

Muddana Damodara Rao, S/o Ranga Rao, residing at Door No.38-19- 14/1, Jyothi Nagar, 104 Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam, Hindu, aged about 49 years, working in Mechanical department, Designation ALP, ID No.841, PF No.07316975, East Coast Railway, Waltair, Visakhapatnam. …. Defendant

This suit is coming on 04.01.2019 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri M.Nagendra Nath, Sri P.Subba Reddy, Advocates for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and same having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.4,72,075/- basing on the promissory note dated 14.07.2014.

2)The case of the plaintiff as per her plaint is that:

The defendant approached the plaintiff and borrowed an amount of Rs.2,75,000/- from the plaintiff on 14.07.2014 for his family expenses and to clearing sundry debts and executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintiff at Visakhapatnam agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 24% per annum or on demand. In spite of repeated requests and demands made by the plaintiff, defendant did not paid any

OS NO.806/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP 2 amount either towards interest or principal amount and the defendant used to postpone the same on some pretext of the other. On 17.08.2016 got issued registered lawyer notice through her counsel to the defendant and the said notice was not received and the same was returned with an endorsement “enquiry 1” by the postal department, but the defendant neither gave any reply nor paid any amount. Hence, the suit.

3.On 10.12.2018 the defendant called absent no representation and remained exparte.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

5.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

6. Point No.1 :

The plaintiff filed her chief examination affidavit as PW.1 and marked Promissory note dated 14.07.2014 as Ex.A1, Office copy of legal notice, dated 17.08.2016 as Ex.A2. Postal Receipt, dated 17.08.2016 as

Ex.A3, Returned cover with acknowledgement as Ex.A4. Perused the evidence of PW.1. the documents Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 on record. The evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 establishes that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.2,75,000/- on 14.07.2014 from the plaintiff and the defendant executed a promissory note on the same day.

7.The testimony of P.W.1 remained unchallenged. The claim of the plaintiff is maintainable and no evidence is adduced by the defendant as the defendant remained exparte. Hence, the plaintiff proved her case and she is entitled to recover the suit amount. Accordingly, this point is answered.

OS NO.806/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP 3

8.Point No.2: In view of the finding of this court on point No.1 , it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed for.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.4,72,075/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy two thousand and seventy five only) against the defendant with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and with further interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation; on the

principal amount of Rs.2,75,000/-.

Typed to my dictation to Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2019.

VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for : Plaintiff: Defendant:

P.W.1:Mokkarala Uma Sankari -None- P.W.2: Karri Ammi Reddy.

Documents marked for: Plaintiff:

Ex.A1/--Promissory note dated 14.07.2014

Ex.A2/--Office copy of legal notice, dated 17.08.2016

Ex.A3/--Postal Receipt, dated 17.08.2016

Ex.A4/--Returned cover with acknowledgement

Defendant: NIL

VII ASCJ/VSP

OS NO.806/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP 4

Date of presentation:10.07.2017 Date of filing: 01.08.2017

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA,

VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Thursday, the 24th day of January, 2019

O.S.NO.806/2017

Between

Smt. Mokkarala Uma Sankari, W/o M.Nagendra Nath, Hindu, aged 46 years, residing at D.No.49-24-25/A, beside Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple, Ramakrishna Nagar, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam-530 016. …. Plaintif And :

Muddana Damodara Rao, S/o Ranga Rao, residing at Door No.38-19-14/1, Jyothi Nagar, 104 Area, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam, Hindu, aged about 49 years, working in Mechanical department, Designation ALP, ID No.841, PF No.07316975, East Coast Railway, Waltair, Visakhapatnam. …. Defendant

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.4,72,075/- being the balance of principal and interest due on promissory note, dated 14.07.2014 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.2,75,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% per annum and for costs of the suit. The value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.4,72,075/- and a court fee of Rs.7,226/- is paid under Sec.20 Sch. 1 Art.1 (b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act. This suit is coming on 04.01.2019 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri M.Nagendra Nath, Sri P.Subba Reddy, Advocates for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and same having stood over till this day for consideration, and this Court doth order and:

D E C R E E

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.4,72,075/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy two thousand and seventy five only) with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and with further interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation; on the principal amount of Rs.2,75,000/-.;

OS NO.806/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP 5

and

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs.18,692/- towards costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the court, this the 24th January, 2019.

VII ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Memorandum of Costs

For Plaintiff:-Rs. Ps.For Defendant

Stamp on Vakalat2.00-No costs memo is filed-

Stamp on plaint (Rs.7,156+70)7,226.00 Process fee 89.00

Advocate fees7,931.00

Jr.Advocate fees2,444.00

Publication charges900.00

Typing charges100.00

Costs allowed:18,692-00

VII ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM.

NOTE: The parties should apply as soon as possible for the return of all exhibits which they may wish to preserve, as the record will be liable to be destroyed after three years from this date.

OS/354/2018

Potnuru Srinivasa Rao vs Chenna Padma

24 Jan 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA,

VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Thursday, the 24th day of January, 2019

O.S.NO.354/2018

Between:

Potnuru Srinivasa Rao, S/o late Gurumurthy, Hindu, aged 51 years, residing at D.No.20-48-6/1, Down Relli Veedhi, Mrs. A.V.N.College Road, Visakhapatnam.

...…Plaintif And:-

1. Chenna Padma, W/o late Ch.Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, aged about 40 years, residing at D.No.20-57-8, Down Relli Street, A.V.N.College Road, Visakhapatnam.

2. Chenna Lakshmi, W/o Eswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 38 years, residing at D.No.28-8-9, Upper Relli Veedhi, A.V.N.College Road, Visakhapatnam.

3. Potnuru Mahesh, S/o late Gurumurthy, Hindu, aged about 36 years, residing at D.No.20-3-7, Denkada Veedhi, Upper Relli Veedhi, A.V.N.College Road, Visakhapatnam.

4. Potnuru Sridhar, S/o late Gurumurthy, Hindu, aged about 36 years, residing at D.No.20-3-7, Denkada Veedhi, Upper Relli Veedhi, A.V..N.College Road, Visakhapatnam. …Defendants

This suit is coming on 04-01-2019 for hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Sudhakara Reddy, Advocate for Plaintiff and defendants 1 to 4 having been remained exparte and having stood over for consideration this court made the following:-

JUDGMENT

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for the relief of partition of the A & B schedule mentioned properties into 2 equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and one such to the defendants and for costs of the suit.

2.The case of the plaintiff in brief is that:

On 18.01.2016 the father of the plaintiff died leaving behind him and his mother as Class I Legal heirs and subsequently the mother of the plaintiff

Yellamma also died intestate on 14.07.2017 and when the said P.Guramma acquired the property by way of pasupu Kunkuma from her parents and on 27.08.1975 she gifted the said property to her two sons by way of Registered

Gift Settlement deed dated 27.08.1975 bearing Doc.No.4410/1975 as per the above said Gift settlement deed the father of the plaintiff got half share i.e. A- schedule property and he acquired B-schedule property with his hard earned money purchased is an extent of 37 sq.yards. After the demise of the plaintiff’s father and mother he is in peaceful possession and enjoying of the A & B schedule mentioned properties without any interruption from anybody or whatsoever and when the plaintiff is entitled to ½ share in the schedule properties as per law. But the 1st defendant trying to sell away the A-schedule property to 3rd parties without consent of the plaintiff and the plaintiff many times demanded the defendants to partition the suit schedule properties into two equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff, buyt the defendant did not choose to come forward for partition of the said properties. On that the plaintiff got issued a Registered lawyer’s notice on 12.03.2018 and the defendants 1, 3 and 4 are not received the said notice and the 2nd defendant received the notice and the 2nd defendant did not choose to give any reply nor did not choose to come forward for partition of the suit schedule properties.

Hence, the suit.

3.The defendants 1 to 4 remained exparte.

4.The plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and he marked death certificate of the father of plaintiff, dated 17.02.2016 as Ex.A1, photocopy of death certificate of the mother of the plaintiff, dated 07.11.2017 as Ex.A2, Certified copy of Gift Settlement deed bearing 4410/1975 of the maternal grandmother of the plaintiff, dated 27.08.1975 as Ex.A3, Market value certificate, dated 08.03.2018 as Ex.A4, Market value certificate, dated 14.03.2018 as Ex.A5,

Office copy of legal notice got issued by the plaintiff to the defendants 1 to 4,

dated 12.03.2018 as Ex.A6, postal receipts as Ex.A7, acknowledgement cards

of the 2nd defendant as Ex.A8, translation copy of gift deed as Ex.A9, Aadhaar card of the plaintiff as Ex.A10.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

6.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for partition of the A & B schedule properties?

2. To what relief?

7.POINT Nos.1 and 2:

The plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit as PW.1 and

Exs.A1 to A10 are marked. Perused the evidence of PW.1 and the documents

Exs.A1 to A10 on record. They categorically show that the plaintiff is the legal heir to the estate of the deceased Gurumurthy, Gurumurthy’s mother acquired the A-schedule property by way of pasupu Kunkuma. The said P.Guramma executed a gift settlement deed dated 27.08.1975 in favour of her two sons by name P.Gurumurthy and P.Appa Rao as per the above said Gift Settlement

Deed her father got half share i.e. an extent of 33.33 sq.yards and he is the absolute owner of the said property i.e. A-schedule property, originally A- schedule property is being thatched house in an extent of 45 sq.yards situated in Old D.No.20-8-2,Visakhapatnam. During the life time of her father with his hard earned money he purchased B-schedule property i.e. RCC slabbed house in an extent of 37 sq.yds situated at Denkada Veedhi, Upper Relli Veedhi. But the defendants did not appear before the court to prove their contention as they remained exparte. Hence, the plaintiff proved his case and he is entitled to the relief as prayed for. Accordingly, this point is answered.

8. POINT NO.2: In view of the finding of this court on Point No.1 , it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed for.

9.In the result the suit is decreed with costs by partitioning the plaint A &

B schedule properties into two(2) equal shares and one such share is allotted to the plaintiff and one such share to the defendants.

Typed to my dictation to Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2019.

VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for : Plaintiff: Defendant :

P.W.1: P.Srinivasa Rao -None-

Documents marked for:

Plaintiff:

Ex.A1/--Death certificate of the father of plaintiff, dated 17.02.2016 Ex.A2/--Photocopy of death certificate of the mother of the plaintiff,

dated 07.11.2017

Ex.A3/--Certified copy of Gift Settlement deed bearing 4410/1975 of the maternal grandmother of the plaintiff, dated 27.08.1975 Ex.A4/-- Market value certificate, dated 08.03.2018 Ex.A5/-- Market value certificate, dated 14.04.2018 Ex.A6/-- Office copy of legal notice got issued by the plaintiff to the defendants 1 to 4, dated 12.03.2018 Ex.A7/--Postal receipts Ex.A8/--Acknowledgement cards of the 2nd defendant Ex.A9/--Translation copy of gift deed Ex.A10/--Aadhaar card of the plaintiff

Defendant:

NIL

VII ASCJ/VSP

OS/604/2017

Boddepalli Srivardhan vs Regalabandha Sanyasi Rao

13 Feb 2019

OS NO.604/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA, VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Wednesday, the 13th day of February, 2019

O.S.NO.604/2017

Between

Sri Boddepalli Srivardhan, S/o Venkata Rao, aged 32 years, residing at Vepagunta, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam.

…. Plaintif And :

Mr. Regalabandha Sanyasi Rao, S/o Venkata Ramana, aged 35 years, Prop: Raja Complex, Opp: S.R.K.Theatre, S.Kota Village & Mandal, Vizianagaram and presently working as Godown In charge, Sarna Transport, Door No.31-33-69, Bhanu Street, Near ICICI ATM, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam. …. Defendant

This suit is coming on 21.01.2019 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Duppala Appa Rao, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and same having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.5,15,600/- basing on the promissory note, dated 05.06.2014.

2)The case of the plaintiff as per his plaint is that:

On 05.06.2014 the defendant borrowed an amount of

Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff for his business expenses and after receipt of consideration the defendant executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the said amount with interest @ 24% per annum either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand. Thereafter, on 30.06.2016 the defendant issued a cheque bearing No.751325, drawn on State Bank of

India, Maharanipeta branch, Visakhapatnam for an amount Rs.2,89,000/-. The

OS NO.604/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP plaintiff presented the cheque to his banker i.e. State Bank of India,

Vepagunta Branch, Visakhapatnam for collection and the same was dishonoured. The plaintiff got issued a legal notice dated 30.09.2016 and the defendant failed to repay the cheque amount or the promissory note amount to the plaintiff. Hence, the suit.

3.On 22.03.2018 the defendant called absent no representation and remained exparte.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

5.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

6. Point No.1 :

The plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit as PW.1 and marked Exs.A1 and A2. Promissory note dated 05.06.2014 as Ex.A1, Office copy of legal notice, dated 30.09.2016 as Ex.A2. Perused the evidence of

PW.1. the documents Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 on record. The evidence of P.W.1 coupled with Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 establishes that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- on 05.06.2014 from the plaintiff and the defendant executed a promissory note on the same day.

7.The testimony of P.W.1 remained unchallenged. The claim of the plaintiff is maintainable and no evidence is adduced by the defendant as the defendant remained exparte. Hence, the plaintiff proved his case and he is entitled to recover the suit amount. Accordingly, this point is answered.

8.Point No.2: In view of the finding of this court on point No.1 , it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed for.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.5,15,600/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifteen thousand and Six hundred only)

OS NO.604/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP against the defendant with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and with further interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation; on the principal amount of Rs.3,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation to Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 13th day of February, 2019.

VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for : Plaintiff: Defendant:

P.W.1:Boddepalli Srivardhan -None-

Documents marked for: Plaintiff:

Ex.A1/--Promissory note dated 05.06.2014

Ex.A2/--Office copy of legal notice, dated 30.09.2016

Defendant: NIL

VII ASCJ/VSP

OS NO.604/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP

Date of presentation:03.06.2017 Date of filing: 21.06.2017

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA, VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Wednesday, the 13th day of February, 2019

O.S.NO.604/2017

Between

Sri Boddepalli Srivardhan, S/o Venkata Rao, aged 32 years, residing at Vepagunta, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam.

…. Plaintif And :

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.5,15,600/- being the balance of principal and interest due on promissory note, dated 05.06.2014 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.3,00,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% per annum and for subsequent interest and for costs of the suit.

The value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.5,15,600/- and a court fee of Rs.7,626/- is paid under Sec.20 Sch. 1 Art.1 (b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.

D E C R E E

1. that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs.5,15,600/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifteen thousand and Six

OS NO.604/2017

VII ASCJC/VSP hundred only) with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and with further interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realisation; on the principal amount of

Rs.3,00,000/- ; and

2. that the defendant do also pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs. 7702 /- towards costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the court, this the 13th February, 2019.

VII ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Memorandum of Costs

For Plaintiff:-Rs. Ps.For Defendant

Stamp on Vakalat2.00-No costs memo is filed- Stamp on plaint7,626.00 Process fee 74.00

Institutional Costs allowed: 7702-00

VII ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM.

NOTE: The parties should apply as soon as possible for the return of all exhibits which they may wish to preserve, as the record will be liable to be destroyed after three years from this date.

OS/282/2018

Gajula Satyanarayana vs Tedlapu Rama Rao

25 Jan 2019

OS NO.282/2018

VII ASCJC/VSP 1

IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present : SRI SYED KALEEMULLA, VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam

Friday, the 25th day of January, 2019

O.S.NO.282/2018

Between

Gajula Satyanarayana, S/o late Appa Rao, Gajulla Satyanarayana, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, aged 63 years, Retd Employee, residing at Door No.20-101/1, Doggavanipalem, Near Railway Station, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam-531 173. …. Plaintif And :

Sri Tedlapu Rama Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, aged about 53 years, working as Asst. Telecom Technician, BSNL, Visakhapatnam residing at Door No.2-77.B, Pydimamba colony, Vepagunta, Visakhapatnam – 530 047. …. Defendant

This suit is coming on 04.01.2019 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Malla Tulasi Ram, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained exparte and same having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover a sum of Rs.8,30,000/- basing on the promissory note dated 26.01.2015.

2)The case of the plaintiff as per his plaint is that:

On 26.01.2015 the defendant approached the plaintiff and borrowed an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff for his family expenses and to discharge his sundry debts and after receipt of consideration the defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the even date agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% p.a. either to the at Sriharipuram, Visakhapatnam agreeing to repay the said amount with interest @ 24% per annum either to the plaintiff or to his order on demand. In

OS NO.282/2018

VII ASCJC/VSP 2 spite of repeated requests and demands made by him, the defendant did not choose to repay any amount either principal or interest and postponed the same on some pretext or the other. Hence, the suit.

3.On 17.07.2018 the defendant called absent no representation and remained exparte.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

5.Now the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of the suit amount as prayed for?

2. To what relief?

6. Point No.1 :

The plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit as PW.1 and marked Promissory note dated 26.01.2015 as Ex.A1. Perused the evidence of PW.1. the document Ex.A1 on record. The evidence of P.W.1 coupled with

Ex.A1 establishes that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- on 26.01.2015 from the plaintiff and the defendant executed a promissory note on the same day.

7.The testimony of P.W.1 remained unchallenged. The claim of the plaintiff is maintainable and no evidence is adduced by the defendant as the defendant remained exparte. Hence, the plaintiff proved her case and he is entitled to recover the suit amount. Accordingly, this point is answered.

8.Point No.2: In view of the finding of this court on point No.1 , it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed for.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of

Rs.8,30,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs and Thirty thousand only) against the defendant with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree; and with further interest @ 6% per annum

OS NO.282/2018

VII ASCJC/VSP 3 from the date of decree till the date of realisation; on the principal amount of

Rs.5,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation to Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 25th day of January, 2019.

VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined for : Plaintiff: Defendant:

P.W.1:Gajula Satyanarayana -None-

Documents marked for: Plaintiff:

Ex.A1/--Promissory note dated 26.01.2015

Defendant: NIL

VII ASCJ/VSP

OS/1529/2014

BANK OF INDIA vs CHADARAM TARAKESWARI

25 Jan 2019

IN THE COURT OF VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri Syed Kaleemulla VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

FRIDAY, THIS THE 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 2019

O.S. No. 1529/2014

Between :

Bank of India, Surya Bagh Branch, rep. By Chief Manager, consituted Attorney & GPA holder, Daspalla Complex, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam.

....Plaintiff

And:

1) Smt. Chandaram Tarakeswari, W/o. Gnaneswara Rao, Hindu, aged 49 years, residing at D.No. 2124-16-3, VUDA Colony, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam.

2) Gorripati Swami Naidu, S/o. Chittodu, Hindu, residing at lankavanipalem village, K. Kotapadu Mandal, Visakhapatnam.

3) Dogga Demudu, S/o. SanniBabu, Hindu, residing at D.No. 8-9, Pedugupalem Village, A-Kodru, Visakhapatnam.

....Defendants

This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me, in the presence of Sri Sunkara Padmaja, Advocates for Plaintiff and Sri Md. Habeebullah, Advocate for Defendant No.1 and Sri. B.V.Satyanarayana, Advocate for Defendant No.2 & 3 and the matter having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following the: and

J U D G M E N T

Suit filed by the plaintiff against defendant for recovery of the suit amount of Rs.

6,19,108/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 18.75 + 2% per annum from the date of the suit till realization and for costs of the suit.

Cousel for the plaintiff filed a not press memo. Memo recorded. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 25th day of January, 2019.

VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NO. OF WITNESS EXAMINED

NIL

VII ASCJ/VSP

Date of presentation: 27-08-2014 Date of filing: 27-08-2014

IN THE COURT OF VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: VISAKHAPATNAM

Present : Sri Syed Kaleemulla VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

FRIDAY, THIS THE 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 2019

O.S. No. 1529/2014

Between :

Bank of India, Surya Bagh Branch, rep. By Chief Manager, consituted Attorney & GPA holder, Daspalla Complex, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam.

....Plaintiff

And:

1) Smt. Chandaram Tarakeswari, W/o. Gnaneswara Rao, Hindu, aged 49 years, residing at D.No. 2124-16-3, VUDA Colony, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam.

2) Gorripati Swami Naidu, S/o. Chittodu, Hindu, residing at lankavanipalem village, K. Kotapadu Mandal, Visakhapatnam.

3) Dogga Demudu, S/o. SanniBabu, Hindu, residing at D.No. 8-9, Pedugupalem Village, A-Kodru, Visakhapatnam.

....Defendants

Suit filed by the plaintiff against defendant for recovery of the suit amount of

Rs. 6,19,108/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 18.75 + 2% per annum from the date of the suit till realization and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,49,018/- and a court fee of Rs.8,926/- is paid under section 20, Schedule-I Article-I (b & c) of A.P.C.F.

And S.V. Act.

This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me, in the presence of

Sri Sunkara Padmaja, Advocates for Plaintiff and Sri Md. Habeebullah, Advocate for

Defendant No.1 and Sri. B.V.Satyanarayana, Advocate for Defendant No.2 & 3 and the matter having stood over for consideration, this court DOTH order: and

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed; and

2. that there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 25th day of January, 2019

VII ADDITION SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VISAKHAPATNAM.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

For Plaintiff : For Defendant:

No cost memo filed on either side

VII ASCJ/VSP

Note: The parties should apply as soon aspossible for the return of all exhibits which they may wish to preserve, as the record will be liable to be destroyed after three years from this date.

Order Record 426 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/604/2017	Boddepalli Srivardhan vs Regalabandha Sanyasi Rao	13 Feb 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/282/2018	Gajula Satyanarayana vs Tedlapu Rama Rao	25 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1529/2014	BANK OF INDIA vs CHADARAM TARAKESWARI	25 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/354/2018	Potnuru Srinivasa Rao vs Chenna Padma	24 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/806/2017	Smt. Mokkaralu uma sankari vs Muddana Damodara Rao	24 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1141/2017	Choudary kalyan Kumar vs The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal corporation	24 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/59/2018	Padala Srinivasa Reddy vs Kalidindi Ramesh Raju	04 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/922/2018	Dokkiari Akkamma vs Joga Appa Rao	02 Jan 2019	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/898/2016	Union Bank of India vs Rayavalasa Santosh Kumar	28 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/912/2011	Kanchavarapu Appa Rao vs Vandravi Jagadeeswara Rao	28 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/669/2013	Yandra Chinna Rao vs Vengala Kannayya	27 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1224/2016	Surakala Appala Raju vs Duppala Sudakar	27 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1104/2017	Smt Bammidi paparatnam vs Cheekati Paidiraju	21 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/300035/2012	Annamreddy Venkata Ramana Murthy vs Konganti Hanumatha Rao	20 Dec 2018	ORDER	—
OS/456/2018	Madabathula Sriramamurthy vs Giduthuri Satya Surya Janardhana Rao	20 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/508/2017	Kallanti Ambic vs Smt Gonthina Satya	20 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/833/2017	Sheela Sita vs Shaik ramzan	20 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/62/2012	Mogasala Nageswara Rao vs Durga Venkatesh	19 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/283/2018	Chelikani Chandra Sekhar vs Chulli Veera Venkata Vijaya Kumar	19 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/605/2018	Venkataram Natarajan Raju vs Mallipudi Vearabhadra Rao	19 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1406/2014	VANDRASI SURI APPARAO vs BORRA NAGESWARA RAO	08 Dec 2018	OTHER	—
OS/1696/2011	Yenugula Varalakshmi vs P. Venkata Ramana and another	08 Dec 2018	OTHER	—
OS/1255/2016	Pitchikala Krishna Rao vs Dommeti Venkateswara Rao	07 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/284/2018	Surabhi Sujatha vs Bangari Appala Raju	05 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/919/2018	Potluri Constructions vs Pulipati Venkatesqwara Reddy and 18 others	05 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/924/2013	Kuna Nageswara Rao vs Kolusu Srinivasa Rao @ Sreenu	05 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/365/2011	Venga Nellore Anantha Krishna vs Saragadam Adi Venkata Siva Satyanarayana	04 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1691/2012	Ms Sri Shiridi Sai Rice Traders vs Andhra Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd	04 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/692/2012	Kishore Fancy Stores, rep, by its Sole Proprietor vs Segu Satya Vathi	03 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/693/2012	Ayyappa Tea Point a proprietary concern vs Smt.Segu Satya Varthi	03 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1639/2011	Tammana Shankara rao vs Malladi Janakimatha	03 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1754/2012	Segu Satyavathi vs Bellanna Rama Rao	03 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1755/2012	Segu Satyavathi vs Atma Ram Ashok Jarka	03 Dec 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/372/2011	Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devasthana vs V.V.K.Prasad	29 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/635/2012	State Bank of Hyderabad vs Pentakota Mohan Babu	28 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/946/2018	B.Appalaswamy vs Nakka Yerraji Rao	28 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/300037/2013	M. Venkata Koteswara Rao vs T. Venkata Raju	27 Nov 2018	ORDER	—
OS/388/2015	GANAPATHI SUJATHA vs KALLEPALLI VARAHALU	27 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/876/2011	Sanyasi Rao Patrudu vs Bank of India	27 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/338/2011	RK township Promoters Pvt.ltd vs S suri	26 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/43/2017	Dakamarri Sastyanarayana vs Behara Rama Murthy	22 Nov 2018	ORDER	—
OS/305/2018	Guntaboyina Prakash Rao vs Gajjella Suman	22 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/408/2018	Gorajana Tulasi vs Sampangi Rambabu	22 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/942/2017	Pilla Appala Konda vs Gavidi Appalanaidu	22 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/138/2018	Lolugu Srinivasa Rao vs Chenda Divya Tejasri	20 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/997/2017	Gandreti Ravi babu vs R.Kanka Rao	20 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1123/2016	Mummana Maheswara Rao vs Kucherlapati Satyanarayana	20 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1154/2006	VANDRASI SRINIVASA RAO AND2 OTHERS vs V.V.L.KRISHNA RAO AND 1 OTHER	19 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1187/2016	Sri Vooda Srinivasa Rao vs Paka Prabhakara Rao	15 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/373/2012	Sri Korukonda Prakash vs Sri Alla Sanyasi Rao	14 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/166/2015	karri rambabu vs DSR kumar	13 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/309/2010	Malleti Suri Babu vs Malleti Appa Rao and another	13 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/616/2012	Sodaram Chandra vs Sodaram Raja Rao	12 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1267/2016	Koidala Rama vs B Appalaraju	12 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1853/2012	Kommanamanchi Anantha Subba Rao vs J. Indhira	09 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/207/2012	Mogasala Satyavatghi vs Durga Venkata Ramanaji and another	05 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/792/2012	Kona Sadasiva Rao vs Kona Sankar Rao and 3 others	02 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1584/2008	Balireddy Appadu @ Appa Rao vs Vs1.Balireddy Sanni Babu and 2 others	02 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1214/2010	nagiredla srinvasa rao and others vs Chilla lakshmi and anothers	01 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1940/2012	Iluri Bapanna and another vs Andhra Cements Ltd.,	01 Nov 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/421/2009	Dokkara Chinnam Naidu vs Giduturi Surya Mohan Rao	31 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/3/2016	Sirigidi Appanna Babu vs Allaboina pydi Raju	30 Oct 2018	ORDER	—
OS/147/2018	K. Bhavana vs J. Sujatha	30 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/127/2015	Ms Welcome Marketing Assistance Tansukhlal Prakas vs The Chief Executive, Ms Utility power tech ltd	29 Oct 2018	OTHER	—
EP/69/2016	Abbireddi Subba Rayudu vs Redla Ramesh	26 Oct 2018	ORDER	—
OS/202/2017	Varun leasing vs Malla Ravi Kumar	26 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/190/2016	Nallamilli Siva Sankara reddy vs Dantuluri Varma	23 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/2120/2014	K RAVIKANTH SRINIVAS vs Vs1. POLISETTI GIRIDHAR GOPAL,	23 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/175/2015	Gantipalli Vijayalakshmi vs Chandu Durga Prasad	12 Oct 2018	ORDER	—
EP/1000089/2015	Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd rep by Rajesh Tiwari vs Rajesh Babu Kommoju	12 Oct 2018	ORDER	—
OS/1325/2017	Smt Kamirddy Subadramma vs Barri renuku	12 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/837/2017	Pulamarasetti Jagadeesh vs Pentakota chakravarthi	11 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/291/2011	O Appa Rao vs O Srinivasa Rao	10 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1133/2015	ONIMI SRINIVASA RAO vs ONIMI APPA RAO	10 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/476/2012	Addala Subba Venkata Satya Rama Chandra Rao vs Addala Srinivas	08 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/694/2012	Jeeri Sri Vidya vs Maddila Nagamani	04 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/336/2018	Dharmannagari Purushottam Reddy vs Marisetti Veera Sai Venkateswara Rao	03 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/474/2009	Kandrapu Yellayya Reddy vs Seerapu Kanaka Reddy	01 Oct 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/115/2017	Nakkarana Maheswara Rao vs Dogga Murali	28 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/260/2017	Taparthi sreenivasu vs Jajula Satya Rao	28 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/883/2017	Kasireddy Satyanarayana vs Smt Betha vimala	28 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1189/2010	Allu Jagadamba vs Kum. Edibilli Surya Kumari	28 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/885/2011	I Annamari vs The Commander Bureau Sailors	27 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1453/2011	K.Yerraji vs Vs1.K.Kanakarajuand 2others	26 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/787/2012	S. Venkata Vijaya Veera Ganapathi Raju vs Satya Sai Marines Pvt. Ltd.,	25 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/108/2011	Sanapala Prakasam vs The District Collector	24 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/379/2010	Bhadragiri Sriram vs M.Rudra Murthy	24 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/975/2017	Sadi Sitaram vs The Greater visakhapatnam Municipal corporation	20 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1944/2011	M sailaja Kumari vs Sundunagunta Ramakrishna	20 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/855/2009	State Bank of India vs Boddepalli Naveen Babu and another	18 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/81/2015	Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd vs Ram Mohan Gupta Kophamasu	14 Sep 2018	ORDER	—
OS/292/2017	K.M.V.N.Swamy vs Padda Siva Kumar	11 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/604/2012	A.P. Grameena Vikas Bank vs Naidu Simhachalam and 2 others	11 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/769/2016	Saragadam Ravi George vs Polamarasetty Bala shouri	11 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/308/2016	Nambala Venkata rao @ Venkata reddy vs Chintalapudi chandra rao	07 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/93/2013	The Karnataka Bank Ltd., vs Balleda Dhanunjayam	05 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/1116/2017	Smt badana suseela vs Anga Appala Raju	04 Sep 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/300041/2013	Polamarasetti Suresh vs Peela Veera	21 Aug 2018	ORDER	—
ATA/100017/2011	Chandana Mohanarao vs Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation	20 Aug 2018	JUDGEMENT	—
ATA/100018/2011	CHANDANA MOHANRAO vs Greater VIsakha Municipal Corporation, Commissione	20 Aug 2018	JUDGEMENT	—

Showing 100 of 426 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Feb 2019		1
Jan 2019		7
Dec 2018		28
Nov 2018		29
Oct 2018		18
Sep 2018		20
Aug 2018		10
Jul 2018		30
Jun 2018		30
May 2018		5
Apr 2018		12
Mar 2018		17

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SRI SYED KALEEMULLA handled?

SRI SYED KALEEMULLA has handled 454 court orders since 2017 at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam. The average disposal rate is 21 orders per month.

What types of cases does SRI SYED KALEEMULLA hear?

Based on available records, SRI SYED KALEEMULLA primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Where is SRI SYED KALEEMULLA currently posted?

SRI SYED KALEEMULLA is posted as VII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by SRI SYED KALEEMULLA available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by SRI SYED KALEEMULLA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SRI SYED KALEEMULLA dispose cases?

SRI SYED KALEEMULLA disposes approximately 21 cases per month, based on 454 orders handled over their tenure at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam.

Since when is SRI SYED KALEEMULLA serving?

SRI SYED KALEEMULLA has been serving at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam since 2017.

Case Types

OS 73%

EP 15%

ATA 10%

IP 2%

Posting History

May 2017 — Feb 2019

VII ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) · 454 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri Chinnamsetty Raju

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

1,274 orders

Sri M. Venkata Ramana

I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

5,391 orders

Kum. C.k.gayathri Devi

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

749 orders

Sri D.seshayya

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM-ACB

0 orders

Sri M.srihari

IV ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE-SPL JUDGE ECONOMIC OFFENCES

2 orders

Sri S. Damodara Rao

SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT-CUM-VI ADJ

11 orders

Sri S.Srinivasa Rao

VII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

736 orders

Smt. P.sri Satya Devi

SPL. JUDGE FOR SC AND ST CASES

1,369 orders

Sri. K.Ratna Kumar

XII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

433 orders

Sri. D.vijay Goutam

SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL...

130 orders

Smt. M.sobha

XIV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri K Venkateswara Rao

XV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. M.Ramakrishnamraju

V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS CUM FAMILY JUDGE

0 orders

Sri P Rajaram

ADDL. FAMILY JUDGE

829 orders

Sri U.u.prasad

II ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT...

0 orders

Sri J Srinivas Rao

III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE-cum-ADDITIONAL DISTRIC...

1 orders

Sri Y.gopal Krishna

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

0 orders

M D V N Sindhura

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

516 orders

Sri Ch. Pavan Kumar

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

761 orders

Dr. Soni Dwarampudi

VI ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)

525 orders

Smt. Dr. K. Sarada

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

515 orders

Smt. V.ganga Bhavani

I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

790 orders

Smt. Y.Premalatha

II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

385 orders

Sri G.Karthik

III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

1,053 orders

Smt. Sindhu Gurram

V ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

814 orders

Sri M.Pradeep Kumar

CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM

432 orders

Smt. P.Pradeepa

I ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPAT...

14 orders

Sri K.Vasudeva Rao

IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPA...

251 orders

Smt K.Sruta Vinda

VII ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS...

641 orders

Ms Sri Rajarajeswari Tejaswi Kalaharsti

SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS FOR TRI...

0 orders

Sri P Rajendra Prasad

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT - I

334 orders

Y.Ganapathi Rao

SPL. MAGISTRATE COURT-III

399 orders

D.viswanadham

SPL.MAGISTRATE COURT VI

10 orders

← View all judges at Prl District Court Complex, Visakhapatnam