Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT BENCH :: GUNTUR.

(CONSTITUTED BY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, GUNTUR UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987)

SATURDAY, THIS THE 14th day of September, 2024.

PRESIDING OFFICER: Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi, I Addl. Civil Judge ( Junior Division), Guntur. MEMBER: Sri. V.V.Gowri Sankar, Advocate, Guntur Bar Association.

Lok Adalath Case No. _________/2024

(In O.S.No:228/2024 on the file of Ist Additional Civil Judge's Court, ( Junior

Division), Guntur

Between: Reddy Suresh, S/o. Late Siva Nageswara Rao, Hindu, A/37 years, Business, R/o.D.No. 3- 20, Chebrole Village and Mandal, Guntur. …. Plaintiff.

And

Mudavath Bala Saida Naik, S/o. Soma Naik, Hindu, A/33 years, R/o. Near Saravana Stores, Lalapeta, Guntur.

.......Defendant.

Suit is filed for Declaration that the plainiff is absolute owner of the plant schedule proeprty and for consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment in the plaint schedule porperty and for costs. Plaint presented on : 23.02.2024 Valuation : Value of the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction is Rs.8,05,000/-; on which a court fee of Rs.10,526/- under section 26(c) of APCF and SV Act is paid.

AWARD UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY ACT, 1987.

1.The suit filed for declaration of the plaint schedule property and for consequential permanent injunction, restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the title and rights.

2.The suit is compromised with the intervention of elders of both the parties and both the parties agreed that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property by virtue of the family partition dt. 10.01.2024, conveying the title and ownership in respect of the plaint schedule property.

3.The defendant agreed that he shall not claim any rights over the plaint schedule property in any manner, as the plainiff is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property in title and possession.

Accordingly, we request the Honourable Lok Adalat may be pleased to pass an award in terms of the settlement mentioned above.

PLAINT SCHEDULE PROPERTY

Guntur District, chebrole sub-district, Chebrole Grama Panchayath area, Chebrole Grama D.No. 341, Ac. 6.00 Cents, Ac.0.44 cents, and in plot. no. 342/2 out of Ac. 1.51 cents, Ac.0.26 cents, in the above 2 survey Nos. to a total extent of Ac.0.70 cents, land in bounded by: East: Yerra Cheruvu Kaluva, South : Property of Rekha Venkateswarlu. West: Property of Shaik Dada. North : Property of Shaik Meera Saheb. Within the boundaries to an exten of Ac. 0.70 cents or 0.525 agricultural land.

(compromise petition is herewith attached)

Both parties have been explained the terms of award in Telugu and that they understood the terms of compromise and affixed their signature/thumb impressions in evidence of their consent for the terms of award. Given under my hand and seal of Lok Adalath on this the 14th day of September, 2024.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT BENCH :: GUNTUR.

(CONSTITUTED BY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, GUNTUR UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987)

SATURDAY, This the 14th day of September, 2024.

PRESIDING OFFICER: Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

MEMBER: Sri. V.V. Gowri Sankar, Advocate, Guntur Bar Association.

Lok Adalath Case No. _________/2024

(In O.S.No.168/2024 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur) Between: Dasari Siva Rama Krishna S/o Mohan Rao, 44 years, Cultivation and business, resident of Dr.No:8-59, Gollapalem, Chebrolu village and mandal, Guntur District. …. Plaintiff.

And

Badavath Kasipathi Rao S/o Gopa Naik, 60 years, working as Sr. Techician, JE(CnW), Mechanical PF Account No:24609679248, South Central Railway, Guntur

Division. ........Defendant.

Suit for recovery of sum of Rs.07,86,499/- being the amount of principal and interest and for costs.

Plaint presented on : 19.02.2024

Valuation : Amount due is Rs.07,86,499/- on which a court fee of Rs.10,326/- is paid U/Sec.20 of APCF and SV Act.

AWARD UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY ACT, 1987.

1. That the court fee paid by the plaintiff shall be returned to the plaintiff by the court

before which the proceedings have been pending u/s 21 (1) R/w Sec.25 of the Legal

services Authority Act 1987 and it shall not form part of the costs payable by the defendant.

02. The Honourable court attached the retirement benefits of the respondent/defendant was served to the garnishee i.e., The Senior Divisional

Personal Officer, South Central Railway, Guntur.

03. That the defendant compromised with the plaintiff. In view of the compromise between the plaintiff and defendant, the plaintiff agreed to receive Rs.4,00,000/- ( Rupees four lakhs only) from the garnishee of the defendant out of the attached amount.

04. The defendant has no objection to receive the amount of Rs.4,00,000/- from his garnishee directly credited to the plaintiff’s bank account No:11599241997 ( IFSC

Code No:SBIN0002701) of State Bank of India, Chebrole branch, Guntur District.

05. the defendant prays the Honourable authority to direct the garnishee i.e., The

Senior Division Personal Officer, South Central Railway to credit the said amount of

Rs.4,00,000/- to the plaintiff’s SB account out of the attached warrant amount in IA

No:30/2024.

06. The defendant entitled to receive the remaining balance amount which was kept in the hands of the Garnishee and the plaintiff has no objection to receive the same by the defendant from the Garnishee and the same may be credited to defendant’s account.

07. The plaintiff has no objection to raise the attachment in IA No:30/2024.

08. That both parties shall bore their own costs.

(compromise petition is herewith attached)

Both parties have been explained the terms of award in Telugu and that they understood the terms of compromise and affixed their signature/thumb impressions. Given under my hand and seal of Lok Adalath on this the 14 th day of

September, 2024.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT BENCH :: GUNTUR.

(CONSTITUTED BY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY,

GUNTUR UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987)

SATURDAY, This the 14th day of September, 2024.

PRESIDING OFFICER: Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

MEMBER: Sri. V.V. Gowri Sankar, Advocate, Guntur Bar Association.

Lok Adalath Case No. _________/2024

(In O.S.No.590/2024 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur)

Between: State Bank of India, SMEC, Guntur rep. By it's Chief Manager, P. Rajendra Prasad. …. Plaintiff.

And

Sri. Ambica Creations represented by it’s Proprietor Murarisetty Sateesh Chandra resident of Shop No.3 & 4, Vasavi Wholesale Cloth Market, Mangalagiri Road, Guntur. ……….Defendant

Suit for recovery of sum of Rs.10,59,175/- being the amount of

principal and interest and for costs.

Plaint presented on : 23.02.2024

Valuation : Amount due is Rs.10,59,175/- on which a court fee of Rs.13,026/- is paid U/Sec.20 of APCF and SV Act.

AWARD UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES

AUTHORITY ACT, 1987.

1. That the court fee paid by the plaintiff shall be returned to the plaintiff by the court before which the proceedings have been pending u/s 21 (1) R/w Sec.25 of the Legal services Authority Act 1987 and it shall not form part of the costs payable by the defendant.

02. The defendant agreed to regularize his loan account and agreed to pay the installments till the entire amount due under the loan account is paid and the plaintiff bank agreed for the same.

03. The plaintiff therefore, prays that the Honourable court may be pleased to pass a decree against the defendant directing him to pay the installments regularly till the amount due under the loan account is closed and in case the defendant commits default in payment of 2 installments consecutively, the plaintiff is at liberty to recover the amount due under the loan account with interest as per the terms agreed by defendant at the time of sanctioning the loan after deducting the amount paid by the defendant.

(compromise petition is herewith attached)

Both parties have been explained the terms of award in Telugu and that they understood the terms of compromise and affixed their signature/thumb impressions.

Given under my hand and seal of Lok Adalath on this the 14 th day of September, 2024.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT BENCH :: GUNTUR.

(CONSTITUTED BY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY,

GUNTUR UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987)

SATURDAY, This the 14th day of September, 2024.

PRESIDING OFFICER: Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

MEMBER: Sri. V.V. Gowri Sankar, Advocate, Guntur Bar Association.

Lok Adalath Case No. _________/2024

(In E.P. No:340/2022 in O.S.No.101/2021 on the file of I

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur)

Between: Shaik Saida Bi, W/o Nagur Vali, 48 years, Ponnekallu village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District. Presently residing at Dr.No:8-6- 1149, Krishna Babu colony, Guntur. ….Petitioner/Decree Holder.

And

1. Shaik Karimulla S/o Masthan, 54 years, self employed, resident of Dr.No:86-176, Main Road, near Masjid, Krishna Babu colony, Guntur.

2. Shaik Saida, S./o Karimulla, 32 years, Self employed, resident of Dr.No:86-176, Main Road, near Masjid, Krishna Babu colony,

Guntur. …....Respondents/Judgment debtors.

E.P. filed for recovery of Rs.8,34,986/- from the respondents 1 and 2/Judgment debtors under the decree dated 27.01.2022 in

O.S.No:101/2021.

AWARD UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES

AUTHORITY ACT, 1987.

01. That the court fee paid by the plaintiff shall be returned to the plaintiff by the court before which the proceedings have been pending u/s 21 (1) R/w Sec.25 of the Legal services Authority Act 1987 and it shall not form part of the costs payable by the defendant.

02. Both parties have agreed to full and final settlement of

Rs.6,00,000/- for which the Judgment debtors paid an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- towards part payment.

03. The total remaining balance of Rs.5,00,000/- should be repaid by the month of January, 2027 alongwith interest @ 2% per month.

04. After the total repayment of settlement amount alongwith interest then the receipt shall be obtained from Decree holder and then the original documents of the house property shall be handedover to Judgment debtors from Decree Holders.

(compromise petition is herewith attached)

Both parties have been explained the terms of award in Telugu and that they understood the terms of compromise and affixed their signature/thumb impressions.

Given under my hand and seal of Lok Adalath on this the 14 th day of September, 2024.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT BENCH :: GUNTUR.

(CONSTITUTED BY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY,

GUNTUR UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987)

SATURDAY, This the 14th day of September, 2024.

PRESIDING OFFICER: Smt. K. Naga Lakshmi, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

MEMBER: Sri. V.V. Gowri Sankar, Advocate, Guntur Bar Association.

Lok Adalath Case No. _________/2024

(In E.P. No:86/2021 in O.S.No.15/2019 on the file of I

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur)

Between: Kondapalli Anjaneyulu S/o Chinna Brahmaiah, 56 years, Cultivation, Cultivation, resident of Oppicharla village, Karampudi village, Guntur District. ….Petitioner/Decree Holder.

And

Gunduboina Vinay Purush, S/o late Venkateswarlu, 53 years, Hindu, resident of Dr.No:4-12-14/B, 2nd lane, Siddartha Nagar,

Guntur. …....Respondent/Judgment debtor.

E.P. filed for recovery of Rs.9,57,740/- from the respondent/Judgment debtor under the decree dated 29.08.2019 in O.S.No:15/2019.

AWARD UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES

AUTHORITY ACT, 1987.

01. That the court fee paid by the plaintiff shall be returned to the plaintiff by the court before which the proceedings have been pending u/s 21 (1) R/w Sec.25 of the Legal services Authority Act 1987 and it shall not form part of the costs payable by the defendant.

02. The Decree Holder filed the execution petition against the

Judgment debtor for recovery of the decree amount by arrest of the Judgment debtor. But due to intervention of the elders the

Decree Holder agreed to receive an amount of Rs.7,00,00/- ( Rupees seven lakhs only) towards full satisfaction of the EP amount.

03. The Judgment debtor paid the said amount of Rs.7,00,000/- ( Rupees seven lakhs only) towards full satisfaction of the E.P.

amount to the Decree Holder.

04. Both parties are prays that the Honourable court may be pleased to record the F.S. Memo and terminate the Execution petition without costs.

(compromise petition is herewith attached)

Both parties have been explained the terms of award in Telugu and that they understood the terms of compromise and affixed their signature/thumb impressions.

Given under my hand and seal of Lok Adalath on this the 14 th day of September, 2024.