Ms. Anamika

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

HYD, City Civil Court Complex · Hyderabad · Telangana

MS. ANAMIKA, XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, is posted at HYD, City Civil Court Complex, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 810 court orders on record since 2023. 32 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP cases.

810

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/5276/2023

MOHAMMED SHAIK ALI vs MD AZIZ

25 Mar 2025

1 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

THE COURT OF II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,

HYDERABAD.

PRESENT: MS. ANAMIKA

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Dated, this the 25 th day of March, 2025

Original Suit Number 5276 of 2023

Between :-

Mohammed Shaik Ali, Son of Late Mohammed Hussain, Aged about 71 years, Occupation: Retired Person, Resident of House number 17-5-292, Mata ki Khidki, Dabeerpura, Charminar, Hyderabad – 24.

...Plaintiff

AND

Mr.Md.Aziz, Son of Md.Muneer, Aged about 45 years, Occupation Business, Resident of 16-5-275, Komatwadi, Outside Dabeerpura, Hyderabad - 24.

...Defendant

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Mr. Fahad Bin Abdur Rahman, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff,

Mr. M.M. Ahmed Khan, Learned Counsel for defendant and upon hearing both sides, perusing the material on record and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day this Court passed the following:-

-:J U D G M E N T:-

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant praying this Court :- 2 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

i. To direct the defendant to vacate the suit schedule property and to handover the vacant possession of suit schedule property to the plaintiff.

ii. To direct the defendant to pay the arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,89,500/- from February, 2022 to September, 2023.

iii. To grant mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing the suit till the date of delivery of possession.

Brief averments of plaint are as follows:-

2.Plaintiff is the absolute owner and possessor of premises bearing municipal No.16-5-275, situated at Komatwadi, Outside

Dabeerpura, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property). In the month of March, 2012, defendant approached the plaintiff and requested to let out the suit schedule property for Harware

Shop. Accordingly, plaintiff agreed to let out the suit schedule property for residential purpose. Present monthly rent of suit schedule property is

Rs.10,000/-, upon enhancement of 12% of monthly rent on completion of every one year on existing monthly rent. Accordingly, defendant executed a lease deed for a period of 11 months on 01-04-2012, excluding electricity charges. Original agreement is in possession of defendant. Defendant is continuing the oral agreement with plaintiff.

Security deposit of Rs.15,000/-was paid by defendant, which shall be refunded to the defendant at the time of vacating the suit schedule property, without any interest.

3 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.1.Defendant has occupied as a tenant in the suit schedule property for Hardware Shop Purpose. Since 01-02-2022 defendant defaulted in payment of rent and stopped paying the rent from the month of February, 2022. Therefore, plaintiff had requested the defendant to pay the due rents, but defendant simply ignored the request of plaintiff. Defendant is also irregular in payment of electricity bills. Defendant is well aware that plaintiff is a senior citizen and she is dependent on the rental income of the suit schedule property. It was agreed between plaintiff and defendant that defendant shall pay monthly rent on or before 5th of every month, but defendant failed to do so.

2.2Plaintiff has asked the defendant to pay the rental dues, vacate the suit schedule property and to deliver vacant possession of suit schedule property to the plaintiff but the defendant did not listen to plaintiff. Therefore, on 05-08-2023 plaintiff got issued a legal notice to the defendant calling upon him to pay the accumulated rent of

Rs.1,79,000/-, clear unpaid electricity dues and deliver the vacant possession of the suit schedule property. Plaintiff further informed the defendant that he will be treated as trespasser. He will be liable to pay damages and mesne profit @Rs.25,000/- per month, apart from the monthly rent. Said legal notice was sent to the address of suit schedule property and it was received by defendant, but he did not preferred to reply the said legal notice.

4 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.3.During the lock down, defendant failed to pay rents for 5 months stating that he has no business. Therefore, considering the difficulties, plaintiff accommodated the defendant, but defendant has not paid the rents to the plaintiff from the last 19 months. Defendant lastly made the payment of rent for the month of January, 2022 and thereafter stopped paying rents to the plaintiff. Defendant is neither paying the rent nor vacating the suit schedule property. Hence this suit is filed.

2.4.Defendant is a tenant holding over and tenancy is from month to month. 15 days are sufficient to terminate the tenancy of defendant.

Therefore, plaintiff has rightly terminated the tenancy of defendant.

Following are the particulars of suit claim.

a) Rent from 01.02.2022 to 31.12.2022 (9000X11): Rs.99,000/-

b) Rent from 01-01-20223 to 31-08-2023 (10000x8):Rs.80,000/- :Rs.1,79,000/-

c) Rent after legal notice i.e., 01-09-2023 to 31-09-2023 : Rs.10,000/- Rs.1,89,500/-

3.After registration of original suit, summons were ordered to be issued to the defendant. Defendant made appearance through Mr. M.M.

Ahmed Khan, Advocate and filed written statement.

3.1.In the written statement defendant denied the material averments of the plaint. It is the contention of defendant that he used to run Kirana Store in the nearby shop. Subsequently, Government 5 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

acquired the said land for road widening purpose. Therefore, while searching a mulgi plaintiff came in contact with defendant and defendant requested to let out the suit schedule mulgi on rent, on which plaintiff informed that his sons Mohd. Jahangir and Mohd. Ghouse are the owners of suit schedule property, as they have purchased the suit schedule property with their earnings on the name of plaintiff, due to love and affection. Thereafter, defendant talked with sons of plaintiff and obtained the suit schedule property on rent in the month of May, 2011 and the said tenancy is oral tenancy.

3.2.Defendant is running Hardware Shop in the suit schedule property. Defendant is regularly paying the rent to plaintiff.

Subsequently on the instructions of plaintiff, defendant started paying rent to his sons by way of cash and the tenancy was extended from time to time. Presently defendant is paying rent of Rs.10,000/- regularly, without fail.

3.3.While the matter stood thus, some disputes arose between plaintiff and her sons. Thereafter, plaintiff along with his henchmen stated visiting the suit schedule property and threatening the defendant to enhance the rent and demanded to pay huge security deposit. When defendant refused for the same stating that already he is paying huge rent, plaintiff threatened the defendant to forcibly occupy the suit schedule property. Plaintiff and his henchmen used to come to the suit 6 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

schedule property continuously and pressurize the defendant for enhancement of rent or to vacate the suit schedule property as plaintiff will let out the suit schedule property to third party to receive more amount. When defendant informed the same to sons of plaintiff they stated that they would settle the matter. Defendant is paying the rent till today. Due to disputes between plaintiff and his sons, this suit is filed by plaintiff.

4. On 06-03-2024 following issues were settled for trial:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of eviction of the defendant from suit schedule property?

2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,89,500/-

i.e., from February, 2022 to September, 2023?

3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- for the date of filing the suit to the

date of delivery of suit schedule property?

4. To what relief.?

4.1.During trial, plaintiff was examined as PW1 and Exhibit A1 to

A6 were marked. Defendant was examined as DW1 and Exhibits B1 to

B7 were marked. Learned counsel for plaintiff requested to decree the suit by considering the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of plaintiff. Learned counsel for defendant requested to dismiss the suit by considring the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of defendant.

7 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

4.2.PW1 filed chief affidavit reiterating the contents of plaint. He further explained that suit schedule property is his self acquired property. None of his children paid money towards purchase of suit schedule property. He has long back abandoned his three elder sons in presence of community elders because of their vices and ill-treatment towards their parents. He has clearly instructed the defendant not to pay rents to his three elder sons.

4.3.Exhibit A1 is the office copy of legal notice, dated 05-08-2023 which shows that plaintiff issued legal notice to the defendant calling him to pay arrears of rent for the last 18 months amounting to

Rs.1,79,000/- along with payment of rent for 5 months during Covid-19 and to evict from the suit schedule property and to hand over the vacant possession of suit schedule property to plaintiff. Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt which shows the dispatch of notice. Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card which shows that legal notice was received by defendant. Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 1138/2011, dated 29.03.2011 which shows the ownership of plaintiff over the suit schedule property. Exhibit A5 is the statement of encumbrance on suit schedule property which shows the execution of registered sale deed number 1138/2011, dated 29.03.2011. Exhibit A6 is the Market Value Assistance certificate. During the cross Examination nothing new or contrary to the case of plaintiff came to the record.

8 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

4.4.Chief examination of DW1 is nothing but reiteration of contents of written statement. Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 114, dated 12.12.2022. Exhibit B2 is the the original

Rental receipt bearing number 112, dated 11.11.2022. Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 110, dated 09.09.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 106, dated 08.08.2022. Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 104, dated 07.07.2022. Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 108, dated 10.10.2022. Exhibit B7 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 102, dated 08.01.2022. During cross-examination DW1 admitted that plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property. He admitted that in Exhibits B1 to B7 Municipal number and name of owner of property is not mentioned. He also admitted about receiving of legal notice.

4.5.At this stage, its clear that following facts are admitted facts:- i. Plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property.

ii. Defendant obtained the suit schedule property on rent.

Dated 25-03-2025

according to defendant he is regularly paying rent to the son of plaintiff and he filed Exhibits B1 to B7 to show the payment of rent of suit schedule property to the son of plaintiff. Perusal of Exhibits B1 to B7 no where shows the address of property for which defendant is paying rent to son of plaintiff. Therefore, this court is of the opinion that it cannot be concluded that defendant paid rent of suit schedule property to son of plaintiff under Exhibits B1 to B7. Further, no document is filed showing the payment of rent subsequent to 12.12.2022 either to the plaintiff or to the son of plaintiff. Hence, this court is of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled for relief of eviction and recovery of arrears.

5.In the result, the suit is decreed. Accordingly, defendant is directed to vacate the suit schedule property within two months from the date of this judgment. Defendant is further directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,89,500/- as arrears of rent from February, 2022 to

September 2023 within two months from the date of this Judgment.

Plaintiff is at liberty to file a separate application under order XX Rule 2 for mesne profits for use and occupation of the suit schedule property till recovery of possession. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is of the opinion that both parties shall bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 25 th day of March, 2025.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

10 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Mohammed Shaik Ali DW1 : Md.Aziz

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff: Exhibit A1 is the office copy of legal notice, dated 05-08-2023.

Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt.

Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card.

Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 1138/2011,

dated 29.03.2011.

Exhibit A5 is the Encumbrance certificate.

Exhibit A6 is the Market Value Assistance certificate.

For Defendant:

Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 114, dated 12.12.2022.

Exhibit B2 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 112, dated 11.11.2022.

Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 110, dated 09.09.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 106, dated 08.08.2022.

Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 104, dated 07.07.2022.

Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 108, dated 10.10.2022.

11 of 10 O.S.No.5276 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

Exhibit B7 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 102, dated 08.01.2022.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5274/2023

MOHAMMED SHAIK ALI vs MD SARWAR

25 Mar 2025

1 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

IN THE COURT OF II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,

HYDERABAD.

PRESENT: MS. ANAMIKA

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Dated, this the 25 th day of March, 2025

Original Suit Number 5274 of 2023

Between :-

Mohammed Shaik Ali, Son of Late Mohammed Hussain, Aged about 71 years, Occupation: Retired Person, Resident of House number 17-5-292, Mata ki Khidki, Dabeerpura, Charminar, Hyderabad – 24.

...Plaintiff

AND

Mr.Md.Sarwar, Son of Mohammed Shaik Ali, Aged about 40 years, Occupation Business (Mutton Shop), Resident of 16-5-274, 276, 277 & 278, Komatwadi, Outside Dabeerpura, Hyderabad - 24.

...Defendant

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Mr. Fahad Bin Abdur Rahman, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff,

-:J U D G M E N T:-

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant praying this Court :- 2 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

i. To direct the defendant to vacate the suit schedule property and to handover the vacant possession of suit schedule property to the plaintiff.

ii. To direct the defendant to pay the arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.2,63,500/- from February, 2022 to September, 2023.

iii. To grant mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing the suit till the date of delivery of possession.

Brief averments of plaint are as follows:-

2.Plaintiff is the absolute owner and possessor of premises bearing municipal No.16-5-274, 276, 277 & 278, Komatwadi, Outside

Dabeerpura, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property). Defendant is son of plaintiff,In the month of March, 2012, defendant approached the plaintiff and requested to let out the suit schedule property for Mutton Shop. Accordingly, plaintiff agreed to let out the suit schedule property for Mutton Shop. Present monthly rent of suit schedule property is Rs.14,000/-, upon enhancement of 12% of monthly rent on completion of every one year on existing monthly rent.

Accordingly, defendant executed a lease deed for a period of 11 months on 01-04-2012, excluding electricity charges. Original agreement is in possession of defendant. Defendant is continuing the oral agreement with plaintiff. Security deposit of Rs.15,000/-was paid by defendant, which shall be refunded to the defendant at the time of vacating the suit schedule property, without any interest.

3 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.1.Defendant has occupied as a tenant for running Mutton Shop.

Since 01-02-2022 defendant defaulted in payment of rent and stopped paying the rent from the month of February, 2022. Therefore, plaintiff had requested the defendant to pay the due rents, but defendant simply ignored the request of plaintiff. Defendant is also irregular in payment of electricity bills. Defendant is well aware that plaintiff is a senior citizen and he is dependent on the rental income of the suit schedule property. It was agreed between plaintiff and defendant that defendant shall pay monthly rent on or before 5th of every month, but defendant failed to do so.

Rs.2,49,500/-, clear unpaid electricity dues and deliver the vacant possession of the suit schedule property. Plaintiff further informed the defendant that he will be treated as trespasser. He will be liable to pay damages and mesne profit @Rs.25,000/- per month, apart from the monthly rent. Said legal notice was sent to the address of suit schedule property and it was received by defendant, but he did not preferred to reply the said legal notice.

4 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.4.Defendant is a tenant holding over and tenancy is from month to month. 15 days are sufficient to terminate the tenancy of defendant.

Therefore, plaintiff has rightly terminated the tenancy of defendant.

Following are the particulars of suit claim.

a) Rent from 01.02.2022 to 31.12.2022 (12500X11): Rs.1,37,500/-

b) Rent from 01-01-20223 to 31-08-2023 (14000x8):Rs.1,12,000/- :Rs.2,49,500/-

c) Rent after legal notice i.e., 01-09-2023 to 31-09-2023 : Rs.14,000/- Rs.2,63,500/-

3.After registration of original suit, summons were ordered to be issued to the defendant. Defendant made appearance through Mr. M.M.

Ahmed Khan, Advocate and filed written statement.

3.1.In the written statement defendant denied the material averments of the plaint. It is the contention of defendant that his 5 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

brothers Mohammed Jahangir and Mohammed Ghouse have purchased the suit schedule property from their hard earnings on the name of plaintiff due to love and affection. After purchasing the said property, defendant obtained the suit schedule property from the plaintiff and his two sons Mohammed Jahangir and Mohammed Ghouse on rent basis in the month of June, 2011and the said tenancy is oral.

3.2.Defendant is running Mutton Shop in the suit schedule property. Defendant is regularly paying the rent to plaintiff.

Subsequently on the instructions of plaintiff defendant started paying rent to his sons by way of cash and the tenancy was extended from time to time. Presently defendant is paying rent of Rs.10,000/- regularly, without fail.

3.3.While the matter stood thus, some disputes arose between plaintiff and his sons. Thereafter, plaintiff along with his henchmen stated visiting the suit schedule property and threatening the defendant to enhance the rent and demanded to pay huge security deposit. When defendant refused for the same stating that already he is paying huge rent, plaintiff threatened the defendant to forcibly occupy the suit schedule property. Plaintiff and his henchmen used to come to the suit schedule property continuously and pressurize the defendant for enhancement of rent or to vacate the suit schedule property as plaintiff will let out the suit scheduled property to third party to receive more 6 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

amount. Defendant is paying the rent till date. Due to disputes between plaintiff and his sons, this suit is filed by plaintiff.

4. On 06-03-2024 following issues were settled for trial:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of eviction of the defendant from suit schedule property?

2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.2,63,500/-

i.e., from February, 2022 to September, 2023?

3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- for the date of filing the suit to the

date of delivery of suit schedule property?

4. To what relief.?

4.1.During trial, plaintiff was examined as PW1 and Exhibit A1 to

A6 were marked. Defendant was examined as DW1 and Exhibits B1 to

B6 were marked. Learned counsel for plaintiff requested to decree the suit by considering the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of plaintiff. Learned counsel for defendant requested to dismiss the suit by considering the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of defendant.

4.2.PW1 filed chief affidavit reiterating the contents of plaint. He further explained that suit schedule property is her self acquired property. None of his children paid money towards purchase of suit schedule property. He has long back abandoned his three elder sons in 7 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

presence of community elders because of their vices and ill treatment towards their parents. He has clearly instructed the defendant not to pay rents to his three elder sons.

Rs.2,49,000/- along with payment of rent for 5 months during Covid-19 and to evict the suit schedule property and to hand over the vacant possession of suit schedule property to plaintiff. Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt which shows the dispatch of notice. Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card which shows that legal notice was received by defendant. Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed, dated 12.06.2006 which shows the ownership of plaintiff over the suit schedule property. It no where shows that suit schedule property was purchased in the name of plaintiff by his sons due to love and affection. Exhibit A5 is the statement of encumbrance on suit schedule property which shows the execution of registered sale deed number 3067/2006, dated 12.06.2006. Exhibit A6 is the Market Value Assistance certificate.

During the cross Examination nothing new or contrary to the case of plaintiff came to the record.

4.4.Chief examination of DW1 is nothing but reiteration of contents of written statement. Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt 8 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

bearing number 121, dated 10.10.2022. Exhibit B2 is the the original

Rental receipt bearing number 117, dated 06.06.2022. Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 116, dated 05.05.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 120, dated 09.09.2022. Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 119, dated 08.08.2022. Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 118, dated 07.07.2022. During cross- examination DW1 admitted that plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property and he is not paying rent to plaintiff since 2022. He also admitted that in Exhibits B1 to B6 Municipal number and name of owner of property is not mentioned.

4.5.At this stage, its clear that following facts are admitted facts:- i. Plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property.

ii. Defendant obtained the suit schedule property on rent.

iii.Defendant is not paying rent to plaintiff since 2022.

4.6 Both parties are at dispute regarding the issue of eviction of defendant from the suit schedule property. According to plaintiff, defendant is not paying the rent for the suit schedule property. Hence, he shall be evicted from the suit schedule property. To the contrary, according to defendant he is regularly paying rent to the sons of plaintiff and he filed Exhibits B1 to B6 to show the payment of rent of suit schedule property to the sons of plaintiff. Perusal of Exhibits B1 to B6 nowhere shows the address of property for which defendant is paying 9 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

rent to son of plaintiff. Therefore, this court is of the opinion that it cannot be concluded that defendant paid rent of suit schedule property to sons of plaintiff under Exhibits B1 to B6. Further, no document is filed showing the payment of rent subsequent to 10.10.2022 either to the plaintiff or to the sons of plaintiff. Although defendant stated in his cross- examination that after receiving legal notice but he failed to file any document to prove that after receiving legal notice, he started making payment of rent to plaintiff. Hence, this court is of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled for relief of eviction and recovery of arrears.

5.In the result, the suit is decreed. Accordingly, defendant is directed to vacate the suit schedule property within two months from the date of this judgment. Defendant is further directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,63,500/- as arrears of rent from February, 2022 to

September 2023 within two months from the date of this Judgment.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 25 th day of March, 2025.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

10 of 10 O.S.No.5274 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Mohammed Shaik Ali DW1 : Md.Sarwar

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Exhibit A1 is the office copy of legal notice, dated 05-08-2023.

Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt.

Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card.

Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing dated 12.06.2006.

Exhibit A5 is the Encumbrance certificate.

Exhibit A5 is the Market Value Assistance certificate.

For Defendant:

Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 121, dated 10.10.2022.

Exhibit B2 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 117, dated 06.06.2022.

Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 116, dated 05.05.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 120, dated 09.09.2022.

Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 119, dated 08.08.2022.

Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 118, dated 07.07.2022.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5275/2023

MOHAMMED SHAIK ALI vs MIRZA AWAIS BAIG

25 Mar 2025

1 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

THE COURT OF II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,

HYDERABAD.

PRESENT: MS. ANAMIKA

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Dated, this the 25 th day of March, 2025

Original Suit Number 5275 of 2023

Between :-

Mohammed Shaik Ali, Son of Late Mohammed Hussain, Aged about 71 years, Occupation: Retired Person, Resident of House number 17-5-292, Mata ki Khidki, Dabeerpura, Charminar, Hyderabad – 24.

...Plaintiff

AND

Mr.Mirza Awais Baig, Son of Mirza Mazher Baig, Aged about 41 years, Occupation Business, Resident of 16-5-275, Komatwadi, Outside Dabeerpura, Hyderabad - 24.

...Defendant

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Mr. Fahad Bin Abdur Rahman, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff,

-:J U D G M E N T:-

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant praying this Court :- 2 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

i. To direct the defendant to vacate the suit schedule property and to handover the vacant possession of suit schedule property to the plaintiff.

ii. To direct the defendant to pay the arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,22,300/- from February, 2022 to September, 2023.

iii. To grant mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing the suit till the date of delivery of possession.

Brief averments of plaint are as follows:-

2.Plaintiff is the absolute owner and possessor of premises bearing municipal No.16-5-275, situated at Komatwadi, Outside

Dabeerpura, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property). In the month of March, 2012, defendant approached the plaintiff and requested to let out the first floor portion of suit schedule property for residential purpose. Accordingly, plaintiff agreed to let out the suit schedule property for residential purpose. Present monthly rent of suit schedule property is Rs.6,500/-, upon enhancement of 12% of monthly rent on completion of every one year on existing monthly rent.

3 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.1.Defendant has occupied as a tenant for residential purpose.

Since 01-02-2022 defendant defaulted in payment of rent and stopped paying the rent from the month of February, 2022. Therefore, plaintiff had requested the defendant to pay the due rents, but defendant simply ignored the request of plaintiff. Defendant is also irregular in payment of electricity bills. Defendant is well aware that plaintiff is a senior citizen and she is dependent on the rental income of the suit schedule property. It was agreed between plaintiff and defendant that defendant shall pay monthly rent on or before 5th of every month, but defendant failed to do so.

Rs.1,15,800/-, clear unpaid electricity dues and deliver the vacant possession of the suit schedule property. Plaintiff further informed the defendant that he will be treated as trespasser. He will be liable to pay damages and mesne profit @Rs.25,000/- per month, apart from the monthly rent. Said legal notice was sent to the address of suit schedule property and it was received by defendant, but he did not preferred to reply the said legal notice.

4 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.4.Defendant is a tenant holding over and tenancy is from month to month. 15 days are sufficient to terminate the tenancy of defendant.

Therefore, plaintiff has rightly terminated the tenancy of defendant.

Following are the particulars of suit claim.

a) Rent from 01.02.2022 to 31.12.2022 (5800X11): Rs.63,800/-

b) Rent from 01-01-20223 to 31-08-2023 (6500x8):Rs.52,000/- :Rs.1,15,800/-

c) Rent after legal notice i.e., 01-09-2023 to 31-09-2023 : Rs.6,500/- Rs.1,22,300/-

3.After registration of original suit, summons were ordered to be issued to the defendant. Defendant made appearance through Mr. M.M.

Ahmed Khan, Advocate and filed written statement.

3.1.In the written statement defendant denied the material averments of the plaint. It is the contention of defendant that when 5 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

defendant approached the plaintiff and requested him to let out the suit schedule property, plaintiff informed that his sons Mohd. Jahangir and

Mohd. Ghose are the owners of suit schedule property, as they have purchased the suit schedule property with their earnings on the name of plaintiff, due to love and affection. Thereafter, defendant talked with sons of plaintiff and obtained the suit schedule property on rent in the month of August, 2011 and the said tenancy is oral tenancy.

3.2.Defendant is residing in the suit schedule property along with his family members. Defendant is regularly paying the rent to plaintiff.

Dated 25-03-2025

will let out the suit scheduled property to third party to receive more amount. Defendant is paying the rent till today. Due to disputes between plaintiff and his sons, this suit is filed by plaintiff.

4. On 06-03-2024 following issues were settled for trial:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of eviction of the defendant from suit schedule property?

2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,22,300/-

i.e., from February, 2022 to September, 2023?

3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- for the date of filing the suit to the

date of delivery of suit schedule property?

4. To what relief.?

4.1.During trial, plaintiff was examined as PW1 and Exhibit A1 to

A6 were marked. Defendant was examined as DW1 and Exhibits B1 to

Dated 25-03-2025

schedule property. He has long back abandoned his three elder sons in presence of community elders because of their vices and ill treatment towards their parents. He has clearly instructed the defendant not to pay rents to his three elder sons.

Rs.1,15,800/- along with payment of rent for 5 months during Covid-19 and to evict from the suit schedule property and to hand over the vacant possession of suit schedule property to plaintiff. Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt which shows the dispatch of notice. Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card which shows that legal notice was received by defendant. Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 1138/2011, dated 29.03.2011 which shows the ownership of plaintiff over the suit schedule property. Exhibit A5 is the statement of encumbrance on suit schedule property which shows the execution of registered sale deed number 1138/2011, dated 29.03.2011. Exhibit A6 is the Market Value Assistance certificate. During the cross Examination nothing new or contrary to the case of plaintiff came to the record.

4.4.Chief examination of DW1 is nothing but reiteration of contents of written statement. Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 107, dated 08.08.2022. Exhibit B2 is the the original 8 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

Rental receipt bearing number 111, dated 09.09.2022. Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 113, dated 11.11.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 103, dated 05.06.2022. Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 109, dated 10.10.2022. Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 105, dated 07.07.2022. During cross- examination DW1 admitted that as per document plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property inspite of issuing legal notice he did not paid rent to plaintiff and continued paying rent to Jahangir Bhai. He also admitted that in Exhibits B1 to B6 Municipal number and name of owner of property is not mentioned.

4.5.At this stage, its clear that following facts are admitted facts:- i. Plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule property.

ii. Defendant obtained the suit schedule property on rent.

iii.Defendant is not paying rent to plaintiff.

4.6 Both parties are at dispute regarding the issue of eviction of defendant from the suit schedule property. According to plaintiff, defendant is not paying the rent for the suit schedule property. Hence, he shall be evicted from the suit schedule property. To the contrary, according to defendant he is regularly paying rent to the son of plaintiff and he filed Exhibits B1 to B6 to show the payment of rent of suit schedule property to the son of plaintiff. Perusal of Exhibits B1 to B6 nowhere shows the address of property for which defendant is paying 9 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

rent to son of plaintiff. Therefore, this court is of the opinion that it cannot be concluded that defendant paid rent of suit schedule property to son of plaintiff under Exhibits B1 to B6. Further, no document is filed showing the payment of rent subsequent to 11.11.2022 either to the plaintiff or to the son of plaintiff. Hence, this court is of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled for relief of eviction and recovery of arrears.

September 2023 within two months from the date of this Judgment.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 25 th day of March, 2025.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Mohammed Shaik Ali DW1 : Mirza Awais Baig 10 of 10 O.S.No.5275 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Exhibit A1 is the office copy of legal notice, dated 05-08-2023.

Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt.

Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card.

Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 1138/2008,

dated 29.03.2011.

Exhibit A5 is the Encumbrance certificate.

Exhibit A5 is the Market Value Assistance certificate.

For Defendant:

Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 107, dated 08.08.2022.

Exhibit B2 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 111, dated 09.09.2022.

Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 113, dated 11.11.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 103, dated 05.06.2022.

Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 109, dated 10.10.2022.

Exhibit B6 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 105, dated 07.07.2022.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5273/2023

MOHAMMED KHAJA MOINUDDIN vs DINESH SINGH

25 Mar 2025

1 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

THE COURT OF II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,

HYDERABAD.

PRESENT: MS. ANAMIKA

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Dated, this the 25 th day of March, 2025

Original Suit Number 5273 of 2023

Between :-

Mr.Mohammed Khaja Moinuddin, son of Mohammed Shaik Ali, Aged about 38 years, Occupation: Business, Resident of House number 17-5-292, Mata ki Khidki, Dabeerpura, Charminar, Hyderabad – 24.

...Plaintiff

AND

Mr.Dinesh Sing, Son of Karan Sing, Aged about 36 years, Occupation Business, Resident of 17-5-287 & 288, Mata Ki Khidki, Dabeepura, Hyderabad-500024.

...Defendant

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Mr. Fahad Bin Abdur Rahman, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff,

-:J U D G M E N T:-

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant praying this Court :- 2 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

i. To direct the defendant to vacate the suit schedule property and to handover the vacant possession of suit schedule property to the plaintiff.

ii. To direct the defendant to pay the arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,33,400/- from February, 2022 to September, 2023.

iii. To grant mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing the suit till the date of delivery of possession.

Brief averments of plaint are as follows:-

2.Plaintiff is the absolute owner and possessor of premises bearing municipal No.17-5-287 & 288, Mata Ki Khidki, Dabeerpura,

Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property). In the month of October, 2013, defendant approached the plaintiff and requested to let out the suit schedule property for Mirror Work Shop.

Accordingly, plaintiff agreed to let out the suit schedule property for

Mirror Work Shop. Present monthly rent of suit schedule property is

Rs.7,000/-, upon enhancement of 12% of monthly rent on completion of every one year on existing monthly rent. Accordingly, defendant executed a lease deed for a period of 11 months on 01-11-2013, excluding electricity charges. Original agreement is in possession of defendant. Defendant is continuing the oral agreement with plaintiff.

Security deposit of Rs.15,000/-was paid by defendant, which shall be refunded to the defendant at the time of vacating the suit schedule property, without any interest.

3 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.1.Defendant has occupied portion as a tenant for Mirro Work

Shop. Since 01-02-2022 defendant defaulted in payment of rent and stopped paying the rent from the month of February, 2022. Therefore, plaintiff had requested the defendant to pay the due rents, but defendant simply ignored the request of plaintiff. Defendant is also irregular in payment of electricity bills. Defendant is well aware that plaintiff is a senior citizen and she is dependent on the rental income of the suit schedule property. It was agreed between plaintiff and defendant that defendant shall pay monthly rent on or before 5th of every month, but defendant failed to do so.

Rs.1,26,400/-, clear unpaid electricity dues and deliver the vacant possession of the suit schedule property. Plaintiff further informed the defendant that he will be treated as trespasser. He will be liable to pay damages and mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- per month, apart from the monthly rent. Said legal notice was sent to the address of suit schedule property and it was received by defendant, but he did not preferred to reply the said legal notice.

4 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

2.4.Defendant is a tenant holding over and tenancy is from month to month. 15 days are sufficient to terminate the tenancy of defendant.

Therefore, plaintiff has rightly terminated the tenancy of defendant.

Following are the particulars of suit claim.

a) Rent from 01.02.2022 to 31.12.2022 (6400X11): Rs.70,400/-

b) Rent from 01-01-20223 to 31-08-2023 (7000x8):Rs.56,000/- :Rs.1,26,000/-

c) Rent after legal notice i.e., 01-09-2023 to 31-09-2023 : Rs.7,000/- Rs.1,33,400/-

3.After registration of original suit, summons were ordered to be issued to the defendant. Defendant made appearance through Mr. M.M.

Ahmed Khan, Advocate and filed written statement.

3.1.In the written statement defendant denied the material averments of the plaint but admitted the ownership of plaintiff over the suit schedule property. According to defendant, plaintiff is the co-owner 5 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

of suit schedule property. It is the contention of defendant that when defendant approached the plaintiff and another co-owner of suit schedule property namely Mohd.Sarwar and requested him to let out the suit schedule property, plaintiff and his brother informed that his brothers Mohd. Jahangir and Mohd. Ghouse are the owners of suit schedule property, as they have purchased the suit schedule property with their earnings on the name of plaintiff and his brother due to love and affection. Thereafter, defendant talked with brothers of plaintiff and obtained the suit schedule property on rent in the month of October, 2016 and the said tenancy is oral tenancy.

3.2.Defendant is running Mirror Business in the suit schedule property. Defendant was regularly paying the rent to plaintiff.

Subsequently, on the instructions of plaintiff, defendant started paying rent to his sons by way of cash and the tenancy was extended from time to time. Presently defendant is paying rent of Rs.7,000/- regularly, without fail.

3.3.While the matter stood thus, some disputes arose among their family members of plaintiff. Thereafter, plaintiff along with his henchmen stated visiting the suit schedule property and threatening the defendant to enhance the rent and demanded to pay huge security deposit. When defendant refused for the same stating that already he is paying huge rent, plaintiff threatened the defendant to forcibly occupy the suit 6 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

schedule property. Plaintiff and his henchmen used to come to the suit schedule property continuously and pressurize the defendant for enhancement of rent or to vacate the suit schedule property as plaintiff will let out the suit scheduled property to third party to receive more amount. When defendant informed the same to brothers of plaintiff they stated that they would settle the matter. Defendant is paying the rent till today. This suit is filed by plaintiff in collusion with his brothers.

4. On 06-03-2024 following issues were settled for trial:-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of eviction of the defendant from suit schedule property?

2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of arrears of rent of 20 months amounting to Rs.1,33,400/-

i.e., from February, 2022 to September, 2023?

3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for future mesne profit @ Rs.25,000/- for the date of filing the suit to the

date of delivery of suit schedule property?

4. To what relief.?

4.1.During trial, plaintiff was examined as PW1 and Exhibit A1 to

A6 were marked. Defendant was examined as DW1 and Exhibits B1 to

B5 were marked. Learned counsel for plaintiff requested to decree the suit by considering the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of plaintiff. Learned counsel for defendant requested to dismiss the suit by considering the oral evidence adduced and documentary evidence marked during trial on behalf of defendant.

7 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

4.2.PW1 filed chief affidavit reiterating the contents of plaint. He further explained that suit schedule property is his self acquired property. None of his children paid money towards purchase of suit schedule property. He has long back abandoned his three elder sons in presence of community elders because of their vices and ill treatment towards their parents. He has clearly instructed the defendant not to pay rents to his three elder sons.

Rs.1,26,400/- along with payment of rent for 5 months during Covid-19 and to evict the suit schedule property and to hand over the vacant possession of suit schedule property to plaintiff. Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt which shows the dispatch of notice. Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card which shows that legal notice was received by defendant. Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 2495/2013, dated 03.09.2013 which shows the ownership of plaintiff along with Mohammed Sarwar over the suit schedule property. Exhibit

A5 is the statement of encumbrance on suit schedule property. Exhibit

A6 is the Market Value Assistance certificate. During the cross

Examination nothing new or contrary to the case of plaintiff came to the record.

8 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

4.4.Chief examination of DW1 is nothing but reiteration of contents of written statement. Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 123, dated 06.06.2022. Exhibit B2 is the the original

Rental receipt bearing number 122, dated 05.05.2022. Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 124, dated 07.07.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 125, dated 08.08.2022. Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 126, dated 09.09.2022. During cross-examination DW1 stated that according to Exhibit A4 plaintiff and Mohd.Sarwar are owners of suit schedule property. He also admitted that he never paid rent to plaintiff.

He admitted that in Exhibits B1 to B5 house number and name of owner is not mentioned.

4.5.At this stage, its clear that following facts are admitted facts:- i. Plaintiff is the co-owner of suit schedule property.

ii. Defendant obtained the suit schedule property on rent.

4.6 Both parties are at dispute regarding the issue of eviction of defendant from the suit schedule property. According to plaintiff, defendant is not paying the rent for the suit schedule property. Hence, he shall be evicted from the suit schedule property. To the contrary, according to defendant he is regularly paying rent to the son of plaintiff and he filed Exhibits B1 to B5 to show the payment of rent of suit schedule property to the sons of plaintiff. Perusal of Exhibits B1 to B5 nowhere shows the address of property for which defendant is paying 9 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

rent to sons of plaintiff. Therefore, this court is of the opinion that it cannot be concluded that defendant paid rent of suit schedule property to sons of plaintiff under Exhibits B1 to B5. Further, no document is filed showing the payment of rent subsequent to 08.08.2022 either to the plaintiff or to the sons of plaintiff. Hence, this court is of the opinion that plaintiff is entitled for relief of eviction and recovery of arrears.

September 2023 within two months from the date of this Judgment.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court on this the 25 th day of March, 2025.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Mohammed Khaja Moinuddin DW1 : Dinesh Singh 10 of 10 O.S.No.5273 OF 2023

Dated 25-03-2025

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Exhibit A1 is the office copy of legal notice, dated 05-08-2023.

Exhibit A2 is the original postal receipt.

Exhibit A3 is the acknowledgment card.

Exhibit A4 is the certified copy of sale deed bearing number 2945/2013,

dated 03.09.2013.

Exhibit A5 is the Encumbrance certificate.

Exhibit A5 is the Market Value Assistance certificate.

For Defendant:

Exhibit B1 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 123, dated 06.06.2022.

Exhibit B2 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 122, dated 05.05.2022.

Exhibit B3 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 124, dated 07.07.2022.

Exhibit B4 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 125, dated 08.08.2022.

Exhibit B5 is the the original Rental receipt bearing number 126, dated 09.09.2022.

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5166/2023 Compromised

UNION BANK OF INDIA vs D. TRINADH KUMAR

04 Feb 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CITY CIVIL

COURT: HYDERABAD.

PRESENT :Sri N. RAMACHANDRA RAO ,

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC:XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 04th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 5166 OF 2023

Between:

UNION BANK OF INDIA,

(A Govt. of India Undertaking) (Formerly) Andhra Bank Credit Card Division, Rep. By Mr. Ch. V. Gopal Reddy, Senior Manager, Head Office, Koti, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. … PLAINTIFF

A N D

Mr. D. Trinadh Kumar, S/o. Mr. D. Subbarao, Aged 53 years, Occ: Business, D. No. 8-231/4, SFI, Deepika Residency, Srinivasnagar, Opp. VRS Engg College, Tadigadapa, Vijayawada – 07. or Smt. Jayasree Dama, W/o. Mr. D. Trinadh Kumar, Aged 43 years, Occ: Housewife, D. No. 8-231/4, SFI, Deepika Residency, Srinivasanagar, Opp. VRS Engg College, Tadigadapa, Vijayawada – 07. E-mail: trinadh.varama09@gmail.com… DEFENDANT

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

2 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023

This suit is coming before me on 09.01.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri M. V. Naga Raj, counsel for the plaintiff and defendant was set ex-parte and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed to pass a Decree and Judgment in favour of the plaintiff Bank and against the Defendant for a sum of Rs.1,38,304.33ps (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Four and

Thirty Three Paise only) to award pendent lite and future interest @2.95% per month monthly compounded by way of service charges on the suit amount from the date of filing of the suit to till the date of realization.

2. Brief averments of the plaint :- It is submitted that the defendant approached the plaintiff bank with an application in the year 2014 to sanction Andhra Bank Credit Card agreeing to the terms and conditions mentioned in the application form. The Plaintiff bank after processing the application at Hyderabad has issued a Credit Card No. 6528- 63xx-xxxx-7001. The Defendant was utilizing the credit card facility from time to time and the charges were debited into his account which is maintained by the plaintiff bank. The monthly bills pertaining to the

Defendants with details of the amount credited and debited along with the

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

3 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023 outstanding amount were issued with a request to pay the outstanding amount as per the bills.

As per the Terms and Conditions of the credit card, the defendant is liable to pay 2.95% as service charge per month on the outstanding balance.

On 21.09.2020, the Plaintiff bank received the last payment made by the defendant, thereafter the defendant committed default in payment of dues and the details of the transactions are reflected in the statement of account as on 25.08.2023. The Plaintiff bank made several efforts to recover the due amount under the credit card from the Defendant and the plaintiff bank demanded the defendant several times to clear the outstanding dues, under his credit card account but the defendant failed to respond. The present suit is filed for recovery of Rs. 1,38,304.33ps (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight

Thousand Three Hundred and Four and Thirty Three Paise only). The

Plaintiff entitled to recover pendent lite and future interest @ 2.95% monthly compounded from the date of filing of the suit to till the date of realization and defendants are liable to pay the same.

3.Despite service of summons, the defendant did not choose to appear and contest the case. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the documents.

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

4 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023

5. Now the points for determination are :-

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery Rs.

1,38,304.33ps (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand

Three Hundred and Four and Thirty Three Paise only) with interest @ 2.95% percent per month from the date of filing of suit till the date of realization from the defendants as prayed ?

2. To what relief ?

Answer to Point:

6.The suit is filed for recovery of money by the plaintiff bank on the basis of credit card transactions. The plaintiff’s case is that on the basis of the application made by the defendant, it sanctioned the credit card bearing

No. 6528-63xx-xxxx-7001 in the name of the defendant and issued credit card in his favour. According to plaintiff, the defendant while utilizing the said credit card facility was not prompt in making payments and the payments made by them were not matched with the outstanding amount.

The defendant made last payment on 21.09.2020 and subsequently they failed to pay the remaining outstanding amount. In those circumstances, the plaintiff bank filed the present suit against the defendants.

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

5 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023

Though the defendants did not appear before the court to contest the case, the plaintiff bank has to prove its case on its own not dependent on the weakness of defendants. In order to prove the claim, GPA holder of plaintiff bank got himself examined as PW1, in his chief affidavit reiterated the plaint averments and got marked the documents Ex A1 to A4.

7.Ex.A1 is the Attested copy of Application, Ex.A2 is the Statement of

Account from 01.12.2014 to 25.08.2023. Ex.A3 is the authorization letter,

dated 30-07-2024, Ex.A4 is the Gazette Notification No. 133, dated 04-03-

2020.

7.1.Ex.A1 is the application submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff bank requesting the bank to issue credit card in his name. The reverse side of Ex.A1 contained all the terms and conditions of the membership of the applicant. Ex.A1 application is duly signed by applicant i.e., defendant.

Ex.A2 is the Statement of account for a period from 01.12.2014 to 25.08.2023 pertaining to credit card No. 6528-63xx-xxxx-7001 which stood in the name of the defendant. Ex.A2 is the statement of account contained all the transactions right from the date on which the credit card was issued by the plaintiff bank upto 25.08.2023 i.e., just prior to the date of filing of the suit in this court. Ex.A2 contained the debit and credit entries from the beginning upto the date i.e., 21.09.2020 on which the

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

6 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023 defendant made last payment to the plaintiff bank. Ex.A2 shows that subsequent to the said date the defendant did not make any payment to the plaintiff bank. Since the defendant did not make any payment subsequent to the said date, the plaintiff bank levied service charges and other charges as per the terms and conditions, and filed this suit for Rs. 1,38,304.33ps (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Four and

Thirty Three Paise only). The documents which are filed on behalf of the plaintiff referred to supra, especially Ex.A2 statement of account, therefore clearly supports the case of the plaintiff. The authorization issued by the plaintiff bank in favour of PW-1 is marked as Ex.A3.

Ex.A4 shows, Andhra Bank & Corporation Bank were amalgamated into

Union Bank. Since the defendants did not choose to contest the suit, the above oral and documentary evidence adduced by plaintiff remained unrebutted. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled for a decree for the suit amount. Point is answered accordingly.

8. IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. Defendant is liable to pay the suit amount of Rs. 1,38,304.33ps (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Eight Thousand

Three Hundred and Four and Thirty Three Paise only) together with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

7 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023 decree and thereafter at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on principle sum.

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 04 th day of February, 2026.

Sd/-

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC: XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT: HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESS EXAMINED

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PW1 Ms. Clara James- None -

DOCUMENTS MARKED

PLAINTIFF

Ex.A1Attested copy of Application

Ex.A2Statement of Account, dated 01.12.2014 to 25.08.2023

Ex.A3Authorization Letter, dated 30.07.2024

Ex.A4Gazette Notification No. 133, dated 04.03.2020.

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

8 OS. NO. 5166 OF 2023

DOCUMENTS MARKED

DEFENDANT

- Nil -

Sd/-

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC: XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT: HYDERABAD.

XXII JCJ, CCC, HYD

Order Record 796 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/51/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs HASAN PATEL	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	Compromised
OS/52/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs R. NAVEEN KUMAR	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	Compromised
OS/56/2025	State Bank Of India vs KAVALI MALLESH	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/61/2025	State Bank Of India vs SYED SHAREEF	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/90/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs N.K. GOUD GADDAM	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	Compromised
OS/150/2025	State Bank Of India vs GANDU RAVI	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/311/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs NIDA NAJ	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/449/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SURESH PATEL	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/527/2024	Union Bank of India vs LALITENDRANATH.K	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/838/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs PALVAI PRUDVI RAJ	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/841/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs GADAMABOINA RAJAIAH	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/928/2025	Union Bank of India vs ANIL KUMAR S	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1015/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs BHARAT CHANDGUDE	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1989/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs AVINASH YADAV	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2262/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SRI N VASUDEVA RAO	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2411/2024	Union Bank of India vs Goutam	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2677/2024	Union Bank of India vs SUNNY KUMAR	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3009/2024	Union Bank of India vs NEPAL SINGH	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3106/2024	Union Bank of India vs MVAS PRAKASH	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3113/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs M. VISWANATH PRASAD	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5593/2024	State Bank Of India vs SIRICILLA SWAMY	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5757/2024	Union Bank of India vs PAWAN KUMAR	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1804/2024	RANJITH THAKUR vs THE GHMC	17 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5595/2024	State Bank Of India vs JOGUNOURI ANANTHA RAO	17 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/18/2025	State Bank Of India vs KORANI YADAIAH	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/19/2025	State Bank Of India vs AERUPULA SHIVA KUMAR REDDY	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/475/2025	State Bank Of India vs ADAPA MAHENDRA	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/477/2025	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs MD MUJAHID	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/909/2025	Union Bank of India vs SANJAY VITHOBA KATE	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1123/2025	Union Bank of India vs SANDIP BHAI B ZAREER	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/1255/2025	State Bank Of India vs SAMAIAH KAMBAMPATI	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2426/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs GOGRAJ BAJIA	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2427/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs JITHENDAR KUMAR K.	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3116/2024	Union Bank of India vs MUSTKEEM HASAN	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3169/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs RAJESH .N	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3172/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SANJAY JAIN	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3351/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs MANDE VENKATESWARLU	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3822/2024	Union Bank of India vs SHAHABUDDIN MANSOORI	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/4932/2024	Union Bank of India vs MADA SATYANARAYANA	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5436/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs KAMBALAPURAM SRINIVASULU	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5442/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs RAJESH BALLEM	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5469/2024	State Bank Of India vs S. USHAIAH	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5618/2024	State Bank Of India vs MD HUSSAIN	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5621/2024	State Bank Of India vs ABBOJU JOGACHARY	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5651/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs N. SHOBHAN BABU	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5653/2024	State Bank Of India vs MALLURU NAGARAJA	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5655/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs BIDLAN SURENDAR	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5734/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs NARAHARI POLEMONI	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5735/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs BHASHABOINA RAJESH	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/418/2025	State Bank Of India vs CHILUVERU RAJU	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2406/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs DEVENDRA SHARMA	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3111/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SYED OMAR	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3383/2024	Union Bank of India vs KULYARAM NIMBARAM DEVASI	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5078/2024	Union Bank of India vs PARVEEN KUMAR	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5596/2024	State Bank Of India vs SHAIK NAZEER	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5652/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs KINNERA GOVARDAN	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/5654/2024	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs PUTTAPAKA KRISHNASWAMY	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2091/2024	SAFIA BEGUM vs MOHAMMED BABA	27 Feb 2026	Order	—
EP/785/2025	M/s. Shriramchandra Chits Pvt., Ltd., rep., by its Foreman, Mr. P. Manga Rao vs Sri Bapatla Venkata Ramana	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/1754/2025	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs N. SREEDEVI	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	Compromised
OS/3998/2023	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs BANDI SAIDI REDDY	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	Compromised
OS/5166/2023	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs D. TRINADH KUMAR	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	Compromised
EP/1267/2024	M/s. CVR Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs T Bala Murali	03 Feb 2026	Order	—
OS/3349/2024	Union Bank of India vs SRI AASIF ALI	29 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/927/2025	Union Bank of India vs GYAN SINGH MEENA	28 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3354/2024	Union Bank of India vs ANISETTI SATYA	28 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/2994/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs V. NARENDER GOUD	27 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/3374/2024	Union Bank of India vs SURESH BHAGWAN PAWAR	27 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/606/2025	Union Bank of India vs G. ARAVIND	22 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/835/2024	Union Bank of India vs G. RAM KISHAN	22 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/4784/2024	Union Bank of India vs AMIT JAIN	22 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
OS/57/2025	State Bank Of India vs BIMAGONI SARITHA	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/146/2025	State Bank Of India vs JANGAM RAVI KUMAR	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/423/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs SONALI DATTATRAYA PORE	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/423/2025	Union Bank of India vs PARVEEN MOR	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/589/2025	Union Bank of India vs AYYAPPAN	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/934/2025	Union Bank of India vs RAJ KUMAR	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/937/2025	Union Bank of India vs MAHESH KUMAR	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1171/2025	Union Bank of India vs BABUSENAN	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2595/2024	Union Bank of India vs VENKATESH VATTAMWAR	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2945/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs BHEEMIDI LAXMA REDDY	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2997/2024	Union Bank of India vs K.M. RATNAM	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3108/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs BHIMASHIBHAI VADHE	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3376/2024	Union Bank of India vs JYOTSNA ANAND SAWANT	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3377/2024	Union Bank of India vs KUMARI SARITHA	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3689/2024	Union Bank of India vs J.V. NARENDRA	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3732/2024	Union Bank of India vs KIRAN KUMAR.V	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4000/2024	Union Bank of India vs PARASURAM GUNDA	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4002/2024	Union Bank of India vs M. DHAVA PRABHU	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4267/2024	Union Bank of India vs DHANANI SANKARA RAO	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4783/2024	Union Bank of India vs RAMU DAS	31 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/291/2025	Union Bank of India vs BHARGABI CHATTERJEE	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/310/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs N V CHALAPTHI RAO	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/459/2025	Union Bank of India vs JITENDRA KUMAR	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/843/2024	Union Bank of India vs S.KUMRAIAH	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/843/2025	Union Bank of India vs PAVAN KUMAR JAISWAL	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/868/2024	UNION BANK OF INDIA vs MANJEET SINGH	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/932/2025	Union Bank of India vs CHEJERLA VASU	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/935/2025	Union Bank of India vs GYUADRABOINA RAMESH	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1074/2025	STATE BANK OF INDIA vs LAINGAMAIAH BASHAMONI	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 796 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Mar 2026		57
Feb 2026		7
Jan 2026		8
Dec 2025		76
Oct 2025		2
Sep 2025		6
Aug 2025		21
Jul 2025		18
Jun 2025		41
May 2025		10
Apr 2025		46
Mar 2025		47

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has MS. ANAMIKA handled?

MS. ANAMIKA has handled 810 court orders since 2023 at HYD, City Civil Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 23 orders per month.

What types of cases does MS. ANAMIKA hear?

Based on available records, MS. ANAMIKA primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at HYD, City Civil Court Complex.

Where is MS. ANAMIKA currently posted?

MS. ANAMIKA is posted as XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE at HYD, City Civil Court Complex, Hyderabad, Telangana.

Are judgments by MS. ANAMIKA available online?

Yes. 32 judgments by MS. ANAMIKA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does MS. ANAMIKA dispose cases?

MS. ANAMIKA disposes approximately 23 cases per month, based on 810 orders handled over their tenure at HYD, City Civil Court Complex.

Since when is MS. ANAMIKA serving?

MS. ANAMIKA has been serving at HYD, City Civil Court Complex since 2023.

Case Types

OS 82%

EP 18%

Posting History

Feb 2026 — Mar 2026

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 2 orders
Feb 2026 — Feb 2026

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 5 orders
Jul 2025 — Dec 2025

IV JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
May 2025 — Dec 2025

VII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 35 orders
Apr 2025 — Aug 2025

III JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 18 orders
Apr 2025 — May 2025

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 1 orders
Apr 2025 — May 2025

XXI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 6 orders
Oct 2024 — May 2025

II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 73 orders
May 2023 — Present

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 670 orders

Outcomes on Record

Compromised 7

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. S Sasidhar Reddy

CHIEF JUDGE

1,099 orders

Smt. Y. Padma

II ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1,069 orders

Manisha Sravan Unnam

III ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. K. Murali Mohan

IX ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

121 orders

Sri. Ch. Jithendhar

X ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

299 orders

Smt. P.lakshmi Kumari

XI ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1 orders

Smt. M. Padmaja

XIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1,179 orders

Sri. D.v. Nageswara Rao

XXV ADDL CHIEF JUDGE

1,759 orders

Smt. Vempati Aparna

XXVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

14 orders

Ms. Shalini Lingam

II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

86 orders

Smt. Putta Mounika

III JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

5 orders

Ms. K.Keerthana

IV JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

20 orders

Ms. G.Girija

V JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

36 orders

Ms. K.Bindu

VII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

137 orders

Ms. B.Manasa

VIII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

64 orders

Smt. B. Kalpana

IX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

210 orders

Smt. Arisha Nusrat

X JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2 orders

Sri. Rama Chandra Rao Nadendla

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

339 orders

Gopi Krishna Kumaram

XXI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

0 orders

Sri C.suresh

I SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

344 orders

Sri. B. Rama Rao

II SENIOR CIVIL JUGDE

45 orders

Sri. G. Uday Kumar

THE PRL. SPECIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JU...

48 orders

Sri. N. Venkat Ram

ADDL. SPECIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE...

19 orders

← View all judges at HYD, City Civil Court Complex