Sri. Sai Kiran Kasamala

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

HYD, City Civil Court Complex · Hyderabad · Telangana

SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA, XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, is posted at HYD, City Civil Court Complex, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 821 court orders on record since 2022. 29 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP cases.

821

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/723/2025

JAKHOTIA POLYFIBRE PVT LTD vs SANTOSHIMATHA FEED FACTORY

16 Apr 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CITY CIVIL COURT:

HYDERABAD.

DATED THIS THE 16 th DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA,

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

O.S. No. 723 of 2025

Between:-

M/S. JAKHOTIA POLYFIBRE PVT. LTD., Rep. by its MANAGER, MR. SUMIT AGARWAL, S/o. Chhajuram Agarwal, Age: 47 years, Occ: Business, Regd. Office at: 3-6-314, 2ND Floor, Jakhotia Arcade, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500029.

... Plaintiff

A N D

M/S. SANTOSHIMATHA FEED FACTORY, Rep. by its Partner, MR. KUNITILA SANTHOSH KANTH, Shop At: Plot No: 35 & 36, Industrial Estate, Beside Andhra Bank Street, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh - 534202.

... Defendant

This suit coming up before me for final hearing, in the presence of Sri K. Anoop Kumar, Counsel for the plaintiffand the defendant were set Ex- parte, and the matter having been heard and stood over for consideration till this date, this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of sum of Rs. 3,26,529/- with subsequent interest @ 24% p.a. from the date of filing of this suit to till the date of realization.

2. The averments of the plaint, in nutshell:-

The Plaintiff submits that it is a Company registered under the Companies

Act, bearing Registration No: U19119AP006PTC050597 for the year 20062007,

dated 11.07.2006, having its Registered Office at H.No. 36314, 2nd Floor, Jakhotia

Arcade, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 500029. The present suit is being instituted through the Manager of the Plaintiff Company, who is fully acquainted with the day today business activities and is duly authorised to file the present suit pursuant to the

Board Resolution dated 27.01.2025. The Plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing Plastic Products, Sugar Bags, and PP Woven Sacks and is regularly supplying the same to various companies and wholesalers on both cash and credit basis. In the normal course of its business, the Defendant approached the Plaintiff and placed an order for the supply of PP Woven Sacks. In compliance with the said order, the Plaintiff supplied the goods to the Defendant under the following three invoices:

S.No. Date Invoice No. Amount (Rs.) 110.04.2023JPPL/2023-24/9540,710/- 224.04.2023JPPL/2023-24/22448,852/- 324.05.2023JPPL/2023-24/5901,83,967/-

Total 2,73,529/-

The Plaintiff submits that out of the total invoice amount of Rs. 2,73,529/-, the

Defendant has made partial payment of Rs. 50,000/- through bank transfer on different dates. However, the balance outstanding amount of Rs. 2,23,529/- remains unpaid, as reflected in the Ledger maintained by the Plaintiff

Company. Despite repeated requests and demands made by the Plaintiff, the

Defendant failed to clear the dues and has been evading payment under one pretext or the other, thereby causing wrongful loss to the Plaintiff and unjust enrichment to the Defendant. Left with no alternative due to the non- cooperative and delaying conduct of the Defendant, the Plaintiff was constrained to issue a Legal Notice dated 21.12.2024 through Registered

Post, demanding payment of the outstanding amount of Rs. 2,23,529/- within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt. The said notice was duly received by the Defendant on 26.12.2024. However, despite receipt of the said notice, the Defendant neither responded to the same nor complied with the demand made therein. The Plaintiff is hereby filing the present suit for recovery of Rs. 3,26,529/-, which includes the principal outstanding of Rs.

2,23,529/- and other consequential charges. The Office Copy of the Legal

Notice, Postal Receipt, and Postal Tracking Report are filed along with the plaint for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. Under these circumstances, the Plaintiff is left with no other efficacious remedy except to approach this

Hon’ble Court for redressal. The Defendant is, therefore, legally liable to pay

the said sum of Rs. 3,26,529/- to the Plaintiff. Hence, this suit.

3.The defendant is set Ex-parte.

4.In order to prove the suit claim, the plaintiff firm Manager himself was examined as PW1, and got marked Exs.A1 to A13.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff and perused record.

6.Now the points for determination are :-

1)Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount

of Rs. 3,26,529/- with the subsequent interest @18% p.a. from the

date of filing of this suit and till the date of realization, as prayed

for?

2) To what relief ?

7. POINT No.1:--

(a).It is the case of the Plaintiff that it is a registered company engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying plastic products and PP Woven Sacks. In the normal course of its business, the Defendant placed an order with the Plaintiff

Company for the supply of PP Woven Sacks, pursuant to which the Plaintiff supplied goods under the following three invoices:

S.No. Date Invoice No. Amount (Rs.) 110.04.2023JPPL/2023-24/9540,710/- 224.04.2023JPPL/2023-24/22448,852/- 324.05.2023JPPL/2023-24/5901,83,967/-

Total 2,73,529/-

Out of the total consideration of Rs. 2,73,529/-, the Defendant paid only

Rs.50,000/- through bank transfers made on different dates, leaving an outstanding balance of Rs.2,23,529/-. Despite several oral and written demands, the Defendant failed to clear the said balance. Consequently, the

Plaintiff was constrained to issue a Legal Notice dated 21.12.2024, which was served on the Defendant on 26.12.2024, calling upon the Defendant to pay the outstanding amount within two weeks. However, the Defendant neither replied to the said notice nor made any payment. The Plaintiff thereafter instituted the present suit seeking recovery of Rs.3,26,529/-, which includes the principal outstanding and other consequential claims.

(b) In order to substantiate the claim, the Plaintiff examined its Manager as PW1. The said witness, being fully conversant with the day-to-day affairs of the Plaintiff Company and duly authorised under the Board Resolution

dated 27.01.2025, filed his chief examination affidavit reiterating the contents

of the plaint in detail. PW1 deposed that the Defendant had placed an order for the supply of PP Woven Sacks, pursuant to which the Plaintiff supplied goods under three invoices bearing Nos.JPPL/2023-24/95 dated 10.04.2023,

JPPL/2023-24/224 dated 24.04.2023, and JPPL/2023-24/590 dated 24.05.2023, amounting in total to Rs.2,73,529/-. He further stated that out of the said amount, the Defendant made a part payment of Rs.50,000/- by way of bank transfers on different dates, leaving a balance of Rs.2,23,529/- unpaid. PW1 also deposed that despite repeated oral and written demands made by the Plaintiff Company, the Defendant failed and neglected to pay the outstanding amount. As a consequence, the Plaintiff issued a Legal

Notice dated 21.12.2024, through Registered Post, calling upon the

Defendant to pay the due sum of Rs. 2,23,529/- within two weeks. PW1 confirmed that the said Legal Notice was duly served on the Defendant on 26.12.2024, but no reply was received, nor was any payment made in response. In support of his oral evidence, PW1 got marked Exs.A1 to A13.

Exs.A1 to A9 include the invoices and delivery-related documents that clearly establish the supply of goods by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Ex.A10 is the office copy of the Legal Notice, Ex.A11 is the postal receipt evidencing dispatch of the notice, and Ex.A12 is the track report confirming that the said notice was received by the Defendant. Ex.A13 is the Ledger Account maintained by the Plaintiff Company in the regular course of business, covering the period from 01.04.2023 to 17.02.2025, which accurately reflects the transaction details and the outstanding balance of Rs. 2,23,529/-. The documentary evidence produced by PW1, when taken together with his oral testimony, clearly supports the Plaintiff’s version and proves the supply of goods, part payment made by the Defendant, the outstanding dues, and the service of legal notice. Since the Defendant has neither entered appearance nor cross-examined the witness, the evidence led by the Plaintiff remains unrebutted and unimpeached.

(c) A cumulative reading of the oral and documentary evidence on record clearly establishes that despite repeated demands and legal notice, the

Defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 2,23,529/- or respond to the Plaintiff's claim. The Plaintiff has also established the total claim amount of Rs. 3,26,529/- which includes the principal and other charges.

(d) In the absence of any rebuttal and in view of the credible, consistent, and supported evidence of PW1, this Court is satisfied that the Plaintiff has proved its case. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant.

8.POINT No.2: In the result the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant is liable to pay the suit amount of

Rs. 3,26,529/-, together with future interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on principal sum of Rs. 3,26,529/-. Defendant shall pay the above said amount within two(02) months from the date of judgment failing which the plaintiff shall be at liberty to proceed against defendant for execution of decree as per law.

Typed to my dictation by the stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 16 th day of April, 2025.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For plaintiff For defendant: PW1 : MR. SUMIT AGARWALNone

Documents marked for plaintiff:

Ex. A 1 Incorporation Certificate and Memorandum and Article of

Association dt. 11-07-2006 Ex. A 2 Board resolution dt. 27-01-2025

Ex. A3 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/05 dt 10-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A4 E-Way bill No. 1016 2664 4242 dt. 10-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A5 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/224 dt 24-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A6 E-Way bill No. 1416 3338 2452 dt. 24-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A7 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/590 dt 24-05-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A8 E-Way bill No. 1416 4788 2654 dt. 24-05-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A9 Office copy of legal notice dt. 21-12-2024 Ex.A10 Postal receipt dt. 21-12-2024

Ex.A11 Served postal track report dt. 26-12-2024 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex.A12 Served postal acknowledgment card dt. 26-12-2024

Ex.A13 Leger statement of account from 01-04-2023 to 17-02-2025

Documents marked for defendants: Nil.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

OS/201/2023

G.V. RAMANAIAH vs AVULA DASTAGIRAIAH

17 Apr 2025

O.S. No.201 OF 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT

HYDERABAD.

THURSDAY, DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA

XX Junior Civil Judge,

FAC XIX Junior Civil Judge,

City Civil Court, Hyderabad

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 201 OF 2023

Between:

G.V. Ramanaiah, S/o Venkataiah, Hindu, Age 76 years, Occ : Retd. Government Employee, R/o Flat No. G-2, Sree Vrudhi Residency, Saleem Nagar Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad – 500 036. Phone No. 9490273969 …Plaintiff

AND

Avula Dastagiraiah, S/o Avula Chinna Dastagiraiah, Age 57 years, Occ : Business, R/o D.No. 12-63, Vivekananda Nagar, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, - 516300, AP.

Phone Nos : 9885084975 / 8309673924 …Defendant

This suit is coming before me for final hearing, in the presence of Sri.T.

Sasi Kumar, learned advocate for the plaintiff and defendant was set ex-parte and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery of sum of Rs.3,51,232/- along with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of 2 suit till the date of realization and for attachment of property before Judgment along with costs of suit.

2. The averments of the plaint, in nutshell are:

The plaintiff submits that he is a retired State Government employee from

Kadapa District and that, based on a long-standing acquaintance, he lent a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- to Defendant No.1, who is also a resident of plaintiff’s native place, on 28.01.2020 to meet the defendant's family and personal needs. At the time of borrowing, Defendant No.1 promised to repay the said amount along with interest at 1% per month within a period of six months and, in token thereof, executed a promissory note on 28.01.2020 in favour of the plaintiff. The said transaction was witnessed by K. Bhaskar, S/o K. Brahmanandam, resident of 103, SV Residency, Malakpet, Hyderabad, and another individual. Despite the repeated requests and reminders, the defendant failed to discharge the liability as promised. Consequently, the plaintiff, through his counsel, issued a legal notice dated 15.10.2022, sent by Registered Post with Acknowledgment

Due under Receipt No. RN158091569IN and also sent through WhatsApp to the defendant’s mobile number, in accordance with Section 4 of the Information

Technology Act, 2000, demanding payment of the principal amount of

Rs.2,50,000/- along with agreed interest at 12% per annum from 28.01.2020, within a period of fifteen days. However, the defendant failed and neglected to comply with the said demand. The plaintiff, despite waiting for two more months after issuance of the legal notice, did not receive any payment from the 3 defendant. As the plaintiff, being a Senior Citizen and a Retired Employee, is now facing financial hardship, he is constrained to file the present suit claiming a sum of Rs.3,51,232/-, inclusive of principal and interest, against the defendant. Hence, this suit.

3.Summons was served on defendant. The defendant failed to appear

before this Court. Hence, the defendant was set Ex-parte.

4.In order to prove the suit claim, the plaintiff himself was examined as

PW1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A5.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff and perused record.

6. Now the points for determination are:

(1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit

amount of Rs.3,51,232/- with the subsequent interest

@12% p.a. from the date of filing of this suit and till the

date of realization along with costs of suit, as prayed

for?

(2) To what relief?

7. Point No.1:

(a) It is the case of the plaintiff that he lent Rs.2,50,000/- to Defendant No.1 on 28.01.2020, based on long-standing acquaintance. The defendant promised to repay the amount with 1% monthly interest within six months and executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. Despite repeated reminders, the defendant failed to repay the loan. The plaintiff issued a legal notice on 15.10.2022 by Registered Post and WhatsApp under the Information 4

Technology Act, 2000, demanding repayment along with 12% interest per annum, but the defendant did not respond. As the plaintiff, a senior citizen, is facing financial hardship, he has filed the present suit claiming Rs.3,51,232/- against the defendant.

(b) In support of his claim, the plaintiff got examined himself as PW1. In his chief affidavit, PW1 reiterated the averments made in the plaint. Through PW.1,

Exs.A1 to A5 documents were marked. Ex.A1 is the original promissory note

dated 28.01.2020, executed by the defendant, wherein the defendant

acknowledged receipt of Rs.2,50,000/- from the plaintiff and undertook to repay the same with interest at 1% per month within six months. The execution of

Ex.A1 clearly evidences the lending transaction between the parties and supports the oral testimony of PW1. Ex.A2 is the office copy of the legal notice

dated 15.10.2022, issued by the plaintiff through his counsel, calling upon the

defendant to repay the principal amount along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum, within fifteen days from the date of receipt. Ex.A3 is the registered postal receipt dated 22.10.2022, evidencing dispatch of the said legal notice.

Ex.A4 is the printout of the India Post tracking report showing the movement and delivery status of the notice sent. Ex.A5 is the postal acknowledgment card

dated 26.10.2022, duly signed, confirming that the defendant received the legal

notice. These documents collectively establish that the plaintiff issued a valid legal demand for repayment, and the same was duly served on the defendant, who chose not to respond. The consistent oral evidence of PW1, supported by 5 documentary evidence under Exs.A1 to A5, demonstrates that the loan transaction did take place and that despite notice and sufficient opportunity, the defendant failed to discharge the liability. The suit amount claimed by the plaintiff, which includes the principal and accrued interest, remains unpaid, justifying the present action for recovery.

(c) It is also pertinent to mention that the testimony of PW1, both oral and documentary, remained unrebutted as the defendant remained ex parte. There is no contra evidence adduced on behalf of the defendant to dispute the claim of the plaintiff.

(d) In view of the evidence of PW1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A5, which is found to be trustworthy, reliable and convincing, this Court opines that the plaintiff has established his claim. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

8. Point No.2: In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The defendant is directed to pay the suit amount of Rs.3,51,232/- together with future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the principal sum of Rs.3,51,232/-. The defendant shall pay the said amount within two (02) months from the date of judgment, failing which the plaintiff shall be at liberty to proceed against the defendant for execution of the decree as per 6 law.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 17 th day of April, 2025.)

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For defendants:

PW.1: G.V. Ramanaiah -None-

Documents marked for plaintiff:

Ex.A1 Promissory Note Dated 28.01.2020 Ex.A2 Office Copy of Legal Notice Dated 15.10.2022 Ex.A3 Registered Postal Receipt Dated 22.10.2022 Ex.A4 Print-out of Indian Postal Tracking Report Ex.A5 Postal Acknowledgment Card Dated 26.10.2022

Documents marked for defendants: Nil.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5794/2024

PONNA BOINA ARUNA vs MRO

15 Apr 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CITY CIVIL COURT:

HYDERABAD.

DATED THIS THE 15 th DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA,

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

O.S. No.5794 of 2024

Between:

1. Ponna Boina Aruna W/o Late P. Ravi Raj Aged bout: 47 Years, Occ: House hold

2. Ponna Boina Akshith Raj S/o Late P. Ravi Aged about 14 years, Occ: Student

3. Ponan Boina Akshaya D/o Late P. Ravi Raj Aged about 10 Years, Occ: Student ( Plaintiff No 2 &3 is represented by natural mother i.e., Plaintiff No. 1) All are R/o 18-4-416/417 Aliyabad Charminar Hyderabad 500053

..Plaintiffs

AND

1.Thasildhar Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

2.The All Concerned.

... Defendants

This suit coming on or before me for final hearing, in the presence of Sri.

L.K. Sharma, Counsel for the plaintiffs and that defendants were set Ex-parte, and the matter having been heard and stood over for consideration till this date, this court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit is filed for declaration by the plaintiffs praying this Court to declare the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi

Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah, for the purpose of legal status only.

2. The averments made in the plaint, in nut shell are:-

It is submitted that the plaintiff no. 1 is the wife and plaintiff no. 2 & 3 are the son and daughter of Deceased Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj

S/o Late P. Yadaiah and except the plaintiffs herein, there are no other legal heirs there to Deceased Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P.

Yadaiah. That the plaintiffs further submits that the late Deceased Late Mr Ponna

Boina Ravi S/o Late P. Yadaiah expired on 08-11-2024 leaving behind the plaintiffs as his legal heirs. That the Plaintiffs approached concerned MRO for legal heir certificate but they refused. Hence the Plaintiffs left with no other go have filed the present suit.

3.Summons were served on defendant no.1. Publication filed for defendant no.2. Defendants did not turn up for appearance and did not choose to contest the suit. Hence, the Defendants no.1 & 2 were set ex-parte.

4. To prove the suit claim, Plaintiff no.1 got examined herself as PW1. In her chief in examination, she reiterated the contents of the plaint. Through PW.1,

Exs.A1 to A5 documents were marked.

5. Now the point for determination is :

***1):* ‘ *Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of***

the deceased Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah , as

prayed for?” 2): To what relief ?

6. POINT No: 1 :- In order to substantiate the averments in the plaint, the plaintiff no.1 got examined herself as PW-1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A5 documents. PW.1 filed her affidavit-in-chief which are nothing but repetition of the entire contents of the plaint. According to PW1, the plaintiffs are the only legal heirs of Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah.

7.In order to prove the death of Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj

S/o Late P. Yadaiah, the plaintiffs produced Ex.A1-Death certificateissued by

Registrar of Births and Death, which discloses that Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @

P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah died at his residence, Hyderabad, on 08-11- 2024. Ex.A.2 is adhaar card of the deceased. In order to prove their relationship with Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah, the plaintiffs got marked Ex.A3 to A5 documents, which are Aadhar Cards of plaintiffs no.1 to 3.

Ex.A3 to A5 clearly reflect the deceased name i.e., Late Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @

P. Ravi Raj, & they shows that plaintiff No.1 is the wife of deceased Mr Ponna

Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj and plaintiffs no.2 & 3 are the Children of deceased

Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj.

8.As there is no contra evidence on this point and as the evidence of PW1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A5 remained unrebutted, this court is of the considered opinion that it is just, fair and reasonable to declare that the plaintiffs no.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of deceased Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P.

Yadaiah, for the purpose of legal status only. Hence, this point is answered in favour of the plaintiffs.

9. POINT 2: To what relief ?

In the result, the suit is decreed, without costsby declaring that the plaintiffs no.1 to 3 are the legal heirs of deceased Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P.

Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah, for the purpose of legal status only.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 15 th day of April, 2025.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiffs For defendants:

PW1 : Ponna Boina ArunaNil

Documents marked for plaintiffs:

Ex. A 1 Original death certificate of Late Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj, Ex. A 2 Original Adhar card of deceased, Ex. A3 Original Adhar card of plaintiff No. 1 Ex. A4 Original Adhar card of plaintiff No. 2 Ex. A5 Original Adhar card of plaintiff No. 3.

Documents marked for defendants: Nil.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

OS/96/2025

MOHAMMED SANAULLAH KHAN vs TAHSILDAR

17 Apr 2025

O.S. No.96 OF 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT

HYDERABAD.

THURSDAY, DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA

XX Junior Civil Judge,

FAC XIX Junior Civil Judge,

City Civil Court, Hyderabad

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 96 OF 2025

Between:

1.Mohammed Sanaullah Khan, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Retired.

2.Mohammed Sadathullah Khan, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Business.

3. Mohammed Samiullah Khan, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Business.

4.Mohammed Shafeeullah Khan, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Service Abroad.

5.Mohammed Shujaullah Khan, Aged about 52 years, Occ: Advocate.

All are sons of Late Mohammed Fayaz Ali Khan and Late Smt. Iqbal Banu Begum and are R/o H.No. 16-2-840/1/B, Ameen Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad – 500 059, TS.

...Plaintiffs

AND

1.The Tahsildar, Saidabad Mandal, Saroornagar, Balaji Nagar, Saroor Nagar West, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana– 500 059.

2.Sabiya Fatima Khatoon, D/o Late Mohammed Fayaz Ali Khan, Aged about 55 years,Occ : Housewife, R/o H.No. 16-2-840/1/A and B, Ameen Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad – 500 059, TS.

3.All Concerned.…Defendants

2 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

This suit is coming before me for final hearing, in the presence of

Ms.Sadia Khatoon, learned advocate for the plaintiffs and defendants were set ex-parte and the matter having stood over for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This suit is filed for declaration, to declare that plaintiffs and defendant no.2 as the legal heirs of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum, for the purpose of legal status only.

2. Brief averments of the plaint:

It is submitted that plaintiffs no.1 to 5 and defendant no.2 are the children of deceased Mohammed Fayaz Ali Khan, who died on 09.11.2006 and deceased Iqbal Banu Begum, who died on 15.02.2022, leaving behind the plaintiffs and defendant no.2 as their surviving legal heirs and successors. It is further submitted that during the lifetime of Iqbal Banu

Begum, she owned savings bank account in State Bank of India, Malakpet

Branch. After her demise, plaintiffs approached the Bank on 09.12.2024,to close the account, but the bank requested a legal heir certificate from the appropriate authorities. On 16.12.2024, plaintiffs approached the defendant no.1, with a request to issue legal heir certificate, but the defendant no.1 refused the same and advised the plaintiffs to approach the competent Civil

Court to obtain the required relief. Hence, this suit is filed for declaration.

3. Summons was served on defendant no.1 and 2. Publication filed for

3 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

defendant no.3. Defendants did not turn up for appearance and did not choose to contest the suit. Hence, the Defendants no.1 to 3 are set Ex-parte.

4.To prove the suit claim, plaintiff no.3 got examined himself as PW1.

Through PW.1, Exs.A1 to A8 was marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and perused the record.

6. Now the points for determination are:

(1) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as

legal heirs of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum, as prayed for?

(2) To what relief?

7. Point No.1: In order to substantiate the averments in the plaint, the plaintiff no.3 got examined himself as PW-1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A8.

PW.1 filed his affidavit-in-chief which is nothing but repetition of entire contents of the plaint. According to PW1, the plaintiffs and defendant no.2 are the only legal heirs of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum.

8.In order to prove the death of Mohammed Fayaz Ali Khan, the plaintiffs produced Ex.A1-Death certificate, which discloses that Mohammed Fayaz Ali

Khan died on 09.11.2006. In order to prove the death of Iqbal Banu Begum, the plaintiffs produced Ex.A2-Death certificate, which discloses that Iqbal Banu

Begum died on 15.02.2022. In order to prove their relationship with deceased

Iqbal Banu Begum,the plaintiffs got marked Exs.A3 to A8, which are passports of plaintiffs no.1 to 3, Marriage Certificates of plaintiffs no.4 and 5 and defendant no.2. Exs.A3 to A8 clearly reflects that plaintiffs no.1 to 5 and

4 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

defendant no.2 are the children of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum.

9.As there is no contra evidence on this point and as the evidence of PW1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A8 remained unrebutted, this court is of the considered opinion that it is just, fair and reasonable to declare that the plaintiffs and defendant no.2 as the legal heirs of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum, for the purpose of legal status only. Hence, this point is answered in favour of the plaintiffs.

10. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed, without costsby declaring that the plaintiffs no.1 to 5 and defendant no.2 are the legal heirs of deceased Iqbal

Banu Begum, for the purpose of legal status only.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 17 th day of April, 2025.)

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs: For defendants:

PW.1: Mohammed Samiullah Khan -None- Documents marked for Plaintiffs:

Ex.A1 Death Certificate of Late Mohammed Fayaz Ali Khan Ex.A2 Death Certificate of Late Iqbal Banu Begum Ex.A3 Passport of Plaintiff No.1

5 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

Ex.A4 Passport of Plaintiff No.2 Ex.A5 Passport of Plaintiff No.3 Ex.A6 Marriage Certificate of Plaintiff No.4 Ex.A7 Marriage Certificate of Plaintiff No.5 Ex.A8 Marriage Certificate of Defendant No.2

Documents marked for defendants: Nil.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

OS/5852/2024

SYED NOORUL HASSAN MAGRABI vs TAHSILDAR

16 Apr 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: CITY CIVIL COURT:

HYDERABAD.

DATED THIS THE 16 th DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA,

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

O.S. No.5852 of 2024

Between:

1.Syed Noorul Hassan Magrabi, S/o. Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 9-4-136/80/A, Quli Qutub Shah Nagar Tombs, Tolichowki, Golconda, Hyderabad, T.S-500008 (Aadhaar No. 9853 7852 1400).

2. Syed Noorul Hussain Magrabi, S/o. Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 9-4-136/28, Quli Qutubsha Colony, Near Habeba Masjeed, Jamali Kunta, Tolichowki, Golconda, Hyderabad, T.S- 500008, (Aadhaar No. 7168 6975 3010).

3. Saleha Fatima, W/o. Mohd Younus Khan, D/o. Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H. No. 19-3-799, Aliabad, Charminar, Hyderabad, T.S-500053, (Aadhaar No. 6241 3282 5247).

4. Sajida Fatima Magrabi W/o. Mohammed Abdul Samad, D/o. Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Household, R/o. H. No. 12-2-247, Murad Nagar, Asifnagar, Hyderabad, T.S-500008, (Aadhaar No. 4899 3651 7571).

…Plaintiffs AND

1. The Tahsildar Bahadurpura Mandal Hyderabad.

2. All Concerned. …Defendants

This suit is coming on or before me for final hearing, in the presence of Sri.

Mohd Barkat Ali, Counsel for the plaintiffs and that defendants were set Ex-parte, and the matter having been heard and stood over for consideration till this date, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit is filed for declaration to declare the plaintiffs as the legal heirs of Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, for the purpose of legal status only.

2. The averments made in the plaint, in nut shell are:

It is submitted that plaintiffs no.1 to 4 are the children of Late Syed Abdul

Haleem Magrabi, who died intestate on 01-08-2018, and Late Faqarunnisa

Begum, who died intestate on 03-06-2000, leaving behind the plaintiffs as their surviving legal heirs. It is further submitted that for all practical and legal purposes, the plaintiffs had approached defendant no.1 with a request to issue legal heir certificate. However, the defendant no.1 refused to issue the same and advised to approach competent Civil Court to obtain the required relief.

Hence this suit is filed for declaration.

4. To prove the suit claim, Plaintiff no.3 got examined herself as PW1. Through

PW.1, Exs.A1 to A9 were marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiffs and perused the record.

6. Now the points for determination are:

1) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal

heirs of deceased Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, as prayed for?

2) To what relief?

7. Point No.1: In order to substantiate the averments in the plaint, the plaintiff no.3 got examined herself as PW-1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A9 documents.

PW.1 filed her affidavit-in-chief which are nothing but repetition of the entire contents of the plaint. According to PW1, the plaintiffs are the only legal heirs of

Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi.

8.In order to prove the death of Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, the plaintiffs produced Ex.A1-Death certificate, which discloses that Syed Abdul Haleem

Magrabi died at his residence, Hyderabad, on 01-08-2018. In order to prove their relationship with Late Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, the plaintiffs got marked

Exs.A3 to A9, which are Aadhar Cards of plaintiffs no.1 to 3, Pan card of plaintif no.4, marriage certificate of plaintiff no.3 and Death Certificate of Faqarunnisa

Begum. Exs.A3 to A8 clearly reflects that that plaintiffs no.1 to 4 are the children of deceased Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi.

9.As there is no contra evidence on this point and as the evidence of PW1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A9 remained unrebutted, this court is of the considered opinion that it is just, fair and reasonable to declare that the plaintiffs no.1 to 4 are the legal heirs of deceased Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi, for the purpose of legal status only. Hence, this point is answered in favour of the plaintiffs.

10. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed, without costsby declaring that the plaintiffs no.1 to 4 are the legal heirs of deceased Syed Abdul Haleem

Magrabi, for the purpose of legal status only.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 16 th day of April, 2025.)

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

For Plaintiffs For defendants:

PW1: Saleha Fatima None Documents marked for plaintiffs:

Ex. A 1 Burial ground report issued by GHMC of Syed Abdul Hamid Magrabi died on 24-09-1969

Ex. A 2 Death certificate of Syed Abdul Haleem Magrabi died on 01-08-2018

Ex. A3 Aadhar card of the plaintiff No.1 Ex. A4 Aadhar card of the plaintiff No.2 Ex. A5 Aadhar card of the plaintiff No.3 Ex. A6 Aadhar card of the plaintiff No.4 Ex. A7 marriage certificate of plaintiff No.3 Ex. A8 PAN card of plaintiff No.4 Ex.A9 Death certificate of Faqarunnisa Begum

Documents marked for defendants: Nil.

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

Order Record 771 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/1049/2025	VADDI ANJANADEVI vs TAHSILDAR MRO	21 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5709/2024	ROQUIA MUTAHIRA WAJEEDA vs TAHSILDAR	21 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/96/2025	MOHAMMED SANAULLAH KHAN vs TAHSILDAR	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/172/2025	CHINTHA SUBBA LAXMI vs ALL CONCERNED	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/201/2023	G.V. RAMANAIAH vs AVULA DASTAGIRAIAH	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4888/2024	SUDHA RAMASAMYAND vs The Tahsildar.	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5170/2024	SADIQUNNISA FAREESA vs The Tahsildar.	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/771/2025	GIRDHARILAL BIDADA vs ALL CONCERNED	17 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/338/2025	UZMA BEGUM vs TAHSILDAR	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/392/2025	SYED ALTAF UR RAHMAN ZUBAIR vs TAHSILDAR	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3891/2024	GRANDHI TANOOJ KUMAR vs The Tahsildar.	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/6218/2023	NELLUTLA RAJ KUMAR vs PAPPULA VEERAMALLU	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/723/2025	JAKHOTIA POLYFIBRE PVT LTD vs SANTOSHIMATHA FEED FACTORY	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/849/2024	kamlekar kavitha vs The Tahsildar.	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5852/2024	SYED NOORUL HASSAN MAGRABI vs TAHSILDAR	16 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5794/2024	PONNA BOINA ARUNA vs MRO	15 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/605/2025	AMBATI VANAJA vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4677/2024	CHALLAPALLI SIVA RAMAKRISHNA SASTRI vs The Tahsildar.	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4857/2024	AMEER UNNISA vs The Tahsildar.	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5626/2024	ALLURI RUPA DEVI vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/6060/2023	NAKKA VENU vs P. CHANDRASHEKAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/263/2025	SHAMEEM BEGUM vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/390/2025	RANVEER SINGH vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/770/2025	NARAM SANGEETHA vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2269/2022	MOHAMMED SOAHIL vs NAVAPETA NARANDER CHARI	11 Apr 2025	Order	—
OS/5671/2024	MOHAMMED RIZVAN UDDIN vs TAHSILDAR	11 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5398/2024	SAILAJA REDDY SATHI vs All Concerned	09 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1238/2024	KHALID BIN MOHAMMED vs ABU MOAZZAM BIN MOHAMMED BAJSIR	07 Apr 2025	Order	—
OS/186/2025	NEW STAR EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY vs SYED ASHFAQ AHMED NAQVI	03 Apr 2025	Order	—
OS/186/2025	NEW STAR EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY vs SYED ASHFAQ AHMED NAQVI	03 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2149/2024	PADMAVATHI GLASS CO vs SP UPVC INDUSTRIES	02 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2908/2020	Rebba Shailaja vs K. Maheshwar Reddy	02 Apr 2025	Order	—
OS/4537/2023	State Bank Of India vs Mallepally Mahendar	02 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4605/2024	AKSHAY BOHARA vs K. PRAMOD	02 Apr 2025	Order	—
OS/5586/2024	MOHAMMED KAMAL AHMED vs TAHSILDAR	02 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2279/2024	SAMA LAXMA REDDY vs KUNDUR JAYSHREE REDDY	01 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2359/2024	M. VENKAT REDDY vs B SANDEEP	01 Apr 2025	Judgement	—
OS/303/2022	Syed Ali Hashmi vs Syed Abdul Wahab Quadri	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/304/2022	Rajkunta Krishna vs Syed abdul Wahab Quadri	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/306/2022	T. Laxman Rao vs Syed Abdul Wahab Quadri	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/995/2020	Ahmedi Banu vs Md.Mahmood Ali	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1005/2020	D.V.L.Subrahmanya Sastry vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1493/2020	The Voltas Employees Co operative House Building Society Ltd. vs Deputy Registrar of Co operative	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1892/2021	Mohammed Akhtar Hussain vs Mohammed Azgar Hussain	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4468/2024	KONDURI VEENA vs The Tahsildar.	28 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/268/2018	Abdul Khader Lathwala vs Mrs. Ameena Banu	27 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/484/2016	Sayeeda Parveen vs Parveen Begum	27 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/775/2024	DEEPIKA AGARWAL vs KANTA DEVI	27 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/2545/2020	Shiv Prasad vs C.R.Narender Raju	27 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4314/2024	NARAYANA VENKATALAKSHMI vs ALL CONCERNED	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5178/2024	KORE NANDU KUMAR vs CH SAMPATH KUMAR	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5957/2024	HAMANDH KAVITHA vs TAHSILDAR	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2291/2024	PARIMAL G JOSHI vs The Tahsildar.	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2336/2021	Mahadev Prasad vs Raj Kumar	26 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/2852/2024	NIMMATOORI ANUDEEP AURORA vs The Tahsildar.	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3717/2024	AEKKA SRILATHA vs The Tahsildar.	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5610/2024	K. SOMPAL ESWAR vs TAHSILDAR	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5710/2024	REHANA BEGUM vs TAHSILDAR	26 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/446/2020	Mohammead Adnan vs The Regional Passport Officer	24 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4337/2024	B. RAJANI vs The Tahsildar.	24 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4805/2024	ALIYA BEGUM vs The Tahsildar.	24 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5044/2024	GUNTHA BHAGYALATHA REDDY vs The Tahsildar.	24 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
EP/336/2020	M/s. Kapil Chits (Hyd) Pvt. Ltd. vs M. Sunil Kumar	24 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/28/2024	KOUSAR FATHIMA vs Md Mujahid Ali	24 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/3087/2024	MOHD MASOOD vs SAYEEDA SULTANA	24 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/3283/2024	B. MUNICHARAN vs BODAGALA BALAJI CHANDRASEKHAR	20 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5496/2024	MOHAMMED SHOUKAT ALI vs TAHSILDAR	20 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5924/2024	REDDY PARASHURAM REDDY vs TAHSILDAR	20 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/129/2025	P. MANJULA vs TAHSILDAR	20 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/783/2018	Mohd. Anwar Ul Haq vs Hameeduddin Quadri	19 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1437/2020	Fahad Shahnawaz vs Ashrat Bee	19 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2265/2023	State Bank Of India vs M/s.NEW CLASSIC MENS BEAUTY SALOON	19 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/4408/2023	State Bank Of India vs MOHAMMED SULTHAN	19 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/189/2025	SARJU DEVI KACHWAWA vs TAHSILDAR/MRO	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/244/2025	MAHENDRA KUMAR vs TAHSILDAR	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/393/2025	SAYADA HABEEBA BANU vs TAHSILDAR	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4095/2024	GOVIND VASAVI vs The Tahsildar.	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4885/2024	SYED SAMEER vs The Tahsildar.	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5720/2024	AMREEN BARADRAF vs TAHSILDAR	18 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
EP/136/2025	M/s. Rao Brothers Chit Fund (P) Ltd., vs Mohd. Ismail	17 Mar 2025	Order	—
EP/111/2019	M/s Rao Brothers Chit Funds Pvt ltd vs Sri. Grandhi Abhinav	17 Mar 2025	Order	—
EP/221/2023	Mohammed Mohiuddin Khan vs Mohammed Fareed	17 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/2865/2024	AAVASARALA ANURADHA vs The Tahsildar.	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4649/2024	RAHIMA QADRI vs Ikramuddin Ahmed	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5608/2024	KOKKELAGADDA KARUNA vs THE TAHSILDAR	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/176/2025	RUBINA vs TAHSILDAR	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/2763/2022	P. NAVEEN KUMAR vs P. RAJESHEKAR and another 04	13 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/5633/2024	PULLA MOSES vs TAHSILDAR	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5748/2024	SYED RASHEEDUDDIN vs The Tahsildar.	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/5791/2024	J. SANJAY KUMAR vs TAHSILDAR	13 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
EP/72/2025	T.Srinivas Rao vs Surendra Kumar Gupta	11 Mar 2025	Order	—
EP/73/2025	T.Srinivas Rao vs Muni Devi Gupta	11 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/4278/2024	P. SUGUNA SREE vs The Tahsildar.	10 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4463/2024	PISIPATI RAJKUMAR vs The Tahsildar.	10 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/4771/2024	HUSSAMUDDIN AHMED vs IKRAMUDDIN AHMED	10 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/861/2023	A. HARISH KUMAR vs B.S. NAGARAJ	10 Mar 2025	Order	—
OS/5937/2024	SUNITA CAPOOR vs TAHSILDAR	10 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/16/2025	KAMALA MEHTA vs TAHSILDAR	07 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/43/2025	THOTA RAJA RAMESH vs SIDDABATHULA SHASHIDHAR	07 Mar 2025	Judgement	—
OS/84/2025	VEERUBHOTLA SRIDEVI vs ALL CONCERNED	07 Mar 2025	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 771 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2025		44
Mar 2025		97
Feb 2025		26
Jan 2025		42
Dec 2024		28
Nov 2024		57
Oct 2024		18
Sep 2024		25
Aug 2024		36
Jul 2024		33
Jun 2024		35
May 2024		18

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA handled?

SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA has handled 821 court orders since 2022 at HYD, City Civil Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 26 orders per month.

What types of cases does SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA hear?

Based on available records, SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at HYD, City Civil Court Complex.

Where is SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA currently posted?

SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA is posted as XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE at HYD, City Civil Court Complex, Hyderabad, Telangana.

Are judgments by SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA available online?

Yes. 29 judgments by SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA dispose cases?

SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA disposes approximately 26 cases per month, based on 821 orders handled over their tenure at HYD, City Civil Court Complex.

Since when is SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA serving?

SRI. SAI KIRAN KASAMALA has been serving at HYD, City Civil Court Complex since 2022.

Case Types

OS 92%

EP 8%

Posting History

Feb 2025 — May 2025

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 55 orders
Oct 2024 — Apr 2025

X JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Apr 2024 — Aug 2024

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 22 orders
Mar 2023 — Jun 2023

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 4 orders
Nov 2022 — May 2025

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 722 orders
Sep 2022 — Oct 2022

XXII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 7 orders
Aug 2022 — Sep 2022

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Aug 2022 — Oct 2022

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 11 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. S Sasidhar Reddy

CHIEF JUDGE

1,099 orders

Smt. Y. Padma

II ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1,069 orders

Manisha Sravan Unnam

III ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

0 orders

Sri. K. Murali Mohan

IX ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

121 orders

Sri. Ch. Jithendhar

X ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

299 orders

Smt. P.lakshmi Kumari

XI ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1 orders

Smt. M. Padmaja

XIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

1,179 orders

Sri. D.v. Nageswara Rao

XXV ADDL CHIEF JUDGE

1,759 orders

Smt. Vempati Aparna

XXVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDGE

14 orders

Ms. Shalini Lingam

II JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

86 orders

Smt. Putta Mounika

III JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

5 orders

Ms. K.Keerthana

IV JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

20 orders

Ms. G.Girija

V JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

36 orders

Ms. Anamika

VI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

670 orders

Ms. K.Bindu

VII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

137 orders

Ms. B.Manasa

VIII JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

64 orders

Smt. B. Kalpana

IX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

210 orders

Smt. Arisha Nusrat

X JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

2 orders

Sri. Rama Chandra Rao Nadendla

XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

339 orders

Gopi Krishna Kumaram

XXI JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

0 orders

Sri C.suresh

I SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

344 orders

Sri. B. Rama Rao

II SENIOR CIVIL JUGDE

45 orders

Sri. G. Uday Kumar

THE PRL. SPECIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JU...

48 orders

Sri. N. Venkat Ram

ADDL. SPECIAL COURT IN THE CADRE OF DISTRICT JUDGE...

19 orders

← View all judges at HYD, City Civil Court Complex

Sri. Sai Kiran Kasamala

HYDERABAD.

DATED THIS THE 16 th DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA,

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

A N D

J U D G M E N T

Total 2,73,529/-

of Rs. 3,26,529/- with the subsequent interest @18% p.a. from the

date of filing of this suit and till the date of realization, as prayed

Total 2,73,529/-

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

Documents marked for plaintiff:

Ex. A 1 Incorporation Certificate and Memorandum and Article of

Ex. A3 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/05 dt 10-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A4 E-Way bill No. 1016 2664 4242 dt. 10-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A5 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/224 dt 24-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A6 E-Way bill No. 1416 3338 2452 dt. 24-04-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A7 Invoice No. JPPL/2023-24/590 dt 24-05-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex. A8 E-Way bill No. 1416 4788 2654 dt. 24-05-2023 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex.A11 Served postal track report dt. 26-12-2024 (as per 63 B of BSA)

Ex.A13 Leger statement of account from 01-04-2023 to 17-02-2025

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

HYDERABAD.

THURSDAY, DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA

XX Junior Civil Judge,

FAC XIX Junior Civil Judge,

City Civil Court, Hyderabad

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 201 OF 2023

J U D G M E N T

(1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit

amount of Rs.3,51,232/- with the subsequent interest

@12% p.a. from the date of filing of this suit and till the

date of realization along with costs of suit, as prayed

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

HYDERABAD.

DATED THIS THE 15 th DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA,

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD

AND

J U D G M E N T

1): ‘ Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of

the deceased Mr Ponna Boina Ravi @ P. Ravi Raj S/o Late P. Yadaiah , as

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE:

WITNESSES EXAMINED:

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CITY CIVIL COURTS, HYDERABAD.

HYDERABAD.

THURSDAY, DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

PRESENT: SRI SAI KIRAN KASAMALA

XX Junior Civil Judge,

FAC XIX Junior Civil Judge,

City Civil Court, Hyderabad

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 96 OF 2025

AND

2 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

J U D G M E N T

3 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

(1) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as

legal heirs of deceased Iqbal Banu Begum, as prayed for?

4 OS NO. 96 OF 2025

XX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

FAC XIX JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

CITY CIVIL COURT, HYDERABAD.

***1):* ‘ *Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of***